Skip to main content
Log in

Graphical unit block approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling of parallel interacting trains of columns and tanks

  • Published:
Adsorption Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple, graphical, unit block approach for complex pressure swing adsorption (PSA) cycle scheduling has been developed for parallel interacting trains of PSA columns, possibly assisted by trains of tanks. For parallel interacting trains of PSA columns, this new methodology involves a priori specifying for each train the cycle steps, their sequence, and the number of beds, and then following a systematic procedure that requires filling in a 2-D grid for each of these coupled trains. For parallel interacting trains of PSA columns assisted by trains of tanks, a similar methodology has been developed; however, the number of tanks to include and their steps is an output from the methodology rather than an input to it. The reason for this is that tanks are inherently required when the coupling between steps is otherwise impossible or leads to the generation of undesirable idle steps. The overall outcome is a unit block for each train that can easily be extended to form its complete cycle schedule, thereby forming the grand cycle schedule of the coupled train–train or train-tank system. Three heuristics were also discovered about the minimum number of beds required to satisfy the number and types of steps in the cycle step sequence. These new methodologies and heuristics should be very useful for quickly scrutinizing different PSA cycle schedules for complex PSA processes comprising any number of parallel interacting trains of PSA columns, including the possibility of being assisted by one or more trains of tanks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chiang, A.S.T.: Arithmetic of PSA process scheduling. AIChE J. 34, 1910–1912 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amico, J.S., Reinhold, III, H.E., Knaebel, K.S.: Helium recovery. US Patent 5,542,966, 1966

  • Ebner, A.D., Mehrotra, A., Ritter, J.A.: Graphical approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling. Adsorption 15, 406–421 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuderer, A.: Pressure swing adsorption process and system. US Patent 4,381,189, 1983

  • Grande, C.A., Blom, R.: Dual pressure swing adsorption units for gas separation and purification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51, 8695–8699 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jee, J.G., Lee, S.J., Kim, M.B., Lee, C.H.: Three-bed PVSA process for high-purity O2 generation from ambient air. AIChE J. 51, 2988–2999 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Kratz, W.C., Rarig, D.L., Guro, D.E., Schmidt, W.P.: Adsorptive process for separating multi-component gas mixtures. U.S Patent 4,914,218, 1990

  • Kumar, R., Kratz, W.C.: Separation of multicomponent gas mixtures by selective adsorption. US Patent 5,133,785, 1992

  • Kumar, R., Kratz, W.C., Rarig, D.L., Guro, D.E., Schmidt, W.P.: Gas mixture fractionation to produce two high purity products by pressure swing adsorption. Sep. Sci. Techol. 27, 509–522 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, A., Ebner, A.D., Ritter, J.A.: Arithmetic approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling. Adsorption 16, 113–116 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, A., Ebner, A.D., Ritter, J.A.: Simplified graphical approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling. Adsorption 17, 337–345 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold, III, H.S., D’Amico, J.S., Knaebel, K.S.: Natural gas enrichment process. US Patent 5,536,300, 1996

  • Reinhold, III: Pressure swing adsorption method for separating gas components. US Patent 7,740,687, 2010

  • Ruthven, D.M., Farooq, S., Knaebel, K.S.: Pressure Swing Adsorption. VCH Publishers Inc, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sircar, S: Separation of multi-component gas mixtures. US Patent 4,171,206, 1979a

  • Sircar, S: Separation of multi-component gas mixtures by pressure swing adsorption. US Patent 4,171,207 ,1979b

  • Sircar, S.: Fractionation of multicomponent gas mixtures by pressure swing adsorption. US Patent 4,790,858 ,1988

  • Sircar, S.: Recovery of nitrogen, hydrogen and carbon dioxide from hydrocarbon reformate. US Patent 4,813,980, 1989

  • Smith, O.J.I.V., Westerberg, A.W.: Mixed-integer programming for pressure swing adsorption cycle scheduling. Chem. Eng. Sci. 45, 2833–2842 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.-I., Patel, N.M., Sircar, S., Allam, R.J.: Ammonia synthesis. US Patent 4,792,441, 1988

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support provided in part by the National Space Biomedical Research Institute through NASA NCC9-58, in part by the SAGE Center at the University of South Carolina, and in part by the Process Science and Technology Center, a consortium composed of the University of Texas at Austin, the University of South Carolina, and the Texas A&M University.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Ritter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebner, A.D., Mehrotra, A. & Ritter, J.A. Graphical unit block approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling of parallel interacting trains of columns and tanks. Adsorption 21, 229–241 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-015-9665-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-015-9665-9

Keywords

Navigation