Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Economics of downscaled climate-induced changes in cropland, with projections to 2050: evidence from Yolo County California

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article establishes quantitative relationships between the evolution of climate and cropland using daily climate data for a century and data on allocation of land across crops for six decades in a specific agro-climatic region of California. These relationships are applied to project how climate scenarios reported by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change would drive cropland patterns into 2050. Projections of warmer winters, particularly from 2035 to 2050, cause lower wheat area and more alfalfa and tomato area. Only marginal changes in area were projected for tree and vine crops, in part because although lower, chill hours remain above critical values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The amount of rainfall may differ in the valley region of Yolo County and the upper watershed where reservoirs are located. Hence, our rainfall data may under represent surface water availability. However, as long as the rainfall in the valley and upper watershed is correlated (likely so), using rainfall in the valley is expected to make little difference in the regression results.

  2. GDDwinter likely affects the growth of annuals as well as perennials as shown in Lobell and Field (2011) recent findings that the low minimum temperature in February adversely affects almond yields. Nevertheless, in our study, the climate variable for tree crops is represented by Mchill alone, due to the considerable negative correlation between chill hours and GDDwinter.

  3. Wheat varieties planted in California these days do not require a cool period. However, the plausibility of vernalization is based on the fact that our data period extends more than a half century.

References

  • Adams RM, Rosenzweig C, Peart RM et al (1990) Global climate change and U.S. agriculture. Nature 345:219–224, 17 May 1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron R (1983) Availability of chilling temperatures in California. Agric Meteorol 28:351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auffhammer M, Hsiang S, Schlenker W, Sobel A (2013) Global climate models: a user guide for economists. Rev Environ Econ Policy 7:181–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldocchi D, Wong S (2008) Accumulated winter chill is decreasing in the fruit growing regions of California. Clim Chang 87(Suppl 1):S153–S166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Am C (2009) The economic effects of climate change of the California winegrape industry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis

  • Cayan DR, Maurer EP, Dettinger MD, Tyree M, Hayhoe K (2008) Climate change scenarios for the California region. Clim Chang 87(Suppl 1):S21–S42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayan DR, Polade S, Gershunov A, Dettinger M, Pierce D (2012) Climate change model simulations: new CMIP5 projections. Southwest CSC Meeting, Tucson, Arizona, June 13, 2012

  • Chouard P (1960) Vernalization and its relations to dormancy. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 11:191–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christy JR, Norris WB, Redmond K, Gallo KP (2006) Methodology and results of calculating central California surface temperature trends: evidence of human-induced climate change? J Clim 19:548–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark TE, West KD (2006) Using out-of-sample mean squared prediction errors to test the martingale difference hypothesis. J Econ 135:155–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell M, Jones B, Olken B (2014) What do we learn from the weather? The new climate-economy literature. J Econ Lit 52(3):740–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deschenes O, Greenstone M (2007) The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather. Am Econ Rev 97(1):354–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deschenes O, Kolstad C (2011) Economic impacts of climate change on California agriculture. Clim Chang 109(suppl 1):365–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders W (2004) Applied econometric time series, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng S, Hu Q (2004) Changes in agro-meteorological indicators in the contiguous United States: 1951–2000. Theor Appl Climatol 78:247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez AP, Ponti L, Ellis CK, d’Oultremont T (2006) Analysis of climate effects on agricultural systems, CEC-500–2005–188-SF. California Climate Change Center, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks NP, Smith A, Sumner DA (2014) Crop supply dynamics and the illusion of partial adjustment. Am J Agric Econ 96(5):1469–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson L, Haden VR, Hollander AD et al (2012) Adaptation strategies for agricultural sustainability in Yolo County, California. California Energy Commission. Publication number: CEC‐500‐2012‐032

  • Lobell DB, Field C (2011) California perennial crops in a changing climate. Clim Chang 109:317–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Schlenker WS, Costa-Roberts J (2011a) Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333:616–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Torney A, Field C (2011b) Climate extremes in California agriculture. Clim Chang 109:355–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luedeling E, Zhang M, Girvetz EH (2009) Climatic changes lead to declining winter chill for fruit and nut trees in California during 1950–2099. PLoS ONE 4(7):e6166. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh B, Jackson L (2008) Small grain production manual part 12: small grains in crop rotations, publication 8175. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources

  • McKenney DW, Pedlar JH, Papadopol P, Hutchinson MF (2006) The development of 1901–2000 historical monthly climate models for Canada and the United States. Agric For Meteorol 138:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta VK, Haden VR, Joyce BA, Purkey DR, Jackson LE (2013) Irrigation demand and supply, given projections of climate and land-use change, in Yolo County, California. Agric Water Manag 117:70–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu JE, McCarl BA, Wein AM (2013) Adaptation to climate change: changes in farmland use and stocking rate in the U.S. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 18(6):713–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) U.S. Department of Commerce National Climatic Data Center. URL: http://cdo.ncdc.noaa.gov/CDO/cdo

  • Schlenker W, Roberts MJ (2009) Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(37):15594–15598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker W, Hanemann M, Fisher AC (2006) The impact of global warming on U.S. agriculture: an econometric analysis of optimal growing conditions. Rev Econ Stat 88(1):113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker W, Hanemann M, Fisher AC (2007) Water availability, degree days, and the potential impact of climate change on irrigated agriculture in California. Clim Chang 81(1):19–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Jones PD, Ambenje P et al (2007) Observations: surface and atmospheric climate change. In: Solomon SD, Qin M (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Resources Association (2005) Yolo County integrated regional water management plan backgroun data and information appendix. URL: www.yolowra.org/irwmp_documents_a.html

  • Yolo County Agricultural Department. Agricultural crop reports, issues for 1937–2008, URL: http://www.yolocounty.org/Index.aspx?page=486

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research came from a grant from the California Energy Commission and the U.C. Agricultural Issues Center. We thank Louise Jackson for help throughout the project. Nathan Hendricks provided able research assistance. Lee and Sumner are both members of the U.C. Giannini Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyunok Lee.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 68 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 75 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 35 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 33 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, H., Sumner, D.A. Economics of downscaled climate-induced changes in cropland, with projections to 2050: evidence from Yolo County California. Climatic Change 132, 723–737 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1436-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1436-9

Keywords

Navigation