Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The spillover effects of outward FDI on environmental sustainability in developing countries: exploring the channels of home country institutions and human capital

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foreign direct investments (FDI)-induced environmental effects have become a crucial and frequently discussed issue that has attracted the attention of the international community. On this account, several studies have examined FDI and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission relationship but with focus on the environmental impact of FDI inflow for host countries. While the strand of study examining CO2 emissions and outward FDI relationship are scarce, the mediating mechanism of home country’s institution and human capital level in outward FDI-CO2 relationship remains unexplored. This study aims to fill this research gap by using the extended Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology (STIRPAT) framework, for a panel of 86 developing countries. Findings revealed that national institutions facilitate outward FDI reverse technology spillover effects to reinforce its effectiveness in mitigating carbon emission via environmentally friendly technologies. However, high human capital level shows to strengthen the quality of home country institutions which in turn facilitate more outward FDI spillover that improves environmental quality. Furthermore, overseas direct investment spillovers promote high human capital level in home countries to encourage green technological capabilities and innovations that boosts cleaner production strategies toward environmental sustainability goals. The study supports Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis which validates the non-monotonic inverted-U-shape relationship between CO2 emissions and per capita GDP. On policy recommendation, developing countries should prioritize human capital development and update local institutions to facilitate new and advanced technologies that enhances sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Authors evaluations using data from: a https://www.statista.com/statistics/, b https://unctadstat.unctad.org/

Fig. 2

Source: Author’s illustration

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

Publicly available data were used in this study. However, the datasets that support the findings of this study are available on request.

References

  • Abbas, M. G., Wang, Z., Ullah, H., Mohsin, M., Abbas, H., & Mahmood, M. R. (2022). Do entrepreneurial orientation and intellectual capital influence SMEs’ growth? Evidence from Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 17, 25774–25789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17542-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd Razak, F. D., Khalid, N., & Ali, M. H. (2021). Asymmetric impact of institutional quality on environmental degradation: Evidence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Sustainability, 13, 12507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Acheampong, A. O. (2018). Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: What causes what and where? Energy Economics, 74, 677–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, S., Adedoyin, F., Olaniran, E., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). Energy consumption, economic policy uncertainty and carbon emissions; causality evidence from resource rich economies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 68, 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Z., Asghar, M. M., Malik, M. N., & Nawaz, K. (2020). Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resource Policy, 67, 101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, S. C., & Schmidt, P. (1995). Efficient estimation of models for dynamic panel data. Journal of Economics, 68(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01641-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbar, A., Rehman, A., Ullah, I., Zeeshan, M., & Afridi, F. E. A. (2020). Unraveling the dynamic nexus between trade liberalization, energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and health expenditure in Southeast Asian countries. Risk Management Healthcare Policy, 13, 1915–1927. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S272801.PMID:33116973;PMCID:PMC7547123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, H. S., Zeqiraj, V., Lin, W. L., Law, S. H., Yusop, Z., Bare, U. A. A., & Chin, L. (2019). Does quality institutions promote environmental quality? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(10446), 10456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04670-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An, H., Razzaq, A., Haseeb, M., & Mihardjo, L. W. W. (2021). The role of technology innovation and people’s connectivity in testing environmental Kuznets curve and pollution heaven hypotheses across the Belt and Road host countries: New evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(5), 5254–5270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components model. Journal of Econometric, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aşıcı, A. A. (2013). Economic growth and its impact on environment: A panel data analysis. Ecological Indicators, 24(2013), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Avtar, R., Tripathi, S., Aggarwal, A. K., & Kumar, P. (2022). Population–urbanization–energy nexus: a review. Resources, 8, 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8030136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awan, U., Khattak, A., Rabbani, S., & Dhir, A. (2020). Buyer-driven knowledge transfer activities to enhance organizational sustainability of suppliers. Sustainability, 12, 2993. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, J. (2016). A new look at the FDI-income-energy-environment nexus: Dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN. Energy Policy, 91, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaguer, J., & Cantavella, M. (2018). The role of education in the environmental Kuznets curve Evidence from Australian Data. Energy Economics, 70, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H., Demetriades, P., & Law, S. H. (2007). Financial Development, Openness and Institutions: Evidence from Panel Data, University of Leicester Discussion Paper No. 07/5.

