Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A randomized, double-blind, phase II, exploratory trial evaluating the palliative benefit of either continuing pamidronate or switching to zoledronic acid in patients with high-risk bone metastases from breast cancer

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies suggest switching from pamidronate to a more potent bone-targeted agent is associated with biomarker and palliative response in breast cancer patients with bone metastases. Until now, this has not been addressed in a double-blind, randomized trial. Breast cancer patients with high-risk bone metastases, despite >3 months of pamidronate, were randomized to either continue pamidronate or switch to zoledronic acid every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a fall in serum C-telopeptide (sCTx) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included difference in mean sCTx, pain scores, quality of life, toxicity, and skeletal-related events (SREs). Seventy-three patients entered the study; median age 61 years (range 37–87). Proportion of patients achieving a fall in sCTx over the 12-week evaluation period was 26/32 (81 %) with zoledronic acid and 18/29 (62 %) with pamidronate (p = 0.095). Mean decrease in sCTx (mean difference between groups = 50 ng/L, 95 % CI 18–84; p = 0.003) was significantly greater in patients who received zoledronic acid. Quality of life, pain scores, toxicity, and frequency of new SREs were comparable between the two arms. While a switch from pamidronate to zoledronic acid resulted in reduction in mean sCTx, there were no significant differences between the arms for proportion of patients achieving a reduction in sCTx, quality of life, pain scores, toxicity or SREs. Given the lack of palliative improvement, the current data do not support a switching strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hortobagyi GN, Theriault RL, Porter L, Blayney D, Lipton A, Sinoff C, Wheeler H, Simeone JF, Seaman J, Knight RD (1996) Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and lytic bone metastases. Protocol 19 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. N Engl J Med 335(24):1785–1791. doi:10.1056/NEJM199612123352401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lipton A, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN, Simeone J, Knight RD, Mellars K, Reitsma DJ, Heffernan M, Seaman JJ (2000) Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Cancer 88(5):1082–1090

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosen LS, Gordon DH, Dugan W Jr, Major P, Eisenberg PD, Provencher L, Kaminski M, Simeone J, Seaman J, Chen BL, Coleman RE (2004) Zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate for the treatment of bone metastases in breast carcinoma patients with at least one osteolytic lesion. Cancer 100(1):36–43. doi:10.1002/cncr.11892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lipton A, Steger GG, Figueroa J, Alvarado C, Solal-Celigny P, Body JJ, de Boer R, Berardi R, Gascon P, Tonkin KS, Coleman RE, Paterson AH, Gao GM, Kinsey AC, Peterson MC, Jun S (2008) Extended efficacy and safety of denosumab in breast cancer patients with bone metastases not receiving prior bisphosphonate therapy. Clin Cancer Res 14(20):6690–6696. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong MH, Stockler MR, Pavlakis N (2012) Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003474. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003474.pub3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clemons M, Gelmon KA, Pritchard KI, Paterson AH (2012) Bone-targeted agents and skeletal-related events in breast cancer patients with bone metastases: the state of the art. Curr Oncol (Tor, Ont) 19(5):259–268. doi:10.3747/co.19.1011

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Poznak CH, Temin S, Yee GC, Janjan NA, Barlow WE, Biermann JS, Bosserman LD, Geoghegan C, Hillner BE, Theriault RL, Zuckerman DS, Von Roenn JH (2011) American Society of Clinical Oncology executive summary of the clinical practice guideline update on the role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(9):1221–1227. doi:10.1200/jco.2010.32.5209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Verma S, Kerr-Cresswell D, Dranitsaris G, Charbonneau F, Trudeau M, Yogendran G, Cesta AM, Clemons M (2004) Bisphosphonate use for the management of breast cancer patients with bone metastases: a survey of Canadian Medical Oncologists. Support Care Cancer 12(12):852–858. doi:10.1007/s00520-004-0671-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen LS, Gordon D, Kaminski M, Howell A, Belch A, Mackey J, Apffelstaedt J, Hussein MA, Coleman RE, Reitsma DJ, Chen BL, Seaman JJ (2003) Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, comparative trial. Cancer 98(8):1735–1744. doi:10.1002/cncr.11701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clemons MJ, Dranitsaris G, Ooi WS, Yogendran G, Sukovic T, Wong BY, Verma S, Pritchard KI, Trudeau M, Cole DE (2006) Phase II trial evaluating the palliative benefit of second-line zoledronic acid in breast cancer patients with either a skeletal-related event or progressive bone metastases despite first-line bisphosphonate therapy. J Clin Oncol 24(30):4895–4900. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.05.9212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Broom R, Du H, Clemons M, Eton D, Dranitsaris G, Simmons C, Ooi W, Cella D (2009) Switching breast cancer patients with progressive bone metastases to third-generation bisphosphonates: measuring impact using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Pain. J Pain Symptom Manag 38(2):244–257. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.08.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clemons M, Dranitsaris G, Ooi W, Cole DE (2008) A phase II trial evaluating the palliative benefit of second-line oral ibandronate in breast cancer patients with either a skeletal related event (SRE) or progressive bone metastases (BM) despite standard bisphosphonate (BP) therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108(1):79–85. doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9583-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fizazi K, Lipton A, Mariette X, Body JJ, Rahim Y, Gralow JR, Gao G, Wu L, Sohn W, Jun S (2009) Randomized phase II trial of denosumab in patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer, breast cancer, or other neoplasms after intravenous bisphosphonates. J Clin Oncol 27(10):1564–1571. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.19.2146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Amir E, Trinkaus M, Simmons CE, Dranitsaris G, Clemons MJ (2009) Vascular endothelial growth factor activity after switching of bisphosphonate treatment for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 62(5):474–476. doi:10.1136/jcp.2008.062505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Amir E, Whyne C, Freedman OC, Fralick M, Kumar R, Hardisty M, Clemons M (2009) Radiological changes following second-line zoledronic acid treatment in breast cancer patients with bone metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis 26(5):479–484. doi:10.1007/s10585-009-9247-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown JE, Thomson CS, Ellis SP, Gutcher SA, Purohit OP, Coleman RE (2003) Bone resorption predicts for skeletal complications in metastatic bone disease. Br J Cancer 89(11):2031–2037. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Coleman RE, Major P, Lipton A, Brown JE, Lee K-A, Smith M, Saad F, Zheng M, Hei YJ, Seaman J, Cook R (2005) Predictive value of bone resorption and formation markers in cancer patients with bone metastases receiving the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid. J Clin Oncol 23(22):4925–4935. doi:10.1200/jco.2005.06.091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Health Canada Vitamin D and Calcium: updated dietary reference intakes. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/nutrition/vitamin/vita-d-eng.php#a7. Accessed 27 Oct 2014

  19. Harris K, Li K, Flynn C, Chow E (2007) Worst, average or current pain in the Brief Pain Inventory: which should be used to calculate the response to palliative radiotherapy in patients with bone metastases? Clin Oncol 19(7):523–527. doi:10.1016/j.clon.2007.04.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J et al (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11(3):570–579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ford JA, Jones R, Elders A, Mulatero C, Royle P, Sharma P, Stewart F, Todd R, Mowatt G (2013) Denosumab for treatment of bone metastases secondary to solid tumours: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 49(2):416–430. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown JE, Cook RJ, Lipton A, Costa L, Coleman RE (2010) Prognostic factors for skeletal complications from metastatic bone disease in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 123(3):767–779. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-0981-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Coleman RE (2002) The clinical use of bone resorption markers in patients with malignant bone disease. Cancer 94(10):2521–2533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobs C, Ng T, Ong M, Clemons M (2014) Long-term benefits versus side-effects from bone-targeted therapies for cancer patients: minimizing risk while maximizing benefits. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 8(4):420–428. doi:10.1097/spc.0000000000000084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vinholes JJ, Purohit OP, Abbey ME, Eastell R, Coleman RE (1997) Relationships between biochemical and symptomatic response in a double-blind randomised trial of pamidronate for metastatic bone disease. Ann Oncol 8(12):1243–1250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation-Ontario Chapter, research project grant program.

Funding

The funding source had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or manuscript writing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Clemons.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Mark Clemons has received educational grants and travel sponsorship from Novartis. Susan Dent has received speaker honoraria from Novartis and attended advisory boards for Amgen. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Clinical Trials identifier: NCT01907880.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacobs, C., Kuchuk, I., Bouganim, N. et al. A randomized, double-blind, phase II, exploratory trial evaluating the palliative benefit of either continuing pamidronate or switching to zoledronic acid in patients with high-risk bone metastases from breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 155, 77–84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3646-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3646-2

Keywords

Navigation