Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Entrepreneurship, poverty, and Asia: Moving beyond subsistence entrepreneurship

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Approximately 1.7 billion people in Asia live in poverty today. To date, efforts to address poverty in Asia have largely focused on subsistence entrepreneurship rather than on creating ventures that empower them to break out of poverty. That is, the mechanisms that have been used, such as microlending, generally lead entrepreneurs to create businesses providing basic life essentials rather than helping them build businesses that generate capital to improve the entrepreneur’s standard of living. This article initially reviews what we know about entrepreneurship as a solution to poverty in Asia. We then examine what we know about other major tools to address poverty in Asia. Next, we propose a research agenda on poverty in Asia. Finally, we introduce the articles in this Special Issue of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management, “Asia & Poverty: Closing the Great Divide through Entrepreneurship & Innovation,” on new approaches to entrepreneurship to help address the key issue of the alleviation of poverty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These figures from the most recent comprehensive World Bank survey are from 2008.

  2. There are also comprehensive lines of research in both entrepreneurship and economics that examine how venture capital and private equity can strengthen a country’s entrepreneurial sector (see Ahlstrom, Bruton, & Chan, 2000; Brown, Haltiwanger, & Lane, 2006; Bruton & Ahlstrom, 2003; Bruton, Ahlstrom, & Singh, 2002; Bruton, Ahlstrom, & Yeh, 2004; Cumming & Suret, 2011; Hargadon & Kenney, 2012; Kenney, 2011; Lerner, 2009). This Special Issue is more directly focused on entrepreneurship.

  3. The work of Joseph Schumpeter is a notable exception, though Schumpeter wrote more about entrepreneurs in his early work and focused more on larger firms and their research and development in the interwar period and the Second World War (McCraw, 2010).

  4. It should be noted that poverty defined by income is used here since it is more easily quantified and can clearly be addressed. There are several ways that poverty is defined and measured, including different levels of income or consumption. See Chen and Ravallion (2010) for a discussion.

  5. This is consistent with research in technology assessment and evaluation. Assessment routines are crucial to what technologies and techniques are selected, funded, and promoted (Garud & Ahlstrom, 1997b).

  6. While poverty is difficult to define precisely, it should be recognized that concepts such as base of the pyramid (BoP) are much harder to define. The result is that BOP is conceptually appealing but has largely gone unoperationalized for the purposes of empirical research (Ahlstrom, Bruton, & Zhao, 2013; Economist, 2010).

  7. Some marketing scholars use the term subsistence entrepreneurship to describe entrepreneurship in settings of poverty (i.e., Viswanathan et al., 2014). While these authors imply there is little opportunity for sustained capital growth they do not specifically limits for the future as they use the term.

  8. We limit this search also to academic journals and articles published since 2000. Harvard Business Review is not included here as it is generally not considered to be a peer-reviewed academic journal.

References

  • Abzug, R., Simonoff, J., & Ahlstrom, D. 2000. Nonprofits as large employers: A city-level geographical inquiry. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(3): 455–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. 2012. Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D. 2010. Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D. 2014. The hidden reason why the First World War matters today: The development and spread of modern management. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 21(1): 201–218.

  • Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Chan, E. S. 2000. Venture capital in China: Ground-level challenges for high technology investing. Journal of Private Equity, 3(2): 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Zhao, L. 2013. Turning good research into good publications. Nankai Business Review International, 4(2): 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., & Ding, Z. 2014. Entrepreneurship in China: An overview. International Small Business Journal, 32(6): 610–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlstrom, D., Levitas, E., Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., & Zhu, H. 2014. The three faces of China: Strategic alliance partner selection in three ethnic Chinese economies. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 572–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alatas, V., Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., & Tobias, J. 2010. Targeting the poor: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. w15980, Cambridge.

  • Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., & Newman, A. M. B. 2015. The poverty problem and the industrialization solution. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, this issue.

  • Anand, S., & Harris, C. J. 1994. Choosing a welfare indicator. American Economic Review, 84(2): 226–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, N., Karlan, D., & Yin, W. 2006. Tying Odysseus to the mast: Evidence from a commitment savings product in the Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2): 635–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aturupane, H., Glewwe, P., & Isenman, P. 1994. Poverty, human development, and growth: An emerging consensus?. American Economic Review, 84(2): 244–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. 2006. Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., & Fu, K. 2015. Economic and political institutions and entry into formal and informal entrepreneurship. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, this issue.

