Abstract
Educational neuroscience aims to merge neuroscience and education for better teaching and learning outcomes. Translating scientific findings into educator-friendly terms is crucial to empower teachers in applying these insights to teaching methods. Despite advancements in neuroeducation, a significant gap persists, and there is a lack of specific neuro-educational pedagogical knowledge, notably in early childhood math education. This exploratory review article outlines recent neuroscientific insights into numerical understanding in the human brain. It presents seven neuro-pedagogical principles essential for developing mathematical abilities in early childhood: (1) Mathematical abilities are distributed across various brain regions. (2) Innate mathematical abilities exist in young children. (3) Brain networks for perceiving quantities are vital for mathematical thinking and evolve with age and experience. (4) Distinguishing between small and large quantities (subitizing) can mediate between the innate ability to understand quantities and the later understanding of numbers and their meaning. (5) A mental number line maps numbers spatially. (6) Neurocognitive mechanisms perceive and manipulate numerical information through a triple code: quantity, numerals, and number words. (7) Finger gnosis, the ability to identify fingers without visual involvement, correlates with mathematical abilities. Each principle is discussed in terms of ongoing research, limitations of the current findings, and practical implications and examples suitable for early childhood educators.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2018). Cortical circuits for mathematical knowledge: Evidence for a major subdivision within the brain’s semantic networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1740), 20160515. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0515.
Anobile, G., Arrighi, R., & Burr, D. C. (2019). Simultaneous and sequential subitizing are separate systems, and neither predicts math abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 178, 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.017.
Ansari, D., & Dhital, B. (2006). Age-related changes in the activation of the intraparietal sulcus during nonsymbolic magnitude processing: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(11), 1820–1828. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1820.
Barrocas, R., Roesch, S., Gawrilow, C., & Moeller, K. (2020). Putting a finger on numerical development–reviewing the contributions of kindergarten finger gnosis and fine motor skills to numerical abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01012.
Berteletti, I., & Booth, J. R. (2015). Perceiving fingers in single-digit arithmetic problems. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00226.
Boaler, J. (2015). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Wiley.
Bugden, S., DeWind, N. K., & Brannon, E. M. (2016). Using cognitive training studies to unravel the mechanisms by which the approximate number system supports symbolic math ability. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.05.002.
Chang, Z., Schwartz, M. S., Hinesley, V., & Dubinsky, J. M. (2021). Neuroscience concepts changed teachers’ views of pedagogy and students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 685856. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685856.
Chang, H., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Xie, Y., de Los Angeles, C., Adair, E., & Menon, V. (2022). Foundational number sense training gains are predicted by hippocampal–parietal circuits. Journal of Neuroscience, 42(19), 4000–4015. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1005-21.2022.
Clements, D. (2001). Mathematics in the preschool. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(5), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.7.5.0270.
Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & MacDonald, B. L. (2019). Subitizing: The neglected quantifier. In A. Norton & M. W. Alibali (Eds.), Constructing Number: Merging Perspectives from Psychology and Mathematics Education. Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 13–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00491-0.
Cutini, S., Scatturin, P., Moro, S. B., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Are the neural correlates of subitizing and estimation dissociable? An fNIRS investigation. Neuroimage, 85, 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.027.
Decarli, G., Paris, E., Tencati, C., Nardelli, C., Vescovi, M., Surian, L., & Piazza, M. (2020). Impaired large numerosity estimation and intact subitizing in developmental dyscalculia. PLoS One, 15(12), e0244578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244578.
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1–2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-N.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371.
Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. OUP USA.
Demeyere, N., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). The neuroanatomy of visual enumeration: Differentiating necessary neural correlates for subitizing versus counting in a neuropsychological voxel-based morphometry study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 948–964. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00188.
Dubinsky, J. M., Roehrig, G., & Varma, S. (2022). A place for neuroscience in teacher knowledge and education. Mind Brain and Education, 16(4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12334.
Emerson, R. W., & Cantlon, J. F. (2012). Early math achievement and functional connectivity in the fronto-parietal network. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, S139–S151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.11.003.
Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2010). Reading and the brain: What early childhood educators need to know. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0387-z.
Friedman, I. A., Grobgeld, E., & Teichman-Weinberg, A. (2019). Imbuing education with brain research can improve teaching and enhance productive learning. Psychology, 10(02), 122. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2019.102010.
Gracia-Bafalluy, M., & Noël, M. P. (2008). Does finger training increase young children’s numerical performance? Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 44(4), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.020.
Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., Lehtinen, E., & Räsänen, P. (2015). Preschool children’s spontaneous focusing on numerosity, subitizing, and counting skills as predictors of their mathematical performance seven years later at school. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(2–3), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.1016814.
Howard-Jones, P. A., Varma, S., Ansari, D., Butterworth, B., De Smedt, B., Goswami, U., Laurillard, D., & Thomas, M. S. C. (2016). The principles and practices of educational neuroscience: Comment on Bowers (2016). Psychological Review, 123(5), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000036.
Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2009). Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(25), 10382–10385. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812142106.
Kucian, K., Grond, U., Rotzer, S., Henzi, B., Schönmann, C., Plangger, F., Gälli, M., Martin, E., & Von Aster, M. (2011). Mental number line training in children with developmental dyscalculia. Neuroimage, 57(3), 782–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.070.
