Abstract
The European Union’s (EU) efforts toward reaching sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the regulatory decisions serve as a model for other nations. Despite the successful progress of the EU in the field of development, it is seen that crime and security problems continue. Security is one of the essential factors for the welfare of the people in a country. Evaluating the security performances of the EU countries in the context of sustainable development is significant for monitoring their development on Europeanization. In terms of the methodology, dataset, and comparative analyses performed, this study fills a gap in the literature while evaluating the sustainable security performances of EU countries. Besides, this study is the first to obtain the importance weight of sustainable security evaluation criteria. In this study, a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach is used to evaluate the security performances of EU member countries. The importance weights of evaluation criteria are determined using the fuzzy Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) approach. The EU member countries are ranked according to their sustainable security performances with the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. As a result of the evaluation, the top five performing countries are Croatia, Czechia, Slovenia, Poland, and Hungary. The ensuring security practices in the countries differ from each other. However, with this study, the security performances of the countries can be observed on a single scale. The study’s findings can help researchers and policymakers better understand countries’ security performance in the sustainable development context.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors confirm that data supporting the application and results are available within the article and raw data are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
References
Achim, M. V., Văidean, V. L., Borlea, S. N., & Florescu, D. R. (2021). The impact of the development of society on economic and financial crime. Case study for European Union member states. Risks, 9(5), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9050097
Berrittella, M. (2018). Organized crime and public spending: A panel data analysis. Economics of Governance, 19(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-018-0206-3
Blanco, L., & Ruiz, I. (2013). The impact of crime and insecurity on trust in democracy and institutions. American Economic Review, 103(3), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.284
Blaustein, J., Chodor, T., & Pino, N. W. (2020). Making crime a sustainable development issue: from ‘drugs and thugs’ to ‘peaceful and inclusive societies.’ The British Journal of Criminology, 60(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz050
Boral, S., Howard, I., Chaturvedi, S. K., McKee, K., & Naikan, V. N. A. (2020). A novel hybrid multi-criteria group decision making approach for failure mode and effect analysis: An essential requirement for sustainable manufacturing. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 21, 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.10.005
Bove, V., & Gavrilova, E. (2017). Police officer on the frontline or a soldier? The effect of police militarization on crime. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150478
Büyüközkan, G., & Güler, M. (2020). Smart watch evaluation with integrated hesitant fuzzy linguistic SAW-ARAS technique. Measurement, 153, 107353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107353
Çakır, S. (2018). An integrated approach to machine selection problem using fuzzy SMART-fuzzy weighted axiomatic design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29(7), 1433–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1189-3
Ceccato, V., & Lukyte, N. (2011). Safety and sustainability in a city in transition: The case of Vilnius. Lithuania Cities, 28(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.10.001
Chiodi, S. I. (2016). Crime prevention through urban design and planning in the smart city era: The challenge of disseminating CP-UDP in Italy: Learning from Europe. Journal of Place Management and Development, 9(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-09-2015-0037
Chou, S., & Chang, Y. (2008). A decision support system for supplier selection based on a strategy-aligned fuzzy SMART approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 2241–2253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.03.001
Cozens, P. M. (2002). Sustainable urban development and crime prevention through environmental design for the british city. Towards an effective urban environmentalism for the 21st century. Cities, 19(2), 129–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00008-2
Dadelo, S., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., & Dadeliene, R. (2012). Multiple criteria assessment of elite security personal on the basis of ARAS and expert methods. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 46(4), 65–88.
Dogan, O. (2021). Process mining technology selection with spherical fuzzy AHP and sensitivity analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 178, 114999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114999
Dong, B., Egger, P. H., & Guo, Y. (2020). Is poverty the mother of crime? Evidence from homicide rates in China. PLoS ONE, 15(5), e0233034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233034
Drakos, K., & Konstantinou, P. T. (2014). Terrorism, crime and public spending: Panel VAR evidence from Europe. Defence and Peace Economics, 25(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2013.804668
Edwards, W. (1971). Social utilities. The Engineering Economist. Summer Symposium Series, 6, 119–129.