  • Banerjee, A., Cole, S., Duflo, E., & Linden, L. 2005. Remedying education: Evidence from two randomized experiments in India. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. w11904, Cambridge.

  • Barone, M. 2004. Hard America, soft America: Competition vs. coddling and the battle for the nation’s future. New York: Crown Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M., Chytilová, J., & Morduch, J. 2012. Behavioral foundations of microcredit: Experimental and survey evidence from rural India. American Economic Review, 102(2): 1118–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baulch, B. (Ed.). 2011. Why poverty persists: Poverty dynamics in Asia and Africa. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., Litan, R. E., & Schramm, C. J. 2009. Good capitalism, bad capitalism, and the economics of growth and prosperity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., & Strom, R. 2007. Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4): 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Burgess, R. 2000. Land reform, poverty reduction, and growth: Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(2): 389–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Burgess, R. 2004. Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1): 91–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J., & Panagariya, A. 2013. Why growth matters: How economic growth in India reduced poverty and the lessons for other developing countries. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. L., & Medoff, J. 1994. Gazelles. In L. C. Solmon & A. R. Levenson (Eds.). Labor markets, employment policy and job creation: 159–167. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • Bloom, N. & Van Reenen, J. 2010. Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1): 203–224.

  • Boyce, G. 1995. Information, mediation and institutional development: The rise of large-scale enterprise in British shipping, 1870–1919. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Brown, C., Haltiwanger, J., & Lane, J. 2006. Economic turbulence: Is a volatile economy good for America?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D. 2010. Business and the world’s poorest billion: The need for an expanded examination by management scholars. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. 2003. An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2): 233–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Puky, T. 2009. Institutional differences and the development of entrepreneurial ventures: A comparison of the venture capital industries in Latin America and Asia. Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 762–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Singh, K. 2002. The impact of the institutional environment on the venture capital industry in Singapore. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 4(3): 197–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Yeh, K. S. 2004. Understanding venture capital in East Asia: The impact of institutions on the industry today and tomorrow. Journal of World Business, 39(1): 72–88.

  • Bruton, G. D., Dattani, M., Fung, M., Chow, C. & Ahlstrom, D. 1999. Private equity in China: Differences and similarities with the western model. Journal of Private Equity, 2(2): 7–14.

  • Bruton, G. D., Ketchen, D., & Ireland, D. 2013. Entrepreneurship as a solution to poverty. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(6): 683–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Khavul, S., & Chavez, H. 2011. Microfinance in emerging markets: Building a new line of inquiry from the ground up. Journal of International Business Studies, 42: 718–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R., & Pande, R. 2003. Do rural banks matter? Evidence from the Indian social banking experiment. American Economic Review, 95(3): 780–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. 1990. Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

  • Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. 2010. The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4): 1577–1625.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA Factbook. 2014. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2172rank.html, Accessed July 25, 2014.

  • Clark, H. 2011. Accelerating poverty reduction and sustainable human development. UNDP 2011 Global Poverty Reduction and Development Forum, Beijing, China.

  • Coad, A. 2009. The growth of firms: A survey of theories and empirical evidence. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D., Fleming, G., & Schwienbacher, A. 2009. Corporate relocation in venture capital finance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5): 1121–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D. J., & Suret, J. M. 2011. Entrepreneurial finance and venture capital markets. European Financial Management, 17(3): 420–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., & Binswanger, H. 1999. The evolution of the World Bank’s land policy: Principles, experience, and future challenges. World Bank Research Observer, 14(2): 247–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, H. 1989. The other path. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, H. 2000. The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M. 1997. Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: W. W. Norton.

  • Du, J., Guariglia, A., & Newman, A. 2013. Do social capital building strategies influence the financing behavior of Chinese private small and medium-sized enterprises?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. doi:10.1111/etap.12051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvendack, M., Palmer-Jones, R., Copestake, J. G., Hooper, L., Loke, Y., & Rao, N. 2011. What is the evidence of the impact of microfinance on the well-being of poor people?. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. 2006. The white man’s burden: Why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (Ed.). 2008. Reinventing foreign aid. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist. 2010. The guru of the bottom of the pyramid. April, 22: 51–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderle, G. 2010. Wealth creation in China and some lessons for development ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enke, S. 1963. Population and development: A general model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77(1): 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, G. S. 1979. A welfare economic approach to growth and distribution in the dual economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(3): 325–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. 2013. Contract structure, risk-sharing, and investment choice. Econometrica, 81(3): 883–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. 1967. The new industrial state. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Ahlstrom, D. 1997a. Researchers’ roles in negotiating the institutional fabric of technologies. American Behavioral Scientist, 40: 523–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Ahlstrom, D. 1997b. Technology assessment: A socio-cognitive perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14: 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, G., McGahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. 2012. Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4): 661–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, G., Rao-Nicholson, R., Corbishley, C., & Bansal, R. 2015. Institutional entrepreneurship, governance, and poverty: Insights from emergency medical response services in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, this issue.

