Abstract
Cellulose acetate (CA) is a polymeric material that finds application in various fields due to its non-toxic, renewable, and biodegradable nature. Electrospinning is widely used for producing CA nanofibers for many industrial applications like sensors, protective clothing, wound dressing, and filters. However, its performance during end-use application is directly influenced by fiber quality, pore size, and fiber diameter, depending on the material and electrospinning process parameters. Presently, efficient and qualitative production of nanofibers through single needle-based electrospinning is still challenging. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the interactive effects of the polymer concentration, positive voltage, and spinning distance parameters on CA’s spinnability, morphology, and fiber diameter in the industrially scalable needleless wire spinneret electrospinning technique using a response surface methodology and linear regression principle. Hence, several experiments were conducted to produce CA nanofibers according to the 3-factor-3-level Box–Behnken design of experiments within the pre-determined range of selected process parameters. SEM images and rheology of the polymer solutions revealed that CA concentration significantly affects the fibers’ spinning behavior, morphology, and diameter, whereas less impacted by the other two parameters. The predicted mean fiber diameter values, determined by the linear regression model, have shown ~ 95% correlation with the experimental data, suggesting a high level of fitting with its significance and reliability. The response surface and contour plots analyzed the materials and electrospinning parameters’ interactive effects to predict the direction of minimizing or maximizing the CA nanofiber’s diameter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad A, Ali U, Nazir A et al (2019) Toothed wheel needleless electrospinning: a versatile way to fabricate uniform and finer nanomembrane. J Mater Sci 54:13834–13847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03875-0
Akkoyun S, Öktem N (2021) Effect of viscoelasticity in polymer nanofiber electrospinning: simulation using FENE-CR model. Eng Sci Technol Int J 24:620–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2020.12.017
Ali U, Niu H, Aslam S et al (2017) Needleless electrospinning using sprocket wheel disk spinneret. J Mater Sci 52:7567–7577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0989-6
Amariei N, Manea LR, Bertea AP et al (2017) The influence of polymer solution on the properties of electrospun 3D nanostructures. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 209:012092. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/209/1/012092
Andrady AL (2022) Nanofiber‐based chemical sensors. In: Applications polymer nanofibers. Wiley, pp 100–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119267713.ch4
Angel N, Guo L, Yan F et al (2020) Effect of processing parameters on the electrospinning of cellulose acetate studied by response surface methodology. J Agric F Res 2:100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2019.100015
Bhardwaj N, Kundu SC (2010) Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv 28:325–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004
Bouchekara HREH, Boucherma M, Allag H (2012) Interactive implementation of experimental design method -application to engineering optimal design. Am J Comput Appl Math 1:78–85. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ajcam.20110102.15
Gu SY, Ren J, Vancso GJ (2005) Process optimization and empirical modeling for electrospun polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofiber precursor of carbon nanofibers. Eur Polym J 41:2559–2568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.05.008
Gupta D, Jassal M, Agrawal AK (2016) The electrospinning behavior of poly(vinyl alcohol) in DMSO–water binary solvent mixtures. RSC Adv 6:102947–102955. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA15017A
Huang Z-M, Zhang Y-Z, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S (2003) A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 63:2223–2253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-7
Kenry LCT (2017) Nanofiber technology: current status and emerging developments. Prog Polym Sci 70:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.002
Khan WS, Asmatulu R, Ceylan M, Jabbarnia A (2013) Recent progress on conventional and non-conventional electrospinning processes. Fibers Polym 14:1235–1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-1235-8
Kong L, Ziegler GR (2013) Quantitative relationship between electrospinning parameters and starch fiber diameter. Carbohydr Polym 92:1416–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.026
Liu B, Zhang S, Wang X et al (2015) Efficient and reusable polyamide-56 nanofiber/nets membrane with bimodal structures for air filtration. J Colloid Interface Sci 457:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.07.019
Lu B, Wang Y, Liu Y et al (2010) Superhigh-throughput needleless electrospinning using a rotary cone as spinneret. Small 6:1612–1616. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201000454
Munir MM, Suryamas AB, Iskandar F, Okuyama K (2009) Scaling law on particle-to-fiber formation during electrospinning. Polym 50:4935–4943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2009.08.011
Nayak P, Ghosh AK, Bhatnagar N (2022) Investigation of solution rheology in electrospinning of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. Fibers Polym 23:48–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-021-0374-6
Ng J-J, Supaphol P (2018) Rotating-disk electrospinning: needleless electrospinning of poly(caprolactone), poly(lactic acid) and poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofiber mats with controlled morphology. J Polym Res 25:155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-018-1540-4
Niu H, Lin T (2012) Fiber Generators in Needleless Electrospinning. J Nanomater 2012:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/725950
