Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Challenges and barriers to e-leadership participation: Examining the perspectives of Malaysian secondary school teachers

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, the role of information and communication technology (ICT) has increasingly impacted school instructional and leadership practices. With the assistance of ICT, interactions between school leaders and teachers have undergone tremendous changes that have reduced face-to-face contact. However, only a limited number of studies have evaluated the barriers and challenges to participating in ICT-based e-leadership in schools. Therefore, this sequential explanatory mixed-methods study was designed to examine these challenges and barriers to teachers’ participation in e-leadership platforms. Feedback from samples of 260 current secondary school teachers was obtained via a survey using the convenience sampling method. The internal consistencies of the items were also checked using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses. Parametric tests such as the independent t-test and ANOVA were conducted to determine the differences between teachers’ perceptions based on their demographic factors: age, gender and years of teaching experience. In addition, regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between teachers’ demographics and the challenges they encountered. Furthermore, 10 teachers were interviewed to obtain detailed explanations of the challenges and barriers they faced while participating in e-leadership systems. Thematic analysis was employed to assess the interview transcript data. The quantitative findings revealed that the challenges faced by teachers included ineffective ICT equipment in schools, ICT equipment in schools that needs to be updated, lack of understanding in using the ICT system, a lack of knowledge derived from limited support courses and workshops to assist educators, ineffective school’s ICT system and disturbance of their free time. From interview sessions, teachers have mentioned significant issues related to internet networks, teachers’ willingness to ignore certain issues, and perceived intrusions on privacy. In examining differences related to challenges and barriers to e-leadership based on teachers’ demographics, the ANOVA and independent t-test analyses revealed that most of these differences were non-significant, except for teachers’ gender and teaching experience. To conclude, principals and educational authorities must support teachers with the ongoing training, financial resources, and allocation that are critical in preparing teachers to participate in e-leadership systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset generated and analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Ab Rahman, A. H., Yasoa, M. R., Muhamad, S. F., Abdullah, A., Mohamad, S. R., Samad, N. S. A., & Bahari, N. (2023). Acceptance of E-Learning Post-COVID-19: A case study on pondok school institution. In A. Hamdan, H. M. Shoaib, B. Alareeni, & R. Hamdan (Eds.), The Implementation of smart technologies for business success and sustainability: During covid-19 crises in developing countries (pp. 581–594). Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, D. (2018). Mastering theories of educational leadership and management. University of Malaya Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 28, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, M., Razak, H. A., Omar, M., & Mkpojiogu, E. O. C. (2019). Knowledge Transfer of VLE Frog in Secondary School. Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Information and Education Technologies, 248–251.

  • Akram, M., & Khan, A. M. (2020). Exploring e-leadership of principals: Increasing school effectiveness by learning management system. Journal of Education & Social Sciences, 8(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AlAjmi, M. K. (2022). The impact of digital leadership on teachers’ technology integration during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kuwait. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alazzam, A. B., Bakar, A. R., Hamzah, R., & Asimiran, S. (2012). Effects of demographic characteristics, educational background, and supporting factors on ICT readiness of technical and vocational teachers in Malaysia. International Education Studies, 5(6), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albidewi, I. (2016). E-leadership system: A futuristic vision. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 2(2), 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Emran, M., & Malik, S. I. (2016). The Impact of Google Apps at Work: Higher Educational Perspective. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 10(4), 85–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Harthi, A. S. A. (2017). Technology self-efficacy among school leaders in Oman: A preliminary study. Journal of Further and Higher Education., 41(6), 760–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. M. (1998). A descriptive study of principals’ and teachers’ perceptions of the value of technology for schools. Unpublished doctorate dissertation. University of Cincinnati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (2003). Adding the “E” to E-Leadership: How it may impact your leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 615–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awidi, I. T., & Cooper, M. (2015). Using management procedure gaps to enhance e-learning implementation in Africa. Computers & Education, 90, 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagger, M., & Sterner, O. (2022). E-leadership and its influence on employees: A qualitative study from the perspective of employee working on site. A report of a degree project. Umea School of Business, Economics and Statistics. UMEA University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barakabitze, A. A., Kitindi, E. J., Sanga, C., Kibirige, G., & Makwinya, N. (2015). Exploring students’ skills and attitudes on effective use of ICTs: Case study selected Tanzanian public secondary schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, I., & Presser, O. (2013). E-Leadership of school principals: Increasing school effectiveness by a school data management system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 1000–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Digital competences and long-term ICT integration in school culture: The perspective of elementary school leaders. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 769–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundrett, M., & Rhodes, C. (2013). Researching educational leadership and management: Methods and approaches. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, T. (2012). Authenticity in research: Reliability, validity and triangulation. In A. Briggs, M. Coleman, & M. Morrison (Eds.), Research Methods in Educational Leadership and Management (3rd ed., pp. 91–105). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carreño, I. G. (2014). Educational leadership: E-leadership importance in virtual education. Academia Journal of Educational Research, 2(7), 110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattagni, A., & Farris, E. (2001). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994–2000 (NCES 2001–071). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

  • Cetinkaya, L. (2019). The usage of social network services in school management and their effects. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues., 11(1), 116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-H., & Jang, S.-J. (2014). Interrelationship between stages of concern and technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: A study on Taiwanese senior high school in-service teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., Zhou, C., & Wu, D. (2020). Research on the information literacy evaluation indicator system for primary and secondary school teachers. China Educational Technology, 8, 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., Liu, Y., Li, Z., & Li, Y. (2022). Promoting teacher information literacy from a principal’s perspective based on intermediate chain analysis. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11157-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheok, M. L., Wong, S. L., Mohd Ayub, A. F., & Mahmud, R. (2020). What influence Malaysian teachers’ satisfaction towards the FROG virtual learning environment? A structural equation modelling. Proceedings of the ICCE 2020 - 28th International Conference on Computers in Education, 1, 640–645.

  • Chou, C. M., Shen, C. H., Hsiao, H. C., & Shen, T. C. (2019). Factors influencing teachers’ innovative teaching behaviour with information and communication technology (ICT): The mediator role of organisational innovation climate. Educational Psychology, 39(1), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, Y. P., & Chua, Y. P. (2017). How are e-leadership practices in implementing a school virtual learning environment enhanced? A grounded model study. Computers & Education, 109, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). Sage.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Divaharan, S., & Lim, C. P. (2010). Secondary school socio-cultural context influencing ICT integration: A case study approach. Australasia Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elyousfi, F., Anand, A., & Dalmasso, A. (2021). Impact of e-leadership and team dynamics on virtual team performance in a public organization. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(5), 508–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embong, A. H., MohdGhazaly, M., MohdYasin, M. F., & Abdul Rahman, B. (2023). Covid-19 pandemic implications on quran subjects at primary school in malaysia: A new solution based on 3t quranic basic module. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(3), 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, H. (2012). What is our current understanding of one-to-one computer projects: A systematic narrative research review? Educational Research Review, 7, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonstad, N. (2013). E-leadership: e-skills for competitiveness and innovation vision, roadmap and foresight scenarios: Final report, e-skills vision. The European Commission, 67–103.

  • Franciosi, S. J. (2012). Transformational leadership in a digital culture. Digital, Culture and Education., 42(2), 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghavifekr, S., & Wong, S. Y. (2022). Technology leadership in Malaysian schools: The way forward to Education 4.0 – ICT utilization and digital transformation. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 13(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L., & Anthony, A. (2016). Teaching and learning with ICT tools: Issues and challenges from teachers’ perceptions. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 38–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotkas, Y., Gedik, N., & Baydas, O. (2013). Enablers and barriers to the use of ICT in primary schools in Turkey: A comparative study 2005–2011. Computers & Education, 68, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronow, M. (2007). ICT leadership in school education. Paper presented at the Australian Catholic University Conference, Sydney, Australia.

  • Gurr, D. (2000). How information and communication technology is changing the work of principals. Paper presented at the International Congress of School Effectiveness and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, D. (2004). ICT, leadership in education and e-leadership. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25(1), 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, M. (2019). Understanding the sharp primary level enrolment increases beginning in 2011.Working Papers 08/2018, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajar Umira Md Zaki (2023). Has the education system progressed in line with the Education Blueprint? The Malaysian Reserve, June 21st, 2023.

  • Hamidon, N. (2021). Case study: challenges and solutions of online learning during the COVID 19 pandemic for students in secondary schools. Paper presented at the International Conference of Research on Language Education (I-RoLE) 2021, 23-24 March 2021, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Melaka.

  • Hamzah, N. H., Nasir, M. K. M., & Abdul Wahab, J. (2021). The Effects of principals’ digital leadership on teachers’ digital teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(2), 216–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2017). A Practical guide for beginning researchers (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawati, A.H. & Jarud R.K. (2020). COVID-19 and unequal Learning. Khazanah Research Institute Views. Retrieved on December, 12, 2021 from http://www.krinstitute.org/assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/20200426_Covid_Education_v3.pdf.

  • Hedberg, J., Harper, B., & Bloch, D. (1992). Educational information systems: Problems of the small educational organisation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 132–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Chapman & Hall.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Ma, J., & Yang, J. (2021). What to teach? Strategies for developing digital competency in preservice teacher training. Computers & Education, 165(4), 104149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, F., & Teo, T. (2020). Influence of teacher-perceived organisational culture and school policy on Chinese teachers’ intention to use technology: An extension of technology acceptance model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1547–1567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W. H. D., Hood, D. W., & Yoo, S. J. (2012). Gender divide and acceptance of collaborative web 2.0 applications for learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 16, 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humbly, L., O’Neill, T., & Kline, T. (2007). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, M. Y. (2015). Model of virtual leadership, intra-team communication and job performance among school leaders in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 674–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indra, R., Ritonga, M., & Kustati, M. (2022). E-leadership of the school principals in implementing online learning during COVID-19 pandemic at public senior high schools. Frontiers in Education, 7, 973274. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.973274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkster, C.D. (1998). Technology leadership in elementary school principals: A comparative case study. Unpublished doctorate dissertation. University of Minnesota.

  • Ishak, A. R., Adnan, N. A., Aziz, M. Y., Nazl, S. N., Mualif, S. A., Ishar, S. M., Suaidi, N. A., & Aziz, M. Y. A. (2022). The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on depression, anxiety, and stress among teachers in malaysia: A cross-sectional study. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 18(8), 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, A., Ujang, N., Masek, A., Razali, S. S., & Hashim, S. (2018). The application of FROG VLE system in teaching and facilitating among vocational colleges lecturers. Proceeding of the 2018 IEEE 10th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 168–172.

  • Jameson, J. (2013). E-Leadership in higher education: The fifth “age” of educational technology research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 889–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamarudin, K. H., Hassan, A. A. G., Mohamed, A., Yahya, A. S., & Rashid, M. F. (2022). Stay-at-home: Impact of pandemic covid-19 on the use of indoor space in Malaysian households. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1082(1), 12009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashif, M. N. U., & Ali, M. N. (2019). E-Leadership: Secondary school heads and contemporary needs. International Journal of Distance Education and E- Learning., 4(2), 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiboro, K. D. (2018). Influence of teachers’ demographic characteristics on information communication technologies integration in instruction in lower primary schools in Kiambu county. The School of Education, Kenyatta University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. Y. (2019). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: the independent t-test. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 44(3), e26. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Researchers (4th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulshreshtha, K., & Sharma, G. (2021). Understanding e-leadership: Please mind the gap. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 168, 120750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B., & Schrum, L. (2013). Using systems thinking to leverage technology for school improvement: Lessons learned from award-winning secondary schools/districts. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, G., Fu, W., & Wang, K. (2019). Analysis of t-test misuses and SPSS operations in medical research papers. Burn & Trauma, 31(7), 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P. (2007). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: Pedagogical and policy implications. Educational Technology Resource & Development, 55(1), 83–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Van Wart, M., Kim, S., Wang, X., McCarthy, A., & Ready, D. (2020). The effects of national cultures on two technologically advanced countries: The case of e-leadership in South Korea and the United States. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(3), 298–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelace, K.J. (2015). A case study of e-leadership constructs: an assessment of leadership in a healthcare organization. Unpublished EdD dissertation, The University of San Francisco.

