Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of complex congenital heart disease in infants using low dose cardiac computed tomography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite advances in new CT techniques with radiation dose reduction, there are limited studies describing radiation dose. Describing radiation dose might help to educate physicians on how the benefit of cardiac CT outweighs the potential risk of radiation. The aim of this study was to describe the radiation exposure parameters in newborns and infants and the role of CT scan in providing useful information for optimal surgical planning and management of newborns and infants with complex congenital heart disease. In complex congenital heart disease delineating the anatomy and using the CT images as needed for three-dimensional modelling helps for optimal surgical planning. This single center, retrospective study included 74 infants with CHD (median age 2 months, range 1 day to 9 months) who underwent cardiac CT evaluation from September 2018 to April 2019, using the Siemens Somatom Definition Edge scanner. Total dose length product (DLP) and computed tomographic dose index volume (CTDIvol) were recorded, and the estimated effective radiation dose was calculated using a previously published conversion rate. Median effective radiation dose for the computed tomographic angiography (CTA) was 0.6 mSv. The median DLP was 13 mGycm and median CTDIvol was 3.5 mGy. Cardiac CT can be done with a sub-mSv dose in infants. Cardiac CT completes the standard initial evaluation of neonates and infants with complex CHD, allowing thorough understanding of complex spatial relationships between anatomical and defective structures, and is achievable with minimal radiation exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CHD:

Congenital heart disease

CT:

Computed tomography

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiography

CTA:

Computed tomographic angiography

DLP:

Dose length product

CTDIvol:

Computed tomographic dose index volume

References

  1. Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, Kim YH, Seo DM, Park JJ (2005) Computed tomography for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:347–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-004-4015-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehta R, Lee KJ, Chaturvedi R, Benson L (2008) Complications of pediatric cardiac catheterization: a review in the current era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72:278–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goo HW (2011) Cardiac MDCT in children: CT technology overview and interpretation. Radiol Clin North Am 49:997–1010. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2011.06.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leschka S, Oechslin E, Husmann L et al (2007) Pre- and postoperative evaluation of congenital heart disease in children and adults with 64-section CT. Radiographics 27:829–846. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.273065713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Han BK, Lindberg J, Grant K, Schwartz RS, Lesser JR (2011) Accuracy and safety of high pitch computed tomography imaging in young children with complex congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 107:1541e1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas KE, Wang B (2008) Age specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children’s hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method. Pediatr Radiol 38(6):645–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0794-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2008) The measure, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT. Report #96 of AAPM task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee, 2008

  8. Orly Goitein Y, Salem J, Jacobson et al (2014) The role of cardiac computed tomography in infants with congenital heart disease. ISR Med Assoc J 16(3):147–5223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ying Liu J, Li H et al (2016) Image quality and radiation dose of dual-source CT cardiac angiography using prospective ECG-triggering technique in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. J Cardiothorac Surg 11:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0460-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weustink AC, Neefjes LA, Kyrzopoulos S et al (2009) Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography. Radiology 253:672–680. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2533090358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schicchi N, Fogante M, Esposto Pirani et al (2019) Third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT in pediatric congenital heart disease patients: state-of-the-art. Radiol Med 124:1238–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01097-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Long CM, Long SS, Johnson PT, Mahesh M, Fishman EK, Zimmerman SL (2015) Utility of low-dose high-pitch scanning for pediatric cardiac computed tomography imaging. J Thorac Imaging 30(4):W36-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng M, Zhao H, Xu J, Wu Y, Li J (2013) Image quality of ultra-low-dose dual source CT angiography using high pitched spiral acquisition and iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7(6):376–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2013.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krishnamurthy R (2009) The role of MRI and CT in congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 39:S196–S204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1166-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paul JF, Rohnean A, Sigal-Cinqualbre A (2010) Multidetector CT for congenital heart patients: what a pediatric radiologist should know. Pediatr Radiol 40:869–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1614-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu XH, Huang GY, Pa M et al (2008) Multidetector CT angiography and 3D reconstruction in young children with coarctation of the aorta. Pediatr Cardiol 29:726–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-008-9226-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng Z, Wang X, Duan Y et al (2010) Low-dose prospective ECG-triggering dual-source CT angiography in infants and children with complex congenital heart disease: first experience. Eur Radiol 20:2503–2511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1822-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 32:228–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-002-0671-1 (discussion 242–244)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE (2001) Estimates of the cancer risks from pediatric CT radiation are not merely theoretical: comment on “point/counterpoint: in X-ray computed tomography, technique factors should be selected appropriate to patient size against the proposition.” Med Phys 28:2387–23888. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1415074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ait-Ali L, Andreassi MG, Foffa I, Spadoni I, Vano E, Picano E (2010) Cumulative patient effective dose and acute radiation-induced chromosomal DNA damage in children with congenital heart disease. Heart 96:269–274. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2008.160309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Watson TG, Mah E, Schoepf UJ, King L, Huda W, Hlavacek AM (2013) Effective radiation dose in computed tomographic angiography of the chest and diagnostic cardiac catheterization in pediatric patients. Pediatr Cardiol 34(3):518–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-012-0486-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meinel FG, Huda W, Schoepf UJ et al (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography in infants with tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary atresia and major aortopulmonary collateral arteries. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7(6):367–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2013.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Booij R, Dijkshoorn ML, van Straten M et al (2016) Cardiovascular imaging in pediatric patients using dual source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2015.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao W, Zhong YM, Sun AM et al (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of sub mSv prospective ECG—triggering cardiac CT in young infant with complex congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32(6):991–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-016-0854-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the staff of the Cardiovascular computed tomography unit at Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital for their support in this work.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or non-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilachew A. Adebo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dodge-Khatami, J., Adebo, D.A. Evaluation of complex congenital heart disease in infants using low dose cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 37, 1455–1460 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02118-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02118-7

Keywords

Navigation