  • Godfrey, P. 2014. More than money: Five forms of capital to create wealth and eliminate poverty. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y., Chow, I. H.-S., & Ahlstrom, D. 2011. Cultural diversity in China: Dialect, job embeddedness, and turnover. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(2): 221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. 2006. Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from Medieval trade. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A., & Laitin, D. 2004. A theory of endogenous institutional change. American Political Science Review, 98: 633–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. 2011. Historically large decline in job creation from startup and existing firms in the 2008–2009 recession. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau’s Business Dynamics Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, A. B., & Kenney, M. 2012. Misguided policy? Following venture capital into clean technology. California Management Review, 54(2): 118–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Christensen, C. M. 2002. The great leap: Driving innovation from the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, Fall: 51–56.

  • Hitt, M. A., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., & Svobodina, L. 2004. The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia. Organization Science, 15(2): 173–185.

  • Hubbard, R. G., & Duggan, W. 2009. The aid trap: Hard truths about ending poverty. New York: Columbia Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, J., & Sun, S. L. 2015. Profits and outreach to the poor: The institutional logics of microfinance institutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, this issue.

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. 2003. A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6): 963–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, L., Khanna, T., & Varshney, A. 2013. Caste and entrepreneurship in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 48(6): 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. 2001. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management, 7(3): 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. T., & Miller, N. H. 2008. Giffen behavior and subsistence consumption. American Economic Review, 98(4): 1553–1577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I., & Romer, P. M. 2010. The new Kaldor facts: Ideas, institutions, population, and human capital. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(1): 224–245.

  • Kaldor, N. 1966. Strategic factors in economic development. New York: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. 2011. How venture capital became a component of the US national system of innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6): 1677–1723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. R., Griffin, K., & Riskin, C. 1999. Income distribution in urban China during the period of economic reform and globalization. American Economic Review, 89(2): 296–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khavul, S. 2010. Microfinance: Creating opportunities for the poor?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khavul, S., Bruton, G. D., & Wood, E. 2009. Informal family business in Africa. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(6): 1219–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kistruck, G. M., Beamish, P. W., Qureshi, I., & Sutter, C. J. 2013a. Social intermediation in the base of the pyramid markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(1): 31–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kistruck, G. M., Sutter, C. J., Lount, J. R., & Smith, B. R. 2013b. Mitigating principal-agent problems in base of the pyramid markets. An identity spillover perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3): 659–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochar, A. 1995. Explaining household vulnerability to idiosyncratic income shocks. American Economic Review, 85(2): 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, G. 2013. Child labour: Determinants, dimensions and policies in India. Economic Affairs, 58(4): 417–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. S. 1998. The wealth and poverty of nations: Why some are so rich and some so poor. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff, N. H. 1979. Entrepreneurship and economic development: The problem revisited. Journal of Economic Literature, 17(1): 46–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. 2009. Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed—and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Wang, L.C., Zhao, L. & Ahlstrom, D. 2013. Board turnover in Taiwan’s public firms: An empirical study. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4): 1059–1086.

  • Lu, Y., Au, K., Peng, M. W., & Xu, E. 2013. Strategic management in private and family business. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3): 633–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. 2002. Lectures on economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Lützenkirchen, C., & Weistroffer, C. 2012. Microfinance in evolution. Frankfurt: Deutsche Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. 2009. Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5): 419–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., Marti, I., & Ventresca, M. 2011. Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manders, J. 2004. Sequencing property rights in the context of development: A critique of the writings of Hernando de Soto. Cornell International Law Journal, 37: 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. 2010. Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCraw, T. K. 2010. Prophet of innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and creative destruction. Cambridge: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. 2004. The gifts of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naim, M. 2013. The end of power: From boardrooms to battlefields and churches to states, why being in charge isn’t what it used to be. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, A., Ahlstrom, D., & Filer, L. 2007. Localized advantage in a global economy: The case of Bangalore. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49(5): 591–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasar, S. 2012. Grand pursuit: The story of economic genius. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B. 1995. Growing out of the plan: Chinese economic reform, 1978–1993. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbuabor, J. E., Malaolu, V. A., & Elias, T. I. 2013. Small scale enterprises, poverty alleviation and job creation in Nigeria: Lessons from burnt bricklayers in Benue State. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(18): 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, S. 2004. Guilds, efficiency, and social capital: Evidence from German proto-industry. Economic History Review, 57(May): 286–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, S. 2011. Institutions and European trade: Merchant guilds, 1000–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. H., Radelet, S., Lindauer, D. L., & Block, S. A. 2013. Economics of development, 7th ed. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., & Jalan, J. 1999. China’s lagging poor areas. American Economic Review, 89: 301–305.

  • Riskin, C. 1994. Chinese rural poverty: Marginalized or dispersed?. American Economic Review, 84(2): 281–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. 2001. The microfinance revolution: Sustainable finance for the poor. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (Eds.). 2010. Handbook of development economics, Vol. 5. Kidlington, UK: North Holland/Elsevier.

  • Romer, P. 1986. Increasing returns and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): 1002–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. 2012. Due diligence: An impertinent inquiry into microfinance. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, E. A. 1911. The changing Chinese: The conflict of oriental and Western cultures in China. New York: Century Co.

  • Sammon, E. 2013. Eradicating global poverty: A noble goal, but how do we measure it?. Development Progress working paper no. 2, London.

  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1912. The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Si, S., Yu, X., Wu, A., Chen, S., Chen, S., & Su, Y. 2015. Entrepreneurship and poverty reduction: A case study of Yiwu, China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, this issue.

  • Singh, K. M., Singh, R. K. P., Jha, A. K., & Kumar, A. 2013. Fodder market in Bihar: An exploratory study. Economic Affairs, 58(4): 357–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1): 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3): 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sombart, W. 1913. Krieg und kapitalismus (War and capitalism). Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suresh, A., & Raju, S. S. 2014. Poverty and sustainability implications of groundwater based irrigation: Insights from Indian experience. Economic Affairs, 59(2): 311–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, V. 2011. Financial inclusion in India: An evaluation of the coverage, progress and trends. IUP Journal of Financial Economics, 9(2): 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, T. W. 1956. Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record, 32(2): 334–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavanti, M. 2013. Before microfinance: The social value of microsavings in Vincentian poverty reduction. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4): 697–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L., & Bacha, E. L. 1976. The unequalizing spiral: A first growth model for Belindia. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90: 197–218.

  • Todd, H. 1996. Women at the center. Boulder: Westview Press.

  • Van Zanden, J. L. 2009. The long road to the industrial revolution. Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, M., Echambadi, R., Venugopal, S., & Sridharan, S. 2014. Subsistence entrepreneurship, value creation, and community exchange systems: A social capital explanation. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(2): 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Tunzelmann, N., Bogdanowicz, M., & Bianchi, A. 2014. The new dynamics of growth and change in Asia. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. C., Ahlstrom, D., Nair, A., & Hang, R. Z. 2008. Creating globally competitive and innovative products: China’s next Olympic challenge. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 73(3): 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. W., Bruton, G. D., Tihanyi, L., & Ireland, R. D. 2013. Research on entrepreneurship in the informal economy: Framing a research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5): 598–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. 2005. Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24: 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2012. An update to the World Bank’s estimates of consumption poverty in the developing world http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPOVCALNET/Resources/Global_Poverty_Update_2012_02-29-12.pdf, accessed 15 Nov 2014.

  • Young, M. N., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Rubanik, Y. 2011. What do firms from transition economies want from their strategic alliance partners?. Business Horizons, 54(2): 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. N., Tsai, T., Wang, X., Liu, S., & Ahlstrom, D. 2014. Strategy in emerging economies and the theory of the firm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(2): 331–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, B., Hao, S., Ahlstrom, D., Si, S., & Liang, D. 2014. Entrepreneurial firms’ network competence, technological capability, and new product development performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(3): 687–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. 2006. Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4): 917–955.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work in this article was substantially supported by a grant from the RGC Research Grant Direct Allocation Scheme (Project no. 2070465, 2011-2012) of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The authors would also like to thank Marc Ahlstrom of Burlington County College for his editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Ahlstrom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bruton, G.D., Ahlstrom, D. & Si, S. Entrepreneurship, poverty, and Asia: Moving beyond subsistence entrepreneurship. Asia Pac J Manag 32, 1–22 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9404-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9404-x

Keywords

Navigation