Abstract
Thumb carpometacarpal joint space changes when the surrounding soft tissues including the capsule, ligaments, and tendons are stretched or pulled away. When at rest, joint forces originate from passive contraction of muscles and the involvement of joint capsule and ligaments. Previous biomechanical models of hand and finger joints have mostly focused on the assessment of joint properties when muscles were active. This study aims to present an experimental-numerical biomechanical model of thumb carpometacarpal joint to explore the contribution of tendons, ligaments, and other soft tissues in the passive forces during distraction. Five fresh cadaveric specimens were tested using a distractor device to measure the applied forces upon gradual distraction of the intact joint. The subsequent step involved inserting a minuscule sensor into the joint capsule through a small incision, while preserving the integrity of tendons and ligaments, in order to accurately measure the fundamental intra-articular forces. A numerical model was also used to calculate the passive forces of tendons and ligaments. Before the separation of bones, the forces exerted by tendons and ligaments were relatively small compared to the capsule force, which accounted for approximately 92% of the total applied force. Contribution of tendons and ligaments, however, increased by further distraction. The passive force contribution by tendons at 2-mm distraction was determined less than 11%, whereas it reached up to 74% for the ligaments. The present study demonstrated that the ligament-capsule complex plays significant contribution in passive forces of thumb carpometacarpal joint during distraction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Swigart, C. R., R. G. Eaton, S. Z. Glickel, and C. Johnson. Splinting in the treatment of arthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint. J. Hand Surg. 24(1):86–91, 1999.
Goto, A., S. Leng, K. Sugamoto, W. P. Cooney, S. Kakar, and K. Zhao. In vivo pilot study evaluating the thumb carpometacarpal joint during circumduction. Clin. Orthop. and Relat. Res.®. 472:1106–1113, 2014.
Li, Y. K., and C. P. White. Carpometacarpal osteoarthritis of the thumb. CMAJ. 185(2):149–149, 2013.
Neumann, D. A., and T. Bielefeld. The carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: stability, deformity, and therapeutic intervention. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Therapy. 33(7):386–399, 2003.
Lafeber, F. P., F. Intema, P. M. Van Roermund, and A. C. Marijnissen. Unloading joints to treat osteoarthritis, including joint distraction. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 18(5):519–525, 2006.
Ateshian, G. A., J. W. Ark, M. P. Rosenwasser, R. J. Pawluk, L. J. Soslowsky, and V. C. Mow. Contact areas in the thumb carpometacarpal joint. J. Orthop. Res. 13(3):450–458, 1995.
Cooney, W., 3rd., and E. Chao. Biomechanical analysis of static forces in the thumb during hand function. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 59(1):27–36, 1977.
BE, V. G. F. et al. Thumb CMC joint biomechanics: a novel device for dynamic splinting. UMass Medical School, 2015.
Gardner, T., M. Evans, A. Simpson, P. Kyberd, and J. Kenwright. A method of examining the magnitude and origin of “soft” and “hard” tissue forces resisting limb lengthening. Med. Eng. Phys. 19(5):405–411, 1997.
Shrivastava, N., M. F. Koff, A. E. Abbot, V. C. Mow, M. P. Rosenwasser, and R. J. Strauch. Simulated extension osteotomy of the thumb metacarpal reduces carpometacarpal joint laxity in lateral pinch. J. Hand Surg. 28(5):733–738, 2003.
Spaans, A. J., L. P. V. Minnen, A. Braakenburg, and A. B. Mink van der Molen. Joint distraction for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a feasibility study with 1-year follow-up. J. Plast. Surg. Hand Surg. 51(4):254–258, 2017.
Ottenhoff, J. S., A. J. Spaans, A. Braakenburg, T. Teunis, L. P. van Minnen, and A. B. M. van der Molen. Joint distraction for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: 2-year follow-up results of 20 patients. J. Wrist Surg. 10(06):502–510, 2021.
Ottenhoff, J. S., T. Teunis, A. Braakenburg, and A. B. Mink van der Molen. Can we decrease the duration of basal thumb joint distraction for early osteoarthritis from 8 to 6 weeks? Study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Trials. 22(1):316, 2021.