Leibovich, T., Katzin, N., Harel, M., & Henik, A. (2017). From sense of number to sense of magnitude: The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000960.
Lin, C. H. (2022). Developing mental number line games to improve young children’s number knowledge and basic arithmetic skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 222, 105479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105479.
Lourenco, S. F., & Aulet, L. S. (2023). A theory of perceptual number encoding. Psychological Review, 130(1), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000380.
Lynn, A., Wilkey, E. D., & Price, G. R. (2022). Predicting children’s math skills from task-based and resting-state functional brain connectivity. Cerebral Cortex, 32(19), 4204–4214. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab476.
Merkley, R., & Ansari, D. (2016). Why numerical symbols count in the development of mathematical skills: Evidence from brain and behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.006.
Micheloyannis, S., Sakkalis, V., Vourkas, M., Stam, C. J., & Simos, P. G. (2005). Neural networks involved in mathematical thinking: Evidence from linear and non-linear analysis of electroencephalographic activity. Neuroscience Letters, 373(3), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.10.005.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
Özdem, Ş., & Olkun, S. (2021). Improving mathematics achievement via conceptual subitizing skill training. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(4), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1694710.
Penner-Wilger, M., & Anderson, M. L. (2013). The relation between finger gnosis and mathematical ability: Why redeployment of neural circuits best explains the finding. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 877. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00877.
Pinel, P., Piazza, M., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments. Neuron, 41(6), 983–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00107-2.
Pitt, B., & Casasanto, D. (2022). The Order of Magnitude: Why SNARC-like tasks (still) cannot support a generalized Magnitude System. Cognitive Science, 46(2), e13108. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13108.
Prpic, V., Mingolo, S., Agostini, T., & Murgia, M. (2021). Magnitude and order are both relevant in SNARC and SNARC-like effects: A commentary on Casasanto and Pitt (2019). Cognitive Science, 45(7), e13006. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13006.
Schaeffer, M. W., Rozek, C. S., Maloney, E. A., Berkowitz, T., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2021). Elementary school teachers’ math anxiety and students’ math learning: A large-scale replication. Developmental Science, 24(4), e13080. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13080.
Schwartz, M. S., Hinesley, V., Chang, Z., & Dubinsky, J. M. (2019). Neuroscience knowledge enriches pedagogical choices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.002.
Sella, F., Tressoldi, P., Lucangeli, D., & Zorzi, M. (2016). Training numerical skills with the adaptive videogame the number race: A randomized controlled trial on preschoolers. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 5(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2016.02.002.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Sokolowski, H. M., Fias, W., Ononye, C. B., & Ansari, D. (2017). Are numbers grounded in a general magnitude processing system? A functional neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 105, 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.019.
Soylu, F., Lester Jr, F. K., & Newman, S. D. (2018). You can count on your fingers: The role of fingers in early mathematical development. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 4(1), 107–135. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v4i1.85.
Starr, A., Libertus, M. E., & Brannon, E. M. (2013). Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(45), 18116–18120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302751110.
Tablante, J., Krossa, L., Azimi, T., & Chen, L. (2023). Dysfunctions associated with the intraparietal sulcus and a distributed network in individuals with math learning difficulties: An ALE meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 44(7), 2726–2740. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26240.
Tam, Y. P., Wong, T. T. Y., & Chan, W. W. L. (2019). The relation between spatial skills and mathematical abilities: The mediating role of mental number line representation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.10.007.
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2015). One way neuroscience can improve Pre-literacy and Pre-numeracy skills in Young Children. World Education Research Association: International perspectives on language, literacy and learning. Corvinus University.
Tsang, J. M., Blair, K. P., Bofferding, L., & Schwartz, D. L. (2015). Learning to See Less Than nothing: Putting perceptual skills to work for Learning Numerical structure. Cognition and Instruction, 33(2), 154–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2015.1038539.
Van Herwegen, J., Costa, H. M., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2017). Improving approximate number sense abilities in preschoolers: PLUS games. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(4), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000191.
Varma, S., McCandliss, B. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (2008). Scientific and pragmatic challenges for Bridging Education and Neuroscience. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08317687.
Viswanathan, P., & Nieder, A. (2013). Neuronal correlates of a visual sense of number in primate parietal and prefrontal cortices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(27), 11187–11192. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308141110.
Vogel, S. E., & De Smedt, B. (2021). Developmental brain dynamics of numerical and arithmetic abilities. Npj Science of Learning, 6(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00099-3.
Wästerlid, C.A. (2020). Conceptual subitizing and preschool class children’s learning of the part-part-whole relations of number. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(6), 1038–1054. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.1038.
Yeo, D. J., Wilkey, E. D., & Price, G. R. (2017). The search for the number form area: A functional neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 78, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.027.
Funding
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
A popularized version of this paper is slated to appear in Hebrew in “Mechkar veIyun beChinuch Matemati” (Research and Discussions on Math Education), published by Sha’anan Educational College. The Chief Editor of this journal, Y. Biton, has given permission for additional publication in English.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Elgavi, O., Hamo, P. Math on the Brain: Seven Principles from Neuroscience for Early Childhood Educators. Early Childhood Educ J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01656-2
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01656-2