Abstract
A simple, graphical, unit block approach for complex pressure swing adsorption (PSA) cycle scheduling has been developed for parallel interacting trains of PSA columns, possibly assisted by trains of tanks. For parallel interacting trains of PSA columns, this new methodology involves a priori specifying for each train the cycle steps, their sequence, and the number of beds, and then following a systematic procedure that requires filling in a 2-D grid for each of these coupled trains. For parallel interacting trains of PSA columns assisted by trains of tanks, a similar methodology has been developed; however, the number of tanks to include and their steps is an output from the methodology rather than an input to it. The reason for this is that tanks are inherently required when the coupling between steps is otherwise impossible or leads to the generation of undesirable idle steps. The overall outcome is a unit block for each train that can easily be extended to form its complete cycle schedule, thereby forming the grand cycle schedule of the coupled train–train or train-tank system. Three heuristics were also discovered about the minimum number of beds required to satisfy the number and types of steps in the cycle step sequence. These new methodologies and heuristics should be very useful for quickly scrutinizing different PSA cycle schedules for complex PSA processes comprising any number of parallel interacting trains of PSA columns, including the possibility of being assisted by one or more trains of tanks.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10450-015-9665-9/MediaObjects/10450_2015_9665_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10450-015-9665-9/MediaObjects/10450_2015_9665_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10450-015-9665-9/MediaObjects/10450_2015_9665_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10450-015-9665-9/MediaObjects/10450_2015_9665_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10450-015-9665-9/MediaObjects/10450_2015_9665_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10450-015-9665-9/MediaObjects/10450_2015_9665_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10450-015-9665-9/MediaObjects/10450_2015_9665_Fig7_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chiang, A.S.T.: Arithmetic of PSA process scheduling. AIChE J. 34, 1910–1912 (1988)
D’Amico, J.S., Reinhold, III, H.E., Knaebel, K.S.: Helium recovery. US Patent 5,542,966, 1966
Ebner, A.D., Mehrotra, A., Ritter, J.A.: Graphical approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling. Adsorption 15, 406–421 (2009)
Fuderer, A.: Pressure swing adsorption process and system. US Patent 4,381,189, 1983
Grande, C.A., Blom, R.: Dual pressure swing adsorption units for gas separation and purification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51, 8695–8699 (2012)
Jee, J.G., Lee, S.J., Kim, M.B., Lee, C.H.: Three-bed PVSA process for high-purity O2 generation from ambient air. AIChE J. 51, 2988–2999 (2005)
Kumar, R., Kratz, W.C., Rarig, D.L., Guro, D.E., Schmidt, W.P.: Adsorptive process for separating multi-component gas mixtures. U.S Patent 4,914,218, 1990
Kumar, R., Kratz, W.C.: Separation of multicomponent gas mixtures by selective adsorption. US Patent 5,133,785, 1992
Kumar, R., Kratz, W.C., Rarig, D.L., Guro, D.E., Schmidt, W.P.: Gas mixture fractionation to produce two high purity products by pressure swing adsorption. Sep. Sci. Techol. 27, 509–522 (1992)
Mehrotra, A., Ebner, A.D., Ritter, J.A.: Arithmetic approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling. Adsorption 16, 113–116 (2010)
Mehrotra, A., Ebner, A.D., Ritter, J.A.: Simplified graphical approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling. Adsorption 17, 337–345 (2011)
Reinhold, III, H.S., D’Amico, J.S., Knaebel, K.S.: Natural gas enrichment process. US Patent 5,536,300, 1996
Reinhold, III: Pressure swing adsorption method for separating gas components. US Patent 7,740,687, 2010
Ruthven, D.M., Farooq, S., Knaebel, K.S.: Pressure Swing Adsorption. VCH Publishers Inc, New York (1994)
Sircar, S: Separation of multi-component gas mixtures. US Patent 4,171,206, 1979a
Sircar, S: Separation of multi-component gas mixtures by pressure swing adsorption. US Patent 4,171,207 ,1979b
Sircar, S.: Fractionation of multicomponent gas mixtures by pressure swing adsorption. US Patent 4,790,858 ,1988
Sircar, S.: Recovery of nitrogen, hydrogen and carbon dioxide from hydrocarbon reformate. US Patent 4,813,980, 1989
Smith, O.J.I.V., Westerberg, A.W.: Mixed-integer programming for pressure swing adsorption cycle scheduling. Chem. Eng. Sci. 45, 2833–2842 (1990)
Wang, S.-I., Patel, N.M., Sircar, S., Allam, R.J.: Ammonia synthesis. US Patent 4,792,441, 1988
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support provided in part by the National Space Biomedical Research Institute through NASA NCC9-58, in part by the SAGE Center at the University of South Carolina, and in part by the Process Science and Technology Center, a consortium composed of the University of Texas at Austin, the University of South Carolina, and the Texas A&M University.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebner, A.D., Mehrotra, A. & Ritter, J.A. Graphical unit block approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling of parallel interacting trains of columns and tanks. Adsorption 21, 229–241 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-015-9665-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-015-9665-9