Abstract
Understanding population structure is important for guiding ongoing conservation and restoration efforts. The greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) is a species of concern distributed across 1.2 million km2 of western North America. We genotyped 1499 greater sage-grouse from 297 leks across Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota using a 15 locus microsatellite panel, then examined spatial autocorrelation, spatial principal components analysis, and hierarchical Bayesian clustering to identify population structure. Our results show that at distances of up to ~240 km individuals exhibit greater genetic similarity than expected by chance, suggesting that the cumulative effect of short-range dispersal translates to long-range connectivity. We found two levels of hierarchical genetic subpopulation structure. These subpopulations occupy significantly different elevations and are surrounded by divergent vegetative communities with different dominant subspecies of sagebrush, each with its own chemical defense against herbivory. We propose five management groups reflective of genetic subpopulation structure. These genetic groups are largely synonymous with existing priority areas for conservation. On average, 85.8 % of individuals within each conservation priority area assign to a distinct subpopulation. Our results largely support existing management decisions regarding subpopulation boundaries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldridge CL, Nielsen SE, Beyer HL, Boyce MS, Connelly JW, Knick ST, Schroeder MA (2008) Range-wide patterns of greater sage-grouse persistence. Divers Distrib 14:983–994
Allen AW, Cook JG, Armbruster MJ (1984) Habitat suitability index models: Pronghorn. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-82/10.65:1–22
Blickley JL, Word KR, Krakauer AH, Phillips JL, Sells SN, Taff CC, Wingfield JC, Patricelli GL (2012) Experimental chronic noise is related to elevated fecal corticosteroid metabolites in lekking male greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). PLoS One 7:e50462
Bradbury J, Vehrencamp S, Gibson R (1989) Dispersion of displaying male sage grouse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:1–14
Braun CE (1998) Sage grouse declines in western North America: what are the problems? Proc West Assoc State Fish Wildl Agencies 78:139–156
Braun CE, Oedekoven OO, Aldridge CL (2002) Oil and gas development in western North America: effects on sagebrush steppe avifauna with particular emphasis on sage grouse. Trans N Am Wildl Nat Resour Conf 67:337–349
Bush KL, Vinsky MD, Aldridge CL, Paszkowski CA (2005) A comparison of sample types varying in invasiveness for use in DNA sex determination in an endangered population of greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus uropihasianus). Conserv Genet 6:867–870
Bush KL, Dyte CK, Moynahan BJ, Aldridge CL, Sauls HS, Battazzo AM, Walker BL, Doherty KE, Tack J, Carlson J (2011) Population structure and genetic diversity of greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in fragmented landscapes at the northern edge of their range. Conserv Genet 12:527–542
Byrd DW, McArthur ED, Wang H, Graham JH, Freeman DC (1999) Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush, Artemisia tridentata (Asteraceae). VIII. Spatial and temporal pattern of terpenes. Biochem Syst Ecol 27:11–25
Caizergues A, DuBois S, Loiseau A, Mondor G, Rasplus JY (2001) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix). Mol Ecol Notes 1:36–38
Caizergues A, Rätti O, Helle P, Rotelli L, Ellison L, Rasplus JY (2003) Population genetic structure of male black grouse (Tetrao tetrix L.) in fragmented vs. continuous landscapes. Mol Ecol 12:2297–2305
Carrol SP, Hendry AP, Reznick DN, Fox CW (2007) Evolution on ecological time-scales. Funct Ecol 21:387–393
Carstens B, Brunsfeld S, Demboski J, Good J, Sullivan J (2005) Investigating the evolutionary history of the Pacific Northwest mesic forest ecosystem: hypothesis testing within a comparative phylogeographic framework. Evolution 59:1639–1652
Chen C, Durand E, Forbes F, François O (2007) Bayesian clustering algorithms ascertaining spatial population structure: a new computer program and a comparison study. Mol Ecol Notes 7:747–756
Comer P, Kagan J, Heiner M, Tobalske C (2002) Current distribution of sagebrush and associated vegetation in the Western United States (excluding NM and AZ). Interagency Sagebrush Working Group. http://SAGEMAP.wr.usgs.gov
Connelly JW, Schroeder MA, Sands AR, Braun CE (2000) Guidelines to manage sage grouse populations and their habitats. Wildl Soc Bull 28:967–985
Connelly JW, Knick ST, Schroeder MA, Stiver SJ (2004) Conservation assessment of greater sage-grouse and sagebrush habitats. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies
Connelly JW, Hagen CA, Schroeder MA (2011a) Characteristics and dynamics of Greater Sage-Grouse populations. In: Knick ST, Connelly JW (eds) Greater Sage-Grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. Studies in Avian Biology, 38th edn. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 53–67
Connelly J, Rinkes E, Braun C (2011b) Characteristics of greater sage-grouse habitats: a landscape species at micro and macro scales. In: Knick ST, Connelly JW (eds) Greater Sage-Grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. Studies in Avian Biology, 38th edn. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 69–83
Copeland HE, Doherty KE, Naugle DE, Pocewicz A, Kiesecker JM (2009) Mapping oil and gas development potential in the US Intermountain West and estimating impacts to species. PLoS One 4:e7400
Core Team R (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Coulon A, Fitzpatrick J, Bowman R, Stith B, Makarewich C, Stenzler L, Lovette I (2008) Congruent population structure inferred from dispersal behaviour and intensive genetic surveys of the threatened Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma cœrulescens). Mol Ecol 17:1685–1701
Dalke PD, Pyrah DB, Stanton DC, Crawford JE, Schlatterer EF (1963) Ecology, productivity, and management of sage grouse in Idaho. J Wildl Manag 27:811–841
Davis DM, Reese KP, Gardner SC, Bird KL (2015) Genetic structure of Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in a declining, peripheral population. Condor 117:530–544
Doherty KE, Naugle DE, Walker BL, Graham JM (2008) Greater sage-grouse winter habitat selection and energy development. J Wildl Manag 72:187–195
Dunn PO, Braun CE (1985) Natal dispersal and lek fidelity of sage grouse. Auk 102:621–627
Dyer RJ (2014) GSTUDIO: Analyses and functions related to the spatial analysis of genetic marker data. R package version 3.2.1
Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:1–3
Edminster FC (1954) American game birds of field and forest: their habits, ecology, and management. Scribner, New York
El Mousadik A, Petit R (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco. Theor Appl Genet 92:832–839
Emmons SR, Braun CE (1984) Lek attendance of male sage grouse. J Wildl Manag 48:1023–1028
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620
Evett IW, Weir BS (1998) Interpreting DNA evidence: statistical genetics for forensic scientists. Sinauer, Sunderland
Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587
Finch DM, Boyce DA, Chambers JC, Colt CJ, Dumroese K, Kitchen SG, McCarthy C, Meyer SE, Richardson BA, Rowland MM, Rumble MA, Schwartz MK, Tomosy MS, and Wisdom MJ. 2016 Conservation and restoration of sagebrush ecosystems and sage-grouse: An assessment of USDA Forest Service Science. RMRS-GTR, 348: 1–54
Francois O, Ancelet S, Guillot G (2006) Bayesian clustering using hidden Markov random fields in spatial population genetics. Genetics 174:805–816
Frye GG, Connelly JW, Musil DD, Forbey JS (2013) Phytochemistry predicts habitat selection by an avian herbivore at multiple scales. Ecology 94:308–314
Galpern P, Manseau M, Hettinga P, Smith K, Wilson P (2012) ALLELEMATCH: an R package for identifying unique multilocus genotypes where genotyping error and missing data may be present. Mol Ecol Resour 12:771–778
Gesch D, Oimoen M, Greenlee S, Nelson C, Steuck M, Tyler D (2002) The National Elevation Dataset. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68:5–11
Gibson RM, Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1991) Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display, female site fidelity, and copying. Behav Ecol 2:165–180
Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Am J Heredity 86:485–486
Green JS, Flinders JT (1960) Habitat and Dietary Pygmy Rabbit. Soc Range Manag 33:136–142
Green GA, Livezey KB, Morgan RL (2001) Habitat selection by northern sagebrush lizards (Sceloporus graciosus graciosus) in the Columbia Basin, Oregon. N West Nat 82:111–115
