Skip to main content
Log in

Sorge, Heideggerian Ethic of Care: Creating More Caring Organizations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently ethical implications of human resource management have intensified the focus on care perspectives in management and organization studies. Appeals have also been made for the concept of organizational care to be grounded in philosophies of care rather than business theories. Care perspectives see individuals, especially women, as primarily relational and view work as a means by which people can increase in self-esteem, self-develop and be fulfilled. The ethic of care has received attention in feminist ethics and is often socially construed as a feminine ethic. Although well developed in the caring professions there remains no model or definition of the care ethic in management literature with little care research undertaken. This paper develops the concept of the care ethic using Heidegger’s philosophy, namely, care is fundamental to human being. To show Heideggerian care, an individual notices, pays attention to another and responds in ways to empower and enable. In a study which aimed to analyze women’s lived experience of career, we applied the philosophically grounded methodology hermeneutic phenomenology. Findings revealed the power of Heideggerian care, Sorge, as a key factor in creating meaning. From this, we propose that care has potential as a theoretical and philosophically based construct with strong practical implications. It provides a way of understanding the care ethic, lies at the heart of our being, and is essential to meaning in our grelationships and undertakings. Crucially, it can provide reprieve from the existential angst that trademarks our being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A full discussion of the development of the history of the notion of care can be found in the classic article in the Encyclopedia of Bioethics by Warren T. Reich. [Revised edition. Edited by Warren Thomas Reich. 5 Volumes. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, 2014, 4th ed., pp. 319–331].

  2. Heidegger used two other German words along with Sorge to describe care. Besorgen, translates as to get or obtain something for oneself or someone, and Fursorge, translates as actively caring for someone who needs help, also known as solicitude. Sorge is the root for care made manifest: Fursorge and Besorgen. Sorge is concerned with being: “ontology” (Tomkins and Simpson 2015). In this paper, for simplicity we use the root word Sorge for solicitous care—Fursorge.

  3. Māori performing arts.

  4. Māori woman elder.

References

  • Agne, K. (1999). Caring: The way of the master teacher. In R. Lipka & T. Brinthaupt (Eds.), The role of self in teacher development (pp. 165–188). Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1981). The life of the mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. (2006). Transformational leadership. London: Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bosley, S. L., Arnold, J., & Cohen, L. (2009). How other people shape our careers: A typology drawn from career narratives. Human Relations, 62(10), 1487–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykin, A., & Schoenhofer, S. O. (2001). Nursing as caring: A model for transforming practice. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women’s psychology and girls’ development Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burdach, K. (1923). Faust und die Sorge. Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte, 1(160), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, G. (2018). Care, autonomy, and justice: Feminism and the ethic of care. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. P., Heppner, M. J., & O’Brien, K. M. (2002). Career development of women of color and white women: Assumptions, conceptualization, and interventions from an ecological perspective. The Career Development Quarterly, 50(4), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A. (2010). How can organizations be competitive but dare to care? The Academy of Management Executive, 25(3), 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., & Frost, P. J. (2006). Explaining compassion organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 59–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrich, L. C. (2005). Revisiting phenomenology: Its potential for management research.

  • Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, L. (2014). Engaging phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(2), 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J. (2008). Human capital and transaction cost economics. Center for Strategic.

  • Gabriel, L., & Casemore, R. (Eds.). (2009). Relational ethics in practice: Narratives from counselling and psychotherapy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, R. (2016). Gender, authenticity and leadership: Thinking with Arendt. Leadership, 12(5), 632–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S. K., & Hanes, L. A. (2003). The contribution of phenomenology to HRD research. Human Resource Development Review, 2(2), 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. J. (2014). The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 118–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., Ward, J. V., & Taylor, J. M. (Eds.). (1988). Mapping the moral domain: A contribution of women’s thinking to psychological theory and education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity.

  • Harman, G. (2011). Heidegger explained. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1927/2011). Sein und Zeit [Being and Time] (J. MacQuarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper and Row. (Original work published 1927).

  • Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, R., & Roscigno, V. J. (2004). Organizational success and worker dignity: Complementary or contradictory? American Journal of Sociology, 110(3), 672–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for recognition, trans. Joel Anderson.

  • Honneth, A. (2008). Reification: A new look at an old idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A., & Margalit, A. (2001). Recognition. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 75, 111–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, G. (2013). Recognizing employees: Reification, dignity and promoting care in management. Cross Cultural Management, 20(2), 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroth, M., & Keeler, C. (2009). Caring as a managerial strategy. Human Resource Development Review, 8(4), 506–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laverty, (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., & Maitlis, S. (2012). Care and possibility: Enacting an ethic of care throug narrative practice. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 641–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J. M. (1996). Feminist morality and competitive reality: A role for an ethic of care? Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lips-Wiersma, M. (2002). The influence of spiritual “meaning-making” on career behavior. Journal of Management Development, 21(7), 497–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macann, C. (1993). Four phenomenological philosophers: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. M. (2015). The application of positive leadership in a New Zealand law enforcement organisation. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/11348.

  • McAllister, D. J., & Bigley, G. A. (2002). Work context and the definition of self: How organizational care influences organization-based self-esteem. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 894–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. Cambridge University Press.

  • Owens, L. M., & Ennis, C. D. (2005). The ethic of care in teaching: An overview of supportive literature. Quest, 57(4), 392–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ployhart, R. E., & Moliterno, T. P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: A multilevel model. Academy of management review, 36(1), 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, W. T. (2014). History of the notion of care. In W. T. Reich (Ed.), Encylopedia of bioethics (4th ed., pp. 319–331). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roter, A. B. (2011). The lived experiences of registered nurses exposed to toxic leadership behaviors. Doctoral dissertation, Capella University.

  • Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., Dutton, J. E., & Margolis, J. D. (2012). Care and compassion through an organizational lens: Opening up new possibilities.

  • Sayer, A. (2007). Dignity at work: Broadening the agenda. Organization, 14(4), 565–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seneca. (trans. 1953). Seneca ad Lucilium Epistulae (R. M. Gummere, Trans., Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Shields, J. (2013). Zange and Sorge: Two models of ‘concern’ in comparative philosophy of religion. In J. Kanaris (Ed.), Polyphonic thinking and the divine (pp. 89–96). Amsterdam/Leiden: Rodopi/Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovholt, T. M. (2005). The cycle of caring: A model of expertise in the helping professions. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 27(1), 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, L., & Simpson, P. (2015). Caring leadership: A Heideggerian perspective. Organization Studies., 36(8), 1013–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train, K. J. (2015). Compassion in organizations: Sensemaking and embodied experience in emergent relational capability. A phenomenological study in South African human service organizations, Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town.

  • Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. (2006). Women and caring: What can feminists learn about morality from caring? In V. Held (Ed.), Justice and care: Essential readings in feminist ethics (pp. 101–115). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. C. (2010). Creating caring institutions: Politics, plurality, and purpose. Ethics and Social Welfare, 4(2), 158–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. Ontario: The Althouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (2016). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing, Taylor & Francis Group. ProQuest Ebook sCentral, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/aut/detail.action?docID=4693331.

  • Weil, S. (1977). The Simone Weil Reader. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, R. L., Flores, L. Y., & Navarro, R. L. (2005). Career development in context: Research with people of color. Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work, 225–252.

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margie J. Elley-Brown.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Both authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standard of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research Involving Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elley-Brown, M.J., Pringle, J.K. Sorge, Heideggerian Ethic of Care: Creating More Caring Organizations. J Bus Ethics 168, 23–35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04243-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04243-3

Keywords

Navigation