Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Abnormal aortic stiffness in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: phenotypic variation determined by magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess aortic stiffness in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), and to determine if differences exist among the BAV phenotypes. Stiffness was measured by pulse wave velocity (PWV) determined using velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging (VENC-MRI). VENC-MRI was performed in 100 BAV patients and 45 normal controls. PWV was determined between the mid ascending and mid descending aorta. The BAV phenotypes were characterized using steady-state free precession (SSFP) images acquired across the face of the aortic valve, and classified as follows: right-left cusp (R-L) fusion, right and non-coronary cusp (R-NC) fusion, and left and non-coronary cusp (L-NC) fusion. The following BAV phenotypes were identified: 76 R-L, 23 R-NC, and 1 L-NC fusion. BAV patients demonstrated significantly greater PWV compared to normal controls, after adjusting for age (9.16 vs. 3.83 m/s; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, PWV was significantly greater in patients with R-NC fusion than those with R-L fusion phenotype (12.27 vs. 7.97 m/s; p < 0.001). There was significantly increased PWV from VENC-MRI in BAV patients compared to normal controls. Thisis the first to demonstrate the association of different BAV phenotypes and aortic stiffness. VENC-MRI PWV assessment potentially represents a novel parameter for enhanced surveillance and may alter surgical triage of aorta in this high risk group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roberts WC (1970) The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. A study of 85 autopsy cases. Am J Cardiol 26(1):72–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sabet HY, Edwards WD, Tazelaar HD, Daly RC (1999) Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: a surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases. Mayo Clin Proc. 74(1):14–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Basso C, Boschello M, Perrone C, Mecenero A, Cera A, Bicego D et al (2004) An echocardiographic survey of primary school children for bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 93(5):661–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandes SM, Sanders SP, Khairy P, Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K, Lang P et al (2004) Morphology of bicuspid aortic valve in children and adolescents. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(8):1648–1651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman T, Mani A, Elefteriades JA (2008) Bicuspid aortic valve: clinical approach and scientific review of a common clinical entity. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 6(2):235–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tzemos N, Therrien J, Yip J, Thanassoulis G, Tremblay S, Jamorski MT et al (2008) Outcomes in adults with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA 300(11):1317–1325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Michelena HI, Desjardins VA, Avierinos JF, Russo A, Nkomo VT, Sundt TM et al (2008) Natural history of asymptomatic patients with normally functioning or minimally dysfunctional bicuspid aortic valve in the community. Circulation 117(21):2776–2784

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Forsell C, Bjorck HM, Eriksson P, Franco-Cereceda A, Gasser TC (2014) Biomechanical properties of the thoracic aneurysmal wall: differences between bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve patients. Ann Thorac Surg 98(1):65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernandes SM, Khairy P, Sanders SP, Colan SD (2007) Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and interventions in the young. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(22):2211–2214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ciotti GR, Vlahos AP, Silverman NH (2006) Morphology and function of the bicuspid aortic valve with and without coarctation of the aorta in the young. Am J Cardiol 98(8):1096–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schaefer BM, Lewin MB, Stout KK, Gill E, Prueitt A, Byers PH et al (2008) The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape. Heart 94(12):1634–1638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Della Corte A, Bancone C, Dialetto G, Covino FE, Manduca S, Montibello MV et al (2014) The ascending aorta with bicuspid aortic valve: a phenotypic classification with potential prognostic significance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 46(2):240–247 (Discussion 7)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Della Corte A, Bancone C, Buonocore M, Dialetto G, Covino FE, Manduca S et al (2013) Pattern of ascending aortic dimensions predicts the growth rate of the aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6(12):1301–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Groenink M, de Roos A, Mulder BJ, Verbeeten B Jr, Timmermans J, Zwinderman AH et al (2001) Biophysical properties of the normal-sized aorta in patients with Marfan syndrome: evaluation with MR flow mapping. Radiology 219(2):535–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D et al (2006) Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 27(21):2588–2605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nistri S, Grande-Allen J, Noale M, Basso C, Siviero P, Maggi S et al (2008) Aortic elasticity and size in bicuspid aortic valve syndrome. Eur Heart J 29(4):472–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaefer BM, Lewin MB, Stout KK, Byers PH, Otto CM (2007) Usefulness of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype to predict elastic properties of the ascending aorta. Am J Cardiol 99(5):686–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nistri S, Sorbo MD, Basso C, Thiene G (2002) Bicuspid aortic valve: abnormal aortic elastic properties. J Heart Valve Dis 11(3):369–373 (Discussion 73–74)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yap SC, Nemes A, Meijboom FJ, Galema TW, Geleijnse ML, ten Cate FJ et al (2008) Abnormal aortic elastic properties in adults with congenital valvular aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol 128(3):336–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nollen GJ, Groenink M, Tijssen JG, Van Der Wall EE, Mulder BJ (2004) Aortic stiffness and diameter predict progressive aortic dilatation in patients with Marfan syndrome. Eur Heart J 25(13):1146–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grotenhuis HB, Ottenkamp J, Westenberg JJ, Bax JJ, Kroft LJ, de Roos A (2007) Reduced aortic elasticity and dilatation are associated with aortic regurgitation and left ventricular hypertrophy in nonstenotic bicuspid aortic valve patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(15):1660–1665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogers WJ, Hu YL, Coast D, Vido DA, Kramer CM, Pyeritz RE et al (2001) Age-associated changes in regional aortic pulse wave velocity. J Am Coll Cardiol 38(4):1123–1129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Petersen SE, Wiesmann F, Hudsmith LE, Robson MD, Francis JM, Selvanayagam JB et al (2006) Functional and structural vascular remodeling in elite rowers assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(4):790–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van der Meer RW, Diamant M, Westenberg JJ, Doornbos J, Bax JJ, de Roos A et al (2007) Magnetic resonance assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity, aortic distensibility, and cardiac function in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 9(4):645–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stevanov M, Baruthio J, Gounot D, Grucker D (2001) In vitro validation of MR measurements of arterial pulse-wave velocity in the presence of reflected waves. J Magn Reson Imaging 14(2):120–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ward C (2000) Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart 83(1):81–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fedak PW, Verma S, David TE, Leask RL, Weisel RD, Butany J (2002) Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 106(8):900–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Keane MG, Wiegers SE, Plappert T, Pochettino A, Bavaria JE, Sutton MG (2000) Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. Circulation 102(19 Suppl 3):III35–III39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferencik M, Pape LA (2003) Changes in size of ascending aorta and aortic valve function with time in patients with congenitally bicuspid aortic valves. Am J Cardiol 92(1):43–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cecconi M, Manfrin M, Moraca A, Zanoli R, Colonna PL, Bettuzzi MG et al (2005) Aortic dimensions in patients with bicuspid aortic valve without significant valve dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 95(2):292–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Beroukhim RS, Kruzick TL, Taylor AL, Gao D, Yetman AT (2006) Progression of aortic dilation in children with a functionally normal bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 98(6):828–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiang X, Rowitch DH, Soriano P, McMahon AP, Sucov HM (2000) Fate of the mammalian cardiac neural crest. Development 127(8):1607–1616

