Abstract
We tested whether changes in water transparency caused either by precipitation-mediated sedimentation (inorganic turbidity) or eutrophication (organic turbidity) differently interact with top predator presence to determine predation rates, and individual decisions of mesopredators between foraging and avoiding predators. We tested the hypothesis that fear-induced cascade effects are more pronounced in organic turbid water through an experiment in which we manipulated turbidity (clear water and organic/inorganic turbid water) and predation risk (presence/absence of a top predator) in a 3 × 2 factorial design. We assessed prey consumption, prey selection (benthic and planktonic invertebrates) and food partitioning among individuals within shoals of an invertivorous fish, Moenkhausia forestii. The overall prey consumption by mesopredators was similar with and without top predator in clear water, but the presence of a top predator resulted in decreased invertebrate consumption in turbid waters, with no difference between organic and inorganic turbidity. Also, fear-induced cascade effects caused a strong preference of planktonic prey over benthic in inorganic turbidity and decreased evenness in prey consumption among individuals. Our findings suggest that the interactive effects of turbidity and top predator presence on mesopredator foraging depend on prey type and highlight individual differences in foraging behaviours among shoal members. Increased anthropogenic impacts on aquatic environments could have lasting long-term population impacts for fishes in terms of foraging and predator avoidance behaviour.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data
Data are available upon request to the corresponding author. Code is available upon request to the corresponding author.
References
Abrahams MV, Kattenfeld MG (1997) The role of turbidity as a constraint on predator-prey interactions in aquatic environments. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:169–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050330
Ajemian MJ, Sohel S, Mattila J (2015) Effects of turbidity and habitat complexity on antipredator behavior of threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Environ Biol Fish 98:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-014-0235-x
Bauman AG, Seah JCL, Januchowski-Hartley FA, Hoey AS, Fong J, Todd PA (2019) Fear effects associated with predator presence and habitat structure interact to alter herbivory on coral reefs. Biol Lett 15:20190409. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0409
Becker LJS, Brooks EM, Gabor CR (2016) Effects of turbidity on foraging behavior in the endangered fountain darter (Etheostoma fonticola). Am Midl Nat 175:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1674/amid-175-01-55-63.1
Borner KK, Krause S, Mehner T, Uusi-Heikkilä S, Ramnarine IW, Krause J (2015) Turbidity affects social dynamics in Trinidadian guppies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:645–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1875-3
Brejão GL, Gerhard P, Zuanon J (2013) Functional trophic composition of the ichthyofauna of forest streams in eastern Brazilian Amazon. Neotrop Ichthyol 11:361–373. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252013005000006
Butakka CMM, Trivinho-Strixino S, Pinha GD, Takeda AM (2014) Emergence of Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera) in a floodplain lake of the upper Paraná river, Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil. Acta Sci Biol Sci 36:51–58. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v36i1.19323
Chapman BB, Morrell LJ, Tosh CR, Krause J (2010) Behavioural consequences of sensory plasticity in guppies. Proc R Soc B 277:1395–1401. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.2055
Chesson J (1983) The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology 64:1297–1304. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937838
Chivers DP, Al-Batati F, Brown GE, Ferrari MCO (2013) The effect of turbidity on the recognition and generalization of predators and non-predators in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Evol 3:268–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.454
Davies-Colley RJ, Vant WN, Smith DG (1993) Colour and clarity of natural waters: science and management of optical water quality. The Blackburn Press, West Caldwell
De Robertis A, Ryer CH, Veloza A, Brodeur RD (2003) Differential effects of turbidity on prey consumption of piscivorous and planktivorous fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1517–1526. https://doi.org/10.1139/f03-123
Donohue I, Molinos JG (2009) Impacts of increased sediment loads on the ecology of lakes. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 84:517–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469185X.2009.00081.x
Ehlman SM, Torresdal JD, Fraser DF (2020) Altered visual environment affects a tropical freshwater fish assemblage through impacts on predator–prey interactions. Freshw Biol 65:316–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13425
Felipe TRA, Súarez YR, Antonialli WF (2009) The social organization of fish schools: antipredator responses of Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae (Characidae, Tetragonopterinae) under simulated predation in the laboratory. Sociobiology 54:275–281
Figueiredo BRS, Mormul RP, Benedito E (2015) Structural complexity and turbidity do not interact to influence predation rate and prey selectivity by a small visually feeding fish. Mar Freshw Res 66:170–176. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF14030
Figueiredo BRS, Mormul RP, Chapman BB, Lolis LA, Fiori LF, Benedito E (2016) Turbidity amplifies the non-lethal effects of predation and affects the foraging success of characid fish shoals. Freshw Biol 61:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12703
Figueiredo BRS, Fiori LF, Keppeler FW, Mormul RP, Benedito E (2018) Non-lethal effects of a native and a non-native piscivorous fish on the interaction between a mesopredator and benthic and pelagic invertebrates. Aquat Invasions 13: 553–563. 4: 553–563 https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2018.13.4.12
Figueiredo BRS, Calvo C, López-Rodríguez A, Mormul RP, Teixeira-de Mello F, Benedito E, Meerhoff M (2019) Short-term interactive effects of experimental heat waves and turbidity pulses on the foraging success of a subtropical invertivorous fish. Water 11:2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102109
Gomes LC, Bulla CK, Agostinho AA, Vasconcelos LP, Miranda LE (2012) Fish assemblage dynamics in a Neotropical floodplain relative to aquatic macrophytes and the homogenizing effect of a flood pulse. Hydrobiologia 685:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0870-6
Gregory RS (2011) Effect of Turbidity on the Predator Avoidance Behaviour of Juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:241–246. https://doi.org/10.1139/f93-027
Gregory RS, Levings CD (1998) Turbidity reduces predation on migrating juvenile pacific salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc 127:275–285
Gregory RS, Northcote TG (1993) Surface, planktonic, and benthic foraging by juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in turbid laboratory conditions. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:233–240. https://doi.org/10.1139/f93-026
Guiden PW, Bartel SL, Byer NW, Shipley AA, Orrock JL (2019) Predator–prey interactions in the Anthropocene: reconciling multiple aspects of novelty. Trends Ecol Evol 34:616–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.02.017
Harrison XA, Donaldson L, Correa-Cano ME, Evans J, Fisher DN, Goodwin CED, Robinson BS, Hodgson DJ, Inger R (2018) A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology. PeerJ 6:e4794. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4794
Higham TE, Stewart WJ, Wainwright PC (2015) Turbulence, temperature, and turbidity: The ecomechanics of predator–prey interactions in fishes. Integr Comp Biol 55:6–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icv052
Hodgkin EP, Hamilton BH (1993) Fertilizers and eutrophication in southwestern Australia: setting the scene. Fertil Res 36:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00747579
Hoverman JT, Auld JR, Relyea RA (2005) Putting prey back together again: integrating predator-induced behavior, morphology, and life history. Oecologia 144:481–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0082-81
Huenemann TW, Dibble ED, Fleming JP (2012) Influence of turbidity on the foraging of largemouth bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 141:107–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2011.651554
Humphries P, Winemiller KO (2009) Historical impacts on river fauna, shifting baselines, and challenges for restoration. Bioscience 59:673–684. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.8.9
Jönsson M, Ranåker L, Nicolle A, Ljungberg P, Fagerberg T, Hylander S, Jephson T, Lebret K, von Einem K, Hansson LA, Nilsson PA, Balseiro E, Modenutti B (2011) Glacial clay affects foraging performance in a Patagonian fish and cladoceran. Hydrobiologia 663:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0557-4
Kirk JTO (1985) Effects of suspensoids (turbidity) on penetration of solar radiation in aquatic ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 125:195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045935
Kirk JTO (1994) Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, London
Leahy SM, McCormick MI, Mitchell MD, Ferrari MCO (2011) To fear or to feed: the effects of turbidity on perception of risk by a marine fish. Biol Lett 7:811–813. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0645
Lehtiniemi M, Engström-Öst J, Viitasalo M (2005) Turbidity decreases anti-predator behaviour in pike larvae, Esox lucius. Environ Biol Fishes 73:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-004-5568-4
Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640. https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-092
Liu Z, Uiblein F (1996) Prey detectability mediates selectivity in a zooplanktivorous cyprinid (Alburnus alburnus (L.)). Sitzungsber Abt I 203:3–13
