Abstract
Do emerging market multinational enterprises (EMNEs) from the Asia–Pacific region experience cultural distance in the same way that developed economy firms do? In swapping the focal home country position from developed economies to emerging economies, we examine whether the ‘illusion of symmetry’ of the cultural distance construct prevails. When EMNEs make strategic decisions about cross-border equity ownership, they are driven by the critical need for learning. We study the internationalization of Asia–Pacific EMNEs and explore how the organizational form of the business group (BG) influences the learning behavior of EMNEs while they navigate cultural distance. We perform a multilevel analysis of 400 acquisitions made by Indian firms across several industries into 38 host countries between 1990 and 2015. We find that the BG organizational form provides structural and contextual antecedents to strategic ambidexterity by leveraging the absorptive capacity and cross-cultural experience of the BG through simultaneous exploratory learning (entailing lesser control) and exploitative learning (entailing greater control). Our results hold good for other group-affiliated EMNEs from the Asia–Pacific region as well and contribute to multiple streams of literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Shenkar (2012: 4) provides the example that the cultural distance that a Dutch firm investing in China experiences is different from what the Chinese firm would face while investing in the Netherlands.
Prior research examined the impact of ownership structure—i.e., family control (which often coincides with BG affiliation) and concentrated ownership—in emerging markets on outward FDI (Bhaumik et al., 2010).
We referred to the World Economic Outlook (International Monetary Fund, September 2011) list of large developing and emerging economies from Asia (including ASEAN) based on real GDP growth values.
We had included time dummies for the phases of liberalization (early phase, start-up phase, or take-off phase), but we dropped these from the regressions once we included the year of the decision, which is a more fine-grained variable compared to the phase of liberalization.
Alternatively, we could have also used fixed effects Tobit with clustering, as pointed out by one of the reviewers. Hence we have made robustness checks using this alternate procedure.
This level was used only in the samples that contained BG-affiliated firms; in other samples, this level was skipped.
The results for both fixed effects Tobit with clustering and marginal effects of the interactions in Table 4 have not been reported here due to space constraints, but are available upon request.
At one point, recognizing the benefits of the Tata brand and the support provided by the group and the affiliate network, the Tata Group had decided to charge a fee from its affiliate companies.
We could not analyze Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Vietnam separately because there were very few observations.
The detailed results of each of the multilevel Tobit models for these countries are not included due to considerations of space. These results are available on request.
We thank an anonymous reviewer for directing our attention to this possibility.
We could not examine all possible interactions of the variables to confirm this due to multicollinearity issues in the models.
One of the arguments for acquiring a minority stake is the high cost or inefficiency related to combining internal capital markets between the acquirer firm and the target firm (Ouimet, 2013). BG-affiliated EMNEs are able to manage this cost while managing the entry costs and investment risks.
Raisch and Birkinshaw (2008) cite studies that examined various aspects of the top management team’s composition—such as the members’ prior company affiliations or a mix between ‘newcomers’ and ‘old timers’—as important antecedents of ambidextrous behavior. They refer to Lubatkin, Simsek, Ling, and Veiga (2006), who described ‘behavioral integration’ as the degree of the senior management team’s wholeness and unity of effort, the level of the team’s collaborative behavior, the quantity and quality of information exchanged, and the emphasis on joint decision-making.
For instance, Tata Chemicals currently has a revenue of 100 billion Indian rupees and a cash reserve of more than 60 billion Indian rupees (~ 9.3 USD billion) (Tata Chemicals: 2015–16 Annual Report, 2016). Similarly, Bajaj Auto has a revenue of 200 billion rupees and has a cash reserve of 120 billion rupees (~ 18.7 USD billion) (Bajaj Auto: 2016–17 Annual Report, 2017). Hence, these organizations are likely to regularly face pressure from investors to deploy the excess cash productively.
References
Anand, J., & Delios, A. (1997). Location specificity and the transferability of downstream assets to foreign subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(3), 579–603.
Andersson, U., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Nielsen, B. B. (2014). From the editors: Explaining interaction effects within and across levels of analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 1063–1071.
Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1–26.
Athreye, S., & Kapur, S. (2009). Introduction: The internationalization of Chinese and Indian firms - trends, motivations and strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp007
Athukorala, P. (2009). Outward foreign direct investment from India. Asian Development Review, 26(2), 125–153.
