Skip to main content
Log in

Support vector machine algorithm for artificial intelligence optimization

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To improve the short-term power prediction accuracy, a comparative analysis of the PSO and SVM algorithm was carried out. Then, the two were combined and, the penalty factor and kernel function parameters in SVM model were optimized by the improved PSO algorithm. The SVM algorithm with optimized parameters and model were applied to predict and control and form PSO-SVM algorithm. Finally, the short-term power load was modelled and predicted based on PSO-SVM algorithm and it was compared with the conventional SVM algorithm. The results showed that the relative error of the average absolute value of PSO-SVM method was 1.62%, while the relative relative error of the average absolute value of conventional SVM using particle swarm optimization algorithm was 3.52%. It can be seen that the error adopting the new algorithm is reduced by 1.9%. It shows that the precision of the improved power load forecasting model is greatly improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xiao, Y., Kang, N., Hong, Y., et al.: Misalignment fault diagnosis of DFWT based on IEMD energy entropy and PSO-SVM. Entropy 19(1), 6–21 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Du, J., Liu, Y., Yu, Y., et al.: A prediction of precipitation data based on support vector machine and particle swarm optimization (PSO-SVM) algorithms. Algorithms 10(2), 57–68 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Long, Y., Du, Z.J., Wang, W.D., et al.: PSO-SVM-based online locomotion mode identification for rehabilitation robotic exoskeletons. Sensors 16(9), 1408 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nieto, P.J.G., García-Gonzalo, E., Sánchez, A.B., et al.: Air quality modeling using the PSO-SVM-based approach, MLP neural network, and M5 model tree in the metropolitan area of Oviedo (Northern Spain). Environ. Model. Assess. 4, 1–19 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kapoor, N., Ohri, J.: Fuzzified PSO-SVM controller for motion control of robotic manipulator. Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 24(3), 361 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou, C., Yin, K., Cao, Y., et al.: Application of time series analysis and PSO–SVM model in predicting the Bazimen landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Eng. Geol. 204, 108–120 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayat, M,, Tahir, M.: PSO fuzzy SVM-TMH: identification of transmembrane helix segments using ensemble feature space by incorporated fuzzy support vector machine. Mol. Biosyst. 11(8), 2255–2262 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hameed, S.S., Hassan, R., Muhammad, F.F.: Selection and classification of gene expression in autism disorder: use of a combination of statistical filters and a GBPSO-SVM algorithm. PLoS ONE 12(11), e0187371 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, X., Guo, X., Su, J.: Improved support vector machine short-term power load forecast model based on particle swarm optimization parameters. J. Appl. Sci. 13(9), 1467–1472 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Selakov, A., Mellon, S., Bekut, D.: Hybrid PSO-SVM method for short-term load forecasting during periods with significant temperature variations in city of Burbank. Appl. Soft Comput. 16(3), 80–88 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, H.Z., Guo, S., Li, C.J., et al.: A hybrid annual power load forecasting model based on generalized regression neural network with fruit fly optimization algorithm. Knowl.-Based Syst. 37(2), 378–387 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, W.J., Hong, J.: A hybrid dynamic and fuzzy time series model for mid-term power load forecasting. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 64, 1057–1062 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant: 111578109), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant: 11111121005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fasheng Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, X., Yu, F. & Zhao, X. Support vector machine algorithm for artificial intelligence optimization. Cluster Comput 22 (Suppl 6), 15015–15021 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2490-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2490-7

Keywords

Navigation