Hagen CA, Connelly JW, Schroeder MA (2007) A meta-analysis of greater sage-grouse Centrocercus urophasianus nesting and brood-rearing habitats. Wildl Biol 13:42–50
Holderegger R, Di Giulio M (2010) The genetic effects of roads: a review of empirical evidence. Basic Appl Ecol 11:522–531
Holloran MJ, Anderson SH (2005) Spatial distribution of greater sage-grouse nests in relatively contiguous sagebrush habitats. Condor 107:742–752
Holloran MJ, Kaiser RC, Hubert WA (2010) Yearling greater sage-grouse response to energy development in Wyoming. J Wildl Manag 74:65–72
Jackson ND, Fahrig L (2011) Relative effects of road mortality and decreased connectivity on population genetic diversity. Biol Conserv 144:3143–3148
Jaeger DM, Runyon JB, Richardson BA (2016) Signals of speciation: volatile organic compounds resolve closely related sagebrush taxa, suggesting their importance in evolution. New Phytologist
Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2007) CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23:1801–1806
Jombart T, Ahmed I (2011) adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27:3070–3071
Kahn N, St. John J, Quinn TW (1998) Chromosome-specific intron size differences in the avian CHD gene provide an efficient method for sex identification in birds. Auk 115(4):1074–1078
Knick ST, Dobkin DS, Rotenberry JT, Schroeder MA, Vander Haegen WM, Van Riper C III (2003) Teetering on the edge or too late? Conservation and research issues for avifauna of sagebrush habitats. Condor 105:611–634
Latch EK, Dharmarajan G, Glaubitz JC, Rhodes OE Jr (2006) Relative performance of Bayesian clustering software for inferring population substructure and individual assignment at low levels of population differentiation. Conserv Genet 7:295–302
Lomolino MV, Riddle BR, Brown JH, Whittaker RJ (2006) Biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Manel S, Joost S, Epperson BK, Holderegger R, Storfer A, Rosenberg MS, Scribner KT, Bonin A, Fortin MJ (2010) Perspectives on the use of landscape genetics to detect genetic adaptive variation in the field. Mol Ecol 19:3760–3772
Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220
McArthur ED, Plummer AP (1978) Biogeography and management of native western shrubs: a case study, section Tridentatae of Artemisia. Gt Basin Nat Mem 2:229–243
McKelvey K, Schwartz M (2005) dropout: a program to identify problem loci and samples for noninvasive genetic samples in a capture-mark-recapture framework. Mol Ecol Notes 5:716–718
Monsen SB, Shaw NL (2000) Big sagebrush (Artemesia tridentata) communities—ecology, importance and restoration potential. In: Billings Land Reclamation Symposium, 2000: Striving for Restoration, Fostering Technology, and Policy for Reestablishing Ecological Function: March 20-24, 2000, Sheraton Billings Hotel, Billings, Montana. Bozeman: Montana State University, Publication No. 00-01
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (2014) Metadata for Greater sage-grouse core areas. http://fwp.mt.gov/gisData/metadata/sgcore.htm
Murphy T, Naugle DE, Eardley R, Maestas JD, Griffiths T, Pellant M, Stiver SJ (2013) Trial by fire. Rangelands 35:2–10
Natural Resources Conservation Service (2015a) Outcomes in conservation: sage grouse initiative. U.S. Department of Agriculture, February 2015
Natural Resources Conservation Service (2015b) Sage grouse initiative 2.0: Investment Strategy, FY 2015–2018. U.S. Department of Agriculture, August 2015
Naugle DE, Aldridge CL, Walker BL, Cornish TE, Moynahan BJ, Holloran MJ, Brown K, Johnson GD, Schmidtmann ET, Mayer RT (2004) West Nile virus: pending crisis for greater sage-grouse. Ecol Lett 7:704–713
Naugle DE, Walker BL, Doherty KE (2006) Sage grouse population response to coal-bed natural gas development in the Powder River Basin: interim progress report on region-wide lek-count analyses. University of Montana, Missoula
Naugle DE, Doherty KE, Walker BL, Copel HE, Holloran MJ, Tack JD (2011) Sage grouse and cumulative impacts of energy development. In: Naugle DE (ed) Energy development and wildlife conservation in western North America. Island, Washington, pp 55–70
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MH, Wagner H (2015) VEGAN: Community Ecology Package. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html
