Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frontal tDCS and Emotional Reactivity to Negative Content: Examining the Roles of Biased Interpretation and Emotion Regulation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Given findings showing that emotion regulation may be enhanced through prefrontal neurostimulation, the present study examined whether the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on emotional reactivity is mediated via biased interpretation, and whether emotion regulation goals further moderate this relationship.

Methods

Healthy participants (n = 79) were allocated to one of four conditions to receive either active or sham tDCS concurrently with an emotion regulation task during which they were instructed to maintain or down-regulate their emotional reactions (between groups). A homograph priming task assessed biased interpretation, and emotional reactivity was assessed in response to a negative video viewing task.

Results

Those receiving active tDCS showed smaller elevations in negative mood in response to viewing negative videos compared to sham stimulation. Neither tDCS condition nor emotion regulation condition had an impact on interpretive bias, and there was no evidence for tDCS-enhancement of emotion regulation. As such, interpretive bias did not significantly mediate the relationship between tDCS and emotional reactivity, and no moderating role of emotion regulation was observed.

Conclusions

The present results are consistent with neural models implicating increased frontal activity with reduction in emotional reactivity, but provides no support for the role of interpretive bias in this relationship, and no evidence that tDCS enhanced the effects of emotion regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. High arousal image numbers: 1304; 2703; 3103; 3120; 3350; 6230; 6312; 6520; 6560; 8485; 9050; 9163; 9250; 9254; 9410; 9412; 9413; 9414; 9423; 9429; 9424; 9600; 9911; 9921.

    Low arousal image numbers: 2141; 2276; 2301; 2456; 2692; 2718; 2799; 3181; 3300; 4621; 7520; 9000; 9010; 9186; 9295; 9331; 9419; 9426; 9430; 9584; 9435; 9610; 9922; 9927.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick J. F. Clarke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors report no financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clarke, P.J.F., Haridas, S.M.P., Van Bockstaele, B. et al. Frontal tDCS and Emotional Reactivity to Negative Content: Examining the Roles of Biased Interpretation and Emotion Regulation. Cogn Ther Res 45, 19–30 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10162-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10162-9

Keywords

Navigation