Abstract
In this study, we synthesized three precipitated iron catalysts using continuous co-precipitation method with three different iron precursors: ferric nitrate Fe(NO3)3, ferrous sulfate FeSO4, ferrous oxalate FeC2O4. The catalysts were characterized with XRD, SEM, XPS, N2 sorption and H2-TPR, respectively. The results indicated that the phases of catalysts using ferrous salts as iron precursor were composed of Fe2O3 and Fe3O4. Especially, the catalyst sample prepared by ferrous oxalate (Fe–C) exhibited the largest crystallite size, the highest crystallinity (99.78%), and the easiest reducibility. Fischer–Tropsch synthesis reaction was carried out to study the catalytic performance of three precipitated iron catalysts. In comparison with the other two catalysts, Fe–C has showed ability of the highest catalytic activity, the best stability and the highest selectivity of C5+ hydrocarbons. All the results lead us to draw a conclusion that the properties of iron precursors can notably affect morphology, phase structure, reduction behaviors and catalytic performances of the catalyst.
Graphic Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Luo M, Li H (2018) Reac Kinet Mech Catal 124:279–291
Di Z, Zhao T, Feng X et al (2019) Catal Lett 149:279–291
Luo M, Davis BH (2003) Appl Catal A 246:171–181
Keyvanloo K, Hecker WC, Woodfield BF et al (2014) J Catal 319:220–231
Xue Y, Ge H, Chen Z et al (2018) J Catal 358:237–242
Hans S (1999) Appl Catal A 186:3–12
Saheli S, Rezvani AR (2017) J Mol Struct 1144:166–172
Zhang Q, Kang J, Wang Y (2010) Chem Cat Chem 2:1030–1058
Ojeda M, Granados ML, Rojas S (2003) J Mol Catal A Chem 202:179–186
Luo M, Hamdeh H, Davis BH (2009) Catal Today 140:127–134
Dry ME (2004) Appl Catal A 276:1–3
Fraser I, Rabiu AM, van Steen E (2016) Energy Procedia 100:210–216
Hayakawa H, Tanaka H, Fujimoto K (2007) Catal Commun 8:1820–1824
Sirimanothan N, Hamdeh HH, Zhang Y et al (2002) Catal Lett 82:181–191
Bukur DB, Sivaraj C (2002) Appl Catal A 231:201–204
Bian G, Oonuki A, Kobayashi Y et al (2001) Appl Catal A 219:13–14
Wu B, Bai L, Xiang H (2004) Fuel 83:205–212
Xiong H, Moyo M, Motchelaho MAM (2010) Appl Catal A Gen 388:168–178
Torres Galvisa HM, Koekena ACJ, Bitter JH (2013) Catal Today 215:95–102
Wei Y, Luo D, Zhang C (2018) Catal Sci Technol 8:2883–2893
Ma W, Jacobs G, Sparks DE (2015) J Catal 326:149–160
Yamashita T, Hayes P (2008) Appl Surf Sci 254:2441–2449
Roosendaal SJ, van Asselen B, Elsenaar JW et al (1999) Surf Sci 442:329–337
Graat PCJ, Somers MAJ (1996) Appl Surf Sci 100–101:36–40
Graat PCJ, Somers MAJ (1998) Surf Interface Anal 26:773–782
Ruby C, Humbert B, Fusy J (2000) Surf Interface Anal 29:377–380
Mekki A, Holland D, McConville CF et al (1996) J Non Cryst Solids 208:267–276
Yamashita T, Hayes P (2006) J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 152:6–11
Cheng K, Virgnie M, Ordomsky VV (2015) J Catal 328:139–150
Brunauer S, Deming LS, Deming WS et al (1940) J Am Chem Soc 62:1723–1732
Munteanu G, Ilieva L, Andreeva D (1997) Thermochim Acta 291:171–177
Jin Y, Datye AK (2000) J Catal 196:8–17
Bukur DB, Lang X, Mukesh D, Zimmerman WH, Rosynek MP, Li C (1990) Ind Eng Chem Res 29:1588–1599
Zhang CH, Yang Y, Teng BT et al (2006) J Catal 237:405–415
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest for each contributing author.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Di, Z., Feng, X., Yang, Z. et al. Effect of Iron Precursor on Catalytic Performance of Precipitated Iron Catalyst for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis Reaction. Catal Lett 150, 2640–2647 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-020-03158-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-020-03158-3