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability-rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(10), 61–83.
Awate, S., Larsen, M. M., & Mudambi, R. (2012). EMNE catch-up strategies in the wind turbine industry: Is there a trade-off between output and innovation capabilities? Global Strategy Journal, 2(3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-5805.2012.01034.x
Baek, J. K., Kang, J. K., & Lee, I. (2006). Business groups and tunneling: Evidence from private securities offerings by Korean chaebols. Journal of Finance, 61(5), 2415–2449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01062.x
Bajaj Auto. (2017). Bajaj Auto: 2016–17 Annual Report. http://www.bajajauto.com/report/bajaj_auto_ltd_AR_2017_webA_INDI_copy.pdf
Bandeira-de-Mello, R., Fleury, M. T. L., Aveline, C. E. S., & Gama, M. A. B. (2016). Unpacking the ambidexterity implementation process in the internationalization of emerging market multinationals. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2005–2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.146
Barnard, H., & Luiz, J. M. (2018). Escape FDI and the dynamics of a cumulative process of institutional misalignment and contestation: Stress, strain and failure. Journal of World Business, 53(5), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.03.010
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Harvard Business School Press.
Batra, R., & Jain, N. (2017). Tata Steel: The Acquisition of Corus. Ivey Publishing.
Baum, J. A. C., Li, S. X., & Usher, J. M. (2000). Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 766–801.
Benner, M., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676–706. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094913
Bergh, D. D., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Orlandi, I., Heugens, P. P., & Boyd, B. K. (2018). Information asymmetry in management research: Past accomplishments and future opportunities. Journal of Management, 45(1), 122–158.
Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., & Zhou, N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460–1480. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.28
Bertrand, M., Mehta, P., & Mullainathan, S. (2002). Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 121–148.
Beugelsdijk, S., Kostova, T., Kunst, V. E., Spadafora, E., & van Essen, M. (2018). Cultural distance and firm internationalization: A meta-analytical review and theoretical implications. Journal of Management, 44(1), 89–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317729027
Bhaumik, S. K., Driffield, N., & Pal, S. (2010). Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.52
Bhaumik, S. K., Owolabi, O., & Pal, S. (2018). Private information, institutional distance, and the failure of cross-border acquisitions: Evidence from the banking sector in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of World Business, 53(4), 504–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.02.005
Brouthers, K. D., & Brouthers, L. E. (2001). Explaining the national cultural distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 177–189.
Brouthers, K. D., & Hennart, J. F. (2007). Boundaries of the firm: Insights from international entry mode research. Journal of Management, 33(3), 395–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300817
Buckley, P. J., Forsans, N., & Munjal, S. (2012). Host-home country linkages and host-home country specific advantages as determinants of foreign acquisitions by Indian firms. International Business Review, 21(5), 878–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.10.001
Buckley, P. J., Munjal, S., Enderwick, P., & Forsans, N. (2016a). Cross-border acquisitions by Indian multinationals: Asset exploitation or asset augmentation? International Business Review, 25(4), 986–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.10.006
Buckley, P. J., Munjal, S., Enderwick, P., & Forsans, N. (2016b). The role of experiential and non-experiential knowledge in cross-border acquisitions: The case of Indian multinational enterprises. Journal of World Business, 51(5), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.07.006
Buckley, P. J., Munjal, S., Enderwick, P., & Forsans, N. (2017). The role of country alliances in reducing the transaction costs of internationalisation: Evidence from Indian multinational enterprises. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(3), 807–828.
Buckley, P. J., & Munjal, S. (2017). The role of local context in the cross-border acquisitions by emerging economy multinational enterprises. British Journal of Management, 28(3), 372–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12231
Canabal, A., & White, G. O. (2008). Entry mode research: Past and future. International Business Review, 17(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.01.003
Capron, L. (1999). The long-term performance of horizontal acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 20(April), 987–1018.
Carney, M., Shapiro, D. M., & Tang, Y. (2009). Business group performance in China: Ownership and temporal considerations. Management and Organization Review, 5(2), 167–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00139.x
Carney, M., van Essen, M., Estrin, S., & Shapiro, D. (2018). Business groups reconsidered: Beyond paragons and parasites. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(4), 493–516.