Edwards, W. (1977). How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 7(5), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309720
Edwards, W., & Barron, H. (1994). SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1087
Eisner, M. (2008). Modernity strikes back? A historical perspective on the latest increase in interpersonal violence (1960–1990). International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 2(2), 288–316. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-2769
Eisner, M., Nivette, A., Murray, A. L., & Krisch, M. (2016). Achieving population-level violence declines: Implications of the international crime drop for prevention programming. Journal of Public Health Policy, 37, 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-016-0004-5
EUROJUST (2022). https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/. Accessed 12 March 2022.
Eurostat (2019). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database. Accessed 12 March 2022.
Feng, J. (2022). An integrated multi-criteria decision-making method for hazardous waste disposal site selection. Environment Development and Sustainability, 24(6), 8039–8070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01772-8
Frevel, B. (2013). Managing urban safety and security in Germany: Institutional responsibility and individual competence. European Journal of Criminology, 10(3), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370812473540
Frimpong, L. K., Okyere, S. A., Diko, S. K., Abunyewah, M., Boateng, V., & Kita, M. (2022). ‘Everybody is taking their security in their own hands’: exploring everyday urban safety perceptions and realities in Sekondi-Takoradi, Ghana. Urban Forum, 33(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-021-09443-7
Gao, J., Guo, F., Ma, Z., & Huang, X. (2021). Multi-criteria decision-making framework for large-scale rooftop photovoltaic project site selection based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing, 102, 107098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107098
Günay, E. K., Yıldız, Ü., Günsoy, G., & Günsoy, B. (2022). A new approach to human capital: Crime adjusted human capital index on European countries. International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6853615
Gupta, S., & Kumar, S. (2015). Crime detection and prevention using social network analysis. International Journal of Computer Applications, 126(6), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2015906065
Hajmohammad, S., & Vachon, S. (2014). Safety culture: A catalyst for sustainable development. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1813-0
Heidary Dahooie, J., Raafat, R., Qorbani, A. R., & Daim, T. (2021). An intuitionistic fuzzy data-driven product ranking model using sentiment analysis and multi-criteria decision-making. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121158
Homel, P., & Masson, N. (2016). Partnerships for human security in fragile contexts: Where community safety and security sector reform intersect. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2015.1126803
Hong, S. (2016). Representative bureaucracy, organizational integrity, and citizen coproduction: Does an increase in police ethnic representativeness reduce crime? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21876
Jones, S., Odero, K., & Adanu, E. K. (2020). Road crashes in Namibia: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. Development Southern Africa, 37(2), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2019.1659131
Kahraman, C., Gülbay, M., & Kabak, Ö. (2006). Applications of fuzzy sets in industrial engineering: A topical classification. In C. Kahraman (Ed.), Fuzzy applications in industrial engineering (pp. 1–55). Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33517-X_1
Kahraman, C., Onar, S., & Öztayşi, B. (2018). B2C marketplace prioritization using hesitant fuzzy linguistic AHP. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(7), 2202–2215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0429-4
Karasan, A., Kutlu Gündoǧdu, F., & Aydın, S. (2022). Decision-making methodology by using multi-expert knowledge for uncertain environments: Green metric assessment of universities. Environment Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02321-7
Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., Antucheviciene, J., & Chatterjee, P. (2018). Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques for business processes information management. Information, 10(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10010004
Kelly, K. D., Caputo, T., & Jamieson, W. (2005). Reconsidering sustainability: Some implications for community-based crime prevention. Critical Social Policy, 25(3), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018305054073
Kerr, S. (2022). Reflections on freedom of religion or belief and security. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 20(2), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2022.2065805
Kübler, D., & de Maillard, J. (2022). Why european mayors emphasize urban security: Evidence from a survey in 28 European countries. European Journal of Criminology, 19(4), 712–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820921486
