Abstract
Robotics has emerged as a popular interdisciplinary pedagogical approach in the field of education to teach children STEM concepts. By providing playful learning experiences, the use of robots engages children in an active learning process, making it an effective tool to promote their targeted knowledge, skills, and disposition towards STEM, including programming and coding skills. This study aimed to investigate the impact of using a programmable robot (KIBO) as a station activity and how it impacts pre-kindergarteners' programming skills after 2 weeks of play. Fourteen children aged 3–4 participated in the study during the summer, with the robot station activity lasting for 40 min each day. Results indicated a significant improvement in all areas of programming skills, including copying programming (n = 13), programming (n = 13), programming with a conditional statement (n = 7), and decoding (n = 10), after playing with the robot. The findings suggest that incorporating programmable robots as station activities can be a valuable addition to pre-kindergarten curriculums to promote basic programming skills in young children, which can serve as a foundation for future STEM learning. Further research is needed to determine the long-term effects of using robots as a teaching tool for young children.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alimisis, D. (2012). Robotics in education & education in robotics: Shifting focus from technology to pedagogy. Retrieved from https://roboesl.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Robotics-in-Education-Education-in-Robotics.pdf
Bers, M. U. (2010). The TangibleK robotics program: Applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2), 10–22.
Bers, M. U. (2012). Designing digital experiences for positive youth development: From playpen to playground. Oxford University Press.
Bers, M. U. (2018a). Coding as a playground: Programming and computational thinking in the early childhood classroom. Routledge Press.
Bers, M. U. (2018b). Coding and computational thinking in early childhood: The impact of scratch Jr in Europe. European Journal of STEM Education., 3(3), 8.
Cherniak, S., Lee, K., Sung, E., & Jung, S. E. (2019). Child-identified problems and their robotics solutions. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 17(4), 347–360.
Chevalier, M., Giang, C., Piatti, A., & Mondada, F. (2020). Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: A model for creative computational problem solving. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(39), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00238-z
Di Lieto, M. C., Pecini, C., Castro, E., Inguaggito, E., Cecchi, F., Dario, P., Cioni, G., & Eguchi, A. (2016). Computational thinking with educational robotics. In G. Chamblee, & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 79–84). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/172306.
Eguchi, A. (2014). Educational Robotics for Promoting 21st Century Skills. Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 8, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.14313/JAMRIS_1-2014/1
Flannery, L. P., & Bers, M. U. (2013). Let’s dance the ‘“robot hokey-pokey!”’: Children’s programming approaches and achievement throughout early cognitive development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 81–101.
Gerosa, A., Koleszar, V., Tejera, G., Gómez-Sena, L., & Carboni, A. (2022). Educational robotics intervention to foster computational thinking in preschoolers: Effects of children’s task engagement. Frontier in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904761
Govind, M., & Bers, M. (2021). Assessing robotics skills in early childhood: Development and testing of a tool for evaluating children’s projects. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 7(1), 47–68.
International Society for Technology Education and the Computer Science Teachers Association. (2011). Operational definition of computational thinking for K-12 education. Retrieved from https://cdn.iste.org/www-root/Computational_Thinking_Operational_Definition_ISTE.pdf
Kazakoff, E., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5
Keren, G., & Fridin, M. (2014). Kindergarten Social Assistive Robot (KindSAR) for children’s geometric thinking and metacognitive development in preschool education: A pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.009
Lee, J. (2020). Coding in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 21(3), 266–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949119846541
Lee, J., Joswick, C., & Pole, K. (2023). Classroom play and activities to support computational thinking development in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(3), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01319-0
Lee, J., & Junoh, J. (2019). Implementing unplugged coding activities in early childhood classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(6), 709–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00967-z
Lott, K., Urbanek-Carney, S., & Mitchel, A. (2019). Engineering encounters: Cookie jar alarms early childhood engineering with robotics. Science and Children, 57(3), 66–72.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (n.d.). Effective strategies to support child‑centered learning. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-shared/downloads/PDFs/resources/pubs/transforming-teaching-chap-2-excerpt.pdf
Piaget, J. (1953). The origins of intelligence in the child. Routledge.
Project Lead the Way. (n.d.). Robotics reference guide. Retrieved from https://www.keysschools.com/cms/lib/FL02202360/Centricity/Domain/2883/The%20Entire%20Robotics%20Reference%20Guide.pdf
Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L. E., & Bers, M. U. (2021). Learning to code and the acquisition of computational thinking by young children. Computers & Education, 169, 104222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104222
Romero, M., Lepage, A., & Lille, B. (2017). Computational thinking development through creative programming in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0080-z
Strawhacker, A., & Bers, M. (2019). What they learn when they learn coding: Investigating cognitive domains and computer programming knowledge in young children. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 541–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9622-x
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2016). Girls, boys, and bots: Gender differences in young children’s performance on robotics and programming tasks. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 15, 145–165.
Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2019). Computer science education in early childhood: The case of Scratch Jr. Journal of Information Technology Education Innovations in Practice, 18, 113–138. https://doi.org/10.28945/4437
Taylor, M. S., Vasquez, E., & Donehower, C. (2017). Computer programming with early elementary students with Down Syndrome. Journal of Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417704439
Texas Education Agency. (2021). Prekindergarten registration information (20–21). Retrieved from https://tea.texas.gov/academics/early-childhood-education/prekindergarten-registration-information-21-22
Vizner, M., & Strawhacker, A. (2016). Curious construction kit: A programmable building kit for early childhood: Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on creativity and fabrication in education (FabLearn), Stanford, CA, October 14–16. ACM.
Wing, J. (2011, Spring). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why? The Link Magazine, Carnegie Mellon University. Retrieved from https://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebookcomputational-thinking-what-and-why
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Robotics Station for Programming Activity with a Puzzle
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J., Yunus, S. & Lee, J.O. Investigating Children's Programming Skills Through Play with Robots (KIBO). Early Childhood Educ J (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01563-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01563-y