Niu H, Lin T, Wang X (2009) Needleless electrospinning. I. A comparison of cylinder and disk nozzles. J Appl Polym Sci 114:3524–3530. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.30891
Niu H, Zhou H, Lin T (2021) Electrospun carbon nanofibers as electrode materials for supercapacitor applications. In: Electrospun polymers and composites. Elsevier, pp 641–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-819611-300021-2
Ogunlaja AS, Kleyi PE, Walmsley RS, Tshentu ZR (2016) Nanofiber-supported metal-based catalysts. In: Catal. RSC., pp 144–174. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781782626855-00144
Panda PK, Gangwar A, Thite AG (2022) Optimization of Nylon 6 electrospun nanofiber diameter in needle-less wire electrode using central composite design and response surface methodology. J Ind Text 51:7279S-7292S. https://doi.org/10.1177/15280837211058213
Peng C, Zhang J, Xiong Z et al (2015) Fabrication of porous hollow γ-Al2O3 nanofibers by facile electrospinning and its application for water remediation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 215:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.05.026
Plackett RL, Burman JP (1946) The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika 33:305–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/33.4.305
Prahasti G, Zulfi A, Munir MM (2020) Needleless electrospinning system with wire spinneret: an alternative way to control morphology, size, and productivity of nanofibers. Nano Express 1:010046. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-959X/ab976a
Ramakrishnan R, Gimbun J, Samsuri F et al (2016) Needleless electrospinning technology – an entrepreneurial perspective. Indian J Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i15/91538
Regev O, Vandebril S, Zussman E, Clasen C (2010) The role of interfacial viscoelasticity in the stabilization of an electrospun jet. Polym 51:2611–2620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.03.061
Schoolaert E, Hoogenboom R, De Clerck K (2017) Colorimetric nanofibers as optical sensors. Adv Funct Mater 27:1702646. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201702646
Singh B, Kim K, Park M-H (2021) On-demand drug delivery systems using nanofibers. Nanomaterials 11:3411. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123411
Tang ZS, Bolong N, Saad I et al (2017) Response surface modeling of electrospinning parameters on titanium oxide nanofibers’ diameter: a box-behnken design (BBD). Adv Sci Lett 23:11237–11241. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.10258
Theron SA, Yarin AL, Zussman E, Kroll E (2005) Multiple jets in electrospinning: experiment and modeling. Polym 46:2889–2899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.054
Tungprapa S, Puangparn T, Weerasombut M et al (2007) Electrospun cellulose acetate fibers: effect of solvent system on morphology and fiber diameter. Cellulose 14:563–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9113-4
Wang X, Niu H, Lin T, Wang X (2009) Needleless electrospinning of nanofibers with a conical wire coil. Polym Eng Sci 49:1582–1586. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.21377
Wang X, Niu H, Wang X, Lin T (2012) Needleless electrospinning of uniform nanofibers using spiral coil spinnerets. J Nanomater 2012:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/785920
Wu J, Quan Z, Zhang H et al (2020) Electrospun cellulose acetate nanofiber upscaling with a metal plate needleless spinneret. Mater Res Express 6:1250e4. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab6547
Xie X, Chen Y, Wang X et al (2020) Electrospinning nanofiber scaffolds for soft and hard tissue regeneration. J Mater Sci Technol 59:243–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.037
Yalcinkaya F (2019) Preparation of various nanofiber layers using wire electrospinning system. Arab J Chem 12:5162–5172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.12.012
Yördem OS, Papila M, Menceloğlu YZ (2008) Effects of electrospinning parameters on polyacrylonitrile nanofiber diameter: an investigation by response surface methodology. Mater Des 29:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.013
Yu JH, Fridrikh SV, Rutledge GC (2006) The role of elasticity in the formation of electrospun fibers. Polym 47:4789–4797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.04.050
Zhu Z, Wang H, Xu G et al (2019) A new circular spinneret system for electrospinning numerical approach and electric field optimization. Therm Sci 23:2229–2235. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI1904229Z
Zulfi A, Munir MM, Hapidin DA et al (2018) Air filtration media from electrospun waste high-impact polystyrene fiber membrane. Mater Res Express 5:035049. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aab6ef
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the financial support of ‘The Bombay Textile Research Association,’ Mumbai, under various in-house research grants. We also thank Mr. Satya Shanmukh, ICT Mumbai, for his help in carrying out the rheological study of the CA polymer solutions.
Funding
“The Bombay Textile Research Association,” Mumbai, India, funded this research study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
“All the authors have contributed well to completing this study, starting from conception and design, experimental, data collection and analysis, and manuscript preparation. Amol G. Thite, and Deepali M. More performed material preparation, experimental, and data collection. Amol G. Thite, Ravindra D. Kale, and Prasanta K. Panda accomplished the data analysis and first draft of the manuscript. All authors commented and gave valuable suggestions on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript”.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning this article’s research, authorship, and/ or publication.
Ethics approval
Not Applicable.
Consent for publication
Not Applicable.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Thite, A.G., Kale, R.D., Panda, P.K. et al. Up-scaling of cellulose acetate electrospun nanofibers with a needleless wire spinneret technique. Cellulose 30, 4873–4888 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05196-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05196-7