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Macatee TL, Hammond BP, Arenkiel BR, Francis L, Frank DU, Moon AM (2003) Ablation of specific expression domains reveals discrete functions of ectoderm- and endoderm-derived FGF8 during cardiovascular and pharyngeal development. Development 130(25):6361–6374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McKusick VA (1972) Association of congenital bicuspid aortic valve and erdheim’s cystic medial necrosis. Lancet 1(7758):1026–1027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Niwa K, Perloff JK, Bhuta SM, Laks H, Drinkwater DC, Child JS et al (2001) Structural abnormalities of great arterial walls in congenital heart disease: light and electron microscopic analyses. Circulation 103(3):393–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bonderman D, Gharehbaghi-Schnell E, Wollenek G, Maurer G, Baumgartner H, Lang IM (1999) Mechanisms underlying aortic dilatation in congenital aortic valve malformation. Circulation 99(16):2138–2143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shin HJ, Shin JK, Chee HK, Kim JS, Ko SM (2015) Characteristics of aortic valve dysfunction and ascending aorta dimensions according to bicuspid aortic valve morphology. Eur Radiol 25(7):2103–2114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Warner PJ, Al-Quthami A, Brooks EL, Kelley-Hedgepeth A, Patvardhan E, Kuvin JT et al (2013) Augmentation index and aortic stiffness in bicuspid aortic valve patients with non-dilated proximal aortas. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 13:19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Karamanoglu M (2003) Errors in estimating propagation distances in pulse wave velocity. Hypertension 41(6):e8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yener N, Oktar GL, Erer D, Yardimci MM, Yener A (2002) Bicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 8(5):264–267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pachulski RT, Chan KL (1993) Progression of aortic valve dysfunction in 51 adult patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve: assessment and follow up by Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 69(3):237–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Della Corte A, Bancone C, Dialetto G, Covino FE, Manduca S, D’Oria V et al (2014) Towards an individualized approach to bicuspid aortopathy: different valve types have unique determinants of aortic dilatation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 45(4):e118–e124 (Discussion e24)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pees C, Michel-Behnke I (2012) Morphology of the bicuspid aortic valve and elasticity of the adjacent aorta in children. Am J Cardiol 110(9):1354–1360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Koenraadt WM, Grewal N, Gaidoukevitch OY, DeRuiter MC, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Bartelings MM et al (2016) The extent of the raphe in bicuspid aortic valves is associated with aortic regurgitation and aortic root dilatation. Neth Heart J 24(2):127–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Bissell MM, Hess AT, Biasiolli L, Glaze SJ, Loudon M, Pitcher A et al (2013) Aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: flow pattern is a major contributor and differs with valve fusion type. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6(4):499–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mahadevia R, Barker AJ, Schnell S, Entezari P, Kansal P, Fedak PW et al (2014) Bicuspid aortic cusp fusion morphology alters aortic three-dimensional outflow patterns, wall shear stress, and expression of aortopathy. Circulation 129(6):673–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK, Ordovas KG, Urbania TH, Alley MT et al (2010) Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology 255(1):53–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nistri S, Sorbo MD, Marin M, Palisi M, Scognamiglio R, Thiene G (1999) Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves. Heart 82(1):19–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Larson EW, Edwards WD (1984) Risk factors for aortic dissection: a necropsy study of 161 cases. Am J Cardiol 53(6):849–855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hardikar AA, Marwick TH (2013) Surgical thresholds for bicuspid aortic valve associated aortopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6(12):1311–1320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Adamo L, Braverman AC (2015) Surgical threshold for bicuspid aortic valve aneurysm: a case for individual decision-making. Heart 101(17):1361–1367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hiratzka LF, Creager MA, Isselbacher EM, Svensson LG, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO et al (2016) Surgery for aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves: a statement of clarification from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 67(6):724–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA et al (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 129(23):e521–e643

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes MJ et al (2012) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J 33(19):2451–2496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yasuda H, Nakatani S, Stugaard M, Tsujita-Kuroda Y, Bando K, Kobayashi J et al (2003) Failure to prevent progressive dilation of ascending aorta by aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: comparison with tricuspid aortic valve. Circulation 108(Suppl 1):II291–I4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD et al (2008) 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 118(15):e523–e661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Thananya Boonyasirinant, Prabhakar Rajiah & Scott D. Flamm

  2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Thananya Boonyasirinant

  3. Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Scott D. Flamm

Authors
  1. Thananya Boonyasirinant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prabhakar Rajiah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scott D. Flamm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thananya Boonyasirinant.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boonyasirinant, T., Rajiah, P. & Flamm, S.D. Abnormal aortic stiffness in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: phenotypic variation determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 35, 133–141 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1433-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1433-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation