Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attentional Bias to Threat: Examining Associations with Children’s Emotional Regulation and Interactions with Intimate Partner Violence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry & Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) in the home—a prevalent environmental risk for children—exemplifies a key factor that may alter the role of attentional bias to threat (ABT) in children’s psychological adjustment. The current study aims to (1) examine potential variations in ABT and emotion regulation across animal and face stimuli and (2) test IPV as a potential moderator of the relationship between ABT and child outcomes. Participating children (N = 37) completed computerized tasks assessing ABT. Mothers provided data on IPV in the home, child victimization, and child emotion regulation. Children’s ABT toward animal stimuli was not associated with emotion regulation; IPV significantly moderated the link between ABT and emotion regulation (β = − 0.06, p < .001). At low levels of IPV, children’s ABT and emotion regulation were not related, but at high levels of IPV, ABT was negatively associated with emotion regulation skills. The relevance of ABT for understanding functioning may vary by both stimulus selection and by previous experiences of environmental risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McNally RJ (2019) Attentional bias for threat: crisis or opportunity? Clin Psychol Rev 69:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gibb BE, McGeary JE, Beevers CG (2016) Attentional biases to emotional stimuli: key components of the RDoC constructs of sustained threat and loss. Am J Med Genet B 171:65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller LE (2015) Perceived threat in childhood: a review of research and implications for children living in violent households. Trauma Violence Abuse 16:153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zsido AN, Bernath L, Labadi B, Deak A (2020) Count on arousal: introducing a new method for investigating the effects of emotional valence and arousal on visual search performance. Psychol Res 84:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyer P, Bergstrom B (2011) Threat-detection in child development: an evolutionary perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:1034–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Breiding MJ, Black MC, Ryan GW (2008) Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen US states/territories, 2005. Am J Prev Med 34:112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamby S, Finkelhor D, Turner H, Kracke K (2011) The juvenile victimization questionnaire toolkit. http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/jvq/index_new.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2014

  8. Vu NL, Jouriles EN, McDonald R, Rosenfield D (2016) Children’s exposure to intimate partner violence: a meta-analysis of longitudinal associations with child adjustment problems. Clin Psychol Rev 46:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Woody EZ, Szechtman H (2011) Adaptation to potential threat: the evolution, neurobiology, and psychopathology of the security motivation system. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:1019–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cummings EM, Miller-Graff LE (2015) Emotional security theory: an emerging theoretical model for youths’ psychological and physiological responses across multiple developmental contexts. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 24:208–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Briggs-Gowan MJ, Pollak SD, Grasso D, Voss J, Mian ND, Zobel E, McCarthy KJ, Wakschlag LS, Pine DS (2015) Attention bias and anxiety in young children exposed to family violence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 56:1194–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Swartz JR, Graham-Bermann SA, Mogg K, Bradley BP, Monk CS (2011) Attention bias to emotional faces in young children exposed to intimate partner violence. J Child Adolesc Trauma 4:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bodenschatz CM, Skopinceva M, Ruß T, Suslow T (2019) Attentional bias and childhood maltreatment in clinical depression-an eye-tracking study. J Psychiatr Res 112:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly PA, Viding E, Puetz VB, Palmer AL, Mechelli A, Pingault JB, Samuel S, McCrory EJ (2015) Sex differences in socioemotional functioning, attentional bias, and gray matter volume in maltreated children: a multilevel investigation. Dev Psychopath 27:1591–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pine DS, Mogg K, Bradley BP, Montgomery L, Monk CS, McClure E, Guyer AE, Ernst M, Charney DS, Kaufman J (2005) Attention bias to threat in maltreated children: implications for vulnerability to stress-related psychopathology. Am J Psychiatry 162:291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rothbart MK, Rueda MR (2005) The development of effortful control. In: Mayr U, Awh E, Keele SW (eds) Decade of behaviour. Developing individuality in the human brain: a tribute to Michael I. Posner. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 167–188

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lonigan CJ, Vasey MW (2009) Negative affectivity, effortful control, and attention to threat-relevant stimuli. J Abnorm Child Psychol 37:387–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eisenberg N, Morris AS (2002) Children’s emotion-related regulation. In: Kail RV (ed) Advances in child development and behavior, vol 30. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 189–229

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandez KC, Jazaieri H, Gross JJ (2016) Emotion regulation: a transdiagnostic perspective on a new RDoC domain. Cognit Ther Res 40:426–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller-Graff LE, Howell KH (2016) Interventions for preventing violence and remediating its negative effects: contemporary priorities and future directions. Psychol Violence 6:361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Luengo Kanacri BP, Pastorelli C, Eisenberg N, Zuffianò A, Caprara GV (2013) The development of prosociality from adolescence to early adulthood: the role of effortful control. J Personal 81:302–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sloan E, Hall K, Moulding R, Bryce S, Mildred H, Staiger PK (2017) Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic treatment construct across anxiety, depression, substance, eating and borderline personality disorders: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 57:141–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan KL, Chen Q, Chen M (2019) Prevalence and correlates of the co-occurrence of family violence: a meta-analysis on family polyvictimization. Trauma Violence Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019841601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Raghavan C, Mennerich A, Sexton E, James SE (2006) Community violence and its direct, indirect, and mediating effects on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women 12:1132–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB (1996) The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues 17:283–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. LoBue V (2014) Deconstructing the snake: the relative roles of perception, cognition, and emotion on threat detection. Emotion 14:701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. LoBue V, Rakison DH (2013) What we fear most: a developmental advantage for threat-relevant stimuli. Dev Rev 33(4):285–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. LoBue V, Rakison DH, DeLoache JS (2010) Threat perception across the life span: evidence for multiple converging pathways. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 19:375–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. LoBue V (2009) More than just another face in the crowd: superior detection of threatening facial expressions in children and adults. Dev Sci 12:305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tottenham N, Tanaka JW, Leon AC, McCarry T, Nurse M, Hare TA, Marcus DJ, Westerlund A, Casey BJ, Nelson C (2009) The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Res 168:242–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. LoBue V (2010) And along came a spider: an attentional bias for the detection of spiders in young children and adults. J Exp Child Psychol 107(1):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Corrigan A (2002) Social competence scale–parent version. Fast track project technical report

  33. Gouley KK, Brotman LM, Huang KY, Shrout PE (2008) Construct validation of the social competence scale in preschool-age children. Soc Dev 17:380–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yzerbyt V, Muller D, Judd C (2004) Adjusting researchers’ approach to adjustment: on the use of covariates when testing interactions. J Exp Soc Psychol 40(3):424–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith PL, Little DR (2018) Small is beautiful: in defense of the small-N design. Psychon Bull Rev 25:2083–2101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miller LE, Cater ÅK, Howell KH, Graham-Bermann SA (2014) Perpetration patterns and environmental contexts of IPV in Sweden: relationships with adult mental health. Child Abuse Neg 38(1):147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bar-Haim Y (2010) Research review: attention bias modification (ABM): a novel treatment for anxiety disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 51:859–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. LoBue V, Pérez-Edgar K (2014) Sensitivity to social and non-social threats in temperamentally shy children at-risk for anxiety. Dev Sci 17:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Notre Dame, 390 Corbett Family Hall, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA

    Laura Miller-Graff & Caroline Scheid

Authors
  1. Laura Miller-Graff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Caroline Scheid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Miller-Graff.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller-Graff, L., Scheid, C. Attentional Bias to Threat: Examining Associations with Children’s Emotional Regulation and Interactions with Intimate Partner Violence. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 54, 223–231 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-021-01238-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-021-01238-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation