Abstract
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that environmental regulators of riparian zone soil denitrification potential differ according to spatial scale within a watershed; consequently, a second objective was to provide spatial strategies for conserving and restoring the purification function of runoff in riparian ecosystems. The results show that soil denitrification in riparian zones was more heterogeneous at the profile scale than at the cross-section and landscape scales. At the profile scale, biogeochemical factors (including soil total organic carbon, total nitrogen, and nitrate–nitrogen) were the major direct regulators of the spatial distribution of soil denitrification enzyme activity (DEA). At the cross-section scale, factors included distance from river bank and vegetation density, while landscape-scale factors, including topographic index, elevation, and land use types, indirectly regulated the spatial distribution of DEA. At the profile scale, soil DEA was greatest in the upper soil layers. At the cross-section scale, maximum soil DEA occurred in the mid-part of the riparian zone. At the landscape scale, soil DEA showed an increasing trend towards downstream sites, except for those in urbanized areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn, C., & Peralta, R. M. (2012). Soil properties are useful to examine denitrification function development in created mitigation wetlands. Ecological Engineering, 49, 130–136.
Bao, S. D. (2000). Soil agrochemical analysis (third ed.). Beijing: China Agriculture Press (in Chinese).
Bettez, N. D., & Groffman, P. M. (2012). Denitrification potential in stormwater control structures and natural riparian zones in an urban landscape. Environmental Science and Technology, 46(20), 10909–10917.
Dodla, S. K., Wang, J. J., DeLaune, R. D., & Cook, R. L. (2008). Denitrification potential and its relation to organic carbon quality in three coastal wetland soils. Science of the Total Environment, 407(1), 471–480.
Florinsky, I. V., McMahon, S., & Burton, D. L. (2004). Topographic control of soil microbial activity: a case study of denitrifiers. Geoderma, 119(1), 33–53.
Groffman, P. M., & Crawford, M. K. (2003). Denitrification potential in urban riparian zones. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32(3), 1144–1149.
Groffman, P. M., & Tiedje, J. M. (1989). Denitrification in north temperate forest soils: relationships between denitrification and environmental factors at the landscape scale. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 21(5), 621–626.
Groffman, P. M., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Fulweiler, R. W., Gold, A. J., Morse, J. L., Stander, E. K., Tague, C., Tonitto, C., & Vidon, P. (2009). Challenges to incorporating spatially and temporally explicit phenomena (hotspots and hot moments) in denitrification models. Biogeochemistry, 93(1–2), 49–77.
Hale, R., Reich, P., Daniel, T., Lake, P. S., & Cavagnaro, T. R. (2014). Scales that matter: guiding effective monitoring of soil properties in restored riparian zones. Geoderma, 228, 173–181.
Hayakawa, A., Nakata, M., Jiang, R., Kuramochi, K., & Hatano, R. (2012). Spatial variation of denitrification potential of grassland, windbreak forest, and riparian forest soils in an agricultural catchment in eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Ecological Engineering, 47, 92–100.
Hill, A. R., & Cardaci, M. (2004). Denitrification and organic carbon availability in riparian wetland soils and subsurface sediments. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68(1), 320–325.
Hook, P. B., & Burke, I. C. (2000). Biogeochemistry in a shortgrass landscape: control by topography, soil texture, and microclimate. Ecology, 81(10), 2686–2703.
Jahangir, M. M. R., Khalil, M. I., Johnston, P. G., Cardenas, L. M., Hatch, D. J., Butler, M., Barrette, M., O’Flaherty, V., & Richards, K. G. (2012). Denitrification potential in subsoils: a mechanism to reduce nitrate leaching to groundwater. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 147, 13–23.
Jenerette, G. D., & Chatterjee, A. (2012). Soil metabolic pulses: water, substrate, and biological regulation. Ecology, 93(5), 959–966.
Ji, D. Q., Wen, Y., Wei, J. B., & Wu, Z. F. (2013). Dynamic trend of land use landscape ecological security in Liuxihe watershed. Tropical Geography, 33(3), 299–306 (in Chinese).
Ji, D. Q., Wen, Y., Wei, J. B., & Wu, Z. F. (2015). Relationships between landscape spatial characteristics and surface water quality in the Liu Xi river watershed. ActaEcologicaSinica, 35(2), 246–253 (in Chinese).
Lowrance, R., Hubbard, R. K., & Williams, R. G. (2000). Effects of a managed three zone riparian buffer system on shallow groundwater quality in the southeastern coastal plain. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 55(2), 212–220.
Luo, J., Tillman, R. W., & Ball, P. R. (2000). Nitrogen loss through denitrification in a soil under pasture in New Zealand. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32(4), 497–509.
Martin, T. L., Kaushik, N. K., Trevors, J. T., & Whiteley, H. R. (1999). Review: denitrification in temperate climate riparian zones. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 111(1–4), 171–186.
Mou, X. J., Liu, X. T., Tong, C., & Liu, R. F. (2013). Effects of human disturbance on nitrification and denitrification potential in the Min River estuarine wetland. China Environmental Science, 8, 1413–1419 (in Chinese).
Pansu, M., & Gautheyrou, J. (2006). Handbook of soil analysis: mineralogical, organic and inorganic methods. New York: Springer.
Parkin, T. B., & Meisinger, J. J. (1989). Denitrification below the crop rooting zone as influenced by surface tillage. Journal of Environmental Quality, 18(1), 12–16.
Sponseller, R. A., & Fisher, S. G. (2008). The influence of drainage networks on patterns of soil respiration in a desert catchment. Ecology, 89(4), 1089–1100.
Tatariw, C., Chapman, E. L., Sponseller, R. A., Behzad, M., & Edmonds, J. W. (2013). Denitrification in a large river: consideration of geomorphic controls on microbial activity and community structure. Ecology, 94(10), 2249–2262.
Ullah, S., & Faulkner, S. P. (2006). Denitrification potential of different land-use types in an agricultural watershed, lower Mississippi valley. Ecological Engineering, 28(2), 131–140.
Wang, S., Cao, Z., Li, X., Liao, Z., Hu, B., Ni, J., & Ruan, H. (2013). Spatial-seasonal variation of soil denitrification under three riparian vegetation types around the Dianchi Lake in Yunnan, China. Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts, 15(5), 963–971.
Wu, X., Liu, G., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Fu, B., Zheng, X., & Brüggemann, N. (2013). Effects of land cover and soil properties on denitrification potential in soils of two semi-arid grasslands in Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 92, 98–101.
Zhang, Y. K. (2012). Study on the variation of water quality in Conghua section of Liuxi River. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 21(11), 1902–1904 (in Chinese).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41171399 and 40871229), Shenyang Special Funds for Scientific and Technological Innovation (Grant No. F14-133-9-00), and Science and Enterprise Competitive Selection Project of Shenyang City (study on the risk management and remediation technology of urban ecological environment).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Highlights
• Environmental regulators of riparian soil denitrification vary by spatial scale
• At profile scale, DEA is mainly in upper soil, regulated by biogeochemical factors
• At cross-section scale, DEA varies by distance to river bank and vegetation density
• At landscape scale, elevation, topography, and land use indirectly regulate DEA
• Landscape-scale DEA increases downstream, except in urbanized areas
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, J., Feng, H., Cheng, Q. et al. Denitrification potential of riparian soils in relation to multiscale spatial environmental factors: a case study of a typical watershed, China. Environ Monit Assess 189, 85 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5805-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5805-x