Abstract
This paper investigates how we can enact, collectively, affording food systems. Yet rather than asking simply what those assemblages might look like the author enquires as to how they might also feel. Building on existing literature that speaks to the radically relational, and deeply affective, nature of food the aims of this paper are multiple: to learn more about how moments of difference come about in otherwise seemingly banal encounters; to understand some of the processes by which novelty ripples out, up, and through social bodies; to speak to, and suggest ways to resolve, ontological asymmetries within the agrifood literature pertaining to Cartesian dualisms; and to offer ways forward that allow agrifood scholars to talk about phenomena such as feelings and structures/barriers in the same sentence. The empirical flesh of the paper comes from an admittedly unconventional case study. On December 10, 2012, Amendment 64 was added to Colorado’s constitution making it legal for adults to consume marijuana for recreational purposes. The case examined is not about pot, however. The paper, rather, is about hopeful, hydroponic-inspired, agrifood futures; novel doings, feelings, and thinkings sparked by, among other things, food grown in basements and spare bedrooms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
On a related note, though speaking to a different inconsistency, Moore (2011) offers a detailed critique of how the metabolic rift literature unintentionally reinforces Cartesian dualisms when theorizing the ecological crisis.
Haraway (1992) and more recently Barad (2007), in an attempt to work free of the representationalist trap, offer the methodological technique of diffraction: “a mapping of interference, not of replication, reflection, or reproduction. A diffraction pattern does not map where differences appear, but rather maps where the effects of differences appear” (Haraway 1992, p. 300). Elsewhere I explore what this technique might look like when put to work in agrifood scholarship (Carolan 2016).
Amendment 64 states that adults can possess up to an ounce of pot and can grow as many as six marijuana plants at home (though only three can be flowering at any given time). Any homegrown marijuana, however, can only be for personal use and cannot be sold, though adults can gift to another adult up to an ounce of pot.
Abbreviations
- HOA:
-
Home owners associations
- ANT:
-
Actor network theory
References
Anderson, B. 2006. Transcending without transcendence: Utopianism and an ethos of hope. Antipode 38(4): 691–710.
Bakhtin, M. 1984. Rabelais and his world. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant matter: A political economy of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bergson, H. 1998. (1911) Creative evolution. New York, NY: Dover.
Busch, L. 2010. Can fairy tales come true? The surprising story of neoliberalism and world agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 50(4): 331–351.
Carolan, M. 2008. The more-than- representational knowledge/s of countryside: How we think as bodies. Sociologia Ruralis 48(4): 408–422.
Carolan, M. 2011a. Embodied food politics. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Carolan, M. 2011b. The real cost of cheap food. New York, NY: Routledge.
Carolan, M. 2013a. Reclaiming food security. New York, NY: Routledge.
Carolan, M. 2013b. The wild side of agro-food Studies: On co-experimentation, politics, change, and hope. Sociologia Ruralis 53(4): 413–431.
Carolan, M. 2013c. Doing and enacting economies of value: Thinking through the assemblage. New Zealand Geographer 69(3): 176–179.
Carolan, M. 2015. Affective sustainable landscapes and care ecologies: Getting a peal feel for alternative food communities. Sustainability Science 10(2): 317–329.
Carolan, M. 2016. The very public nature of agrifood scholarship, and its problems and possibilities. In Biological economies: Experimentation and the politics of agrifood frontiers, eds. R. Le Heron, H. Campbell, N. Lewis, and M. Carolan. New York, NY: Routledge.
Chatterton, P., and J. Pickerill. 2010. Everyday activism and transitions towards post-capitalist worlds. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35: 475–490.
Cook, P. 2009. When species meet. EASST Review 28(3): 6–7.
Deleuze, G. 1978. Les Cours de Gilles Deleuze, Sur Spinoza. http://www.webdeleuze.com/php/texte.php?cle=14&groupe=Spinoza&langue=2. Accessed 6 Aug 2014.
Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and repetition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G. 1995. Negotiations 1972–1990. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G. 2006. (1993) The fold. London: Continuum.
de Certeau, M. 2011. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Dewey, J. 1946. The public and its problems. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
DuPuis, M., and D. Goodman. 2005. Should we go home to eat: Toward a reflexive politics of localism. Journal of Rural Studies 21: 359–371.
Elder-Vas, D. 2015. Disassembling actor-network theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45(1): 100–121.
Fisher, B., and J. Tronto. 1990. Toward a feminist theory of caring. In Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives, ed. E. Abel, and M. Nelson, 35–62. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Foucault, M. 2003. Society must be defended. New York, NY: Picador.
Friedmann, H. 2005. From colonialism to green capitalism: social movements and the emergence of food regimes. In New directions in the sociology of global development. Research in rural sociology and development, ed. F. Buttel, and P. McMichael, 229–267. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Gibson-Graham, J.K. 1996. The end of capitalism (as we knew it). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Gibson-Graham, J.K. 2014. Rethinking the economy with thick description and weak theory. Current Anthropology 55(S9): S147–S153.
Gibson-Graham, J.K., J. Carmeron, and S. Healy. 2013. Take back the economy: An ethical guide for transforming our communities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Geertz, C. 1973. Thick description: Toward an interpretative theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays, ed. C. Geertz, 3–30. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Habermas, J. 1987. The theory of communicative action. Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Cambridge, UK: Trans. Thomas McCarthy Policy Press.