  • Baum, C. F., Schaffer, M. E., & Stillman, S. (2003). Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Symposium (international) on Combustion, 3(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0300300101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayar, Y., Smirnov, V., Danilina, M., & Kabanova, N. (2022). Impact of institutions and human capital on CO2 emissions in EU transition economies. Sustainability, 14, 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghesi, S., Franco, C., & Marin, G. (2020). Outward foreign direct investment patterns of Italian firms in the European Union’s Emission Trading Scheme. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 122(1), 219–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BP C. (2019). Full report—BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2019

  • Buckley, P. J., Chen, L., Clegg, L. J., & Voss, H. (2020). The role of endogenous and exogenous risk in FDI entry choices. Journal of World Business, 55(1), 101040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bun, M. J. G., & Windmeijer, F. (2010). The weak instrument problem of the system GMM estimator in dynamic panel data models. The Econometrics Journal, 13(1), 95–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, L., Firdousi, S. F., Li, C., & Luo, Y. (2021). Inward FDI, outward FDI, and carbon dioxide emission intensity-threshold regression analysis based on interprovincial panel data. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11909-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çakar, N. D., Gedikli, A., Erdoğan, S., & Yıldırım, D. Ç. (2021). Exploring the nexus between human capital and environmental degradation: The case of EU countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale, G. M., Claudio-Quiroga, G., & Gil-Alana, L. A. (2021). Analysing the relationship between CO2 emissions and GDP in China: A fractional integration and cointegration approach. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CGD. (2022). Who’s causing climatic change now? Climate, energy, and environment, center for Global Development, https://www.cgdev.org/media/developing-countries-are responsible-63-percent-current-carbon-emissions.

  • Chen, F., Liu, A., Lu, X., Zhe, R., Tong, J., & Akram, R. (2022). Evaluation of the effects of urbanization on carbon emissions: The transformative role of government effectiveness. Frontiers in Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.848800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Wang, L., & Li, Y. (2020). Research on the impact of multi-dimensional urbanization on China’s carbon emissions under the background of COP21. The Journal of Environmental Management, 273, 111123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K.-M., & Yang, S.-F. (2013). Impact of outward foreign direct investment on domestic R&D activity: Evidence from Taiwan’s multinational enterprises in low-wage countries. Asian Economic Journal, 27(1), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., Smyth, R., & Zhang, X. (2019). R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870–2014. Energy Economics, 80, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commoner, B., Corr, M., & Stamler, P. J. (1971). The causes of pollution. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 13(3), 2–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish and Ulucak, R. (2020). The pathway toward pollution mitigation: Does institutional quality make a difference? Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, 29(8), 3571–3583. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., Ampon-Wireko, S., & Kofi Dogbe, C. S. (2021). Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeHart, J. L., & Soule, P. T. (2000). Does I=PAT Work in local places? Professional Geographer, 52(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. (1994). Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review, 1, 277–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(1), 175–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. (1998). Climate change and society: Speculation, construction and scientific investigation. International Sociology, 13(4), 421–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171(3977), 1212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, Y. F., López, M. F., & Blanco, B. O. (2018). Innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172(3459), 3467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frondel, M., & Vance, C. (2013). On Interaction Effects: The Case of Heckit and Two-Part Models. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 233(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2013-0104

  • Fu, M., & Li, T. (2010). Human capital as a determinant of FDI technology spillovers and its threshold effects in China: An analysis based on multiple productivity estimates. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorus, M. S., & Aslan, M. (2019). Impacts of economic indicators on environmental degradation: Evidence from MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy, Reviews, 103, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment The quarterly. Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y., Ba, N., Ren, S., & Wu, H. (2021). How does international technology spillover affect China’s carbon emissions? A New Perspective through Intellectual Property Protection. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 577–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y., Guo, Y., Guo, Y., Wu, H., & Ren, S. (2020). Does outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) affect the home country’s environmental quality? The case of China. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 52, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdren, J. P. (1991). Population and the energy problem. Population and Environment, 12(3), 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Chen, F., Wei, H., Xu, Z., & Akram, R. (2022). The impacts of FDI inflows on carbon emissions: Economic development and regulatory quality as moderators. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 820596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IISD S (2019) International Institute for Sustainable Development 2018–2019 Annual Report

