Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of various hCG treatment strategies applied to domesticated pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) broodstock on nest-spawning performance

  • Published:
Aquaculture International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of hCG injections on reproductive efficiency by hCG treatment in both male or female brooders of domesticated pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in the first generation. The study consisted of four treatments based on hormone injection to male or female brooders including T1: both sexes were injected, T2: only females were injected, T3: only males were injected, and T4: without hormone injection. Each treatment which included 14 males and 12 females were introduced to a single rectangular concrete tank with one spawning nest for each mate (a total of 12 nests per tank). Fish were injected by a single dose of 200 IU/kg hCG before transferring to mating tanks. After mating, nests containing fertilized eggs were transferred to circular concrete tanks for incubation and hatching of embryos. According to the results, treatments T3 and T4 did not respond to hormonal stimulation and no fish were spawned. Treatments T1 and T2 showed a positive response to hormone injection. Latency time, fertilization rate, and hatching rate showed no significant difference between T1 and T2 (P > 0.05), but the number of responded females was significantly higher in T2 (P < 0.05). The results of the present study demonstrated that it is possible to perform the semi-artificial propagation of domesticated pikeperch via injecting with 200 IU/kg hCG just to females, without the need for hormonal stimulation for males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Abdolmalaki S, Psuty I (2007) The effects of stock enhancement of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in Iranian coastal waters of the Caspian Sea. ICES J Mar Sci 64:973–980. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi SMH, Ciereszko A, Hatef A, Křišt’an J, Dzyuba B, Boryshpolets S, Rodina M, Cosson J, Linhart O (2015) Sperm morphology, physiology, motility, and cryopreservation in Percidae. In: Kestemont P, Dabrowski K, Summerfelt RC (eds) Biology and culture of percid fishes. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 163–191

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blecha M, Samarin AM, Křišt'an J, Policar T (2016) Benefits of hormone treatment of both sexes in semi-artificial reproduction of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.). Czech J Anim Sci 61:203–208. https://doi.org/10.17221/60/2015-CJAS

  • Bobe J, Labbe C (2010) Egg and sperm quality in fish. Gen Comp Endocrinol 165:535–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.02.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craig JF (2000) Percid fishes: systematics, ecology and exploitation. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 352 p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson EM, Hunter GA (1983) Induced final maturation, ovulation, and spermiation in cultured fish. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ, Donaldson EM (eds) Fish physiology, vol 9. Elsevier, Netherlands, pp 351–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Falahatkar B, Poursaeid S, Efatpanah I, Ranaye Akhavan S, Meknatkhah B, Arzboo Z (2009) Induction of spawning pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in response to various hormones. Aquaculture Europe 2009. August 15–18, Trondheim, Norway.

  • Falahatkar B, Poursaeid S, Efatpanah I, Meknatkhah B, Ershad Langroudi H (2010) Effects of hormonal treatment on induced spermiation, ovulation and steroids changes in Eurasian pikeperch Sander lucioperca. Aquaculture Europe 2010, October 5–8, Porto, Portugal.

  • Falahatkar B, Poursaeid S (2014) Effects of hormonal manipulation on stress responses in male and female broodstocks of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca). Aquacult Int 22:235–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-013-9678-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falahatkar B, Efatpanah I, Kestemont P (2018) Pikeperch Sander lucioperca production in the south part of the Caspian Sea: technical notes. Aquacult Int 26:391–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-017-0222-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falahatkar B, Javid Rahmdel K (2021) A practical manual for propagation and rearing of pikeperch. University of Guilan Press, Rasht, Iran, 202 p. (in Persian)

  • Fontaine P, Wang N, Hermelink B (2015) Broodstock management and control of the reproduction cycle. In: Kestemont P, Dabrowski K, Summerfelt RC (eds) Biology and culture of percid fishes. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 103–122

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Golmoradizadeh A, Sajjadi MM, Falahatkar B, Efatpanah I (2010) Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and carp pituitary extract (CPE) on induced spawning of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) and fertilization parameters. J Mar Sci Technol 9:18–27 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermelink B, Wuertz S, Trubiroha A, Rennert B, Kloas W, Schulz C (2011) Influence of temperature on puberty and maturation of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca. Gen Comp Endocrinol 172:282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2011.03.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Javid Rahmdel K, Falahatkar B (2021) Adaptation of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) to formulated diets: a review. Fish Aquat Life 29:1-12. https://doi.org/10.2478/aopf-2021-0001