Kwong, C. K., Ip, W. H., & Chan, J. W. K. (2002). Combining scoring method and fuzzy expert systems approach to supplier assessment: A case study. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13(7), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060210442671
Leal Filho, W., Tripathi, S. K., Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O. D., Giné-Garriga, R., Lovren, O., & Willats, J. (2019). Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1505674
Levitt, S. D. (1998). The relationship between crime reporting and police: Implications for the use of uniform crime reports. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023096425367
Machin, S., & Marie, O. (2011). Crime and police resources: The street crime initiative. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(4), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01018.x
Machin, S., Marie, O., & Vujić, S. (2011). The crime reducing effect of education. The Economic Journal, 121(552), 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02430.x
Manning, M., Smith, C., & Homel, R. (2013). Valuing developmental crime prevention. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(2), 305–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12024
Marques, S. C. R., Ferreira, F. A. F., Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, I., & Banaitis, A. (2018). Classifying urban residential areas based on their exposure to crime: A constructivist approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.005
Marsal-Llacuna, M. L. (2019). How to succeed in implementing (smart) sustainable urban agendas: “Keep cities smart, make communities intelligent.” Environment Development and Sustainability, 21(4), 1977–1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0115-1
Matzopoulos, R., Abrahams, N., Bowman, B., Shai, N., Prinsloo, M., Salau, S., Bradshaw, D., & Gray, G. (2019). Utility of crime surveys for Sustainable Development Goals monitoring and violence prevention using a public health approach. South African Medical Journal, 109(6), 382–386.
Mawby, R., Tecău, A., Constantin, C., Chițu, I., & Tescașiu, B. (2016). Addressing the security concerns of locals and visitors for the sustainable development of tourist destinations. Sustainability, 8(6), 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060524
Messner, S. F., Raffalovich, L. E., & Shrock, P. (2002). Reassessing the cross-national relationship between income inequality and homicide rates: Implications of data quality control in the measurement of income distribution. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(4), 377–395.
Mir, A. M., Hassan, A., Khalid, A., Hassan, Z. R., Kamiran, F., Raza, A. A., Hassan, S. U., & Shabbir, M. (2022). Data driven smart policing: A novel road distance-based k-median model for optimal substation placement. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107014
Mishra, A. R., Chandel, A., & Saeidi, P. (2022). Low-carbon tourism strategy evaluation and selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy additive ratio assessment approach based on similarity measures. Environment Development and Sustainability, 24(5), 7236–7282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01746-w
Mohilevskyi, L., Fursa, V., Sievidova, I., Komziuk, M., Khloponina-Gnatenko, O., & Pidkopai, D. (2021). Ensuring the economic security of Ukraine in the aspect of the association agreement between the EU. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n2p171
Montella, A., Marzano, V., Mauriello, F., Vitillo, R., Fasanelli, R., Pernetti, M., & Galante, F. (2019). Development of macro-level safety performance functions in the city of Naples. Sustainability, 11(7), 1871. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071871
Mulliner, E., Malys, N., & Maliene, V. (2016). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega, 59, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.013
Oliveira, M. (2021). More crime in cities? On the scaling laws of crime and the inadequacy of per capita rankings—a cross-country study. Crime Science, 10(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-021-00155-8
Önüt, S., Kara, S., & Efendigil, T. (2008). A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach to machine tool selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-008-0095-3
Parjanen, S., Hyypiä, M., Martikainen, S., & Hennala, L. (2019). Elements of socially sustainable innovation processes in finnish urban development. Sustainable Development, 27(3), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1886
Pickett, K. E., Mookherjee, J., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2005). Adolescent birth rates, total homicides, and income inequality in rich countries. American Journal of Public Health, 95(7), 1181–1183. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.056721
Pribićević, I., & Delibašić, B. (2021). Critical sustainability indicators identification and cause–effect relationships analysis for sustainable organization strategy based on fuzzy DEMATEL. Environment Development and Sustainability, 23(12), 17263–17304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01360-w