Chacar, A., & Vissa, B. (2005). Are emerging economies less efficient? Performance persistence and the impact of business group affiliation. Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 933–946. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.478
Chakrabarti, R., Megginson, W., & Yadav, P. K. (2008). Corporate goverance in India. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 20(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9173-6
Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. (2000). Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556403
Chari, M. D. R., Banalieva, & E. R. (2015). How do pro-market reforms impact firm profitability? The case of India under reform. Journal of World Business, 50(2): 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.05.004
Chari, M. D. R., & Chang, K. (2009). Determinants of the share of equity sought in cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8), 1277–1297. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.103
Chari, M. D. R., & David, P. (2012). Sustaining superior performance in an emerging economy: An empirical test in the Indian context. Strategic Management Journal, 33(2), 217–229.
Chari, M. D. R. (2013). Business groups and foreign direct investments by developing country firms: An empirical test in India. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.07.019
Chen, S. F. S., & Hennart, J. F. (2004). A hostage theory of joint ventures: Why do Japanese investors choose partial over full acquisitions to enter the United States? Journal of Business Research, 57(10), 1126–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00041-9
Chittoor, R., Aulakh, P. S., & Ray, S. (2015). What drives overseas acquisitions by Indian firms? A behavioral risk-taking perspective. Management International Review, 55(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-015-0238-7
Chittoor, R., & Aulakh, P. S. (2015). Organizational landscape in India: Historical development, multiplicity of forms and implications for practice and research. Long Range Planning, 48(5), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.07.005
Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5): 1261–1293. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2782277
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Contractor, F. J., Lahiri, S., Elango, B., & Kundu, S. K. (2014). Institutional, cultural and industry related determinants of ownership choices in emerging market FDI acquisitions. International Business Review, 23(5), 931–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.02.005
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Ramamurti, R. (Eds). (2014). Understanding multinationals from emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107587632
Cuypers, I. R. P., Ertug, G., & Hennart, J. F. (2015). The effects of linguistic distance and lingua franca proficiency on the stake taken by acquirers in cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.71
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600105
Deng, P. (2009). Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion? Journal of World Business, 44(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2008.03.014
Dewenter, K. L., Novaes, W., & Pettway, R. H. (2001). Visibility versus complexity in business groups: Evidence from Japanese keiretsu. Journal of Business, 74(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.219244
Doukas, J., & Travlos, N. G. (1988). The effect of corporate multinationalism on shareholders’ wealth: Evidence from international acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 43(5), 1161–1175.
Driffield, N., Mickiewicz, T., & Temouri, Y. (2016). Ownership control of foreign affiliates: A property rights theory perspective. Journal of World Business, 51(6), 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.08.003
Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, & D. Slevin (Eds.), The management of organization, 1 (pp. 167–188). North-Holland.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2000). Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralism. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 703–705.
Eppler, M. J. (2006). Knowledge exploitation, knowledge exploration, and competency trap. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(3), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm
Erramilli, M. K., & Rao, C. P. (1993). Service firms’ international entry-mode choice: A modified transaction-cost analysis approach. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251852
Filatotchev, I., Strange, R., Piesse, J., & Lien, Y. C. (2007). FDI by firms from newly industrialized economies in emerging markets: Corporate governance, entry mode and location. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 556–572. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400279
Fuad, M., & Gaur, A. S. (2019). Merger waves, entry-timing, and cross-border acquisition completion: A frictional lens perspective. Journal of World Business, 54(2), 107–118.
Gaffney, N., Karst, R., & Clampit, J. (2016). Emerging market MNE cross-border acquisition equity participation: The role of economic and knowledge distance. International Business Review, 25(1), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.05.005
Gammeltoft, P., Filatotchev, I., & Hobdari, B. (2012). Emerging multinational companies and strategic fit: A contingency framework and future research agenda. European Management Journal, 30(3), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.03.007
Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., & Singh, D. (2014). Institutions, resources, and internationalization of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 12–20.
