Abstract
The purpose of this study is to look at the factors that contribute to the success of online learning in Malaysian higher education institutions. To evaluate the results, 352 samples were gathered and analysed using the Smart-PLS-Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach. Usability, technological competence, financial aid, and the function of the lecturer all play a part in motivating effective online learning for higher education institutions, according to the report. Except for technical abilities in online learning, all elements affect sustained good efficacy. The result revealed that all direct relationship were supported by the data except technical competencies. The study will help improve the online learning system and the study higher education institution are increasingly adopting learning as both an alternative channel for existing student to traditional classroom learning and as a way to expand their reach to new student. Adopting online learning and associated technology necessitates a considerable investment in terms of personnel, money, energy, and space, all of which must be justified by administrators and those in positions of educational leadership. For the recommendation, ministry of higher education should ensure that student can assess the internet and web where ever they are and ensure this is a the successful factors of online learning among higher education student.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abouzahra, M.M.: Building the e-learning system in King Saud University, a system perspective. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 2(1), pp. 247–253 (2011)
Albarrak, A.I.: Designing E-learning Systems in Medical Education: A Case Study. In: Sixth International Internet Education Conference (2007). September 2–4, 2007
Aldwyn, C.: What is the importance of web usability? Modern Web Design and Usability, 19 January 2013. http://access-matters.com/what-is-the-importance-of-web-usability. Accessed 5 Feb 2013
Allen, I.E., Seaman, J.: Going the Distance: Online Education in the United States, 2011. Sloane Consortium website (2011a). http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/going_distance_201
Allen, I.E., Seaman, J.: Going the Distance: Online Education in the United States, 2011. Sloane Consortium website (2011b). http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/going_distance_2011
Alsheri, A., Rutter, M., Smith, S.: Assessing the relative importance of an E-learning system’s usability design characteristics based on students’ Preferences. Eur. J. Educ. Res. 8(3), 839–855 (2019). https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.839
Ayub, N., Iqbal, S.: Student satisfaction with e-Learning achieved in Pakistan. Asian J. Distance Educ. 9(2), 26–31 (2011)
Berenson, R., Boyles, G., Weaver, A.: Emotional intelligence as a predictor for success in online learning. Int. Rev. Res. Open Dist. Learn. 9(2), 116 (2008)
Cain, M.K., Zhang, Z., Yuan, K.H.: Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: prevalence, influence and estimation. Behav. Res. Methods 49(5), 1716–1735 (2017)
Cercone, K.: Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning design. AACE J. 16(2), 137159 (2008)
Dabbagh, N.: The online learner: characteristics and pedagogical implications. Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 7(3), 217226 (2007)
Feldstein, M.: What is usable e-learning? (2002) eLearn, Sep 2002
Fry, K.: E learning markets and providers: some issues and prospects. Train. Educ. 233–239 (2001)
George, D., Mallery, P.: Cronbach’s alpha. In: SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (2003). 11.0 Update
Hahn, E.D., Ang, S.H.: From the editors: new directions in the reporting of statistical results in the Journal of World Business. J. World Bus. 52(2), 125–126 (2017)
Hair Jr, J.F., Matthews, L.M., Matthews, R.L., Sarstedt, M.: PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal. 1(2), 107–123 (2017)
Hoelter, J.W.: The analysis of covariance structures: goodness-of-fit indices. Sociol. Methods Res. 11(3), 325–344 (1983)
Hong, Z., Bednarek, S.Y., Blumwald, E., Hwang, I., Jurgens, G., Menzel, D., Verma, D.P.S.: A unified nomenclature for Arabidopsis dynaminrelated large GTPases based on homology and possible functions. Plant Mol. Biol. 53(3), 261–265 (2003)
Jones, J., Gaffney-Rhys, R., Jones, E.: Social network sites and student–lecturer communication: an academic voice. J. Furth. High. Educ. 35(2), 201–219 (2011)
Lee, B.C., Yoon, J.O., Kee, I.: Learner’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: theories and results. J. Comput. Educ. 53(4), 1320–1329 (2009)
Malek, M.A., Kumar, S.V.: FinTech knowledge among the finance student in Telangana State. Int. J. Res. Eng. Appl. Manag. (IJREAM). 05(09), 103–113 (2019)
Moody, J.: Distance education: why are the attrition rates so high? Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 5(3), 205210 (2004)
Moore, J.L., Dickson-Deane, C., Galyen, K.: E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: are they the same? Internet High. Educ. 14, 129–135 (2011)
Moore, M.G., Kearsley, G.: Distance Education: A Systems View. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA (2005)
Muilenburg, L.Y., Berge, Z.L.: Student barriers to online learning: a factor analytic study. Distance Educ. 26(1), 2948 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269
Nur Farida, M., Soesatyo, Y., Aji, T.S.: Influence of financial literacy and use of financial technology on financial satisfaction through financial behavior. Int. J. Educ. Lit. Stud. 1(9), 86–95 (2021)
Nycz, M., Cohen, E.: The basics for understanding e-learning. Principles of effective online teaching, 1–17 (2007)
Nagy, A.: The impact of e-learning. In: E-Content, pp. 79–96. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005)
Park, J., Choi, H.J.: Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(4), 207217 (2009)
Park, J.: Factors related to learner dropout in online learning. In: Nafukho, F.M., Chermack, T.H., Graham, C.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2007 Academy of Human Resource Development Annual Conference. AHRD, Indianapolis, IN (2007). 25–125–8
Rafaeli, S., Sudweeks, F.: Networked interactivity. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 2(4) (1997). JCMC243
Selim, H.M.: An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Comput. Educ. 40(4), 343–360 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S03601315(02)00142-2
Simsim, M.T.: Internet usage and user preferences in Saudi Arabia. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 23(2), 101–107 (2011)
Šumak, B., Heričko, M., Pušnik, M.: A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: the role of user types and e-learning technology types. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(6), 2067–2077 (2011)
Swan, K.: Learning effectiveness: what the research tell us’. In: Bourne, J., Moore, J.C. (eds.) Elements of Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction, Sloane Center for Online Education, pp. 1345. Needham, MA (2003)
Tirrell, T., Quick, D.: Checkering’s seven principles of good practice: student attrition in community college online courses. Commun. Coll. J. Res. Pract. 36(8), 580590 (2012)
Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., Head, M.: Who is responsible for e-learning success in higher education? A stakeholders’ analysis. Educ. Technol. Soc. 26–36 (2008)
Yan, P., Guo, J.: The research of web usability design. In: Proceeding In Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE), 2010. The 2nd International Conference on, vol. 4, pp. 480–483 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nordin, N., Nordin, N.N., Nordin, N.I.A., Nordin, N.F. (2023). The Successful Factors of Online Learning for Malaysia Higher Education Students: Smart PLS-SEM Analysis. In: Alareeni, B., Hamdan, A. (eds) Innovation of Businesses, and Digitalization during Covid-19 Pandemic. ICBT 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 488. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08090-6_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08090-6_51
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08089-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08090-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)