Skip to main content
Log in

“It’s Not Just Writing”: Negotiating Childness in Children’s Literature Through Performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Children's Literature in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reflects on insights gained from a larger study that explored how a class of ten- and eleven-year-olds read and responded to David Almond’s hybrid novel, My Name is Mina. Through focusing on the children’s performances of the poems contained within the text, the discussion examines embodied aspects of the children’s engagement and suggests that these play a critical role in the children’s shared readership. The implications of this analysis are then considered in relation to Peter Hollindale’s definition of “childness” and it is argued that a close analysis of William Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale reveals tensions inherent between linguistic constructions of childness within the text and embodied performances on stage. Drawing on critical perspectives from children’s literature theory and research conducted on classroom dialogue, the article argues that children make use of their social and physical positioning to engage in fictive negotiations of childness and adultness and, in so doing, co-create an aesthetic experience that we refer to as children’s literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almond, David. (2010). My Name is Mina. London: Walker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, David. (1998). Skellig. London: Hodder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aveling, Helen. (2009). Unseen Childhoods: Disabled Characters in 20th-Century Books for Girls. London: Bettany Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, Barbara. (1976). American Picturebooks from Noah’s Ark to the Beast Within. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrs, Myra, and Cork, Valerie. (2001). The Reader in the Writer: The Links Between the Study of Literature and Writing Development at Key Stage Two. London: Centre for Literacy in Primary Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, Sarah, and Buckingham, David. (2008). “Scrapbooks” as a Resource in Media Research with Young People. In Pat Thomson (Ed.), Doing Visual Research with Children and Young People (pp. 114–131). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Ronald. (2004). Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff Hodges, Gabrielle. (2010). Reasons for Reading: Why Reading Matters. Literacy, 44(2), 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coats, Karen. (2013). The Meaning of Children’s Poetry: A Cognitive Approach. International Research in Children’s Literature, 6(2), 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, Teresa, and Myhill, Deborah. (2013). Writing Voices: Creating Communities of Writers. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, Alice. (2013). Environmental Crisis in Young Adult Fiction: A Poetics of Earth. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrin, Sidney, and Kidd, Kenneth. (2004). Wild Things: Children’s Culture and Ecocriticism. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, Stanley. (1980). Is There a Text in this Class?: The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. (1973). The Interpretation of Culture: Selected Essays. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubar, Marah. (2013). Risky Business: Talking About Children in Children’s Literature Criticism. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 38(4), 450–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubar, Marah. (2011). On Not Defining Children’s Literature. PMLA, 126(1), 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, Kris. (1994). How Talk, Context and Script Shape Contexts for Learning: A Cross Case Comparison of Journal Sharing. Linguistics and Education., 5(3–4), 335–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, Kris, Rymes, Betsy, and Larson, Joanne. (1995). Script, Counterscript and Underlife in the Classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 445–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollindale, Peter. (1997). Signs of Childness in Children’s Literature. Stroud: Thimble Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iser, Wolfgang. (1974). The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joosen, Vanessa. (2015). Second Childhoods and Intergenerational Dialogues: How Children’s Literature Studies and Age Studies can Supplement Each Other. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 40(2), 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, Lois. (2001). Take Up Thy Bed and Walk: Death, Disability and Cure in Classic Fiction for Girls. London: The Women’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Guin, Ursula K. (1979). Why are Americans Afraid of Dragons? In Susan Wood and Ursula K. Le Guin (Eds.), The Language of the Night: Essays on Fantasy and Science Fiction (pp. 39–45). New York: Ultramarine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesnik-Oberstein, Karen. (1994). Children’s Literature: Criticism and the Fictional Child. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Doreen. (2003). Imagining the Field. In Micheal Pryke, Gillian Rose and Sarah Whatmore (Eds.), Using Social Theory: Thinking Through Research (pp. 72–89). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, Margaret. (1982). What Counts as Evidence in Theories of Children’s Literature? Theory into Practice, 21(4), 284–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolajeva, Maria. (2014). Reading for Learning: Cognitive Approaches to Children’s Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolajeva, Maria. (2016). Recent Trends in Children’s Literature: Return to the Body. International Research in Children’s Literature, 9(2), 132–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullinger, Debbie. (2017). From Tongue to Text: A New Reading of Children’s Poetry. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Jacqueline. (1984). The Case of Peter Pan, Or the Impossibility of Children’s Fiction. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, Louise. (1978). The Reader, The Text, The Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Carbondale Ill: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, Louise. (1938). Literature as Exploration. New York: Modern Language Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, David. (2007). The Development of Children’s Literature. In David Rudd (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to Children’s Literature (pp. 139–258). Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, David. (2004). Theorising and Theories: The Conditions of Possibility of Children’s Literature. In Peter Hunt (Ed.), International Companion Encyclopaedia of Children’s Literature (pp. 29–43). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, Carol. (2007). Shakespeare and Child’s Play: Performing Lost Boys on Stage and Screen. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William. (2015). Macbeth. The Arden Shakespeare. Edited by Sandra Clark and Pamela Mason. Third Series. London: Methuen.

  • Shakespeare, William. (2010). The Winter’s Tale. The Arden Shakespeare. Edited by John Pitcher. Third Series. London: Methuen.

  • Stephens, John. (2011). Schemas and Scripts: Cognitive Instruments and the Representation of Cultural Diversity in Children’s Literature. In Kerry Mallan and Clare Bradford (Eds.), Contemporary Children’s Literature and Film: Engaging with Theory (pp. 12–35). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tandoi, Eve. (2017). Hybrid Novels for Children and Young Adults. In Clémentine Beauvais and Maria Nikolajeva (Eds.), The Edinburgh Companion to Children’s Literature (pp. 329–335). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trites, Roberta Seelinger. (2014). Literary Conceptualisations of Growth: Metaphors and Cognition in Adolescent Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, Donald. (1969). The Family and Individual Development. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Shelby, and Heath, Shirley Brice. (1992). The Braid of Literature: Children’s Worlds of Reading. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eve Tandoi.

Additional information

Eve Tandoi is Lecturer in Education at the University of Gloucestershire. Her interests include children’s nonfiction, hybrid novels for children and young adults and children’s responses to literature in educational settings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tandoi, E. “It’s Not Just Writing”: Negotiating Childness in Children’s Literature Through Performance. Child Lit Educ 50, 76–89 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-018-9377-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-018-9377-3

Keywords

Navigation