Abstract
Background Patients with mild to moderate aortic stenosis (AS) seem to have a worse outcome than commonly expected. Early identification of subjects who may develop a rapid disease progression or cardiovascular events is critical in order to apply adequate risk management. Study design Observational prospective single-centre study. Objective To determine the prognostic role of exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in patients with mild and moderate asymptomatic AS. Patients Ninety consecutive patients (mean age 74 ± 12 years) with isolated mild and moderate AS were enrolled into the study protocol over a 20 months period. Follow-up time was 12 months. Methods A complete echocardiographic study with tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was performed at baseline and during semi-supine symptom-limited exercise test to evaluate: (1) the occurrence of symptoms, (2) ST segment changes, (3) transaortic pressure gradient, (4) the E/A ratio, (5) the E/e′ ratio and (6) the systolic pulmonary artery pressure. Main outcome measures During the 1 year follow-up time, we evaluated the occurrence of adverse cardiac events, defined as any of the following: (1) cardio-vascular hospitalization; (2) requirement for aortic valve replacement; (3) cardiac death. Results During follow-up, three patients died, 11 underwent aortic valve replacement and 26 had cardiovascular hospitalizations. On univariate analysis, patients who exhibited symptoms during exercise (HR 2.93, p = 0.003); the occurrence of a ≥2 mm exercise-induced ST segment depression (HR 3.12, p = 0.001); a ≥15 mmHg increase in mean transaortic pressure gradient during exercise (HR 2.77, p = 0.001); a ≥50 mmHg exercise-induced increase in systolic pulmonary artery pressure (HR 2.90, p = 0.009); an exercise-induced pseudo-normalization of the E/A ratio (E/A ≥ 1) (HR 7.50, p = 0.0001) and, particularly, a ≥15 exercise-induced increase in the E/e′ ratio (HR 7.69, p = 0.0001) had a significantly higher risk of cardiac events during the follow-up time. On multivariate analysis, only the latter covariate (HR 6.04, p = 0.009) was independently associated with adverse cardiac events. Conclusions A ≥15 stress-induced increase in E/e′ ratio is highly predictive of cardiac events in patients with mild to moderate AS. Assessment of diastolic function using TDI during ESE provides additional prognostic information in such patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rosenhek R, Klaar U, Schemper M et al (2004) Mild and moderate aortic stenosis. Natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography. Eur Heart J 25(3):199–205
Kume T, Kawamoto T, Okura H et al (2007) Rapid progression of mild to moderate aortic stenosis in patients older than 80 years. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20:1243–1246
Otto CM (2004) Aortic stenosis: even mild disease is significant. Eur Heart J 25(3):185–187
Lund O, Nielsen TT, Emmertsen K et al (1996) Mortality and worsening of prognostic profile during waiting time for valve replacement and aortic stenosis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 44:289–295
Amato MCM, Moffa PJ, Werner KE et al (2001) Treatment decision in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis: role of exercise testing. Heart 86:381–386
Alborino D, Hoffmann JL, Fournet PC et al (2002) Value of exercise testing to evaluate the indication for surgery in asymptomatic patients with valvular aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 11:204–209
Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG et al (2003) A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 24:1231–1243
Picano E, Pibarot P, Lancellotti P et al (2009) The emerging role of exercise testing and stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:2251–2260
Rafique AM, Biner S, Ray I et al (2009) Meta-analysis of prognostic value of stress testing in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 104:972–977
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:1–39
Kelly TA, Rothbart RM, Copper CM et al (1988) Comparison of outcome of asymptomatic to symptomatic patients older than 20 years of age with valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 16:123–130
Lester SJ, Heilbron B, Gin K et al (1998) The natural history and rate of progression of aortic stenosis. Chest 113:1109–1114
Carabello BA, Paulus WJ (2009) Aortic stenosis. Lancet 373:956–966
Faggiano P, Antonini-Canterin F, Erlicher A et al (2003) Progression of aortic valve sclerosis to aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 91:99–101
Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F et al (2012) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 33(19):2451–2496
Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G et al (2000) Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 343:611–617
Pellikka PA, Sarano ME, Nishimura RA et al (2005) Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis during prolonged follow-up. Circulation 111:3290–3295
Rosenhek R, Zilberszac R, Schemper M et al (2010) Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 121:151–156
Lancellotti P, Lebois F, Simon M et al (2005) Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise: Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 112(9 Suppl):377–382
Marechaux S, Hachicha Z, Bellouin A et al (2010) Usefulness of exercise-stress echocardiography for risk stratification of true asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 31:1390–1397
Cioffi G, Faggiano P, Vizzardi E et al (2011) Prognostic value of inappropriately high left ventricular mass in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Heart 97:301–307
Lancellotti P, Moonen M, Magne J et al (2010) Prognostic effect of long-axis left ventricular dysfunction and B-type natriuretic peptide levels in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 105:383–388
Zito C, Salvia J, Cusmà-Piccione M et al (2011) Prognostic significance of valvuloarterial impedance and left ventricular longitudinal function in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis involving three-cuspid valves. Am J Cardiol 108(10):1463–1469
Todaro MC, Carerj S, Khandheria B et al (2015) Usefulness of atrial function for risk stratification in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. J Cardiol. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.04.010
Picano E, Pibarot P, Lancellotti P et al (2009) The emerging role of exercise testing and stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:2251–2260
Das P, Rimington H, Chambers J (2005) Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 26:1309–1313
Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME et al (1997) Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis clinical, echocardiographic and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 95:2262–2270
Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP et al (2000) Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler catheterization study. Circulation 102(15):1788–1794
Nagueh S, Middleton K, Moplen H et al (1997) Doppler tissue imaging: a non-invasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and evaluation of left ventricular filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:1527–1533
Galderisi M, Rapacciuolo A, Esposito R et al (2013) Site-dependency of E/e′ ratio in predicting invasive left ventricular filling pressure in patients with suspected or ascertained coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14:555–561
Pela G, Regolisti G, Coghi P et al (2004) Effects of the reduction of preload on left and right ventricular myocardial velocities analyzed by Doppler tissue echocardiography in healthy subjects. Eur J Echocardiogr 5:262–271
Sutter J, De Backer J, Van de Veire N et al (2005) Effects of age, gender, and left ventricular mass on septal mitral annulus velocity (E′) and the ratio of transmitral early peak velocity to E′ (E/E′). Am J Cardiol 95:1020–1023
Turiel M, Peretti R, Mornati D et al (2005) The role of echocardiographic techniques in connective tissue diseases. Autoimmun Rev 4:171–177
Hillis GS, Møller JE, Pellikka PA et al (2004) Noninvasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressure by E/e′ is a powerful predictor of servival after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:360–367
Sharp AS ASCOT Investigators (2010) Tissue Doppler E/e′ ratio is a powerful predictor of primary cardiac events in a hypertensive population: an ASCOT substudy. Eur Heart J 31:747–752
Otto CM (2006) Valvular aortic stenosis: disease severity and timing of intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(11):2141–2151
Bergler-Klein J, Klaar U, Heger M et al (2004) Natriuretic peptides predict symptom-free survival and postoperative outcome in severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 109:2302–2308
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We wish to confirm that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this publication. Andrea Sonaglioni declares that he has no conflict of interest. Michele Lombardo declares that he has no conflict of interest. Massimo Baravelli declares that he has no conflict of interest. Graziana Trotta declares that she has no conflict of interest. Claudio Anzà declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical standard
All procedures performed in the present study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sonaglioni, A., Lombardo, M., Baravelli, M. et al. Exercise stress echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging in risk stratification of mild to moderate aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31, 1519–1527 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0724-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0724-9