Abstract
Integrating norms of reciprocity, affect theory of social exchange, and ambivalence literature, we investigated how leader-member exchange (LMX) ambivalence influences employees’ interpersonal behaviors toward supervisors. Study 1, with a time-lagged field method, revealed that LMX ambivalence was positively related to both employee-rated supervisor-directed helping and deviant behaviors and that such relationships were mediated by emotional ambivalence toward supervisors. We also confirmed the amplification effects of workplace gossip about supervisors (WGS). Specifically, while receiving more positive WGS (PWGS) or less negative WGS (NWGS) could strengthen the positive relationship between emotional ambivalence and supervisor-directed helping behaviors, receiving less PWGS or more NWGS would accentuate the positive effect of emotional ambivalence on supervisor-directed deviant behaviors. Study 2 replicated our results with a scenario-based method and offered evidence for the mediating effect of emotional ambivalence toward supervisors. Study 3 included supervisor-rated helping and deviant behavior and a subjective measure of emotional ambivalence and again confirmed the mediating role of emotional ambivalence. Our findings extend knowledge of the interpersonal consequences of LMX ambivalence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this research are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114547952
Ashforth, B. E., Rogers, K. M., Pratt, M. G., & Pradies, C. (2014). Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach. Organization Science, 25(5), 1453–1478. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0909
Bai, Y., Wang, J., Chen, T., & Li, F. (2020). Learning from supervisor negative gossip: The reflective learning process and performance outcome of employee receivers. Human Relations, 73(12), 1689–1717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719866250
Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.24286163
Bell, D. W., & Esses, V. M. (2002). Ambivalence and response amplification: A motivational perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(8), 1143–1152. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022811012
Brady, D. L., Brown, D. J., & Liang, L. H. (2017). Moving beyond assumptions of deviance: The reconceptualization and measurement of workplace gossip. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000164
Chang, X., & Raver, J. L. (2020). The gendered nature of emotional ambivalence towards coworkers and its relational consequences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(6), 831–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09667-2
Chen, A., & Treviño, L. K. (2023). The consequences of ethical voice inside the organization: An integrative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(8), 1316–1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001075
Chen, L., & Weng, Q. (2023). Authoritarian-benevolent leadership and employee behaviors: An examination of the role of LMX ambivalence. Journal of Business Ethics, 186, 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05225-8
Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017a). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099
Cropanzano, R., Dasborough, M. T., & Weiss, H. M. (2017b). Affective events and the development of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0384
Dalal, R. S., Lam, H., Weiss, H. M., Welch, E. R., & Hulin, C. L. (2009). A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship-counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 1051–1066. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.44636148
Dechawatanapaisal, D. (2020). Effects of leader-member exchange ambivalence on work attitudes: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Management Development, 40(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-07-2020-0233
Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 127–150.
Ellwardt, L., Labianca, G. J., & Wittek, R. (2012). Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work?: A social network perspective on workplace gossip. Social Networks, 34(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.11.003
Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.377
Epitropaki, O., Radulovic, A. B., Ete, Z., Thomas, G., & Martin, R. (2020). Leader-follower transgressions, relationship repair strategies and outcomes: A state-of-the-science review and a way forward. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101376
Fong, C. T. (2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1016–1030. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798182
Ford, M. T., Agosta, J. P., Huang, J., & Shannon, C. (2018a). Moral emotions toward others at work and implications for employee behavior: A qualitative analysis using critical incidents. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33, 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9484-3
Ford, M. T., Wang, Y., Jin, J., & Eisenberger, R. (2018b). Chronic and episodic anger and gratitude toward the organization: Relationships with organizational and supervisor supportiveness and extrarole behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000075
Gauglitz, I. K., Schyns, B., Fehn, T., & Schütz, A. (2022). The dark side of leader narcissism: The relationship between leaders’ narcissistic rivalry and abusive supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, 185, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05146-6
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Gray, K., Waytz, A., & Young, L. (2012). The moral dyad: A fundamental template unifying moral judgment. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.686247
Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Han, Y. (2020). Ambivalence in the leader-follower relationship: Dispositional antecedents and effects on work-related well-being. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.