  • May, S. J. (2003). The impact of technology on job effectiveness: Perceptions of high school principals. Unpublished doctorate dissertation. Dekalb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingaine, L. (2013). Leadership challenges in the implementation of ICT in public secondary schools. Kenya. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2019). Executive summary: ICT transformation plan 2019–2023. In Pelan Transformasi ICT. Retrieved from: https://www.moe.gov.my/penerbitan?search=&category=.

  • Mishra, P., Henriksen, D., Boltz, L. O., & Richardson, C. (2016). E-leadership and teacher development using ICT. In R. Huang, Kinshuk, & J. K. Price (Eds.), ICT in Education in Global Context (pp. 249–266). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

  • Moreira, M. A., Rivero, V. M. H., & Alonso, J. J. S. (2019). Leadership and school integration of ICT. Teachers’ perceptions in Spain. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 549–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mtebe. (2020). Applying UNESCO ICT competency framework to evaluate Teachers’ ICT competence levels in Tanzania. Handbook of research on innovative pedagogies and best practices in teacher education (pp. 350–366). IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computer & Education, 51(4), 1523–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordin, F. N., Ahmad, N. Z. B., Asbulah, L. H. B., & Safian, N. B. A. (2023). Online language learning strategies in institutes of higher learning (ipt) in malaysia during the post Covid-19. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(9), 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordin, N., Nordin, N. N., Nordin, N. I. A., & Nordin, N. F. (2023). The successful factors of online learning for Malaysian higher education students: A smart PLS-SEM analysis. In B. Alareeni & A. Hamdan (Eds.), Innovation of Businesses, and Digitalization during Covid-19 Pandemic (pp. 803–815). Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, S. M., Avey, J., Larson, M., & Hughes, L. (2020). The development of trust in virtual leader–follower relationships. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 15(3), 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, S. P., & Chua, Y. P. (2018). An explorative review of e-leadership studies. International Online Journal of Educational Leadership, 2(1), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrowick, J. (2016). A study of existing e-education initiatives. NECT internal report, 17, February 2016.

  • Othman, N. A. F., Jaini, A., Ismail, M., Zainoddin, A. I., Radzi, S. F. M., & Sundram, V. P. K. (2023). Gamification in online learning: A case study among university students in malaysia. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(2), 282–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou, P., & Charalambous, K. (2011). Principals’ attitudes towards ICT and their perceptions about the factors that facilitate or inhibit ICT integration in primary schools of Cyprus. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoong, S. Y., Phoong, S. W., & Phoong, K. H. (2020). The effectiveness of frog virtual learning environment in teaching and learning mathematics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3B), 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman, T., & Ismail. (2019). Principals’ technology leadership and its effect on teachers’ technology integration in 21st century classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman, A., & Rathakrishnan, M. (2018). FROG VLE: Teachers’ technology acceptance using utaut model. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(3), 529–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, A., & Shariff, S. B. (2017). Relationship between technology leadership, ICT facility, competency, commitments and teachers’ practices on implementations with effective teacher’s management tasks in schools. Scholedge International Journal of Multidisciplinary & Allied Studies, 4(9), 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub, L. A., Shukor, N. A., Arshad, M. Y., & Rosli, M. S. (2015). An integrated model to implement contextual learning with virtual learning environment for promoting higher order thinking skills in Malaysian secondary schools. International Education Studies, 8(13), 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razak, N. A., Ab Jalil, H., & Ismail, I. A. (2019). Challenges in ICT Integration among Malaysian public primary education teachers: The roles of leaders and stakeholders. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(24), 184–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzak, N. A. (2015). Challenges facing school leadership in promoting ICT integration in instruction in the public schools of Bahrain. Education and Information Technologies, 20, 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. W., & McLeod, S. (2011). Technology leadership in native American schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(7), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, F., Pozuelos, F., & León, J. (2014). The role of ICT coordinator. Priority and time dedicated to professional functions. Computers & Education, 72, 262–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraih, F., Wong, S. L., Asimiran, S., & Khambari, M. N. (2022). Contemporary communication conduit among exemplar school principals in Malaysian schools. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00179-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen, T. (2014). Trust-Building in e-Leadership: A Case Study of Leaders’ Challenges and Skills in Technology-Mediated Interaction. Journal of Global Business Issues, 8(2), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvanathan, M., Mohamed Hussin, N. A., & NorAzizi, N. A. (2023). Students learning experiences during COVID-19: Work from home period in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions. Teaching Public Administration, 41(1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanmugam, K., Zainal, N. K., & Gnanasekaren, C. (2019). Technology foresight in the virtual learning environment in Malaysia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1228(1).