  • Islam, M., Alam, M., Ahmed, F., & Al-Amin, A. Q. (2022). Economic growth and environmental pollution nexus in Bangladesh: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. International Journal of Environmental Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2021.2017169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, Y., Guo, X., Zhong, S., & Wu, L. (2020). Land financialization, uncoordinated development of population urbanization and land urbanization, and economic growth: Evidence from China. Land, 9(12), 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9120481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L., Zhou, H. F., Bai, L., & Zhou, P. (2017). Does foreign direct investment drive environmental degradation in China? An empirical study based on air quality index from a spatial perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 864–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, Y., Ji, C., Yang, S., Yang, G., Su, M., & Fan, H. (2020). Home governments facilitate cleaner operations of outward foreign direct investment: A case study of a cleaner production partnership programme. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, W., Mughal, N., Zhao, J., Shabbir, M. S., Niedbała, G., Jain, V., & Anwar, A. (2021). Does globalisation matter for environmental degradation? Nexus among energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon dioxide emission. Energy Policy, 153, 11223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamal, M. A., Ullah, A., Qureshi, F., Zheng, J., & Ahamd, M. (2021). China’s outward FDI and environmental sustainability in belt and road countries: Does the quality of institutions matter? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.2008883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kar, S., & Sinha, C. (2014). Sectoral technical progress and aggregate skill formation. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 14, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-013-0152-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. (2020). CO2 emissions and sustainable economic development: New evidence on the role of human capital. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1279–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., & Go, S. (2022). Human capital and environmental sustainability. Sustainability, 12, 4736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Sovacool, B. K., Bazilian, M., Griffiths, S., Lee, J., Yang, M., & Lee, J. (2022). Decarbonizing the iron and steel industry: A systematic review of sociotechnical systems, technological innovations, and policy options. Energy Research & Social Science, 89, 102565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozul-Wright, R., & Fortunato, P. (2012). International trade and carbon emissions. The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), 24(4), 509–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurul, Z., & Yalta, A. Y. (2017). Relationship between institutional factors and FDI flows in developing countries: New evidence from dynamic panel estimation. Economies, 5(2), 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Wang, Q. (2017). Will technology advances alleviate climate change? Dual effects of technology change on aggregate carbon dioxide emissions. Energy for Sustainable Development., 41, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Schindler, S., & Liu, W. (2020). Demystifying Chinese overseas investment in infrastructure: Port development, the Belt and Road Initiative and regional development. Journal of Transport Geography, 87, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., & Wei, L.-Y. (2022). Effects of ODI and export trade structure on CO2 emissions in China: Nonlinear relationships. Environment Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02004-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marošević, K., & Jurković, Z. (2013). Impact of informal institutions on economic growth and development. Interdisciplinary Management Research, 9, 701–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, J. A., Clement, M. T., & Besek, J. F. (2015). The impacts of technology: A re-evaluation of the STIRPAT model. Environmental Sociology, 1(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2014.1002193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A., & Daly, K. (2007). Effect of quality of institutions on outward foreign direct investment. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 16(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638190701325573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mize, T. D. (2019). Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting non-linear interaction effects. Sociological Science, 6, 81–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, S., & Sethi, N. (2021). The energy consumption-environmental quality nexus in BRICS countries: The role of outward foreign direct investment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17180-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad, B., & Khan, S. (2019). Effect of bilateral FDI, energy consumption, CO2 emission and capital on economic growth of Asia countries. Energy Reports, 5, 1305–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBS (National Bureau of Statistics). (2013). China energy statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49, 1417e26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opoku, E. E. O., Dogah, K. E., & Aluko, O. A. (2022). The contribution of human development towards environmental sustainability. Energy Economics, 106, 105782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osabuohien-Irabor and Drapkin. (2022a). FDI Escapism: The effect of home country risks on outbound investment in the global economy. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 6(1), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2022005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osabuohien-Irabor, O., & Drapkin, I. M. (2022b). The impact of technological innovation on energy consumption in OECD economies: The role of outward foreign direct investment and international trade openness. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(4), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.13091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osabuohien-Irabor, O., & Drapkin, I. M. (2023a). Toward achieving zero-emissions in European Union countries: The contributions of trade and overseas direct investment in consumption-based carbon emissions. America Institute of Mathematical Sciences Environmental Science, 10(1), 129–156.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osabuohien-Irabor, O., & Drapkin, I. M. (2023b). Global outward foreign direct investment and economic growth across income groups: The mediating effect of home country institutions. SAGE Open, 13(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231163843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Working Paper WP238 Technology and Employment Programme. Geneva: International Labor Office.