Haraway, D. 1992. The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In Cultural studies, ed. Lawrence Grossberg, Cory Nelson, and Paula Treichler, 295–337. New York, NY: Routledge.
Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience, New York, NY: Routledge.
Haraway, D. 2003. The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Larner, W. 2003. Neoliberalism? Environment and Planning D 21(5): 509–512.
Latimer, J., and M. Miele. 2013. Naturecultures? Science, affect and the non-human. Theory Culture and Society 30: 5–31.
Latour, B. 2000. When things strike back—a possible contribution of science studies to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology 51(1): 107–123.
Latour, B. 2005. What is given in experience? Boundary 2 32(1): 223–237.
Latour, B. 2012. Love your monsters: Why we must care for our technologies as we do our children, The Breakthrough Winter. http://thebreakthrough.org/index.php/journal/past-issues/issue-2/love-your-monsters. Accessed 16 May 2015.
Lawrence, G., C. Richards, and K. Lyons. 2013. Food security in Australia in an era of neoliberalism, productivism and climate change. Journal of Rural Studies 29: 30–39.
Lefebvre, H. 1987. The everyday and everydayness. Yale French Studies 73: 7–11.
Lefebvre, H. 2002 (1961) Critique of everyday life, Volume 2, New York, NY: Verso.
Le Heron, R. 2009. Rooms and moments’ in neoliberalising policy trajectories of metropolitan Auckland, New Zealand: Towards constituting progressive spaces through post-structural political economy. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 50(2): 135–153.
Leitner, H., E. Sheppard, and K.M. Sziarto. 2008. The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33(2): 157–172.
Lewis, N. 2009. Progressive spaces of neoliberalism? Asia Pacific Viewpoint 50(2): 113–119.
Magdoff, F., and B. Tokar (eds.). 2011. Agriculture and food in crisis. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
Marsden, T. 2013. From post-productionism to reflexive governance: Contested transitions in securing more sustainable food futures. Journal of Rural Studies 29: 123–134.
Massumi, B. 2002. Navigating moments. In Hope: New philosophies for change, ed. M. Zournazi, 210–243. Sydney, NSW: Pluto.
McMichael, P. 2009. A food regime genealogy. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1): 139–169.
McMichael, P. 2014. Rethinking land grab ontology. Rural Sociology 79(1): 34–55.
Moore, J. 2011. Transcending the metabolic rift: a theory of crises in the capitalist world-ecology. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38(1): 1–46.
NY Daily News 2013. Kansas couple says they were targeted during drug sweep because of equipment they bought for indoor gardening, New York Daily News March 29, http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/kansas-couple-raided-gardening-equipment-article-1.1303092. Accessed 17 Feb 2015.
Peck, J. 2013. Explaining (with) neoliberalism. Territory, Politics, Governance 1(2): 132–157.
Pinder, D. 2011. Errant paths: the poetics and politics of walking. Environment and Planning D 29: 672–692.
Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2011. Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science 41(1): 85–106.
Rosin, C. 2013. Food security and the justification of productivism in New Zealand. Journal of Rural Studies 29: 50–58.
Rosin, C., P. Stock, and H. Campbell (eds.). 2013. Food systems failure: The global food crisis and the future of agriculture. Routledge: New York, NY.
Ruddick, S. 2010. The politics of affect: Spinoza in the work of Negri and Deleuze. Theory Culture and Society 27(4): 21–45.
Sandel, M. 2012. What money can’t buy: the moral limits of markets. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Sharpe, S. 2014. Potentiality and impotentiality. Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture and Society 26(1): 27–43.
Shelley, M.W. 2008 (1832) Frankenstein, or the modern prometheus. Rockville, MA: Manor.
Sparke, M. 2008. Political geography—political geographies of globalization III: Resistance. Progress in Human Geography 32(3): 423–440.
Stengers, I. 2011. Comparison as a matter of concern. Common Knowledge 17(1): 48–63.
Stock, P., M. Carolan, and C. Rosin (eds.). 2015. Food Utopias: Reimagining citizenship, ethics and community. New York, NY: Routledge.
Thompson, E.P. 1971. The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past and Present 50: 76–136.
Van der Ploeg, J. 2010. The food crisis, industrialized farming and the imperial regime. Journal of Agrarian Change 10: 98–106.
Whatmore, S. 2013. Earthly powers and affective environments: An ontological politics of flood risk. Theory Culture and Society 30: 33–50.
Whitehead, A.N. 1967. Adventures of ideas. New York, NY: Free Press.
Whitehead, A.N. 1968. Modes of thought. New York, NY: Free Press.
Woodward, K., J. Jones, and S. Marston. 2012. The politics of autonomous space. Progress in Human Geography 36(2): 204–224.
Acknowledgments
Some of the time used to write this article was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2013S1A3A2055243). The author would like to thank all those associated with the New Zealand-based Biological Economies project for their support and inspiration, especially Richard Le Heron, Hugh Campbell, and Nick Lewis. Thanks also to the Australasian-based community of researchers that are part of the Agri-Food Research Network. An earlier version of this article was presented in Melbourne, Australia, at the Agrifood XX meetings in 2013. Finally, a word of thanks to Cinzia Piatti and Angga Dwiartama for their perseverance in organizing the symposium this article contributes to.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carolan, M. Adventurous food futures: knowing about alternatives is not enough, we need to feel them. Agric Hum Values 33, 141–152 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9629-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9629-4