Comparative Evaluation of Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for Routine Enumeration of Specific Bacterial DNA in Aquatic Samples

Summary

Three quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods, the internal standard method (IS-PCR), competitive PCR (cPCR) and most probable number-PCR (MPN-PCR), were compared in terms of their ability to quantify specific bacterial DNA in environmental samples. Serially diluted Pseudomonas putida BH, the target bacterium, was inoculated into sterilized potassium phosphate buffer (PPB), river water and activated sludge, total DNA was extracted, and the number of pheB genes carried by P. putida BH in each sample was enumerated. IS-PCR and cPCR could not quantify the pheB gene at low concentrations (1.0 × 10³ copies ml^-1 in all samples and 1.0 × 10⁴ copies ml^--1 in some samples) and tended to give overestimations because of differences in amplification efficiencies between pheB gene and the internal standard/competitor in a reaction tube. Although reproducibility of MPN-PCR was slightly lower than that of the other two methods, MPN-PCR was the most sensitive, enabling us to quantify the pheB gene at 1.0 × 10³ copies ml^--1, and it had a good correlation with the inoculum size of P. putida BH. These results suggest that MPN-PCR is the best suited for routine microbial monitoring in natural environmental samples because of the simple handling, the ease of modification as occasion demands and the wide detection range, especially at low cell densities of the target microbe.