  • Pereira, V., Moosa, I. A., Ramiah, V., & Temouri, Y. (2021). The environmental effects of FDI: Evidence from middle east and North Africa Countries. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 29(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.291512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peres, M., Ameer, W., & Xu, H. (2018). The impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment inflows: Evidence for developed and developing countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 626–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, P. D. (1995). Methods for estimating the population contribution to environmental change. Ecological Economics, 15(3), 225–233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman, F. U., Sohag, K., & Ahmad, E. (2021). Symmetric and asymmetric nexus between institutional quality and sectorial foreign direct investment inflow in India: a fresh insight using simulated dynamic ARDL approach. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3rs-479746/v1

  • Ricardo, E., & Barbosa Camargo, M. I. (2020). Home country institutions and outward FDI: An exploratory analysis in emerging economies. Sustainability, 12, 10010. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. (2004). Absorptive capability and economic growth: How do countries catch-up? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(4), 577–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009a). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economic and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009b). How to do Xtabond2: An introduction to difference and System GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salari, M., Javid, R. J., & Noghanibehambari, J. (2021). The nexus between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in the U.S. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapci, O., & Shogren, J. F. (2018). Environmental quality, human capital and growth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(2), 184–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie, A., Adams, S., Owusu, P. A., Leirvik, T., & Ozturk, I. (2020). Mitigating degradation and emissions in China: The role of environmental sustainability, human capital and renewable energy. Science of the Total Environment, 719, 137530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sasana, H., & Putri, A. E. (2017). The increase of energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in Indonesia. In E3S Web of Conferences, 31, 01008, ICENIS 2017,.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183101008

  • Sattar, A., Tolassa, T. H., Hussain, M. N., & Ilyas, M. (2022). Environmental effects of China Overseas direct invest in South Asia. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221078301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, N. (2022). Unveiling the anthropogenic dynamics of environmental change with the stochastic IRPAT model: A review of baselines and extensions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 96, 106854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seker, F., Ertugrul, H. M., & Cetin, M. (2015). The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: A bound testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz, M., Sharma, R., Sinha, A., & Jiao, Z. (2021). Analyzing nonlinear impact of economic growth drivers on CO2 emissions: Designing an SDG framework for India. Energy Policy, 148, 111965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shujah-ur-Rahman, Chen, S., Saud, S., Saleem, N., & Bari, M. W. (2019). Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: Do human capital and biocapacity matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(31), 31856–31872.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solarin, S. A., Gil-Alana, L. A., & Lafuente, C. (2019). Persistence in carbon footprint emissions: An overview of 92 countries. Carbon Management, 10(4), 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2019.1620038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taiwo Onifade, S., Gyamfi, B. A., Haouas, I., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Re-examining the roles of economic globalization and natural resources consequences on env. degradation in E7 economies: Are human capital & urbanization essential comp? Research Policy, 74, 102435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2009). Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 37(1), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, F., Wan, H., Jiang, X., & Niu, Z. (2021). The impact of outward foreign direct investment on carbon emission toward China’s sustainable development. Sustainability., 13(21), 11605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terrence, D. H., Andrew, P. D., & Micah, R. J. (2019). Limitations of fixed-effects models for panel data. Sociological Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419863785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah, H., Wang, Z., Mohsin, M., Jiang, W., & Abbas, H. (2022). Multidimensional perspective of green financial innovation between green intellectual capital on sustainable business: the case of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15919-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD/ (2022). Foreign investment in developing Asia hit a record $619 billion in 2021, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva 10, Switzerland

  • Wang, C., Liu, T., & Wang, J. (2021). The influence of outward foreign direct investment on enterprise technological innovation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6697298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Xie, Z., & Wu, R. (2020). Examining the effects of education level inequality on energy consumption: Evidence from Guangdong Province. Journal of Environmental Management, 269, 110761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Liao, M., Wang, Y., Malik, A., & Xu, L. (2019). Carbon emission effects of the coordinated development of two-way FDI in China. Sustainability, 11(8), 2428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q., Dong, Y.-X., & Yang, R. (2018). Urbanization impact on carbon emissions in the Pearl River Delta Region: Kuznets curve relationships. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., Hao, Y., & Irfan, M. (2021a). Energy consumption structural adjustment and carbon neutrality in the post-COVID-19 era. Structural Change and Eco Dynamics (pembroke, Ont.), 59, 442–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. G., & Liu, Y. N. (2013). Can Japan’s outwards FDI reduce its CO2 emissions? A new thought on polluter haven hypothesis. Advanced Materials Research, 807–809, 830–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, T., Dong, Q., Du, Q., Dong, R., & Chen, M. (2021b). Carbon dioxide emissions and Chinese OFDI: From the perspective of carbon neutrality targets and environmental management of home country. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Y., Ivanovski, K., Inekwe, J., & Smyth, R. (2020c). Human capital and CO2 in the long run. Energy Economics, 91, 104907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and IPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S09218009(03)00188-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P., Cai, Z., & Sun, Y. (2021). Does the emissions trading system in developing countries accelerate carbon leakage through OFDI? Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 101, 105397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., Song, Y., & Yang, J. (2021). Relationships between urbanization and CO2 emissions in China: An empirical analysis of pop migration. PLoS ONE, 16(8), e0256335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., & Xu, H. (2017). Effects of land urbanization and land finance on carbon emissions: A panel data analysis for Chinese Provinces. Land Use Policy, 63, 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Zb., Dong, Wy., & Tang, Zy. (2022). The carbon reduction effect of China’s outward foreign direct investment for carbon neutrality target. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 83956–83968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21712-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y. (2018). Human capital, institutional quality and industrial upgrading: Global insights from industrial data. Economic Change Restructuring, 51, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-0169194-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, Y., Yang, S., Razzaq, A., & Khan, Z. (2021). Environmental impact of infrastructure led Chinese outward FDI, tourism dev and technology innovation: A regional country analysis. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1989672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldar, A., & Sethi, N. (2021). Effect of institutional quality and renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions-an empirical investigation for developing countries. Environmental science and pollution research international, 28(12), 15485–15503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11532-2

  • Song, T, Zheng, T., and Tong, L. (2008). An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A panel cointegration approach, China Economic Review, 19 (3) 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2007.10.001

  • Bond, S.R. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1 2, 141–162.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-002-0009-9

  • Stern, D. I. (2004). The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve, World Development, 32(8), pp. 1419-1439, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004.

  • World bank (2020). World bank indicators, World bank group Archives, Washington, D.C. United States. https://www.worldbank.org

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our sincere thanks go to the editor and the anonymous referees for their painstaking effort in reading our manuscript as well as their many insightful comments and suggestions which greatly improved this article.

Funding

Support from the Basic Research Program of the National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Economics, School of Economic, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast, Russian Federation

    Osarumwense Osabuohien-Irabor & Igor Mikhailovich Drapkin

  2. Centre for Industrial Policy Studies, National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation

    Igor Mikhailovich Drapkin

Authors
  1. Osarumwense Osabuohien-Irabor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Igor Mikhailovich Drapkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Mikhailovich Drapkin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no competing personal or financial interests that influence this research work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 9.

Table 9 List of countries included in sample data
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Osabuohien-Irabor, O., Drapkin, I.M. The spillover effects of outward FDI on environmental sustainability in developing countries: exploring the channels of home country institutions and human capital. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03494-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03494-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation