Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Allograft bone banking experience in Pakistan

  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To share our experience of establishing a bone bank in Pakistan, and the clinical use of these indigenously produced bone grafts. We retrospectively reviewed our experience of the procurement, processing, and storage of bone grafts at a bone bank in Karachi, Pakistan, the first bone bank to be established in a public sector hospital in Pakistan. The bone bank was established at Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (SIUT), Karachi, in collaboration with Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences/Civil Hospital, Karachi (CHK) in May, 2015. Since then, a large number of bone grafts from the tissue bank have been used for various orthopedic procedures. This paper describes the problems and challenges faced in establishing and running a tissue bank in a Muslim and a developing country and the progress of the bone bank over the first 4 years. A total of 93 bone grafts were retrieved and preserved in the bone bank over the 4-year period. Among these, 56 (60.2%) bones were retrieved from male donors and 37 (39.8%) from females. The mean age of all donors was 55.9 ± 15.34 years (range: 16–90 years). All bone donors were living patients. No c bones were obtained from deceased donors. Types of bone grafts included: femoral heads, 68; head with neck of femur, 19; radius and ulna, 1; lower femur, knee joint, lower leg and foot bones, 4; and skull bone, 1. All grafts were subjected to aerobic and anaerobic bacterial cultures, as well as fungal cultures. Microbiological contamination was observed in 18/93 (19.35%). All culture positive bones were discarded. Bone grafts issued from the bank and transplanted were 51/93 (54.8%) in all. Bone grafts were used in a variety of tumor and non-tumor orthopaedic procedures in CHK. Nine bone grafts were donated to the other hospitals to be used for revision total hip replacement and tumor surgeries. There were no service charges. Two patients (3.92%) developed infections postoperatively, one superficial and one deep. No other complications were noted. This is the preliminary report on the establishment and functioning of a bone bank in a public sector hospital in Pakistan. The favorable outcome has inculcated confidence in orthopedic surgeons for greater use of bone allografts for a variety of indications in this country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aho AJ, Hirn M, Aro HT, Heikkila JT, Meurman O (1998) Bone bank service in Finland: experience of bacteriologic, serologic and clinical results of the Turku Bone Bank 1972–1995. Acta Orthop Scand 69:559–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Alencar PG, Vieira IF (2010) Bone banks. Revista Brasileira De Ortopedia (english Edition) 45:524–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai Mohan M, Biraris Sandeep R, Wade Roshan M (2014) Auto bone banking: innovative method for bone preservation. J Orthop Case Reports 4:16–18. https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.216

  • Hassaballa M, Mehendale S, Poniatowski S, Kalantzis G, Smith E, Learmonth ID (2009) Subsidence of the stem after impaction bone grafting for revision hip replacement using irradiated bone. J Bone Joint Surg 91:37–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hovanyecz P, Lorenti A, Lucero JM, Gorla A, Castiglioni AE (2015) Living donor bone banking: processing and discarding—from procurement to therapeutic use. Cell Tissue Bank 16:593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JB (1987) Bone banking: an overview. Lab Med 18:830–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journeaux SF, Johnson N, Bryce SL, Friedman SJ, Sommerville SM, Morgan DA (1999) Bacterial contamination rates during bone allograft retrieval. J Arthroplasty 14:677–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lakhwani OP, Jindal M, Kaur O, Chandoke RK, Kapoor SK (2017) Effect of bone bank processing on bone mineral density, histomorphometry and biomechanical strength of retrieved femoral head. Ind J Med Res 146(Suppl 2):S45–S50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JW, Chao LH, Su LH, Wang JW, Wang CJ (2002) Experience with a bone bank operation and allograft bone infection in recipients at a medical centre in southern Taiwan. J Hosp Infect 50:293–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lomas R, Chandrasekar A, Board TN (2013) Bone allograft in the UK: perceptions and realities. Hip Int 23:427–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macewen W (1881) Observation concerning transplantation on bone. Proc R Soc London 32:232–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meermans G, Roos J, Hofkens L, Cheyns P (2007) Bone banking in a community hospital. Acta Orthopædica Belgica 73:754–759

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehendale S, Learmonth ID, Smith EJ, Nedungayil S, Maheshwari R, Hassaballa MA (2009) Use of irradiated bone graft for impaction grafting in acetabular revision surgery: a review of fifty consecutive cases. Hip Int 19:114–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohd S, Yusof N, Ramalingam S, Ng WM, Mansor A (2017) Knowledge on bone banking among participants in an orthopaedic conference: a preliminary survey. Malaysian Orthop J 11(2):1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MS, Akhtar N, Hasan MZ, Asaduzzaman SM (2019) Human tissue banking in Bangladesh: hope for the patients of massive burns, surgical wound and bone associated complications. Intl J Burns Trauma 9:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritacco LE, Farfalli GL, Milano FE, Ayerza MA, Muscolo DL, Aponte-Tinao L (2013) Three-dimensional virtual bone bank system workflow for structural bone allograft selection: a technical report. Sarcoma 2013:524395

  • Tomford WW (2000) Bone allografts: past, present and future. Cell Tissue Banking 1:105–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomford WW, Mankin HJ (1999) Bone banking: update on methods and materials. Orthopedic Clinics 30:565–570

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vetter Sven Y, Carsten R, Sara A, Alfred GP, Frank Christian B (2014) Bone banking in a traumatologic department: a ten-year analysis. Int J Biomed Mater Res 2(3):15–20

  • Wang W, Yeung KW (2017) Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: a review. BioactMater 2:224–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwitser EW, Jiya TU, Licher HG, van Royen BJ (2012) Design and management of an orthopaedic bone bank in the Netherlands. Cell Tissue Bank 13:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Badaruddin Sahito.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, M., Mubarak, M., Sahito, B. et al. Allograft bone banking experience in Pakistan. Cell Tissue Bank 23, 367–373 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-021-09950-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-021-09950-8

Keywords

Navigation