Luz-Agostinho KDG, Agostinho AA, Gomes LC, Júlio-Jr HF (2008) Influence of flood pulses on diet composition and trophic relationships among piscivorous fish in the upper Paraná river floodplain. Hydrobiologia 607:187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9390-4
Magurran AE (1986) Individual differences in fish behaviour. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) The behaviour of teleost fishes. Springer, Boston, pp 338–365
Malabarba LR (1998) Monophyly of the Cheirodontinae, characters and major clades (Ostariophysi: Characidae). In: Malabarba LR, Reis RE, Vari RP, Lucena ZMS, Lucena CAS (eds) Phylogeny and classification of neotropical fishes. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre, pp 193–233
Mazzeo N, Iglesias C, Teixeira-de Mello F, Borthagaray A, Fosalba C, Ballabio R, Larrea D, Vilches J, García S, Pacheco JP, Jeppesen E (2010) Trophic cascade effects of Hoplias malabaricus (Characiformes, Erythrinidae) in subtropical lakes food webs: a mesocosm approach. Hydrobiologia 644:325–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0197-8
Money DA, Ingley SJ, Johnson JB (2017) Divergent predation environment between two sister species of livebearing fishes (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae) predicts boldness, activity, and exploration behavior. Rev Biol Trop 65:267–277. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v65i1.23861
Montenegro AKA, Vieira ACB, Cardoso MML, Souza JERT, Crispim MC (2013) Piscivory by Hoplias aff. malabaricus (Bloch, 1794): a question of prey availability? Acta Limnol Bras 25:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2179-975X2013000100008
Nieman CL, Gray SM (2019) Visual performance impaired by elevated sedimentary and algal turbidity in walleye Sander vitreus and emerald shiner Notropis atherinoides. J Fish Biol 95:186–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13878
Nieman CL, Oppliger AL, McElwain CC, Gray SM (2018) Visual detection thresholds in two trophically distinct fishes are compromised in algal compared to sedimentary turbidity. Conserv Physiol 6:coy044. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coy044
Nurminen L, Pekcan-Hekim Z, Repka S, Horppila J (2010) Effect of prey type and inorganic turbidity on littoral predator–prey interactions in a shallow lake: an experimental approach. Hydrobiologia 646:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0175-1
Oliveira EF, Goulart E, Breda L, Minte-Vera CV, Paiva LRS, Vismara MR (2010) Ecomorphological patterns of the fish assemblage in a tropical floodplain: effects of trophic, spatial and phylogenetic structures. Neotrop Ichthyol 8:569–586. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252010000300002
Peretti D, Andrian IF (2004) Trophic structure of fish assemblages in five permanent lagoons of the high Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. Environm Biol Fish 71:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EBFI.0000043155.76741.a1
Pitcher TJ, Parrish JK (1993) Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) Behavior of teleost fishes, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 363–439
Pitcher TJ, Magurran AE, Winfield IJ (1982) Fish in larger shoals find food faster. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:149–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300175
Preisser EL, Bolnick DI (2008) The many faces of fear: comparing the pathways and impacts of nonconsumptive predator effects on prey populations. PLoS ONE 3:5–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002465
Preisser EL, Bolnick DI, Benard MF (2005) Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator–prey interactions. Ecology 86:501–509. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0719
Ranåker L, Jönsson M, Nilsson PA, Brönmark C (2012) Effects of brown and turbid water on piscivore- prey fish interactions along a visibility gradient. Freshw Biol 57:1761–1768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02836.x
Rebora M, Piersanti S, Gaino E (2004) Visual and mechanical cues used for prey detection by the larva of Libellula depressa (Odonata Libellulidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 16:133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2004.9522642
Rocha RRA, Thomaz SM, Carvalho P, Gomes LC (2009) Modeling chlorophyll-a and dissolved oxygen concentration in tropical floodplain lakes (Paraná River, Brazil). Braz J Biol 69:491–500. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842009000300005
Romare P, Hansson LA (2003) A behavioral cascade: top-predator induced behavioral shifts in planktivorous fish and zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1956–1964. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.5.1956
Sabater S, Bregoli F, Acuña V, Barceló D, Elosegi A, Ginebreda A, Marcé R, Muñoz I, Sabater-Liesa L, Ferreira V (2018) Effects of human-driven water stress on river ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 8:11462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29807-7
Santonja M, Minguez L, Gessner MO, Sperfeld E (2017) Predator–prey interactions in a changing world: humic stress disrupts predator threat evasion in copepods. Oecologia 183:887–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3801-4
Schmitz OJ, Suttle KB (2001) Effects of top predator species on direct and indirect interactions in a food web. Ecology 82: 2072–2081. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2072:EOTPSO]2.0.CO;2
Sih A, Ferrari MCO, Harris DJ (2011) Evolution and behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change. Evol Appl 4:367–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00166.x
Smith VH, Joye SB, Howarth RW (2006) Eutrophication of freshwater and marine ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr 51:351–355. https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2002.12.142
Sohel S, Mattila J, Lindström K (2017) Effects of turbidity on prey choice of three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 566:159–167. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12014
Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Lauridsen TL, Skov C, van-Nes EH, Roijackers R, Lammens E, Portielje R (2007) Lake restoration: successes, failures and long-term effects. J Appl Ecol 44:1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01363.x
Sousa WTZ, Thomaz SM, Murphy KJ, Silveira MJ, Mormul RP (2009) Environmental predictors of the occurrence of exotic Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle and native Egeria najas Planch. in a sub-tropical river floodplain: the Upper River Paraná, Brazil. Hydrobiologia 632:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9828-3
Stockner JG, Rydin E, Hyenstrand P (2000) Cultural oligotrophication: causes and consequences for fisheries resources. Fisheries 25:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(2000)025%3c0007:CO%3e2.0.CO;2
Strobbe F, McPeek MA, De Block M, Stoks R (2011) Fish predation selects for reduced foraging activity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:241–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1032-y
Stuart-Smith RD, Stuart-Smith JF, White RWG, Barmuta LA (2007) The effects of turbidity and complex habitats on the feeding of a galaxiid fish are clear and simple. Mar Freshw Res 58:429–435. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF06240
Theodorakis CW (1989) Size segregation and the effects of oddity on predation risk in minnow schools. Anim Behav 38:496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80042-9
Tófoli RM, Hahn NS, Alves GHZ, Novakowski GC (2010) Uso do alimento por duas espécies simpátricas de Moenkhausia (Characiformes, Characidae) em um riacho da região centro-oeste do Brasil. Iheringia Ser Zool 100:201–206. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212010000300003
Turesson H, Brönmark C (2007) Predator-prey encounter rates in freshwater piscivores: effects of prey density and water transparency. Oecologia 153:281–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0728-9
Utne-Palm AC (2002) Visual feeding of fish in a turbid environment: physical and behavioural aspects. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol 35:111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236240290025644
van der Sluijs IS, Gray SM, Amorim MCP, Barber I, Candolin U, Hendry AP, Krahe R, Maan ME, Utne-Palm AC, Wagner HJ, Wong BBM (2011) Communication in troubled waters response of fish communication systems to changing environments. Evol Ecol 25:623–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9450-x
Wellington CG, Mayer CM, Bossenbroek JM, Stroh NA (2010) Effects of turbidity and prey density on the foraging success of age 0-year yellow perch Perca flavescens. J Fish Biol 76:1729–1741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02612.x
West-Eberhard MJ (1989) Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:249–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001341
Yan Z, Han W, Peñuelas J, Sardans J, Elser JJ, Du E, Reich PB, Fang J (2016) Phosphorus accumulates faster than nitrogen globally in freshwater ecosystems under anthropogenic impacts. Ecol Lett 19:1237–1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12658
Acknowledgements
This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001. BRS Figueiredo, RV Granzotti and LF Fiori are grateful to CAPES for scholarships. E Benedito thanks the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for providing the research productivity grant.
Funding
This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
The experiment was carried out in agreement with the “Ethical Principles in Animal Research” adopted by the “Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation (COBEA)” and was registered in “Brazilian Institute of the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA)” (licence number 22442-3).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Handling Editor: Télesphore Sime-Ngando.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Figueiredo, B.R.S., Granzotti, R.V., Fiori, L.F. et al. Cascading effects of predation risk under high organic and inorganic turbidity: impacts on individuals and shoals of a mesopredator fish. Aquat Ecol 54, 855–868 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09782-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09782-w