Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recognition and Construction of Top, Bottom, and Versatile Orientations in Gay/Bisexual Men

  • Special Section: The Puzzle of Sexual Orientation
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on gay and bisexual men’s sexual position self-label (i.e., being a top, bottom, or versatile during anal sex) has revealed only independent snapshots of its development by focusing primarily on the influence of penis size. Moreover, the basic chronology of development of the sexual position self-label has barely been addressed. In response, we implemented a survey of 282 gay and bisexual men that measured demographics (including height and penis size), age of sexual recognitions, sexual position self-label, and attitudinal constructs suggested by previous literature as important (e.g., pleasure, control, anxieties, and gender typicality). Results suggested that men’s sexual position self-label was learned over a 15-year timespan. Ages of first same-sex genital manipulation and first anal sex experiences were related to age at first self-labeling. With respect to predictors of labels, a multivariate path model was created. The model did not support the direct importance of penis size, but identified indirect paths that linked penis size to top/bottom identification (e.g., smaller penis sizes leading to topping-anxieties and thus, a bottom label). Finding bottoming to be pleasurable and the importance of sexual control dynamics were the only two direct predictors. The path model substantiated the reliance both bottoms and tops show towards seeking (or not seeking among tops) gender typical, sexually dominant partners. It also supported previous evidence regarding race; specifically, while race may activate differences in sexual behavioral dynamics, it is not a great predictor of the sexual position self-label. This study shows that sexual position self-labeling has enormous complexity and cannot be reduced down to penis size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, J. M., Kim, P. Y., Hills, A., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (1997). Butch, femme, or straight-acting? Partner preferences of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 960–973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, J., Janssen, E., Strong, D., Carnes, L., Vukadinovic, Z., & Long, J. S. (2003). Sexual risk-taking in gay men: The relevance of sexual arousability, mood, and sensation seeking. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32(6), 555–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carballo-Diéguez, A., Dolezal, C., Nieves, L., Diaz, F., Decena, C., & Balan, I. (2004). Looking for a tall, dark, macho man…Sexual-role behavior variations in Latino gay and bisexual men. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 6, 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, J. M. (1976). Cultural factors affecting urban Mexican male homosexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 5(2), 103–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, J. M. (1977). “Sex role preference” as an explanatory variable in homosexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 6, 53–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Augelli, A. R. (1994). Identity development and sexual orientation: Toward a model of lesbian, gay, and bisexual development. In E. J. Trickett, R. J. Watts, & D. Birman (Eds.), Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context (pp. 312–333). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. (2000). The relations of power and intimacy motives to genitoerotic role preferences in gay men: A pilot study. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 9(1), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W., & Rosser, B. R. S. (2005). Anodyspareunia in men who have sex with men. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 31(2), 129–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, M. J., & Filiault, S. M. (2007). The long and the short of it: Gay men’s perceptions of penis size. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 3(2), 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, F. J., & Stein, T. S. (2002). Sexual orientation identity formation among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: Multiple patterns of milestone experiences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12(2), 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil, S. (2007). A narrative exploration of gay men’s sexual practices as a dialectical dialogue. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grov, C., Parsons, J. T., & Bimbi, D. S. (2010). The association between penis size and sexual health among men who have sex with men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 788–797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grov, C., Rendina, H. J., Ventuneac, A., & Parsons, J. T. (2016). Sexual behavior varies between same-race and different-race partnerships: A daily diary study of highly sexually active black, latino, and white gay and bisexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1453–1462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grov, C., Saleh, L. D., Lassiter, J. M., & Parsons, J. T. (2015). Challenging race-based stereotypes about gay and bisexual men’s sexual behavior and perceived penis size and size satisfaction. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12(3), 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, T. A., Wolitski, R. J., Purcell, D. W., Gómez, C., & Halkitis, P. (2003). Sexual behavior among HIV-positive men who have sex with men: What’s in a label? Journal of Sex Research, 40, 179–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, T. (2011). Circuits of power, circuits of pleasure: Sexual scripting in gay men’s bottom narratives. Sexualities, 14(2), 193–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J. (2014). The good anal sex model: Psychosexual treatment of reported painful anal sex in men how have sex with men. In G. H. Allez (Ed.), Sexual diversity and sexual offending: research, Assessment, and clinical treatment in psychosexual therapy (pp. 29–44). London: Karnac Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, M. M., Pingel, E., Eisenberg, A., Santana, M. L., & Bauermeister, J. (2012). Butch tops and femme bottoms? Sexual positioning, sexual decision making, and gender roles among young gay men. American Journal of Men’s Health, 6(6), 505–518.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. L., Freeman, J. B., & Pauker, K. (2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 116–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kippax, S., & Smith, G. (2001). Anal intercourse and power in sex between men. Sexualities, 4, 413–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2015). Intersecting race and gender cues are associated with perceptions of gay men’s preferred sexual roles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(5), 1471–1481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mah, K., & Binik, Y. M. (2001). The nature of human orgasm: A critical review of major trends. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(6), 823–856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, D. A., & Hart, T. A. (2011). The influence of physical body traits and masculinity on gay male anal sex roles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 835–841.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, D. A., Rieger, G., & Roloff, M. E. (2008). Tops, bottoms, and versatiles. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 23, 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachankis, J. E., Buttenwieser, I. G., Bernstein, L. B., & Bayles, D. O. (2013). A longitudinal, mixed methods study of sexual position identity, behavior, and fantasies among young sexual minority men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(7), 1241–1253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, B. R. S., Short, B. J., Thurmes, P. J., & Coleman, E. (1998). Anodyspareunia, the unacknowledged sexual dysfunction: A validation study of painful receptive anal intercourse and its psychosexual concomitants in homosexual men. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 24(4), 281–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandfort, T. G., & de Keizer, M. (2001). Sexual problems in gay men: An overview of empirical research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 12(1), 93–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. Y., Pratto, F., Operario, D., & Dworkin, S. L. (2013). Sexual positioning and race-based attraction by preferences for social dominance among gay Asian/Pacific Islander men in the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(7), 1233–1239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, S. G. (2003). Gay men and anal eroticism: Tops, bottoms, and versatiles. New York: Harrington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vansintejan, J., Vandevoorde, J., & Devroey, D. (2013). The gay men sex studies: Anodyspareunia among Belgian gay men. Sexual Medicine, 1(2), 87–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wegesin, D., & Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L. (2000). Top/bottom self-label anal sex practices, HIV risk and gender role identity in gay men in New York City. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 12(3), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, C., & Raymond, H. F. (2011). Preference for and maintenance of anal sex roles among men who have sex with men: Sociodemographic and behavioral correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(4), 829–834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinrich, J. D., Grant, I., Jacobson, D. L., Robinson, S. R., McCutchan, J. A., & The HNRC Group. (1992). Effects of recalled childhood gender nonconformity on adult genitoerotic role and AIDS exposure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21, 559–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Paul Vasey, Ph.D., Kelly Suschinsky, Ph.D., and J. B. Leca, Ph.D. for hosting the Puzzle of Sexual Orientation Conference 2015. Thanks to Trevor Hart, Ph.D. and Syed Noor, Ph.D. for their initial feedback. Additional thanks to Nicholas Rule, Ph.D. for unwittingly proving that diametric opposites can be roommates.

Funding

This study was self-funded by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Moskowitz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

David A. Moskowitz and Michael E. Roloff declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

A waiver of informed consent was granted by the institutional review board at the New York Medical College.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moskowitz, D.A., Roloff, M.E. Recognition and Construction of Top, Bottom, and Versatile Orientations in Gay/Bisexual Men. Arch Sex Behav 46, 273–285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0810-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0810-7

Keywords

Navigation