Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantification of Vibrio species in oysters from the Gulf of Mexico with two procedures based on MPN and PCR

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oysters can accumulate potentially pathogenic water bacteria. The objective of this study was to compare two procedures to quantify Vibrio species present in oysters to determine the most sensitive method. We analyzed oyster samples from the Gulf of Mexico, commercialized in Mexico City. The samples were inoculated in tubes with alkaline peptone water (APW), based on three tubes and four dilutions (10−1 to 10−4). From these tubes, the first quantification of Vibrio species was performed (most probable number (MPN) from tubes) and bacteria were inoculated by streaking on thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (TCBS) petri dishes. Colonies were isolated for a second quantification (MPN from dishes). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to determine species with specific primers: ompW for Vibrio cholerae, tlh for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and VvhA for Vibrio vulnificus. Simultaneously, the sanitary quality of oysters was determined. The quantification of V. parahaemolyticus was significantly higher in APW tubes than in TCBS dishes. Regarding V. vulnificus counts, the differences among both approaches were not significant. In contrast, the MPNs of V. cholerae obtained from dishes were higher than from tubes. The quantification of MPNs through PCR of V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus obtained from APW was sensitive and recommendable for the detection of both species. In contrast, to quantify V. cholerae, it was necessary to isolate colonies on TCBS prior PCR. Culturing in APW at 42 °C could be an alternative to avoid colony isolation. The MPNs of V. cholerae from dishes was associated with the bad sanitary quality of the samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam, M. J., Tomochika, K. I., Miyoshi, S. I., & Shinoda, S. (2002). Environmental investigation of potentially pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Seto-Inland Sea, Japan. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 208(1), 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA, AWWA, WEF. (2012). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22th edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Escorcia, G., & Wong-Chang, I. (2014). Diagnóstico y tendencias de la contaminación microbiológica en el golfo de México. In A. V. Botello, J. Rendón von Osten, J. Benítez, & G. Gold-Boucht (Eds.), Golfo de México, contaminación e impacto ambiental: diagnóstico y tendencias (pp. 595–619). Mérida: UAC, UNAM-ICMYL, CINVESTAV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco-Abad, V., Ansede-Bermejo, J., Rodriguez-Castro, A., & Martinez-Urtaza, J. (2009). Evaluation of different procedures for the optimized detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in mussels and environmental samples. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 129(3), 229–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cabanillas-Beltrán, H., Llausás-Magaña, E., Romero, R., Espinoza, A., García-Gasca, A., Nishibuchi, M., Ishibashi, M., & Gómez-Gil, B. (2006). Outbreak of gastroenteritis caused by the pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 in Mexico. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 265(1), 76–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOF: Diario Oficial de la Federación (2011). Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-242-SSA1-2009, Productos y servicios. Productos de la pesca frescos, refrigerados, congelados y procesados. Especificaciones sanitarias y métodos de prueba. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación, 10 de febrero. (Avaiable at: http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle_popup.php?codigo=5177531).

  • Depaola, A., Kaysner, C. A., & Mcphearson, R. M. (1987). Elevated temperature method for recovery of Vibrio cholerae from oysters (Crassostrea gigas). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 53(5), 1181–1182.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Depaola, A., Jones, J. L., Woods, J., Burkhardt, W., III, Calci, K. R., Krantz, J. A., Bowers, J. C., Kasturi, K., Byars, R. H., Jacobs, E., Williams-Hill, D., & Nabe, K. (2010). Bacterial and viral pathogens in live oysters: 2007 United States market survey. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76(9), 2754–2768.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hara-Kudo, Y., Miwa, N., Yamasaki, S., Yatsuyanagi, J., Iwade, Y., Takahash, H., & Miyasaka, J. (2005). Quantitative detection of Vibrio vulnificus in seafood. Kansenshogaku Zasshi, 79(12), 931–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, D., Wada, K., Sei, K., Ike, M., & Fujita, M. (2005). Comparative evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction methods for routine enumeration of specific bacterial DNA in aquatic samples. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 21(6), 1029–1035.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, E. G., Huyn, J. H., & Larock, P. A. (1994). Pertinence of indicator organisms and sampling variables to Vibrio concentrations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 60(10), 3897–3900.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lizárraga-Partida M. L., Gómez-Gil, B., Méndez-Gómez, E., Wong-Chang, I., Pardío-Sedas, V., & Cabanillas-Beltrán, H. (2010). Molecular detection of V. cholerae, V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus in oyster from Mexico by the vibriomex group. Vibrios in the Environment 2010. Biloxi, Mississippi, USA.

  • Luan, X., Chen, J., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Jia, J., Liu, R., & Zhang, X. H. (2008). Rapid quantitative detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood by MPN-PCR. Current Microbiology, 57(3), 218–221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miwa, N., Nishio, T., Arita, Y., Kawamori, F., Masuda, T., & Akiyama, M. (2003). Evaluation of MPN method combined with PCR procedure for detection and enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood. Food Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi), 44(6), 289–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Salazar, M. E., Álvarez-Hernández, S., & Bravo-Nuñez, E. (2001). Coeficientes de asociación. México: UAM-I, Plaza y Valdes.

  • Tantillo, G. M., Fontanarosa, M., Di Pinto, A., & Musti, M. (2004). Updated perspectives on emerging vibrios associated with human infections. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 39(2), 117–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vengadesh, L., Son, R., & Yoke-Kqueen, C. (2012). Molecular quantitation and characterization of Vibrio cholerae from different seafood obtained from wetmarket and supermarket. International Food Research Journal, 19(1), 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. (2010). Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the following projects: “Molecular detection of pathogenic Vibrio sp. in marine mollusks intended for human consumption, CONACYT-SSA, code number 114024” and “Ecological Integrity Indicators and Environmental Health” (Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana). The experiments were carried out at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). The authors thank Dr. Hector Barrera Villa Zevallos for the translation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guadalupe Barrera-Escorcia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barrera-Escorcia, G., Wong-Chang, I., Fernández-Rendón, C.L. et al. Quantification of Vibrio species in oysters from the Gulf of Mexico with two procedures based on MPN and PCR. Environ Monit Assess 188, 602 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5620-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5620-9

Keywords

Navigation