Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unleashing imagination: an effective pedagogical approach to integrate into spherical video-based virtual reality to improve students’ creative writing

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Creative writing is a valuable skill that enables learners to become proficient writers. One reason students often struggle with creative writing is their lack of contextual experiences. Spherical video-based virtual reality (SVVR) has been argued to support students’ writing through immersive virtual experiences. However, what specific pedagogical practices can be developed and integrated with emerging technologies like SVVR to improve their effectiveness to support elementary school students’ creative writing needs further work. This study proposes an innovative approach that integrated the generative learning strategy (GLS) of imagining with SVVR to enhance elementary school students’ creative writing performance. To test the effectiveness of the proposed approach, a quasi-experiment was conducted in an elementary school writing class. The experimental group (N = 56) used the generative learning-based SVVR approach (GSVVR), while the control group (N = 55) used the generative learning-based conventional approach (GC). The results showed that the GSVVR group outperformed the GC group in terms of creative writing (F = 10.953, p < 0.01) with a medium effect size. Furthermore, we found a significant impact on students’ behavioural and emotional engagement as well as their learning persistence, particularly if they had engagement values below 4.3 before the intervention. These findings indicates that while the approach may have limited benefits for students who are already highly engaged (engagement values exceeding 4.3) with SVVR. It can also notably enhance the performance of relatively less engaged (engagement values below 4.3) students. There was a positive correlation between learning persistence and creative writing in the GSVVR group, with learning persistence being one of the significant predictors of student creative writing performance. The study is concluded with a discussion on the pedagogical and theoretical implications of the findings to support elementary school students’ creative writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abdelrahim, A. A. (2023). The impact of a critical fiction analysis based on using augmented reality technology on developing students’ critical thinking and critical writing at Tabuk University. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231155578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbot, B., Tan, M., Randi, J., Santa-Donato, G., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2012). Essential skills for creative writing: Integrating multiple domain-specific perspectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, A. J., Pack, A., & Quaid, E. D. (2021). Understanding learners’ acceptance of high-immersion virtual reality systems: Insights from confirmatory and exploratory PLS-SEM analyses. Computers & Education, 169, 104214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Zhou, J. (2010). Creative writing strategies of young children: Evidence from a study of chinese emergent writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(3), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., & Chao, G. C. N. (2021). Modeling learners’ self-concept in chinese descriptive writing based on the affordances of a virtual reality-supported environment. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6013–6032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10582-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. T., Li, M., Huang, C. Q., Han, Z. M., Hwang, G. J., & Yang, G. (2022). Promoting deep writing with immersive technologies: An SVVR-supported chinese composition writing approach for primary schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 2071–2091. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Alonzo, K. T. (2004). The Johnson-Neyman procedure as an alternative to ANCOVA. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 26(7), 804–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945904266733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale (grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhoff, A., & Urbach, J. (2008). Understanding imaginative thinking during childhood: Sociocultural conceptions of creativity and imaginative thought. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0261-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endres, T., Weyreter, S., Renkl, A., & Eitel, A. (2020). When and why does emotional design foster learning? Evidence for situational interest as a mediator of increased persistence. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, J. D. (1970). Giftedness and writing: Creativity in the classroom. Gifted Child Quarterly, 14, 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627001400406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essex, C. (1996). Teaching creative writing in the elementary school. ERIC Digest.

  • Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding. Cambridge University Press.

  • Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 717–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., & Susilawati, Dewi, S. M. (2019). Generative learning models assisted by virtual laboratories to improve students’ creativity in physics. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(7), 403–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, T. G. (2005). Creating literacy instruction for all students. Allyn and Bacon Publishers.

  • Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg, & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Erlbaum.

  • Hu, S., & Kuh, G. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020114231387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. L., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Learning to be a writer: A spherical video-based virtual reality approach to supporting descriptive article writing in high school chinese courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2251–2270. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jong, M. S. Y., Tsai, C. C., Xie, H., & Kwan-Kit Wong, F. (2020). Integrating interactive learner-immersed video- based virtual reality into learning and teaching of physical geography. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2064–2079. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jong, M. S. Y., Luk, E. T. H., Leung, J. K. P., & Poon, S. S. K. (2018, October 7). EduVenture VR [Computer platform]. Centre for Learning Sciences and Technologies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong http://vr.ev-cuhk.net/.

  • Klingenberg, S., Jørgensen, M. L., Dandanell, G., Skriver, K., Mottelson, A., & Makransky, G. (2020). Investigating the effect of teaching as a generative learning strategy when learning through desktop and immersive VR: A media and methods experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2115–2138. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, Y. J., & Tam, V. T. T. (2022). The impact of 360 videos on basic chinese writing: A preliminary exploration. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10162-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, Y. J., Lyu, B. N., & Chin, C. K. (2019). Does a 3D immersive experience enhance Mandarin writing by CSL students? Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10125/44686.

  • Leroy, A., & Romero, M. (2022). Creative intention and persistence in educational robotic. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(4), 1247–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10128-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., Chen, Y. T., Huang, C. Q., Hwang, G. J., & Cukurova, M. (2023). From motivational experience to creative writing: A motivational AR-based learning approach to promoting Chinese writing performance and positive writing behaviours. Computers & Education, 202, 104844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104844

  • Lin, J. P. (1998). A creative writing classroom. Psychological Press.

  • Lin, V., Barrett, N. E., Liu, G. Z., Chen, N. S., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2021). Supporting dyadic learning of English for tourism purposes with scenery-based virtual reality. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1954663.

  • Liu, C. C., Guo, Y., Hwang, G. J., Tu, Y. F., & Wang, Z. (2023). Effects of an article-structure strategy-based spherical video-based virtual reality approach on EFL learners’ english reading comprehension and learning conceptions. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2155840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh, E. K. (2019). What we know about expectancy-value theory, and how it helps to design a sustained motivating learning environment. System, 86, 102119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, B. J., & Nordgren, L. F. (2015). People underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(2), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makransky, G., & Mayer, R. E. (2022). Benefits of taking a virtual field trip in immersive virtual reality: Evidence for the immersion principle in multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1771–1798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09675-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makransky, G., Andreasen, N. K., Baceviciute, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2021). Immersive virtual reality increases liking but not learning with a science simulation and generative learning strategies promote learning in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 719–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, J., Cunha, J., Lopes, S., Moreira, T., & Rosário, P. (2022). School engagement in elementary school: A systematic review of 35 years of research. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 793–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09642-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Makransky, G., & Parong, J. (2022). The promise and pitfalls of learning in immersive virtual reality. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2108563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moma, L., Kusumah, Y. S., Sabandar, J., & Dahlan, J. A. (2013). The enhancement of junior high school students mathematical creative thinking abilities through generative learning. Mathematical Theory and Modeling, 3(8), 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. J., Quinn, C., Marrington, A., & Clarke, J. A. (2012). Good practice for enhancing the engagement and success of commencing students. Higher Education, 63, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9426-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oral, G. (2003). Yine yazı yazıyoruz. [We are writing once again]. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.

  • Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patera, M., Draper, S., & Naef, M. (2008). Exploring magic cottage: A virtual reality environment for stimulating children’s imaginative writing. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820802114093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plum, L. (1982). Visual thinking: A whole brain approach. Challenge, 1, 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., & Newby, T. (2006). The role of students’ cognitive engagement in online learning. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2001_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of augmented reality technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers & Education, 144, 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing Research (pp. 171–183). Guilford Press.

  • Sharples, M. (1996). An account of writing as creative design. In C. M. Levy, & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 127–148). Routledge.

  • Sun, F. R., Pan, L. F., Wan, R. G., Li, H., & Wu, S. J. (2021). Detecting the effect of student engagement in an SVVR school-based course on higher level competence development in elementary schools by SEM. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. L., & Barbot, B. (2021). Dual pathways in creative writing processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000415.

  • Taylor, C. L., Kaufman, J. C., & Barbot, B. (2021). Measuring creative writing with the storyboard task: The role of effort and story length. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(2), 476–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temizkan, M. (2011). The effect of creative writing activities on the story writing skill. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(2), 933–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance tests of creative thinking-norms-technical manual research edition-verbal tests, forms A and B- figural tests, forms A and B. Personnel Press.

  • Torrance, M., & Galbraith, D. (2006). The processing demands of writing. In C. A. C. S. Graham., & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing Research. The Guilford Press.

  • Treffinger, D. J. (2002). Reaffirming the power of creativity and creative problem solving for children and youth. Creative Learning Today, 11, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. Y., & Sun, J. C. Y. (2021). Real-time virtual reality co-creation: Collective intelligence and consciousness for student engagement and focused attention within online communities. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1928711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). SAGE Publications.

  • Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461527409529129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Guo, R., Wang, Z., & Zeng, R. (2021a). Integrating spherical video-based virtual reality into elementary school students’ scientific inquiry instruction: Effects on their problem-solving performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., & Wang, X. (2021). Why do generative learning strategy improve memory in VR?-based on ICALM. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(12), 646–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G., Chen, Y. T., Zheng, X. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). From experiencing to expressing: A virtual reality approach to facilitating pupils’ descriptive paper writing performance and learning behavior engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 807–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. H., Panjaburee, P., Hwang, G. J., & Wongkia, W. (2023). Effects of a self-regulated-based gamified virtual reality system on students’ english learning performance and affection. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2219702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022ZD0117104) and in part by the Key R&D Program of Zhejiang Province (Nos. 2022C03106).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Intelligent Education Technology and Application of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China

    Yu-Ting Chen & Ming Li

  2. UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK

    Mutlu Cukurova

Authors
  1. Yu-Ting Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mutlu Cukurova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ming Li or Mutlu Cukurova.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

There are no ethical issues or conflicts of interest emanating from this study.

Ethical approval

All participants were volunteers who had agreed to participate in the experiment. They were told they could withdraw from the experiment at any time. There are no ethical issues or conflicts of interest emanating from this study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, YT., Li, M. & Cukurova, M. Unleashing imagination: an effective pedagogical approach to integrate into spherical video-based virtual reality to improve students’ creative writing. Educ Inf Technol 29, 6499–6523 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12115-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12115-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation