Skip to main content

The Successful Factors of Online Learning for Malaysia Higher Education Students: Smart PLS-SEM Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovation of Businesses, and Digitalization during Covid-19 Pandemic (ICBT 2021)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to look at the factors that contribute to the success of online learning in Malaysian higher education institutions. To evaluate the results, 352 samples were gathered and analysed using the Smart-PLS-Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach. Usability, technological competence, financial aid, and the function of the lecturer all play a part in motivating effective online learning for higher education institutions, according to the report. Except for technical abilities in online learning, all elements affect sustained good efficacy. The result revealed that all direct relationship were supported by the data except technical competencies. The study will help improve the online learning system and the study higher education institution are increasingly adopting learning as both an alternative channel for existing student to traditional classroom learning and as a way to expand their reach to new student. Adopting online learning and associated technology necessitates a considerable investment in terms of personnel, money, energy, and space, all of which must be justified by administrators and those in positions of educational leadership. For the recommendation, ministry of higher education should ensure that student can assess the internet and web where ever they are and ensure this is a the successful factors of online learning among higher education student.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abouzahra, M.M.: Building the e-learning system in King Saud University, a system perspective. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 2(1), pp. 247–253 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Albarrak, A.I.: Designing E-learning Systems in Medical Education: A Case Study. In: Sixth International Internet Education Conference (2007). September 2–4, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldwyn, C.: What is the importance of web usability? Modern Web Design and Usability, 19 January 2013. http://access-matters.com/what-is-the-importance-of-web-usability. Accessed 5 Feb 2013

  • Allen, I.E., Seaman, J.: Going the Distance: Online Education in the United States, 2011. Sloane Consortium website (2011a). http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/going_distance_201

  • Allen, I.E., Seaman, J.: Going the Distance: Online Education in the United States, 2011. Sloane Consortium website (2011b). http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/going_distance_2011

  • Alsheri, A., Rutter, M., Smith, S.: Assessing the relative importance of an E-learning system’s usability design characteristics based on students’ Preferences. Eur. J. Educ. Res. 8(3), 839–855 (2019). https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.839

  • Ayub, N., Iqbal, S.: Student satisfaction with e-Learning achieved in Pakistan. Asian J. Distance Educ. 9(2), 26–31 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenson, R., Boyles, G., Weaver, A.: Emotional intelligence as a predictor for success in online learning. Int. Rev. Res. Open Dist. Learn. 9(2), 116 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M.K., Zhang, Z., Yuan, K.H.: Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: prevalence, influence and estimation. Behav. Res. Methods 49(5), 1716–1735 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cercone, K.: Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning design. AACE J. 16(2), 137159 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N.: The online learner: characteristics and pedagogical implications. Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 7(3), 217226 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M.: What is usable e-learning? (2002) eLearn, Sep 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, K.: E learning markets and providers: some issues and prospects. Train. Educ. 233–239 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • George, D., Mallery, P.: Cronbach’s alpha. In: SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (2003). 11.0 Update

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, E.D., Ang, S.H.: From the editors: new directions in the reporting of statistical results in the Journal of World Business. J. World Bus. 52(2), 125–126 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr, J.F., Matthews, L.M., Matthews, R.L., Sarstedt, M.: PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal. 1(2), 107–123 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelter, J.W.: The analysis of covariance structures: goodness-of-fit indices. Sociol. Methods Res. 11(3), 325–344 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Z., Bednarek, S.Y., Blumwald, E., Hwang, I., Jurgens, G., Menzel, D., Verma, D.P.S.: A unified nomenclature for Arabidopsis dynaminrelated large GTPases based on homology and possible functions. Plant Mol. Biol. 53(3), 261–265 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J., Gaffney-Rhys, R., Jones, E.: Social network sites and student–lecturer communication: an academic voice. J. Furth. High. Educ. 35(2), 201–219 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B.C., Yoon, J.O., Kee, I.: Learner’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: theories and results. J. Comput. Educ. 53(4), 1320–1329 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Malek, M.A., Kumar, S.V.: FinTech knowledge among the finance student in Telangana State. Int. J. Res. Eng. Appl. Manag. (IJREAM). 05(09), 103–113 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J.: Distance education: why are the attrition rates so high? Q. Rev. Distance Educ. 5(3), 205210 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.L., Dickson-Deane, C., Galyen, K.: E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: are they the same? Internet High. Educ. 14, 129–135 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.G., Kearsley, G.: Distance Education: A Systems View. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muilenburg, L.Y., Berge, Z.L.: Student barriers to online learning: a factor analytic study. Distance Educ. 26(1), 2948 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nur Farida, M., Soesatyo, Y., Aji, T.S.: Influence of financial literacy and use of financial technology on financial satisfaction through financial behavior. Int. J. Educ. Lit. Stud. 1(9), 86–95 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nycz, M., Cohen, E.: The basics for understanding e-learning. Principles of effective online teaching, 1–17 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, A.: The impact of e-learning. In: E-Content, pp. 79–96. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Choi, H.J.: Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(4), 207217 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.: Factors related to learner dropout in online learning. In: Nafukho, F.M., Chermack, T.H., Graham, C.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2007 Academy of Human Resource Development Annual Conference. AHRD, Indianapolis, IN (2007). 25–125–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, S., Sudweeks, F.: Networked interactivity. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 2(4) (1997). JCMC243

    Google Scholar 

  • Selim, H.M.: An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Comput. Educ. 40(4), 343–360 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S03601315(02)00142-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsim, M.T.: Internet usage and user preferences in Saudi Arabia. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 23(2), 101–107 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Šumak, B., Heričko, M., Pušnik, M.: A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: the role of user types and e-learning technology types. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(6), 2067–2077 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, K.: Learning effectiveness: what the research tell us’. In: Bourne, J., Moore, J.C. (eds.) Elements of Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction, Sloane Center for Online Education, pp. 1345. Needham, MA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirrell, T., Quick, D.: Checkering’s seven principles of good practice: student attrition in community college online courses. Commun. Coll. J. Res. Pract. 36(8), 580590 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., Head, M.: Who is responsible for e-learning success in higher education? A stakeholders’ analysis. Educ. Technol. Soc. 26–36 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, P., Guo, J.: The research of web usability design. In: Proceeding In Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE), 2010. The 2nd International Conference on, vol. 4, pp. 480–483 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurhaiza Nordin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nordin, N., Nordin, N.N., Nordin, N.I.A., Nordin, N.F. (2023). The Successful Factors of Online Learning for Malaysia Higher Education Students: Smart PLS-SEM Analysis. In: Alareeni, B., Hamdan, A. (eds) Innovation of Businesses, and Digitalization during Covid-19 Pandemic. ICBT 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 488. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08090-6_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08090-6_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08089-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08090-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics