Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride”: Teachers’ Perceptions of Reading Instruction in Kindergarten

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many recent articles have focused on reading instruction in kindergarten, but few have solicited the beliefs of the experts—kindergarten teachers. This study examined California teachers’ perceptions of teaching reading to kindergarten students. Kindergarten teachers from northern to southern California were surveyed (N = 103). Teachers reported on student oral language competence, reading achievement, and mastery of six of the English Language Arts Standards. Due to numerous standards, teachers reported that there was less time for traditional kindergarten activities and subject area instruction, both of which promote language development. Participants believed that students with advanced language skills at the beginning of kindergarten became proficient readers. Some students, with underdeveloped language, found learning to read frustrating and confusing. Other students, with underdeveloped language, may have grasped the decoding aspect of reading, but were lacking in comprehension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, K. (2017). Keeping the “kinder” in kindergarten: Developmentally appropriate practice in New York. Retrieved from https://www.nieer.org/2017/01/05putting--kinder-back-kindergarten-developmentally-appropriate-practice-new-york.

  • Alvarez, B. (2015). The reading rush: What educators say about kindergarten reading expectations. Retrieved from https://www.neatoday.org/2015/06/19/the-reading-what-educators-say-about-kindergarten-reading-expectation/.

  • American Institutes for Research. (2011). Policy brief on structuring full-day kindergarten programs to maximize reading achievement. Retrieved from https://www.air.org/news/press-release/american-institutes-research-issues-policy-brief-structuring-full-day.

  • Anderson, R., Hiebert, E., Scott, J., & Wilkinson, I. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading (p. 1969). Washington, DC: The National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassok, D., Latham, S., & Rorem, A. (2016). Is kindergarten the new first grade? AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415616358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (1999). Language and reading success. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (2018). We need to make kindergarten engaging again. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-fundamentals/201811/we-need-make-kindergarten-engaging-again.

  • California Department of Education. (2019). Facts about English language learners in California. Retrieved from https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/cb/cefelfacts.asp.

  • California Department of Education. (1987). English-language arts framework for California public schools. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Education. (1999). Reading/language arts framework for California public schools. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Education. (2017). Report to the governor, legislature, and the legislative analyst’s office: Kindergarten in California: implementation evaluation of transitional kindergarten and kindergarten public school programs in California. Retrieved from https://www.gseis.ucla.edu.

  • Carlsson-Paige, N., McLaughlin, G., & Almon, J. (2015). Reading instruction in kindergarten: little to gain much to lose. Retrieved from www.allianceforchildhood.org and www.DEYproject.org.

  • Cappelloni, N. (2010). Kindergarten teachers’ perceptions of readiness. (Doctoral dissertation).Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database (UMI 978-1241-0681-6).

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1990). Ready to learn: A mandate for the nation. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casbergue, R. (2017). Ready for kindergarten? Rethinking early literacy in the common core era. The Reading Teacher, 70(6), 643–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. (1991). Becoming literate. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2020). Development Process. Retrieved from https://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/development-process/.

  • Corbin, C. (2019). Reading scores drop in kindergarten, increase in grades1–3. Retrieved from https://www.idahonews.org/category/news/.

  • Costantino-Lane, T. (2019). Kindergarten then and now: Perceptions of ten long term teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(5), 585–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2009). Educational Research. NJ: Upper Saddle River, Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkin, D. (1988). A classroom observation study of reading instruction in kindergarten. Center for the Study of Reading, Technical Report No. 422, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois.

  • Dweck, C. (2008). Mindset. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, D. (2008, March/April). Some misunderstanding on school readiness. School Readiness, pp. 49–52.

  • Espinosa, L., Thornburg, K., & Matthews, M. (1997). Rural kindergarten teachers of school readiness: A comparison to the Carnegie study. Early Childhood Education, 25(2), 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, P. A. (2009). Kindergarten teachers speak out: “Too much, too soon, too fast!” Reading Horizons, 49(3). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol49/iss/3/3.

  • Huey, E. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading: With a review of the history of reading and writing and of methods, texts, and hygiene in reading. New York: NY: The Macmillan Company.

  • International Literacy Association. (2018). The power and promise of read-alouds and independent reading [Literacy leadership brief]. Newark, DE: International Literacy Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Literacy Association & National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Where we stand on learning to read and write. Retrieved from www.naeyc.org/positionstatements/learningreadwrite

  • Johnston, F. (2001). The utility of phonic generalizations: Let’s take another look at Clymer’s conclusions. The Reading Teacher, 55(2), 132–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. (1998). Phonemic awareness training for prelinguistic children: Do we need prenatal PA? Reading Improvement, 35(4), 167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana Department of Education. (2108). Fall 2018 reading report: School, district, and state results for kindergarten through grade three. Retrieved from https://www.louisianabelieves.com/docs/default-source/test-results/fall-2018-dibels-reading-report.pdf?sfvrsn=8b009elf-4.

  • Morris, D., Bloodgood, J., & Perney, J. (2003). Kindergarten predictors of first-and-second grade reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 104(2), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, A., & Hunkins, F. (2009). Curriculum. Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, D., Rupley, W., Smith, G., Olinger, C., & Leslie, M. (2017). Acquisition of letter naming knowledge, phonological awareness, and spelling knowledge of kindergarten children at risk for learning to read. Child Development Research. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2142894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reading, S., & Van Deuren, D. (2007). Phonemic awareness: When and how much to teach?. Reading Research and Instruction, 46(3), 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, J., & Simon, D. (1970). The auditory analysis test: An initial report. (Report # BR-5-0253). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development.

  • Shanahan, T., & Lonigan, C. (2017) The role of early language in literacy development. Retrieved from https://www.languagemagazine.com/5100-2/.

  • Snow, C., Griffin, P., & Burke, M. (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallman, A., & Pearson, P. (1990). Formal measures of early literacy (Report No. 511). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Early childhood longitudinal study, kindergarten class of 1998–99.

  • Wexler, N. (2019). Elementary education has gone terribly wrong. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/08/the-radical-case-for-teaching-kids-stuff/592765/.

  • Whipple, G. (1925). The twenty-fourth yearbook of the national society for the study of education report of the national committee on reading. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, C., & Stegeman, W. (1958). Living in the kindergarten. Chicago, IL: Follett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tina Costantino-Lane.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Costantino-Lane, T. “Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride”: Teachers’ Perceptions of Reading Instruction in Kindergarten. Early Childhood Educ J 49, 235–245 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01065-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01065-1

Keywords

Navigation