Skip to main content
Log in

Is democracy responsible for persistent corruption in some developing countries? The case of Ghana

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The question of whether democracy as a system of government helps combat corruption is a subject of debate, particularly in developing countries where democracy is practiced. The objective of this article is to answer a fundamental question: Should democracy be blamed for corruption in Ghana’s Fourth Republic? In addressing this question, this article uses interviews, media reports, Ghana’s constitution, relevant governance indices, and scholarly literature to argue that if constitutionalism and the rule of law, vital to democratic governance, are not respected, democracy cannot be blamed for the persistent corruption in Ghana. Hence, for democracy to help curb corruption, citizens—mainly the power elite—must take a keen interest in promoting constitutionalism and the rule of law. Based on the Ghanaian case, this article contributes to the ongoing debate on the relationship between democracy and corruption, especially in the sub-Saharan African context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

This article’s sources for data generated from media reports, governance indices, grey literature, and scholarly work are available in the references section. However, in-depth interviews conducted in Ghana cannot be shared as per ethics requirements.

Notes

  1. Pseudonyms have been used for the interviewees to ensure anonymity.

References

Download references

Funding

The author received no funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Yaw Asomah.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the University of Saskatchewan (Saskatoon, Canada) in 2017.

Informed consent

Before the interviews were conducted and tape-recorded, participants read and voluntarily signed the consent forms. Participants also had the opportunity to withdraw from the study at any time unconditionally.

Statement regarding research involving human participants and/or animals

This study involved competent adult participants and all standards regarding research involving humans per the University of Saskatchewan (Saskatoon, Canada) research ethics policy were upheld.

Competing interests

The author did not receive funds, grants, or other support or benefits from any organization for the submitted work. Therefore, he has no conflict of interest in any form or kind as far as this manuscript is concerned.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asomah, J.Y. Is democracy responsible for persistent corruption in some developing countries? The case of Ghana. Crime Law Soc Change (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-023-10134-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-023-10134-6

Keywords

Navigation