Gaur, A. S., & Kumar, V. (2009). International diversification, business group affiliation and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. British Journal of Management, 20(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00558.x
Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113–137.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. M. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573
Gopal, S., Manikandan, K.S. and Ramachandran, J. (2021). Are there limits to diversification in emerging economies? Distinguishing between firm‐level and business group strategies. Journal of Management Studies, https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12680
Govindarajan, V., & Ramamurti, R. (2011). Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 31(1), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-5805.2011.00023.x
Granovetter, M. (1995). Coase revisited: Business groups in the modern economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4(1), 93–130.
Granovetter, M. (2005). Business groups and social organizations. In N. J. Smelser, & R. Swedberg (Eds.). Handbook of Economic Sociology (2nd ed.): 429–450. Princeton University Press: New Jersey.
Gubbi, S. R., Aulakh, P. S., Ray, S., Sarkar, M. B., & Chittoor, R. (2010). Do international acquisitions by emerging-economy firms create shareholder value? The case of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.47
Guillén, M. F. (2000). Business groups in emerging economies: A resource based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 362–380.
Guillén, M. F. (2002). Structural inertia, imitation, and foreign expansion: South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987–95. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 509–525.
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706.
Han, M. (2007). Achieving superior internationalization through strategic ambidexterity. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 15(1), 43–77. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495807000046
He, W., & Lyles, M. A. (2008). China’s outward foreign direct investment. Business Horizons, 51(6), 485–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2008.06.006
Hearn, B., Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T. (2018). The institutional determinants of private equity involvement in business groups—the case of Africa. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.02.002
Hennart, J. F. (1991). The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: An empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Science, 37(4), 377–499. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.4.483
Hitt, M. A., Li, H., & Worthington, W. J. (2005). Emerging markets as learning laboratories: Learning behaviors of local firms and foreign entrants in different institutional contexts. Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 353–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2005.0019a.x
Holmes, R. M., Hoskisson, R. E., Kim, H., Wan, W. P., & Holcomb, T. R. (2018). International strategy and business groups: A review and future research agenda. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.11.003
Huang, F. L. (2016). Alternatives to multilevel modeling for the analysis of clustered data. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(1), 175–196.
Hutzschenreuter, T., Kleindienst, I., & Lange, S. (2014). Added psychic distance stimuli and MNE performance: Performance effects of added cultural, governance, geographic, and economic distance in MNEs’ international expansion. Journal of International Management, 20(1), 38–54.
International Monetary Fund. (2011). World economic outlook. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2016/12/31/World-Economic-Outlook-September-2011-Slowing-Growth-Rising-Risks-24738, Accessed June 2020.
Jemison, D. B., & Sitkin, S. B. (1986). Corporate acquisitions: A process perspective. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 145–163.
Kale, P., Singh, H., & Raman, A. P. (2009). Don’t integrate your acquisitions, partner with them. Harvard Business Review, 109–115.
Kang, J. (2014). Roles of board of directors in organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Management and Strategy, 5(4), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v5n4p99
Kedia, B., Gaffney, N., & Clampit, J. (2012). EMNEs and knowledge-seeking FDI. Management International Review, 52(2), 155–173.
Kedia, B. L., Mukherjee, D., & Lahiri, S. (2006). Indian business groups: Evolution and transformation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4), 559–577.
Keen, C., & Wu, Y. (2011). An ambidextrous learning model for the internationalization of firms from emerging economies. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 9(4), 316–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-011-0081-2
Khanna, T., Palepu, K., & Wu, D. E. (2006). House of Tata, 1995: The next generation (A). Harvard Business School Case, 9–798–037.
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41–51.
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55(2), 867–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00229
Khanna, T., Palepu, K., and Bullock, R. J. (2009). House of Tata: Acquiring a Global Footprint, Harvard Business School Case, 708–446, May 2008. (Revised June 2009)
Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. W. (2001). Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1): 45–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:1%3C45::AID-SMJ147%3E3.0.CO;2-F/abstract
Kim, H. G., Gaur, A. S., & Mukherjee, D. (2020). Added cultural distance and ownership in cross-border acquisitions. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 27(3), 487–510.
Kim, H., Hoskisson, R. E., & Lee, S. H. (2015). Why strategic factor markets matter: “New” multinationals’ geographic diversification and firm profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 518–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2229
Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625–645.