  • Khendek A, Chakraborty A, Roche J, Ledoré Y, Personne A, Policar T, Żarski D, Mandiki R, Kestemont P, Milla S, Fontaine P (2018) Rearing conditions and life history influence the progress of gametogenesis and reproduction performances in pikeperch males and females. Animal 12:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Křišt’an J, Alavi SMH, Stejskal V, Policar T (2012) Hormonal induction of ovulation in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) using human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and mammalian GnRH analogue. Aquacult Int 21:811–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9572-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Křišt’an J, Alavi SMH, Stejskal V, Policar T (2013) Hormonal induction of ovulation in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) using human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and mammalian GnRH analogue. Aquacult Int 21:811–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9572-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kucharczyk D, Kestemont P, Mamcarz A (2007a) Artificial reproduction of pikeperch. Polish Ministry of Science, Olsztyn, Poland, 80 p.

  • Kucharczyk D, Targońska K, Kwiatkowski M, Krejszeff S, Łuczyński MJ, Szkudlarek M, Szczerbowski RK, Mamcarz A, Gomułka P, Kestemont P (2007b) Spawning agents and their application. In: Kucharczyk D, Kestemont P, Mamcarz A (eds) Artificial reproduction of pikeperch. Polish Ministry of Science, Olsztyn, Poland, pp 33–42.

  • Kucharczyk D, Malinovskyi O, Nowosad J, Kowalska A, Cejko BI (2021) Comparison of responses to artificial spawning of ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernua) specimens captured from their natural habitat to those produced in cultured conditions. Anim Reprod Sci 225:106684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lappalainen J, Dorner H, Wysujack K (2003) Reproduction biology of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) - a review. Ecol Freshw Fish 12:95–106. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0633.2003.00005.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljubobratović U, Kwiatkowski M, Tόth F, Demény F (2021) Effects of hormonal treatment before water warming on synchronisation of spawning time, oocyte size, and egg quality in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca). Anim Reprod Sci 226:106712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2021.106712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Łuczyński MJ, Szkudlarek M, Szczerbowski A, Bienkiewicz M, Gomułka P, Kwiatkowski M, Targońska K, Kestemont P, Kucharczyk D (2007a) Spawners and handling. In: Kucharczyk D, Kestemont P, Mamcarz A (eds) Artificial reproduction of pikeperch. Polish Ministry of Science, Olsztyn, Poland, pp 17–22.

  • Łuczyński MJ, Kucharczyk D, Szczerbowski A, Szkudlarek M, Mamcarz A, Gomułka P (2007b) State of art of pikeperch reproduction - a short review. In: Kucharczyk D, Kestemont P, Mamcarz A (eds) Artificial reproduction of pikeperch. Polish Ministry of Science, Olsztyn, Poland, pp 9–16.

  • Migaud H, Fontaine P, Sulistyo I, Kestemont P, Gardeur JN (2002) Induction of out-of-season spawning in Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis: effects of rates of cooling and cooling durations on female gametogenesis and spawning. Aquaculture 205:253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00675-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller T, Taller J, Nyitrai G, Kucska B, Cernak I, Bercesenyi M (2004) Hybrid of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca L. and Volga perch, S. volgensis (Gmelin). Aquac Res 35:915–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2004.01088.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Beleke A, Zienert S (2008) Out-of-season spawning of pike perch (Sander lucioperca L.) without the need for hormonal treatments. Aquac Res 39:1279–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01991.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourhosein Sarameh S, Falahatkar B, Takami GA, Efatpanah I (2012) Effects of different photoperiods and handling stress on spawning and reproductive performance of pikeperch Sander lucioperca. Anim Reprod Sci 132:213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.05.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha MJ, Arukwe A, Kapoor BG (2008) Fish reproduction, 1st edn. CRC Press, Maryland, USA, 632 p

  • Roche J, Żarski D, Khendek A, Ben Ammar I, Broquard C, Depp A, Ledoré Y, Policar T, Fontaine P, Milla S (2018) D1, but not D2, dopamine receptor regulates steroid levels during the final stages of pikeperch gametogenesis. Animal 12:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118000824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rónyai A (2007) Induced out-of-season and seasonal tank spawning and stripping of pike perch (Sander lucioperca L.). Aquac Res 38:1144–1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652109.2007.01778.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer FJ, Overton JL, Wuertz S (2016) Pikeperch Sander lucioperca egg quality cannot be predicted by total antioxidant capacity and mtDNA fragmentation. Anim Reprod Sci 167:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.02.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schreck CB, Contreras-Sanchez W, Fitzpatrick MS (2001) Effect of stress on fish reproduction, gamete quality, and progeny. Aquaculture 197:3–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00580-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepien CA, Haponski AE (2015) Taxonomy, distribution, and evolution of the Percidae. In: Kestemont P, Dabrowski K, Summerfelt RC (eds) Biology and culture of percid fishes. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 3–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teletchea F, Fontaine P (2014) Levels of domestication in fish: implications for the sustainable future of aquaculture. Fish Fish 15:181–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakęś Z (2007) Out-of-season spawning of cultured pikeperch [Sander lucioperca (L.)]. Aquac Res 38:1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01831.x

  • Zakęś Z, Demska-Zakęś K (2005a) Artificial spawning of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) stimulated with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and mammalian GnRH analogue with a dopamine inhibitor. Archives of Polish Fisheries 13:63–75

  • Zakęś Z, Demska-Zakęś K (2005b) Controlled reproduction of pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.): a review. Arch Polish Fish 17:153–170. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10086-009-0014-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakęś Z, Demska-Zakęś K (2006) Effects of artificial reproduction of wild pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) stimulated hormonally with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG). In: Zakęś Z, Demska-Zakęś K, Wolnicki J (eds) Reproduction, rearing and prophylactics of cyprinid fish and other species. IRS, Olsztyn, Poland, pp 231–237 (in Polish).

  • Zakęś Z, Demska-Zakęś K (2009) Controlled reproduction of pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.), a review. Arch Polish Fish 17:153–170. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10086-009-0014-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakęś Z, Szczepkowski M (2004) Induction of out-of-season spawning of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.). Aquacult Int 12:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AQUI.0000017183.40691.7d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Żarski D, Kucharczyk D, Targońska K, Palińska K, Kupren K, Fontaine P, Kestemont P (2012a) A new classification of pre-ovulatory oocyte maturation stages in pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), and its application during artificial reproduction. Aquac Res 43:713–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02879.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Żarski D, Targońska K, Kaszubowski R, Kestemont P, Fontaine P, Krejszeff S, Kupren K, Kucharczyk D (2012b) Effect of different commercial spawning agents and thermal regime on the effectiveness of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), reproduction under controlled conditions. Aquacult Int 21:819–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9597-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Żarski D, Targońska K, Kaszubowski R, Kestemont P, Fontaine P, Krejszeff S, Kupren K, Kucharczyk D (2013) Effect of different commercial spawning agents and thermal regime on the effectiveness of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), reproduction under controlled conditions. Aquacult Int 21:819–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-012-9597-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Żarski D, Fontaine P, Roche J, Alix M, Blecha M, Broquard C, Król J, Milla S (2019) Time of response to hormonal treatment but not the type of a spawning agent affects the reproductive effectiveness in domesticated pikeperch, Sander lucioperca. Aquaculture 503:527–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.01.042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar Y, Mylonas CC (2001) Endocrine manipulations of spawning in cultured fish: from hormones to genes. In: Donaldson EM, Lee CS (eds) Reproductive biotechnology in finfish aquaculture. Elsevier, Netherlands, pp 99–136

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Yousefpour Marine Fishes Restocking and Genetic Conservation Center and the University of Guilan for supports of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Bahram Falahatkar: Lab work, experimental design, data curation, project administration, supervision, and draft-editing; Kamyar Javid Rahmdel: data analysis, and draft editing; Eshagh Rasouli Kargar: preparing all equipment, fish and sampling; Shapoor Gholami: Sampling and sample analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahram Falahatkar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All the experimental animal procedures involved in this study were approved by the animal care and welfare and followed the experimental basic principles.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Falahatkar, B., Javid Rahmdel, K., Rasouli Kargar, E. et al. Evaluation of various hCG treatment strategies applied to domesticated pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) broodstock on nest-spawning performance. Aquacult Int 30, 73–85 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-021-00785-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-021-00785-4

Keywords

Navigation