Abstract
In this study, the life cycle assessment method was used to evaluate energy and material consumption and pollutant emission based on the 2013 ledger data of a coal chemistry factory in western China and the subprocesses used include coal gasification, conversion, purification, Fischer–Tropsch synthesis and liquid hydrocarbons separation. This method provides a comprehensive understanding of the potential environmental burden of coal-to-liquid (CTL) production and can be used to identify areas with significant potential for improving energy efficiency and reducing pollutant emissions. The results indicate that the main source of pollution in the CTL program is CTL processing step. Large amounts of water are consumed in the coal mining and CTL processing. The total amount of gaseous pollutants discharged to produce one ton of liquid hydrocarbon is 25.629 t, and 99.5% of this total consists of greenhouse gases. Over the entire life cycle of one ton of this liquid hydrocarbon, 31.955 tons of greenhouse gases (calculated as CO2) are emitted, and the weighted impact potential value is 3.149/PET2010. A series of relevant and consistent emission standards, laws and policies must be issued for the reasonable and orderly growth of the coal chemical industry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aliyon, K., Hajinezhad, A., & Mehrpooya, M. (2019). Energy assessment of coal-fired steam power plant, carbon capture, and carbon liquefaction process chain as a whole. Energy Conversion and Management, 199, 111994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111994.
CLCD. (2012). Chinese life cycle database. Beijing: CLCD.
CRAES. (2011). Pollutant emission coefficient handbook for industrial sources. Beijing: CRAES.
CSY. (2015). China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.
CSY. (2016–2017). China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
CSY. (2017). China Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press.
CSY. (2019). China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.
Cui, L., Ba, K., Li, F., Wang, Q., Ma, Q., Yuan, X., et al. (2020). Life cycle assessment of ultra-low treatment for steel industry sintering flue gas emissions. Science of the Total Environment, 725, 138292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138292.
Di, X. H., Nie, Z. R., & Zuo, T. Y. (2005). Life cycle emission inventories for the fuels consumed by thermal power in China. China Environmental Ence, 25(5), 632–635.
Dong, X., Siyu, Y., Xiuxi, L., & Yu, Q. (2015). Life cycle assessment of energy consumption and GHG emissions of olefins production from alternative resources in China. Energy Conversion and Management, 90, 12–20.
Farjana, S. H., Huda, N., Mahmud, M. A. P., & Lang, C. (2019). Impact analysis of gold silver refining processes through life-cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 867–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.166.
Gao, D., Qiu, X., Zhang, Y., & Liu, P. (2018). Life cycle analysis of coal based methanol-to-olefins processes in China. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 109, 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.11.001.
Han, X., Chen, N., Yan, J., Liu, J., Liu, M., & Karellas, S. (2019). Thermodynamic analysis and life cycle assessment of supercritical pulverized coal-fired power plant integrated with No.0 feedwater pre-heater under partial loads. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 1106–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.159.
Jianxin, Y., Cheng, X., & Rusong, W. (2002). Methodology and application of life cycle assessment. Beijing: China Meteorological Press.
Kythavone, L., & Chaiyat, N. (2020). Life cycle assessment of a very small organic Rankine cycle and municipal solid waste incinerator for infectious medical waste. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 18, 100526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2020.100526.
Li, B., Wu, J., & Lu, J. (2020). Life cycle assessment considering water-energy nexus for lithium nanofiltration extraction technique. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 121152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121152.
Li, H. (2015). Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of coal-based synthetic natural gas. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology.
Li, S., Gao, L., & Jin, H. (2016). Life cycle energy use and GHG emission assessment of coal-based SNG and power cogeneration technology in China. Energy Conversion and Management, 112, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.12.075.
Li, X., Ou, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, X. (2013). Life-cycle fossil energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission intensity of dominant secondary energy pathways of China in 2010. Energy, 50, 15–23.
Liang, X., Wang, Z., Zhou, Z., Huang, Z., Zhou, J., & Cen, K. (2013). Up-to-date life cycle assessment and comparison study of clean coal power generation technologies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 24–31.
Lin, B., & Long, H. (2016). Emissions reduction in China’s chemical industry—Based on LMDI. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 1348–1355.