Puška, A., Stević, Ž, & Pamučar, D. (2022). Evaluation and selection of healthcare waste incinerators using extended sustainability criteria and multi-criteria analysis methods. Environment Development and Sustainability, 24(9), 11195–11225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01902-2
Račkauskas, M., & Liesionis, V. (2013). The relationship between government expenditure and public safety in Lithuania. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 3(2), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2013.3.2(3)
Recasens, A., Cardoso, C., Castro, J., & Nobili, G. G. (2013). Urban security in southern Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 10(3), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370812473535
Saha, M., Panda, S. K., & Panigrahi, S. (2021). A hybrid multi-criteria decision making algorithm for cloud service selection. International Journal of Information Technology, 13(4), 1417–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00716-9
Šileika, A., & Bekerytė, J. (2013). Theoretical issues of relationship between unemployment, poverty and crime in sustainable development. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 2(3), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2013.2.3(5)
Soares, R. R. (2004). Development, crime and punishment: accounting for the international differences in crime rates. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 155–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2002.12.001
Soh, M. B. C. (2012). Crime and urbanization: Revisited Malaysian case. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 42, 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.193
Tang, Y., Zhu, X., Guo, W., Ye, X., Hu, T., Fan, Y., & Zhang, F. (2017). Non-homogeneous diffusion of residential crime in urban China. Sustainability, 9(6), 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060934
Teivāns-Treinovskis, J., Amosova, J., Načisčionis, J., & Nesterova, M. (2016). Country’s development and safety: Violent crimes in crime structure. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 6(2), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2016.6.2(3)
The Institute for Economics & Peace. https://www.economicsandpeace.org/reports/. Accessed 12 August 2022.
UN (2015). United Nations. https://www.un.org/pga/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/08/120815_outcome-document-of-Summit-for-adoption-of-the-post-2015-development-agenda.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2022.
UNODC (2019). United Nations: Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/gsh/Booklet1.pdf. Accessed 14 August 2022.
Uno, J. K., Amenger, H. S., & Adamgbe, K. (2021). Key issues in revitalising education for sustainable security and economic development. Nigeria Academic Forum, 28(1), 1-6.
UNODC (2022). United Nations: Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/index.html. Accessed 12 March 2022.
van Amsterdam, J. G. C., Ramaekers, J. G., Verkes, R. J., Kuypers, K. P. C., Goudriaan, A. E., & van den Brink, W. (2020). Alcohol- and drug-related public violence in Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 17(6), 806–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819828324
Venter, Z. S., Shackleton, C., Faull, A., Lancaster, L., Breetzke, G., & Edelstein, I. (2022). Is green space associated with reduced crime? A national-scale study from the Global South. Science of The Total Environment, 825, 154005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154005
Virta, S. (2013). Governing urban security in Finland: Towards the ‘European model.’ European Journal of Criminology, 10(3), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370812473536
Weng-Wai, C., Siaw-Chui, W., Sheau-Ting, L., Hon-Choong, C., & Izhar, A. I. (2022). Community acceptance towards migrant settlements in a sustainable city: What contributes to the not in my backyard social phenomenon? Journal of International Migration and Integration. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-022-00969-8
Yagmahan, B., & Yılmaz, H. (2022). An integrated ranking approach based on group multi-criteria decision making and sensitivity analysis to evaluate charging stations under sustainability. Environment Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02044-1
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Zavadskas, E. K., Bausys, R., & Mazonaviciute, I. (2019). Safety evaluation methodology of urban public parks by multi-criteria decision making. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.05.014
Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
Watts, R., Bessant, J., & Hil, R. (2008). International criminology: A critical introduction (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934302
Funding
There is no funding for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Gökçe Candan performed computation and analysis. Merve Cengiz Toklu was responsible for data interpretation. Gökçe Candan and Merve Cengiz Toklu discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Candan, G., Toklu, M.C. Evaluating security performances of EU countries in the context of sustainable development using fuzzy SMART and ARAS approaches. Environ Dev Sustain 26, 1645–1671 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02779-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02779-5