Oyler-McCance SJ, St. John J (2010) Characterization of small microsatellite loci for use in non-invasive sampling studies of Gunnison sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus). Conserv Genet Resour 2:17–20
Oyler-McCance SJ, Taylor SE, Quinn TW (2005) A multilocus population genetic survey of the greater sage-grouse across their range. Mol Ecol 14:1293–1310
Parris KM, Schneider A (2009) Impacts of traffic noise and traffic volume on birds of roadside habitats. Ecol Soc 14:29–50
Patterson RL (1952) The sage grouse in Wyoming. Sage Books, Denver
Piertney SB, Höglund J (2001) Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix). Mol Ecol Notes 1:303–304
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
Proctor MF, McLellan BN, Strobeck C, Barclay RM (2005) Genetic analysis reveals demographic fragmentation of grizzly bears yielding vulnerably small populations. Proc R Soc B 272:2409–2416
Remington TE, Braun CE (1985) Sage grouse food selection in winter, North Park, Colorado. J Wildl Manag 49:1055–1061
Ricketts TH (1999) Terrestrial ecoregions of North America: a conservation assessment. Island Press
Robinson AC (2014) Management plan and conservation strategies for greater sage-grouse in North Dakota. North Dakota Game and Fish Department, Bismark
Rosentreter R (2004) Sagebrush identification, ecology, and palatability relative to sage grouse. In: Shaw NL, Monsen SB, Pellant M (eds) Sage grouse habitat restoration symposium proceedings; 4–7 June 2001; Boise, ID. Proceedings RMRS-P-000. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ft. Collins
Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106
Rowland MM, Wisdom MJ, Suring LH, Meinke CW (2006) Greater sage-grouse as an umbrella species for sagebrush-associated vertebrates. Biol Conserv 129:323–335
Schrag A, Konrad S, Miller S, Walker B, Forrest S (2011) Climate-change impacts on sagebrush habitat and West Nile virus transmission risk and conservation implications for greater sage-grouse. GeoJournal 76:561–575
Schroeder MA, Aldridge CL, Apa AD, Bohne JR, Braun CE, Bunnell SD, Connelly JW, Deibert PA, Gardner SC, Hilliard MA (2004) Distribution of sage grouse in North America. Condor 106:363–376
Schulwitz S, Bedrosian B, Johnson JA (2014) Low neutral genetic diversity in isolated greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) populations in Northwest Wyoming. Condor 116:560–573
Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS (2009) Why sampling scheme matters: the effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results. Conserv Genet 10:441–452
Segelbacher G (2002) Noninvasive genetic analysis in birds: testing reliability of feather samples. Mol Ecol 2:367–369
Segelbacher G, Paxton RJ, Steinbrück G, Trontelj P, Storch I (2000) Characterization of microsatellites in capercaillie Tetrao urogallus (AVES). Mol Ecol 9:1919–1952
Semple K, Wayne R, Gibson R (2001) Microsatellite analysis of female mating behaviour in lek-breeding sage grouse. Mol Ecol 10:2043–2048
Shafer A, Cullingham CI, Cote SD, Coltman DW (2010) Of glaciers and refugia: a decade of study sheds new light on the phylogeography of northwestern North America. Mol Ecol 19:4589–4621
Short Bull AR, Cushman SA, Mace R, Chilton T, Kendall KC, Landguth EL, Schwartz MK, McKelvey K, Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2011) Why replication is important in landscape genetics: American black bear in the Rocky Mountains. Mol Ecol 20:1092–1107
Slabbekoorn H, Ripmeester EA (2008) Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Mol Ecol 17:72–83
Smith R (2012) Conserving Montana’s sagebrush highway: long distance migration in sage grouse. Master’s Thesis, The University of Montana
Smits JEG, Fernie KJ (2013) Avian wildlife as sentinels of ecosystem health. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 36:333–342
Soltis DE, Gitzendanner MA, Strenge DD, Soltis PS (1997) Chloroplast DNA intraspecific phylogeography of plants from the Pacific Northwest of North America. Plant Syst Evol 206:353–373
Stanton DJ, McArthur ED, Freeman DC, Golenberg EM (2002) No genetic substructuring in Artemisia subgenus Tridentatae despite strong ecotypic subspecies selection. Biochem Syst Ecol 30:579–593
State of Montana (2014) Executive order creating the Montana sage grouse oversight team and the Montana sage grouse habitat conservation program. Executive Order No. 10-2014, pp1–29