Kotabe, M., Jiang, C. X., & Murray, J. Y. (2011). Managerial ties, knowledge acquisition, realized absorptive capacity and new product market performance of emerging multinational companies: A case of China. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.05.005
Krammer, S. M. S. (2018). A double-edged sword? The antipodal effects of institutional distance on partner selection in cross-border alliances. Journal of World Business, 53(6), 930–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.08.001
Krishnan, H. A., Miller, A., & Judge, W. Q. (1997). Diversification and top management team complementarity: Is performance improved by merging similar or dissimilar teams? Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18
Lala, R. M. (1993). Beyond the last blue mountain: A life of J. R. D. Tata. India: Penguin Books.
Lamb, N. H., & Roundy, P. (2016). The “ties that bind” board interlocks research: A systematic review. Management Research Review, 39(11), 1516–1542. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2015-0027
Lancheros, S. (2016). Exports, outward FDI and technology upgrading: Firm level evidence from India. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(10), 1415–1430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1139697
Landau, C., Karna, A., Richter, A., & Uhlenbruck, K. (2016). Institutional leverage capability: Creating and using institutional advantages for internationalization. Global Strategy Journal, 6(1): 50–68.
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.22527456
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1–47.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125.
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112.
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707712
Liou, R. S., Chao, M. C. H., & Yang, M. (2016). Emerging economies and institutional quality: Assessing the differential effects of institutional distances on ownership strategy. Journal of World Business, 51(4), 600–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.03.001
Liu, Y., & Woywode, M. (2013). Light-touch integration of Chinese cross-border M&A: The influences of culture and absorptive capacity. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55, 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21557
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
Luo, Y., & Bu, J. (2018). When are emerging market multinationals more risk taking? Global Strategy Journal, 8, 635–664. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1310
Luo, Y., & Rui, H. (2009). An ambidexterity perspective toward multinational enterprises from emerging economies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4), 49–70.
Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481–498.
Luo, Y. (2001). Equity sharing in international joint ventures: An empirical analysis of strategic and environmental determinants. Journal of International Management, 7(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-4253(00)00038-7
Madhok, A., & Keyhani, M. (2012). Acquisitions as entrepreneurship: Asymmetries, opportunities, and the internationalization of multinationals from emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal, 2(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-5805.2011.01023.x
Mahmood, I. P., Zhu, H., & Zajac, E. J. (2011). Where can capabilities come from? Network ties and capability acquisition in business groups. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 820–848. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj
Malhotra, S., & Gaur, A. S. (2014). Spatial geography and control in foreign acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.50
Malhotra, S., Sivakumar, K., & Zhu, P. (2011). Curvilinear relationship between cultural distance and equity participation: An empirical analysis of cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Management, 17(4), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2011.06.001
Manikandan, K. S., & Ramachandran, J. (2015). Beyond institutional voids: Business groups, incomplete markets, and organizational form. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 598–617. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2226
Manikutty, S. (2000). Family business groups in India: A resource-based view of the emerging trends. Family Business Review, 13(4), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2000.00279.x
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
Markides, C. C., & Ittner, C. D. (1994). Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification: Evidence from US international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 343–366.
Mathews, J. A. (2002). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460600840142
Mathews, J. A. (2006). Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1), 5–27.
Mcdonough, E. F., & Leifer, R. (1983). Using simultaneous structures to cope with uncertainty. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 727–735. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2008.35590361
Miller, D. (1993). The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.3997509
Miller, D. (1994). What happens after success? The perils of excellence. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 325–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00621.x
Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271–298.
Morschett, D., Schramm-Klein, H., & Swoboda, B. (2010). Decades of research on market entry modes: What do we really know about external antecedents of entry mode choice? Journal of International Management, 16(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2009.09.002
Mukherjee, D., Makarius, E. E., & Stevens, C. E. (2018). Business group reputation and affiliates’ internationalization strategies. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.12.003
Munjal, S., Buckley, P. J., Enderwick, P., & Forsans, N. (2014). The growth trajectory of Indian multinational enterprises. In C. Brautaset & C. M. Dent (Eds.), The great diversity: Trajectories of Asian development (pp. 191–206). Wageningen.
