Abstract
Purpose
To describe cases of unilateral cone–rod dysfunction presenting in two middle-aged females.
Methods
This case series highlights two middle-aged female patients with progressive visual decline in one eye. Fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), multi-focal electroretinogram (mfERG), full-field electroretinogram(ffERG), and genetic testing were obtained.
Results
In the first patient, mfERG showed an extinguished response and ffERG demonstrated markedly reduced a-wave and b-wave amplitudes (more pronounced under photopic conditions) in the right eye. SD-OCT showed attenuation of the ellipsoid zone of the right eye. Similar findings were appreciated in the second patient. Genetic testing in the first patient identified three heterozygous variants in PRPH2, RCBTB1, and USH2A. The second patient was found to have heterozygous variants in BBS1 and ABCA4.
Conclusion
These two cases add to the literature of case reports of unilateral cone–rod and rod-cone dystrophies. However, the underlying etiology of the unilateral pattern of cone–rod dysfunction and the significance of the heterozygous mutations found in both cases remains uncertain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Francois J, Verriest G (1952) Retinopathie pigmentaire unilaterale. Ophthalmologica 124:65–88. https://doi.org/10.1159/000301252
Franceschetti A, Francois J, Babel J (1974) Chorioretinal Heredodegenerations: an updated report of La Société d'Ophtalmologie. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, pp. 266–274
Kolb H, Nr G (1964) Three cases of unilateral pigmentary degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 48(9):471–479. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.48.9
Errea MH, Robson AG, Wong T et al (2019) Unilateral pigmentary retinopathy: a retrospective case series. Acta Ophthalmol 97:e601–e617. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13981
Sieving PA (1994) Unilateral cone dystrophy’: ERG changes implicate abnormal signaling by hyperpolarizing bipolar and/or horizontal cells. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 92:459–474
Farrell DF (2009) Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone–rod dystrophy. Clin Ophthalmol 3:263–270. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s5130
Nomura R, Kondo M, Tanikawa A, Yamamoto N, Terasaki H, Miyake Y (2001) Unilateral cone dysfunction with bull’s eye maculopathy. Ophthalmology 108(1):49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00450-4
Marsiglia M, Duncker T, Peiretti E, Brodie SE, Tsang SH (2012) Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa: a proposal of genetic pathogenic mechanisms. Eur J Ophthalmol 22(4):654–660. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000086
Sim PY, Jeganathan VSE, Wright AF, Cackett P (2018) Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa occurring in an invidiaul with a mutation in the CLRN1 gene. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2017-222045
Mukhopadhyay R, Holder GE, Moore AT, Webster AR (2011) Unilateral retinitis Pigmentosa occurring in an individual with a germline mutation in the RP1 gene. Arch Ophthalmol 129(7):954–956. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.171
Puech B, De Laey JJ, Holder GE (2014) Inherited Chorioretinal dystrophies: a textbook and atlas. Springer, Heidelberg
Hamel CP (2007) Cone rod dystrophies. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-2-7
Lima LH, Zett C, Kniggendorf V et al (2018) Progressive expansion of the hyperautofluorescent ring in cone–rod dystrophy patients. Ophthalmic Genet 39(4):492–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/13816810.2018.1461911
Stone EM, Andorf JL, Whitmore SS (2017) Clinically focused molecular investigation of 1000 consecutive families with inherited Retinal disease. Ophthalmology 124(9):1314–1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.008
Funding
The authors declared that they have no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for authorship.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The following authors have no financial disclosures: SP, AN, VG, SG, SB.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from the participants included in this study. The participants have consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.
Statement of human rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of NYU Langone Health and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Statement on the welfare of animals
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, S., Pandit, S.A., Nair, A.A. et al. Two cases of unilateral cone–rod dysfunction presenting in adult females. Doc Ophthalmol 145, 271–281 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-022-09893-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-022-09893-9