Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Uptake of a Partner Notification Model for HIV Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Women in Tijuana, Mexico

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Undiagnosed HIV infection is common among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW) in Latin America. We examined uptake of a partner notification (PN) model among MSM and TW in Tijuana, Mexico. Forty-six HIV-positive MSM/TW enrolled as index patients, and reported 132 MSM/TW sexual partners for PN. Of notified partners (90/132), 39% declined eligibility screening or participation, 39% tested for HIV, and of those 28% were newly-diagnosed HIV-positive. Partners who were seen by the index patient more than once in the past 4 months and those who primarily had sex with the index patient in one of their homes were more likely to be notified via PN (76% vs. 50%; p = 0.01 and 86% vs. 64%, p = 0.02, respectively). Lower than expected PN uptake was associated with problems identifying index patients, obtaining reliable partner contact information, and engaging notified partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:493–505.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Granich RM, Gilks CF, Dye C, De Cock KM, Williams BG. Universal voluntary HIV testing with immediate antiretroviral therapy as a strategy for elimination of HIV transmission: a mathematical model. Lancet. 2009;373:48–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mugavero MJ, Amico KR, Horn T, Thompson MA. The state of engagement in HIV care in the United States: from cascade to continuum to control. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:1164–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergman J, Gratrix J, Pillay T, et al. Intensive HIV partner notification is effective in identifying new and previously diagnosed HIV infections in Edmonton, Canada. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29:419–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gorbach PM, Weiss RE, Jeffries R, et al. Behaviors of recently HIV-infected men who have sex with men in the year postdiagnosis: effects of drug use and partner types. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;56:176–82.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt JW, Janssen RS. Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States. Implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39:446–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Edelman EJ, Gordon KS, Hogben M, et al. Sexual partner notification of HIV infection among a National United States-based sample of HIV-infected men. AIDS Behav. 2014;18:1898–903.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baral S, Sifakis F, Cleghorn F, Beyrer C. Elevated risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries 2000–2006: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e339.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baral SD, Poteat T, Stromdahl S, Wirtz AL, Guadamuz TE, Beyrer C. Worldwide burden of HIV in transgender women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:214–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Piñeirúa A, Sierra-Madero J, Cahn P, et al. The HIV care continuum in Latin America: challenges and opportunities. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:833–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith LR, Patterson TL, Magis-Rodriguez C, et al. Engagement in the HIV care continuum among key populations in Tijuana,Mexico. AIDS Behav. 2016;20:1017–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines on HIV Self-testing and Partner Notification, December 2016. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/vct/hiv-self-testing-guidelines/en/. Accessed 16 Aug 2017.

  13. Chow JY, Konda KA, Borquez A, et al. Peru’s HIV care continuum among men who have sex with men and transgender women: opportunities to optimize treatment and prevention. Int J STD AIDS. 2016;27:1039–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pitpitan EV, Goodman-Meza D, Burgos JL, et al. Prevalence and correlates of HIV among men who have sex with men in Tijuana, Mexico. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18:19304.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hogben M. Partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(Suppl 3):S160–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rayment M, Curtis H, Carne C, et al. An effective strategy to diagnose HIV infection: findings from a national audit of HIV partner notification outcomes in sexual health and infectious disease clinics in the UK. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93:94–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hogben M, McNally T, McPheeters M, Hutchinson AB. The effectiveness of HIV partner counseling and referral service in increasing identification of HIV-positive individuals. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:S89–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia de Olalla P, Molas E, Barberá MJ, et al. Effectiveness of a pilot partner notification program for new HIV cases in Barcelona, Spain. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0121536.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hosseinipour MC, Rosenberg NE. HIV partner notification: possible and essential. J Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40:915–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ward H, Bell G. Partner notification. Medicine. 2014;42:314–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Aar F, Schreuder I, van Weert Y, Spijker R, Gotz H, de Coul EO. Current practices of partner notification among MSM with HIV, gonorrhoea and syphilis in the Netherlands: an urgent need for improvement. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:114.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Passport to Partner Services. http://www.cdc.gov/std/training/passport-partner-services.htm. Accessed 25 Mar 2016.

  23. Alam N, Chamot E, Vermund SH, Streatfield K, Kristensen S. Partner notification for sexually transmitted infections in developing countries: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:19.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang AL, Peng RR, Tucker JD, Cohen MS, Chen XS. Partner notification uptake for sexually transmitted infections in China: a systematic literature review. Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88:386–93.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hurt CB, Beagle S, Leone PA, et al. Investigating a sexual network of black men who have sex with men: implications for transmission and prevention of HIV infection in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61:515–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McCarthy M, Haddow LJ, Furner V, Mindel A. Contact tracing for sexually transmitted infections in New South Wales, Australia. Sex Health. 2007;4:21–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ruan Y, Pan SW, Chamot E, et al. Sexual mixing patterns among social networks of HIV-positive and HIV-negative Beijing men who have sex with men: a multilevel comparison using roundtable network mapping. AIDS Care. 2011;23:1014–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tobin KE, Muessig KE, Latkin CA. HIV seropositive drug users’ attitudes towards partner notification (PCRS): results from the SHIELD study in Baltimore, Maryland. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67:137–42.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hogben M, Paffel J, Broussard D, et al. Syphilis partner notification with men who have sex with men: a review and commentary. J Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32:S43–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, Tetu AM, et al. Partner notification after STD and HIV exposures and infections: knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of Massachusetts men who have sex with men. Public Health Rep. 2009;124:111–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Perez-Brumer AG, Oldenburg CE, Segura ER, Sanchez J, Lama JR, Clark JL. Anonymous partnerships among MSM and transgender women (TW) recently diagnosed with HIV and other STIs in Lima, Peru: an individual-level and dyad-level analysis. J Sex Transm Dis. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2015-052310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Aar F, van Weert Y, Spijker R, Gotz H, de Coul EO. Partner notification among men who have sex with men and heterosexuals with STI/HIV: different outcomes and challenges. Int J STDS AIDS. 2015;26:565–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Udeagu CN, Bocour A, Shepard CW. For partner services, do we need “face-time” or FaceTime?: trends in relative proportion of in-person notifications and HIV testing after introduction of a telephone option for HIV exposure notification by public health. J Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:671–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Adams OP, Carter AO, Redwood-Campbell L. Understanding attitudes, barriers and challenges in a small island nation to disease and partner notification for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:455.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Clark JL, Perez-Brumer A, Salazar X. “Manejar la Situacion”: partner notification, partner management, and conceptual frameworks for HIV/STI control among MSM in Peru. AIDS Behav. 2015;19:2245–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ahrens K, Kent CK, Kohn RP, et al. HIV partner notification outcomes for HIV-infected patients by duration of infection, San Francisco, 2004 to 2006. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46:479–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Brewer DD. Case-finding effectiveness of partner notification and cluster investigation for sexually transmitted diseases/HIV. J Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32:78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Golden MR, Dombrowski JC, Wood RW, Fleming M, Harrington RD. A controlled study of the effectiveness of public health HIV partner notification services. AIDS. 2009;23:133–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Marcus JL, Bernstein KT, Klausner JD. Updated outcomes of partner notification for human immunodeficiency virus, San Francisco, 2004-2008. AIDS. 2009;23:1024–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mathews C, Coetzee N, Zwarenstein M, et al. A systematic review of strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS. Int J STD AIDS. 2002;13:285–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Landis SE, Schoenbach VJ, Weber DJ, et al. Results of a randomized trial of partner notification in cases of HIV infection in North Carolina. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:101–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Macke BA, Maher JE. Partner notification in the United States: an evidence-based review. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17:230–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Trelle S, Shang A, Nartey L, Cassell JA, Low N. Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patients with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review. BMJ. 2007;334:354.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Brown LB, Miller WC, Kamanga G, et al. HIV partner notification is effective and feasible in sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities for HIV treatment and prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;56:437–42.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cherutich P, Golden MR, Wamuti B, et al. Assisted partner services for HIV in Kenya: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e74–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Henley C, Forgwei G, Welty T, et al. Scale-up and case-finding effectiveness of an HIV partner services program in Cameroon: an innovative HIV prevention intervention for developing countries. J Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40:909–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kahabuka C, Plotkin M, Christensen A, et al. Addressing the first 90: a highly effective partner notification approach reaches previously undiagnosed sexual partner in Tanzania. AIDS Behav. 2017;21:2551–60.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Armbruster B, Helleringer S, Kalilani-Phiri L, Mkandawire J, Kohler HP. Exploring the relative costs of contact tracing for increasing HIV case finding in sub-Saharan countries. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58:e29–36.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Clark JL, Segura ER, Perez-Brumer AG, et al. Potential impact and acceptability of Internet partner notification for men who have sex with men and transgender women recently diagnosed with STD in Lima, Peru. J Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:43–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. USAID-Mexico. HIV/AIDS Health Profile. 2010. http://transition.usaid.gov/our_work/global_health/aids/Countries/lac/mexico_profile.pdf. Accessed 2013 July 23.

  51. Beyrer C, Abdool Karim Q. The changing epidemiology of HIV in 2013. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2013;8:306–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Geibel S, Tun W, Tapsoba P, Kellerman S. HIV vulnerability of men who have sex with men in developing countries: Horizons studies, 2001–2008. Public Health Rep. 2010;125:316–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pines HA, Goodman-Meza D, Pitpitan EV, et al. HIV testing among men who have sex with men in Tijuana, Mexico: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010388.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Centios Ambulatorios de Prevención Atención en SIDA e ITS CAPASITS. HIV & Ambulatory CARE and Prevention Clinics. http://www.censida.salud.gob.mx/interior/capasits/bcalif_capasits.html. Accessed on 11 Aug 2017.

  55. Mexican National Guidelines on pre- and post-testing HIV counseling. https://www.gob.mx/censida/articulos/guias-y-manuales-censida?idiom=es. Accessed 11 Nov 2017.

  56. Latkin CA, Knowlton AR. Social network assessments and interventions for health behavior change: a critical review. Behav Med. 2015;41:90–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lui H. Egocentric network and condom use among mid-age female sex workers in China: a multilevel modeling analysis. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016;30:155–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Golden MR, Hogben M, Potterat JJ, Handsfield HH. HIV partner notification in the United States: a national survey of program coverage and outcomes. J Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31:709–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kobrak P, Ponce R, Zielony R. New arrivals to New York City: vulnerability to HIV among urban migrant young gay men. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44:2014–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Clark JL, Long CM, Giron JM, et al. Partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases in Peru: knowledge, attitudes, and practices in a high-risk community. J Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34:309–13.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Udeagu CN, Bocour A, Shah S, Ramos Y, Gutierrez R, Shephard CW. Bringing HIV partner services into the age of social media and mobile connectivity. J Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:631–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Grant R01DA037811 to TP. Preparation of this manuscript was supported by a NIDA K01DA040543 Mentored Research Scientist Development Award to HAP.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas L. Patterson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All research methods were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the University of California, San Diego and Xochicalco University in Tijuana, Mexico. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its amendments.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Semple, S.J., Pines, H.A., Strathdee, S.A. et al. Uptake of a Partner Notification Model for HIV Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Women in Tijuana, Mexico. AIDS Behav 22, 2042–2055 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1984-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1984-2

Keywords

Navigation