Nayyar, D. (2008). The internationalization of firms from India: Investment, mergers and acquisitions. Oxford Development Studies, 36(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810701848219
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232409
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creation company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): 14–37. https://josephmahoney.web.illinois.edu/BA504_Fall%202008/Uploaded%20in%20Nov%202007/Nonaka%20(1994).pdf
Oehmichen, J., Heyden, M. L. M., Georgakakis, D., & Volberda, H. W. (2017). Boards of directors and organizational ambidexterity in knowledge-intensive firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244904
Ouimet, P. P. (2013). What motivates minority acquisitions? The trade-offs between a partial equity stake and complete integration. Review of Financial Studies, 26(4), 1021–1047. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs125
Padmanabhan, P., & Cho, K. R. (1996). Ownership strategy for a foreign affiliate: An empirical investigation of Japanese firms. Management International Review, 36(1), 45–65.
Palich, L. E, & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1999). A theory of global strategy and firm efficiencies: Considering the effects of cultural diversity. Journal of Management, 25(4): 587–606. http://jom.sagepub.com/content/25/4/587.short
Pan, Y. (1996). Influences on foreign equity ownership level in joint ventures in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 77(1), 1–26.
Peterson, M. F., Arregle, J.-L., & Martin, X. (2012). Multilevel models in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 451–457.
Popli, M., Akbar, M., Kumar, V., & Gaur, A. S. (2016). Reconceptualizing cultural distance: The role of cultural experience reserve in cross-border acquisitions. Journal of World Business, 51(3), 404–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.11.003
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2019). Global economy watch. London.
Purkayastha, A., Kumar, V., & Gupta, V. K. (2021). Emerging market internationalizing firms: Learning through internationalization to achieve entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of World Business, 56(5), 101–207.
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. M. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
Rajakumar, J. (2007). Growth and persistence of large business groups in India. Journal of Comparative International Management, 10(1): 3–22. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Journal-Comparative-International-Management/184745569.html
Ramachandran, J., Manikandan, K. S., & Pant, A. 2013. Why conglomerates thrive (outside the U.S.). Harvard Business Review, 91(12): 110–119.
Ramamurti, R., & Singh, J. V. (2009). Emerging multinationals in emerging markets. Cambridge University Press.
Ramamurti, R. (2012). Commentaries: What is really different about emerging market multinationals? Global Strategy Journal, 2(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-5805.2011.01025.x
Reus, T. H., & Lamont, B. T. (2009). The double-edged sword of cultural distance in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8), 1298–1316. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.25
Sachdeva, A., Deep, M., Srinivasan, R. 2009. Hindalco's Acquisition of Novelis: The Making of a Giant. Harvard Business School Publishing. Product #: IMB303-PDF-ENG.
Sarkar, J. (2010). Business groups in India. In A. M. Colpan, T. Hikino, & J. R. Lincoln (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of business groups: 294–321. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552863.003.0011
Scalera, V. G., Mukherjee, D., & Piscitello, L. (2020). Ownership strategies in knowledge-intensive cross-border acquisitions: Comparing Chinese and Indian MNEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37, 155–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9616-6
Sen, S. (2009). Tata Group: Transforming the sleeping elephant. ICFAI Journal of Business Strategy, 6(1): 31–45. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=36660829&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies,32(3), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069495
Shenkar, O. (2012). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 43: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.40
Silva, F., Majluf, N., & Paredes, R. D. (2006). Family ties, interlocking directors and performance of business groups in emerging countries: The case of Chile. Journal of Business Research, 59(3), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.09.004
Stahl, G. K., & Tung, R. L. (2015). Towards a more balanced treatment of culture in international business studies: The need for positive cross-cultural scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 391–414.
Su, Z., Li, J., Yang, Z., & Li, Y. (2011). Exploratory learning and exploitative learning in different organizational structures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4), 697–714.
Surdu, I., Mellahi, K., Glaister, K. W., & Nardella, G. (2018). Why wait? Organizational learning, institutional quality and the speed of foreign market re-entry after initial entry and exit. Journal of World Business, 53(6), 911–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.07.008
Tallman, S. B. (1988). Home country political risk and foreign direct investment in the United States. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(2), 219–234.