State of Montana (2015) Executive order amending and providing for implementation of the Montana sage grouse conservation strategy. Executive Order No. 12–2015, pp 1–38
Stiver SJ, Apa AD, Bohne JR, Bunnell SD, Deibert PA, Gardner SC, Hilliard MA, McCarthy CW, Schroeder MA (2006) Greater Sage-grouse comprehensive conservation strategy. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife, Cheyenne
Sturges HA (1926) The choice of a class interval. J Am Stat Assoc 21:65–66
Taylor SE, Oyler-McCance SJ, Quinn TW (2003) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Mol Ecol Notes 3:262–264
Thacker ET, Gardner DR, Messmer TA, Guttery MR, Dahlgren DK (2012) Using gas chromatography to determine winter diets of greater sage-grouse in Utah. J Wildl Manag 76:588–592
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2010) 12-month findings for petitions to list the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as threatened or endangered. Fed Reg 75:13910–14014
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2013) greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) conservation objectives: final report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, February 2013
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2015) 12-Month finding on a petition to list greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as an endangered or threatened species. Fed Reg 80:59858–59942
Walker BL, Naugle DE, Doherty KE (2007) Greater sage-grouse population response to energy development and habitat loss. J Wildl Manag 71:2644–2654
Wallestad R, Eng RL (1975) Foods of adult sage grouse in Central Montana. J Wildl Manag 39:628–630
Wallestad R, Schladweiler P (1974) Breeding season movements and habitat selection of male sage grouse. J Wildl Manag 38:634–637
Wambolt CL (1996) Mule deer and elk foraging preference for 4 sagebrush taxa. J Range Manag 49:499–503
Webb SL, Olson CV, Dzialak MR, Harju SM, Winstead JB, Lockman D (2012) Landscape features and weather influence nest survival of a ground-nesting bird of conservation concern, the greater sage-grouse, in human-altered environments. Ecol Process 1:1–15
Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370
Wiens JA (2007) Foundation papers in landscape ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, p 582
Wright S (1949) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen 15:323–354
Zink RM (2014) Comparison of patterns of genetic variation and demographic history in the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus): relevance for conservation. Open Ornithol J 7:19–29
Acknowledgments
This research would not be possible without the many state, federal, and NGO biologists and technicians who have spent countless hours working tirelessly in the field and behind desks for the conservation of the greater sage-grouse. We would specifically like to acknowledge Jake Chaffin (BLM, now USFS), Ben Deeble (Montana Audubon), Brad Fedy (University of Waterloo), Rick Northrup (MTFWP), Sara Oyler-McCance (USGS), Aaron Robinson (NDGFD), Travis Runia (SDGFP), Dale Tribby (BLM), Catherine Wightman (MTFWP), and David Wood (BLM). Our molecular genetic analyses and manuscript preparation would not have been possible without the assistance of Kevin McKelvey, Kristy Pilgrim, Cory Engkjer and the tireless laboratory efforts of Kara Bates, Nasreen Broomand, Taylor Dowell, Scott Hampton, Randi Lesagonicz, Inga Ortloff, Sara Schwarz, Kate Welch, and Katie Zarn, all of the USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation. Use of trade names does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The views in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of their employers.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the Montana and Dakotas Bureau of Land Management (07-IA-11221643-343, 10-IA-11221635-027, 14-IA-11221635-059), the Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative (12-IA-11221635-132), and the Natural Resources Conservation Service—Sage Grouse Initiative (13-IA-11221635-054).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cross, T.B., Naugle, D.E., Carlson, J.C. et al. Hierarchical population structure in greater sage-grouse provides insight into management boundary delineation. Conserv Genet 17, 1417–1433 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0872-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-016-0872-z