Hareli, S., & Rafaeli, A. (2008). Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.007
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028
Kachadourian, L. K., Fincham, F., & Davila, J. (2005). Attitudinal ambivalence, rumination, and forgiveness of partner transgressions in marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271595
Kakarika, M., Taghavi, S., & González-Gómez, H. V. (2023). Don’t shoot the messenger? A morality-and gender-based model of reactions to negative workplace gossip. Journal of Business Ethics, 189, 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05355-7
Katz, I., & Glass, D. C. (1979). An ambivalence-amplification theory of behavior toward the stigmatized. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 55–70). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Kim, Y. J., Van Dyne, L., & Lee, S. M. (2018). A dyadic model of motives, pride, gratitude, and helping. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(10), 1367–1382. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2315
Kim, S. L., Lee, S., & Son, S. Y. (2023). Why does leader-member exchange ambivalence reduce taking charge? The moderating role of cognitive reappraisal. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38, 1355–1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09899-3
Klotz, A. C., & Bolino, M. C. (2013). Citizenship and counterproductive work behavior: A moral licensing view. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0109
Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321–352. https://doi.org/10.1086/324071
Lawler, E. J., & Thye, S. R. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 217–244. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.217
Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2008). Social exchange and micro social order. American Sociological Review, 73(4), 519–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300401
Lee, A., Thomas, G., Martin, R., & Guillaume, Y. (2019). Leader-member exchange (LMX) ambivalence and task performance: The cross-domain buffering role of social support. Journal of Management, 45(5), 1927–1957. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317741190
Li, A., Liao, C., Shao, P., & Huang, J. (2021). Angry but not deviant: Employees’ prior-day deviant behavior toward the family buffers their reactions to abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 177, 683–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04750-2
Liao, Z., Wu, L., Zhang, H. J., Song, Z., & Wang, Y. (2023). Exchange through emoting: An emotional model of leader-member resource exchanges. Personnel Psychology, 76(1), 311–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12506
Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80053-1
Lin, X., & Du, J. (2023). What happens when leader is ambivalent and employee is indifferent? A moderated mediation model of LMX ambivalence and employee creativity. Chinese Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-08-2022-0290
Liu, X. L., Lu, J. G., Zhang, H., & Cai, Y. (2021). Helping the organization but hurting yourself: How employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior predicts work-to-life conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 167, 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.05.002
Lonati, S., Quiroga, B. F., Zehnder, C., & Antonakis, J. (2018). On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations. Journal of Operations Management, 64, 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2018.10.003
Lyubykh, Z., Bozeman, J., Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., & Shan, J. V. (2022). Employee performance and abusive supervision: The role of supervisor over-attributions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2560
McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.249
Melwani, S., & Rothman, N. B. (2022). The push-and-pull of frenemies: When and why ambivalent relationships lead to helping and harming. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(5), 707–723. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000811
Methot, J. R., Melwani, S., & Rothman, N. B. (2017). The space between us: A social-functional emotions view of ambivalent and indifferent workplace relationships. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1789–1819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316685853
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159
Oh, V. Y., & Tong, E. M. (2023). Mixed emotional variants of gratitude: Antecedent situations, cognitive appraisals, action tendencies, and psychosocial outcomes. Cognition and Emotion, 37, 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2023.2205104
Park, H., Hoobler, J. M., Wu, J., Liden, R. C., Hu, J., & Wilson, M. S. (2019). Abusive supervision and employee deviance: A multifoci justice perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 158, 1113–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3749-2
Peng, Y., Xu, X., Ma, J., & Zhang, W. (2020). It matters! Emotion regulation strategy use moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and supervisor-directed deviance. Occupational Health Science, 4, 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-020-00074-1
Pratt, M. G., & Doucet, L. (2000). Ambivalent feelings in organizational relationships. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotions in organizations (pp. 204–226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Quade, M. J., McLarty, B. D., & Bonner, J. M. (2020). The influence of supervisor bottom-line mentality and employee bottom-line mentality on leader-member exchange and subsequent employee performance. Human Relations, 73(8), 1157–1181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719858394
Radulovic, A. B., Thomas, G., Epitropaki, O., & Legood, A. (2019). Forgiveness in leader-member exchange relationships: Mediating and moderating mechanisms. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(3), 498–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12274
Rothman, N. B., Pratt, M. G., Rees, L., & Vogus, T. J. (2017). Understanding the dual nature of ambivalence: Why and when ambivalence leads to good and bad outcomes. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 33–72. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0066
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
Schuh, S. C., Zhang, X. A., Morgeson, F. P., Tian, P., & van Dick, R. (2018). Are you really doing good things in your boss’s eyes? Interactive effects of employee innovative work behavior and leader-member exchange on supervisory performance ratings. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21851
Shao, P., Resick, C. J., & Hargis, M. B. (2011). Helping and harming others in the workplace: The roles of personal values and abusive supervision. Human Relations, 64(8), 1051–1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711399940
Tang, P. M., Yam, K. C., & Koopman, J. (2020). Feeling proud but guilty? Unpacking the paradoxical nature of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160, 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.004
Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Tse, H. H., & Troth, A. C. (2013). Perceptions and emotional experiences in differential supervisor–subordinate relationships. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(3), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731311326693
Vadera, A. K., & Pratt, M. G. (2013). Love, hate, ambivalence, or indifference? A conceptual examination of workplace crimes and organizational identification. Organization Science, 24(1), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0714
Venkataramani, V., & Dalal, R. S. (2007). Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.952
Wang, H. J., Jiang, L., Xu, X., Zhou, K., & Bauer, T. N. (2023). Dynamic relationships between leader-member exchange and employee role-making behaviours: The moderating role of employee emotional ambivalence. Human Relations, 76(6), 926–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221075253
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
Zhao, Q., & Zhou, W. (2021). Good or bad? The ambivalent leader-follower relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 690074. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.690074
Zhong, R., Tang, P. M., & Lee, S. H. (2022). The Gossiper’s high and low: Investigating the impact of negative gossip about the supervisor on work engagement. Personnel Psychology, 77(2), 621–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12571
Zhu, Q., Martinescu, E., Beersma, B., & Wei, F. (2022). How does receiving gossip from coworkers influence employees’ task performance and interpersonal deviance? The moderating roles of regulatory focus and the mediating role of vicarious learning. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 95(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12375
Zou, W. C., Tian, Q., & Liu, J. (2015). Servant leadership, social exchange relationships, and follower’s helping behavior: Positive reciprocity belief matters. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.08.012
Acknowledgements
The first two authors made an equal contribution to the current manuscript. This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 71871209, 71910107003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Standards
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000(5).
Research Involviong Human and Animal Participants
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this study.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all patients (employees) for being included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, L., Weng, Q., Popelnukha, A. et al. Mixed Feelings About Supervisors: The Effect of LMX Ambivalence on Supervisor-Directed Behaviors. J Bus Ethics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05710-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05710-2