Tata Chemicals. (2016). Tata Chemicals: 2015–16 annual report. http://www.tatachemicals.com/upload/content_pdf/tata-chemicals_AR_15_16.pdf
Temouri, Y., Driffield, N., & Bhaumik, S. K. (2016). A strategic perspective of cross-listing by emerging market firms: Evidence from Indonesia, Mexico, Poland and South Africa. Journal of International Management, 22(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.04.003
Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D. A., & Russell, C. J. (2005). The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3): 270–283. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/journal/v36/n3/abs/8400136a.html
Tung, R. L., & Verbeke, A. (2010). Beyond Hofstede and GLOBE: Improving the quality of cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1259–1274. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.41
Van den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W., & de Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.551
Venkatesan, R. (2013). Conquering the Chaos: Win in India, Win Everywhere. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 2013, Pages: 232.
Vermuelen, F., & Barkema, H. (2001). Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069364
Wang, Y. and Larimo, J. (2020). “Survival of full versus partial acquisitions: the moderating role of firm’s internationalization experience, cultural distance, and host country context characteristics”, International Business Review, Vol. 29 No. 1, p. 101605.
Wang, S. L., Luo, Y., Lu, X., Sun, J., & Maksimov, V. (2013). Autonomy delegation to foreign subsidiaries: An enabling mechanism for emerging-market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.40
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00487.x/full
Xie, E., Reddy, K. S., & Liang, J. (2017). Country-specific determinants of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 127–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.12.005
Yalcinkaya, G., Calantone, R. J., & Griffith, D. A. (2007). An examination of exploration and exploitation capabilities: Implications for product innovation and market performance. Journal of International Marketing, 15(4), 63–93.
Yan, Z. J., Zhu, J. C., Fan, D., & Kalfadellis, P. (2018). An institutional work view toward the internationalization of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 53(5), 682–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.03.008
Yaprak, A., & Karademir, B. (2010). The internationalization of emerging market business groups: An integrated literature review. International Marketing Review, 27(2): 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331011037548
Yiu, D. W., Bruton, G. D., & Lu, Y. (2005). Understanding business group performance in an emerging economy: Acquiring resources and capabilities in order to prosper. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00493.x
Yiu, D. W., Ng, F. W., & Ma, X. (2012). Business group attributes and internationalization strategy in China. Asian Business and Management, 12(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2012.38
Yiu, D. W. (2011). Multinational advantages of Chinese business groups: A theoretical exploration. Management and Organization Review, 7(2), 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00210.x
Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–353.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/APBPP.2000.5438568
Zattoni, A., Pedersen, T., & Kumar, V. (2009). The performance of group-affiliated firms during institutional transition: A longitudinal study of Indian firms. Corporate Governance, 17(4), 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00761.x
Zhang, H., Young, M. N., Tan, J., & Sun, W. (2018). How Chinese companies deal with a legitimacy imbalance when acquiring firms from developed economies. Journal of World Business, 53(5), 752–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.05.004
Zhao, H., Luo, Y., & Suh, T. (2004). Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: A meta-analytical review. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 524–544. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400106
Acknowledgements
Professor Rejie George for meticulous reviews and tremendous support far beyond the thesis-supervisory role from inception until final rounds of the manuscript.
Professors Rejie George and Amit Baran Chakrabarti for contributions to a very early version of the manuscript that was presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, 2018 held at Chicago, USA.
Dr. Narayan Chandra Ghosh (and Ayan Panja) in coordination with Dr. Rama Seth (and Reena Gupta) of IIMB Library for access to the ORBIS database.
Ashish Kaushal of Moody’s South Asia, for timely access to BVD databases.
Professor Gijo EV of ISI Bangalore for generous guidance on advanced statistical methods.
Anila Varghese for diligent copy editing.
Professors Anju Seth, Saptarshi Purkayastha, Sathyajit Gubbi and Sougata Ray for several constructive suggestions.
Last but not the least, Professor Roger Strange for his immense support and understanding in constructively enabling the contributions of this manuscript at every step.
Gratitude to the diligent reviewers who helped strengthen the manuscript through several rounds of review.
Funding
This work was supported by Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Category I research project, with work order ID: RP:ACDBCBBGAOEIA/3717/2017–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Venkateswaran, R.T. Is there an illusion of symmetry in cultural distance from Asia–pacific Emnes? the role of business groups in navigating cultural distance through ambidextrous learning. Asia Pac J Manag 40, 1169–1215 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09811-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09811-2