  • Sincar, M. (2013). Challenges school principals facing in the context of technology leadership. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 1273–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockemer, D. (2019). Quantitative methods for the social sciences: A practical introduction with examples in SPSS and Stata. Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2015). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers and Education, 24, 252–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. H., Chan, P. P., & Mohd Said, N.-E. (2021). Higher Education Students’ Online Instruction Perceptions: A Quality Virtual Learning Environment. Sustainability, 13(19), 10840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telem, M. (1990). Educational DSS: Potential services, benefits, difficulties, and dangers”. Computers & Education, 14(1), 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telem, M. (1991). A knowledge base for information technology in educational administration. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(4), 594–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telem, M., & Buvitski, T. (1995). The potential impact of information technology on the high school principal: A preliminary exploration. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27(3), 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terkamo-Moisio, A., Karki, S., Kangasniemi, M., Lammintakanen, J., & Häggman- Laitila, A. (2021). Towards remote leadership in health care: Lessons learned from an integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(3), 595–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thang, S. M., Mahmud, N., MohdJaafar, N., Ng, L. L. S., & Abdul Aziz, N. B. (2022). Online learning engagement among Malaysian primary school students during the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change., 16(2), 302–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thannimalai, T., & Baloh, S. (2021). Challenges of Tamil Language PDPR in Rural Schools. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 183–190.

  • Thannimalai, R., & Raman, A. (2018). The influence of principals’ technology leadership and professional development on teachers’ technology integration in secondary schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 15(1), 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinashe, M. (2022). A demographic perspective on university lecturers’ use of information communication technologies in teaching. European Journal of Social Science Studies, 6(3), 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totolo, A. (2011). Adoption and use of computer technology among school principals in Botswana secondary schools. The International Information & Library Review, 43, 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wart, M., Roman, A., Wang, X., Liu, C., Reiter, R., & Klenk, T. (2019). Operationalizing the definition of e-leadership: Identifying the elements of e-leadership. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 80–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahab, R. A., Ismail, S., & Cusairi, R. M. (2023). Implementation and Challenges of Home-Based Teaching and Learning (PdPR) in Religious Schools in Kubang Pasu. Kedah. World Journal of English Language, 13(6), 339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. (2010). Technology leadership among school principals: A technology-coordinator’s perspective. Asian Social Science, 6(1), 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., & Britt, C. (2014). Statistics in criminal justice. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiyono, B. B., Komariah, A., Alghamdi, A. A., & Fahlevi, M. (2023). The influence of principals’ e-leadership on the effectiveness of schools’ public relations and organizational improvement. Sustainability, 15, 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., Pang, J., & Chi, J. (2022). Through the COVID-19 to Prospect Online School Learning: Voices of students from China, Lebanon, and the US. Education Sciences, 12, 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G. T., Yusop, F. D., & Leng, C. H. (2022). Predictors of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) Learning Satisfaction: A Recipe for Success. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30(4), 1781–1807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeoh, A. (2020). MCO: As lessons move online, local teachers and students struggle with uneven Internet access. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/technews/2020/04/27/mco-as-lessons-move-online-local-teachers-and-students-strugglewith-uneven-Internet-access

  • Yusof, M. R., Yaakob, M. F. M., & Ibrahim, M. Y. (2019). Digital leadership among school leaders in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(9), 1481–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuting, Z., Adams, D., & Lee, K. C. S. (2022). The relationship between technology leadership and teacher ICT competency in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11037-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenda, R., & Dlamini, R. (2022). Examining factors that influence teachers to adopt information and Communication Technology in rural secondary schools: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11198-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors felt grateful to all who contributed to the research phase.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lokman Mohd Tahir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ping, C.S., Tahir, L.M., Rosli, M.S. et al. Challenges and barriers to e-leadership participation: Examining the perspectives of Malaysian secondary school teachers. Educ Inf Technol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12206-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12206-5

Keywords

Navigation