Skip to main content
Log in

Contractivity-preserving explicit multistep Hermite–Obrechkoff series differential equation solvers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New optimal, contractivity-preserving (CP), explicit, d-derivative, k-step Hermite–Obrechkoff series methods of order p up to \(p=20\), denoted by CP HO(dkp), with nonnegative coefficients are constructed. These methods are used to solve nonstiff first-order initial value problems \(y'=f(t,y)\), \(y(t_0)=y_0\). The upper bound \(p_u\) of order p of HO(dkp) can reach, approximately, as high as 2.4 times the number of derivatives d. The stability regions of HO(dkp) have generally a good shape and grow with decreasing \(p-d\). We, first, note that three selected CP HO methods: 4-derivative 7-step HO of order 13, denoted by HO(4, 7, 13), 5-derivative 6-step HO of order 13, denoted by HO(5, 6, 13), and 9-derivative 2-step HO of order 13, denoted by CMDAHO(13) compare favorably with Adams–Cowell of order 13, denoted by AC(13), in solving standard N-body problems over an interval of 1000 periods on the basis of the relative error of energy as a function of the CPU time. Next, the three HO methods compare positively with AC(13) in solving standard N-body problems on the basis of the growth of relative positional error and relative energy error over 10, 000 periods of integration. Finally, these three methods compare also well with P-stable methods of Cash and Franco et al. on some quasi periodic, second-order linear and nonlinear problems. The coefficients of selected HO methods are listed in the appendix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrio, R.: Performance of the Taylor series method for ODE/DAEs. Appl. Math. Comput. 163, 525–545 (2005a)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barrio, R.: Sensitivity analysis of ODEs/DAEs using the Taylor series method. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 27, 1929–1947 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barrio, R., Blesa, F., Lara, M.: VSVO formulation of the Taylor method for the numerical solution of ODEs. Comput. Math. Appl. 50, 93–111 (2005b)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J.C.: The Numerical Analysis of Ordinary Differential Equations: Runge–Kutta and General Linear Methods. Wiley, Chicester (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cash, J.R.: High order P-stable formulae for the numerical integration of periodic I.V.P. Numer. Math. 37, 355–370 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Corliss, G.F., Chang, Y.F.: Solving ordinary differential equations using Taylor series. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 8, 114–144 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deprit, A., Zahar, R.M.W.: Numerical integration of an orbit and its concomitant variations. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 17, 425–430 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco, J.M., Palacios, M.: High-order P-stable multistep methods. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 30, 1–10 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, S., Ketcheson, D.I., Shu, C.-W.: High order strong stability preserving time discretization. J. Sci. Comput. 38, 251–289 (2009). doi:10.1007/s10915-008-9239-z

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, S., Shu, C.-W., Tadmor, E.: Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev. 43, 89–112 (2001)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hairer, E., Nørsett, S.P., Wanner, G.: Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I. Nonstiff Problems. Springer, Berlin (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoefkens, J., Berz, M., Makino, K.: Computing validated solutions of implicit differential equations. Adv. Comput. Math. 19, 231–253 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.: Strong stability preserving hybrid methods. Appl. Numer. Math. 59, 891–904 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, T.Y., Innanen, K.: A survey of multiderivative multistep integrators. Astron. J. 112(3), 1254–1262 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, T.E., Enright, W.H., Fellen, B.M., Sedgwick, A.E.: Comparing numerical methods for ordinary differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 9, 603–637 (1972)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C.A., Carpenter, M.K., Lewis, R.M.: Low-storage, explicit Runge–Kutta schemes for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations. Appl. Numer. Math. 35, 177–219 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J.D.: Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Systems: The Initial Value Problem. Wiley, London (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lara, M., Elipe, A., Palacios, M.: Automatic programming of recurrent power series. Math. Comput. Simul. 49, 351–362 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nedialkov, N.S., Jackson, K.R., Corliss, G.F.: Validated solutions of initial value problems for ordinary differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 105, 21–68 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen-Ba, T., Kengne, E., Vaillancourt, R.: One-step 4-stage Hermite–Birkhoff–Taylor ODE solver of order 12. Can. Appl. Math. Q. 16, 77–94 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen-Ba, T., Desjardins, S.J., Sharp, P.W., Vaillancourt, R.: Contractivity-preserving, explicit, Hermite–Obrechkoff ODE solver of order 13. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 117, 423–434 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10569-013-9520-9

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Obrechkoff, N.: Neue Quadraturformeln. Abh. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Math. Nat. Kl. 4, 1–20 (1940)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, P.J., Dormand, J.R.: High order embedded Runge–Kutta formulae. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 7, 67–75 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, E.: Determination and survey of periodic Trojan orbits in the restricted problem of three bodies. Astron. J. 66, 500–513 (1961)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, P.W.: Numerical comparison of explicit Runge–Kutta pairs of orders four through eight. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 17, 387–409 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, J.F.: On the restricted problem of three bodies. Danske Vid. Selsk. Mat.-fys. Medd. 30, 1–17 (1956)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The anonymous referees are deeply thanked for many constructive comments which have improved this paper considerably. This work was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Thanks are due to Martín Lara for supplying the authors with his programs and and sharing his experience.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Truong Nguyen-Ba.

Additional information

This work was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Appendix: Coefficients of two selected HO methods

Appendix: Coefficients of two selected HO methods

Table 20 of the appendix lists the two selected CP HO methods: HO(4, 7, 13) and HO(5, 6, 13) with their \(c(\text {HO}(d,k,p))\) and \(x_{\text {min}}\) (of the unscaled stability intervals \(( x_{\text {min}}, 0)\)).

Table 20 \(c(\text {HO}(d,k,p))\), \(x_{\text {min}}\) and coefficients of the integration formulae of HO(4, 7, 13) and HO(5, 6, 13)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen-Ba, T., Giordano, T. & Vaillancourt, R. Contractivity-preserving explicit multistep Hermite–Obrechkoff series differential equation solvers. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 124, 385–404 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-015-9668-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-015-9668-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation