Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Customary rights and societal stakes of large-scale tobacco cultivation in Malawi

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent surge in land-based investments in the global South has been seen as both an opportunity for rural economic development and as a trend that poses significant social and environmental risks. This study sheds light on this debate through a look at the tobacco industry in Malawi. We employ a case study approach to investigate how rights, property, and authority associated with land and forest resources have shifted in the context of expanded investments in tobacco, and the stakes for both local land users and citizens. Findings point to the need to broaden the metric of risks and trade-offs associated with large-scale land acquisitions, and to engage in a deeper reading of how these are borne out throughout history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. De Schutter (2011) highlights three such costs: reduced poverty alleviation potential, increasing country vulnerability to price shocks through the orientation towards export markets, and accelerated development of land markets with potentially destructive effects on livelihoods.

  2. Group discussion with Forestry Officers, Kasungu, 12 October 2009.

  3. Calculated from data provided by Dorward and Chirwa (2011) and end-of-year exchange rates.

  4. According to Mangisoni (2005), tobacco directly or indirectly supported between 7 and 8 million people per year from 2000 to 2005.

  5. Following policy reforms in 1990 s, smallholders began to dominate the industry, with the average size of tobacco farms being 1.0 ha and the average tobacco field 0.2 ha. Only China rivals Malawi in this regard among major producer countries (Jaffee 2003).

  6. This contrasts with figures provided during an October 2009 interview with the Tobacco Control Commission, which gave a figure of 15 %, which would suggest the economic importance of the sector to GDP is on the decline. The agricultural sector as a whole contributes about 39 % to the country’s GDP and 90 % to its foreign exchange earnings (MAFS 2010).

  7. A study by the European Commission, World Health Organization and the World Bank (EC et al. 2003) which explored the economic effects of tobacco control on national economies (benefits from employment and income, tax revenue and foreign exchange, and costs associated with public health costs) found that most nations would experience net economic gains if their demand for tobacco products fell, because economic losses would be offset by economic gains at household and national levels. However, Malawi is unique among those countries studied in the contribution of tobacco to total export revenues, the tobacco trade surplus, and low levels of domestic consumption (and related health costs).

  8. Flue-cured tobacco, which requires higher investments in processing, is grown primarily by medium and especially large-scale estates (Jaffee 2003).

Abbreviations

ADMARC:

Agricultural development and marketing cooperative

FMB:

Farmers Marketing Board

GDP:

Gross domestic product

NTFP:

Non-timber forest product

STA:

Sub-traditional authority

TA:

Traditional authority

References

  • Alden Wily, L. 2012. Looking back to see forward: The legal niceties of land theft in land rushes. Journal of Peasant Studies 39(3–4): 751–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anseeuw, W., M. Boche, T. Breu, M. Giger, J. Lay, P. Messerli, and K. Nolte. 2012. Transnational land deals for agriculture in the global South: Analytical report based on the Land Matrix database. Bern/Montpellier/Hamburg: CDE/CIRAD/GIGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baglioni, E., and P. Gibbon. 2013. Land grabbing, large- and small-scale farming: What can evidence and policy from 20th century Africa contribute to the debate? Third World Quarterly 34(9): 1558–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borras Jr., S.M., C. Kay, S. Gómez, and J. Wilkinson. 2012. Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: Key features in Latin America. Journal of Canadian Studies 33(4): 402–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, T.W., and I.M. Hayes. 1997. Sustainable tobacco production in Malawi: The role of supply and demand. Paper presented at the seminar on “Malawi Tobacco and the Future,” Club Makokola, Mangochi, October 1997.

  • Byerlee, D. 2013. Are we learning from history? In The global farms race: Land grabs, agricultural investment, and the scramble for food security, ed. M. Kugelman, and S.L. Levenstein, 21–44. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. 1996. The miombo in transition: Woodlands and welfare in Africa. Bogor, Indonesia: Centre for International Forestry Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDPR (California Department of Pesticide Regulation). 1994. Methyl bromide. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Pesticide Regulation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Intelligence Agency—CIA. 2010. CIA World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mi.html. Accessed 21 Nov 2010.

  • Central Intelligence Agency—CIA. 2014. CIA World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mi.html. Accessed 9 July 2014.

  • Chibwana, C., C. Jumbe, and G. Shively. 2010. Measuring the forest impacts of maize and tobacco subsidies in Malawi. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colchester, M. 2010. Palm oil and indigenous peoples of South East Asia: Land acquisition, human rights violations and indigenous peoples on the palm oil frontier. Moreton-in- Marsh, UK and Rome, Italy: Forest Peoples Programme and the International Land Coalition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotula, L. 2012. The international political economy of the global land rush: A critical appraisal of trends, scale, geography and drivers. Journal of Peasant Studies 39(3–4): 649–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotula, L. 2013. The great African land grab? Agricultural investments and the global food system. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen, F., H. Beukema, N.D. Burgess, F. Parish, C.A. Bruhl, P.F. Donald, D. Murdiyarso, B. Phalan, L. Reijnders, M. Struebig, and E.B. Fitzherbert. 2008. Biofuel plantations on forested lands: Double jeopardy for biodiversity and climate. Conservation Biology 23(2): 348–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Schutter, O. 2011. How not to think of land-grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland. Journal of Peasant Studies 38(2): 249–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. 2011. Challenges posed by the new wave of farmland investment. Journal of Peasant Studies 38(2): 217–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., and D. Byerlee, with J. Lindsay, A. Norton, H. Selod, and M. Stickler. 2011. Rising global interest in farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Diao, X., R. Sherman, T. Marcelle, and W. Peter. 2002. Assessing impacts of declines in the world price of tobacco on China, Malawi, Turkey, and Zimbabwe. TMD Discussion Paper No. 91. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

  • Dorward, A., and E. Chirwa. 2011. The Malawi agricultural input subsidy programme: 2005/06 to 2008/09. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9(1): 232–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. Methyl bromide use. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, World Health Organization and the World Bank. 2003. The economics of tobacco use and tobacco control in the developing world. http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_determinants/life_style/tobacco/documents/world_bank_en.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2014.

  • Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and I. Scoones. 2012. Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies 39(2): 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, IFAD, UNCTAD and World Bank Group. 2010. Principles for responsible agricultural investment that respect rights, livelihood and resources. Rome and Washington, DC: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), and the World Bank Group.

  • French, D. 1986. Confronting and unsolvable problem: Deforestation in Malawi. World Development 14(4): 531–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friends of the Earth, LifeMosaic, and Sawit Watch. 2008. Losing ground: The human rights impacts of oil palm plantation expansion in Indonesia. London: Friends of the Earth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist, H.J. 1997. How tobacco farming contributes to tropical deforestation. Paper presented at the Tobacco Deliberation Group Meeting, National Committee for International Cooperation and Sustainable Development, Utrecht, 29 October 1997.

  • Geist, H.J. 1999a. Global assessment of deforestation related to tobacco farming. Tobacco Control 8: 8–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist, H.J. 1999b. Tobacco: A driving force of environmental change in the Miombo Woodland Zone of Southern Africa. Paper presented at the conference African Environments: Past and Present, July. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Department of Geography.