Longo, S., Cellura, M., Guarino, F., Brunaccini, G., & Ferraro, M. (2019). Life cycle energy and environmental impacts of a solid oxide fuel cell micro-CHP system for residential application. Science of The Total Environment, 685, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.368.
Mantripragada, H. C., & Rubin, E. S. (2013). CO2 implications of coal-to-liquids (CTL) plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 16, 50–60.
Meng-Jie, G., Hui-Min, L., & Ye, Q. (2015). Impact of coal-based synthetic natural gas to electricity on carbon emissions and regional environment in China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 5, 151–159.
NEAC. (2017). National energy administration of China. The Notice on “13th Five-year” Planning on Industry Demonstration of Coal Deep Processing.
Pan, X., Yan, Y., Peng, X., & Liu, Q. (2016). Analysis of the threshold effect of financial development on China’s carbon intensity. Sustainability, 8(3), 271–285.
Qi, T., Li, Z., Zhang, X., & Ren, X. (2012). Regional economic output and employment impact of coal-to-liquids (CTL) industry in China: An input-output analysis. Energy, 46(1), 259–263.
Qin, Z., Zhai, G., Wu, X., Yu, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2016a). Carbon footprint evaluation of coal-to-methanol chain with the hierarchical attribution management and life cycle assessment. Energy Conversion and Management, 124, 168–179.
Qin, Z., Zhai, G., Wu, X., Yu, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2016b). Carbon footprint evaluation of coal-to-methanol chain with the hierarchical attribution management and life cycle assessment. Energy Conversion and Management, 124, 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.07.005.
Ubando, A. T., Rivera, D. R. T., Chen, W. H., & Culaba, A. B. (2019). A comprehensive review of life cycle assessment (LCA) of microalgal and lignocellulosic bioenergy products from thermochemical processes. Bioresource Technology, 291, 121837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121837.
Verma, A., & Kumar, A. (2015). Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification. Applied Energy, 147, 556–568.
Wang, J., Wang, R., Zhu, Y., & Li, J. (2018). Life cycle assessment and environmental cost accounting of coal-fired power generation in China. Energy Policy, 115, 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.040.
Xie, K. (2020). Thoughts on the development of modern coal chemical industry during the 14th five-year plan. Coal Economic Research, 40(5), 1–3.
Xie, K., Li, W., & Wei, Z. (2010). Coal chemical industry and its sustainable development in China. Energy, 35(11), 4349–4355.
Yang, B., Wei, Y.-M., Hou, Y., Li, H., & Wang, P. (2019). Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass cofiring plants with CO2 capture and storage. Applied Energy, 252, 113483.
Yang, D., Jia, X., Dang, M., Han, F., Shi, F., Tanikawa, H., et al. (2020b). Life cycle assessment of cleaner production measures in monosodium glutamate production: A case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122126.
Yang, Q., Qian, Y., Kraslawski, A., Zhou, H., & Yang, S. (2016). Advanced exergy analysis of an oil shale retorting process. Applied Energy, 165, 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.104.
Yang, X., Deng, Z., Liu, C., Zhou, Z., Ren, H., et al. (2020a). Techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquid processes with different gasifier alternatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 120006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120006.
Yu, P., Luo, Z., Wang, Q., & Fang, M. (2019). Life cycle assessment of transformation from a sub-critical power plant into a polygeneration plant. Energy Conversion and Management, 198, 111801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111801.
Zhang, X., Bauer, C., Mutel, C. L., & Volkart, K. (2017). Life cycle assessment of power-to-gas: Approaches, system variations and their environmental implications. Applied Energy, 190, 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.098.
Zhao, W., Sun, Y., Zhang, W., & Liang, S. (2016). Eco-efficiency analysis of municipal solid waste recycling systems by using life cycle approaches. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(22), 7208–7216.
Zhou, H., Yang, Q., Zhu, S., Song, Y., & Zhang, D. (2019). Life cycle comparison of greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption for coal and oil shale to liquid fuels. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 144, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.031.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported with grants from Support Project of High-level Teachers in Beijing Municipal Universities in the Period of 13th Five-year Plan——Beijing Municipal College "Great Wall" Scholars Projects (CIT&TCD20190314), the Ministry of Ecology and Environment (CC20160801), the Beijing Climate Change Response Research and Education Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, C., Zhu, L. Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-to-Liquid Process. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 14453–14471 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01252-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01252-z