  • Geist, H.J., M. Otanez, and J. Kapito. 2006. The tobacco industry in Malawi: A globalized driver of local land change. In Land use and land cover change: Local processes and globalized impacts, ed. E.F. Lambin, and H. Geist, 251–268. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • German, L., G. Schoneveld, and P. Pacheco. 2011. Local social and environmental impacts of biofuels: Global comparative assessment and implications for governance. Ecology and Society 16(4): 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • German, L., W. Achten, and M. Guariguata. 2012. Environmental impacts. In The global farms race: Land grabs, agricultural investment, and the scramble for food security, ed. M. Kugelman, and S. Levenstein, 71–98. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • German, L., G. Schoneveld, and E. Mwangi. 2013. Contemporary processes of large-scale land acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa: Legal deficiency or elite capture of the rule of law? World Development 48: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German, L., A. Mandondo, F. Paumgarten, and J. Mwitwa. 2014. Shifting rights, property and authority in the forest frontier: ‘Stakes’ for local land users and citizens. Journal of Peasant Studies 41(1): 51–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Malawi. 2008. 2008 Population and Housing Census: A preliminary report. Zomba, Malawi: National Statistical Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Malawi, n.d. Annual Economic Survey 20052006. Lilongwe, Malawi: National Statistical Office. http://www.nso.malawi.net/data_on_line/economics/aes/Final%20Report%202005-2006.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2010.

  • ILC (International Land Coalition). 2011. Tirana Declaration. Tirana, Albania: ILC Global Assembly 2011. http://www.landcoalition.org/sites/default/files/aom11/Tirana_Declaration_ILC_2011_ENG.pdf.

  • Isin, E.F., and B.S. Turner. 2002. Handbook of citizen studies. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, S. 1997. Malawi agriculture: Recent structural transformation and future prospects. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, S.M. 2003. Malawi’s tobacco sector: Standing on one leg is better than none. Africa Region Working Paper Series 55. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Keyser, J.C. 2002. The costs and profitability of tobacco compared to other crops in Zimbabwe. HNP Discussion Paper. Economics of Tobacco Control Paper No. 1. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Koester, U., G. Olney, C. Mataya, and T. Chidzanja. 2004. Status and prospects of Malawi’s tobacco industry: A value chain analysis. A report prepared for the Emergency Drought Recovery Project. Lilongwe, Malawi: Ministry of Agriculture.

  • Li, T.M. 2011. Centering labor in the land grab debate. Journal of Peasant Studies 38(2): 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAFS (Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security). 2010. A medium term plan for the Farm Inputs Subsidy Programme (2011–2016), Third version. Lilongwe, Malawi: Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malawi Investment Promotion Agency—MIPA. n.d. Investment incentives. http://www.malawi-invest.net/inves_incent.html. Accessed 21 Nov 2010.

  • Maleta, M. 2004. MalawiTobacco sector performance audit: Review of the performance of sector institutions. Report prepared for the Emergency Drought Recovery Project. Lilongwe, Malawi: Ministry of Agriculture.

  • Mandondo, A., L. German, H. Utila, and U.M. Nthenda. 2014. Assessing societal benefits and trade-offs of tobacco in the Miombo woodlands. Human Ecology 42: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangisoni, J.H. 2005. An economic analysis of the value of agricultural trade preferences to Malawi: A case study of the tobacco, tea and sugar industries. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings 7: 797–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, A., and C. Wilshaw. 1992. Fodya: The Malawi tobacco handbook. Blantyre, Malawi: Central Africana Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S., P. O’Keefe, and M. Sill. 1993. The southern African environment: Profiles of the SADC countries. London: ETC Foundation and Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphree, M.W., and D.H.M. Cumming. 1991. Savanna land use policy and practice in Zimbabwe. Paper presented at the UNESCO/IUBS Conference on Savanna Land Use, Nairobi, January 1991.

  • Nhantumbo, I., and A. Salomao. 2010. Biofuels, land access and rural livelihoods in Mozambique. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotny, T., and F. Zhao. 1999. Consumption and production waste: Another externality of tobacco use. Tobacco Control 8: 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nsiku, N., and W. Botha. 2007. Tobacco revenue management: Malawi case study. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyasa Times. 2010. Malawi coaxes tobacco producers to fight G20. http://www.nyasatimes.com/national/malawi-coaxes-tobacco-producers-to-fight-g20.html. Accessed 21 Nov 2010.

  • OXFAM. 2011. Land and power: The growing scandal surrounding the new wave of investments in land. Oxfam Briefing Paper no. 151. Oxford, UK: OXFAM.

  • Oya, C. 2013. The land rush and classic agrarian questions of capital and labour: A systematic scoping review of the socioeconomic impact of land grabs in Africa. Third World Quarterly 34(9): 1532–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persaud, S.C., and B.G. Saager Meade. 2009. Trade and development when exports lack diversification: A case study from Malawi. Economic Research Report 77. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.

  • Peters, J., and S. Thielman. 2008. Promoting biofuels: Implications for developing countries. Ruhr Economic Papers No. 38. Essen, Germany: Ruhr-Universität Bochum.

  • Peters, P. 2013. Land appropriation, surplus people and a battle over visions of agrarian futures in Africa. Journal of Peasant Studies 40(3): 537–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, C., J. Kydd, and D. Kabame. 2007. Review of experiences with commercial agriculture: Case study on Malawi tobacco. Kent: Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K.S., and P.C. Gupta (eds.). 2004. Report on tobacco control in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, J.C., and N.L. Peluso. 2003. A theory of access. Rural Sociology 68(2): 153–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahan, E., and M. Mikhail. 2012. Private investment in agriculture: Why it’s essential, and what’s needed. OXFAM Discussion Paper. Oxford, UK: OXFAM.

  • Sauer, J., and J.M. Abdallah. 2007. Forest diversity, tobacco production and resource management in Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics 9(5): 421–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlager, E., and E. Ostrom. 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics 68(3): 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoneveld, G. 2012. The anatomy of large-scale farmland acquisitions in sub-Saharan Africa. Working Paper 85. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.

  • Semu-Banda, P. 2008. Turmoil as tobacco prices fluctuate. http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=42382. Accessed 21 Nov 2010.

  • Somers, M.R. 2008. Genealogies of citizenship, markets, statelessness and the right to have rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takane, T. (ed.). 2005. Agricultural and rural development in Malawi: Macro and micro perspectives. Chiba, Japan: Institute of Developing Economies.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Mandala Projects. n.d. Malawi tobacco industry and the environment. TED case studies 252. http://www1.american.edu/TED/maltobac.htm. Accessed 21 Nov 2010.

  • Torbin, R.J., and W.I. Knausenberger. 1998. Dilemmas of development: Burley tobacco, the environment and economic growth. Journal of Southern African Studies 24(2): 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsonga, E.W. 2004. An analysis of the performance of Malawi’s tobacco production and exports. A report prepared for the Emergency Drought Recovery Project. Lilongwe, Malawi: Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Food Security.

  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 1992. The impact of ozone layer depletion. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development). 1991. Agricultural sector assistance program, vol. I. Lilongwe, Malawi: USAID, Malawi.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B., S.M. Borras Jr, R. Hall, I. Scoones, and W. Wolford. 2012. The new enclosures: Critical perspectives on corporate land deals. Journal of Peasant Studies 39(3–4): 619–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolford, W., S.M. Borras Jr., R. Hall, I. Scoones, and B. White. 2013. Governing global land deals: The role of the state in the rush for land. Development and Change 44(2): 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2013. Tobacco. www1.worldbank.org/tobacco/pdf/country%20briefs/malawi.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2014.

  • Wu, W., S. Song, D.L. Ashley, and C. Watson. 2004. Assessment of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in the tobacco and mainstream smoke of bidi cigarettes. Carcinogenesis 25: 283–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, M. 1997. Growth linkages of smallholder tobacco production in Malawi. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted through the financial support of the European Commission. The views expressed in this article can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. The Forest Department, through the Forest Research Institute of Malawi, provided invaluable support by seconding Henry Utila and Martin Nthenda to participate in the study. We also thank district forestry officials and the communities in respective areas of Kasungu and Mchinji for their cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura German.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mandondo, A., German, L. Customary rights and societal stakes of large-scale tobacco cultivation in Malawi. Agric Hum Values 32, 31–46 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9514-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9514-6

Keywords

Navigation