Fischer, K. J., J. E. Johnson, A. J. Waller, T. E. McIff, E. Bruce Toby, and M. Bilgen. MRI-based modeling for radiocarpal joint mechanics: validation criteria and results for four specimen-specific models, 2011.
Gareis, H., S. Moshe, R. Baratta, R. Best, and R. D’Ambrosia. The isometric length-force models of nine different skeletal muscles. J. Biomech. 25(8):903–916, 1992.
P.-H. Kuo and A. D. Deshpande. Contribution of passive properties of muscle-tendon units to the metacarpophalangeal joint torque of the index finger. In: 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, IEEE, 2010, pp. 288–294.
Kim, E., and A. Freivalds. Two-dimensional biomechanical thumb model for pipetting. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 68:165–175, 2018.
Esteki, A., and J. M. Mansour. A dynamic model of the hand with application in functional neuromuscular stimulation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 25:440–451, 1997.
McFarland, D. C., B. I. Binder-Markey, J. A. Nichols, S. J. Wohlman, M. de Bruin, and W. M. Murray. A musculoskeletal model of the hand and wrist capable of simulating functional tasks. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 70:1424–1435, 2022.
Vigouroux, L., M. Domalain, and E. Berton. Comparison of tendon tensions estimated from two biomechanical models of the thumb. J. Biomech. 42(11):1772–1777, 2009.
Faudot, B., J.-L. Milan, B. Goislard de Monsabert, T. Le Corroller, and L. Vigouroux. Estimation of joint contact pressure in the index finger using a hybrid finite element musculoskeletal approach. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 23(15):1225–1235, 2020.
Jacobson, M. D., R. Raab, B. M. Fazeli, R. A. Abrams, M. J. Botte, and R. L. Lieber. Architectural design of the human intrinsic hand muscles. J. Hand Surg. 17(5):804–809, 1992.
Kuo, P.-H., and A. D. Deshpande. Muscle-tendon units provide limited contributions to the passive stiffness of the index finger metacarpophalangeal joint. J. Biomech. 45(15):2531–2538, 2012.
Garner, B. A., and M. G. Pandy. Estimation of musculotendon properties in the human upper limb. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 31:207–220, 2003.
Rezaeian, A., H. Hafiz, A. Moradi, A. Akbarzadeh, and M. Daliri. Thumb carpometacarpal joint reaction force during distraction: a cadaveric study. J. Hand Surg. Eur. Vol. 48:357–359, 2022.
Yang, L., G. Cai, L. Coulton, and M. Saleh. Knee joint reaction force during tibial diaphyseal lengthening: a study on a rabbit model. J. Biomech. 37(7):1053–1059, 2004.
Fung, Y.-C. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. Berlin: Springer, 2013.
Sancho-Bru, J., A. Perez-Gonzalez, M. Vergara-Monedero, and D. Giurintano. A 3-D dynamic model of human finger for studying free movements. J. Biomech. 34(11):1491–1500, 2001.
Roux, A., S. Laporte, J. Lecompte, L.-L. Gras, and I. Iordanoff. Influence of muscle-tendon complex geometrical parameters on modeling passive stretch behavior with the discrete element method. J. Biomech. 49(2):252–258, 2016.
Valero-Cuevas, F. J., M. E. Johanson, and J. D. Towles. Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: the choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty of musculoskeletal parameters. J. Biomech. 36(7):1019–1030, 2003.
Holzbaur, K. R., W. M. Murray, and S. L. Delp. A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33:829–840, 2005.
Gonzalez, R. V., T. S. Buchanan, and S. L. Delp. How muscle architecture and moment arms affect wrist flexion-extension moments. J. Biomech. 30(7):705–712, 1997.
L. Y. Chang and Y. Matsuoka. A kinematic thumb model for the ACT hand. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006, IEEE, 2006, pp. 1000–1005.
Reid, D. A., and P. J. McNair. Passive force, angle, and stiffness changes after stretching of hamstring muscles. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 36(11):1944–1948, 2004.
Jansen, M. P., and S. C. Mastbergen. Joint distraction for osteoarthritis: clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 18:35–46, 2022.
Marijnissen, A. C., P. M. Van Roermund, J. Van Melkebeek, W. Schenk, A. J. Verbout, J. W. Bijlsma, and F. P. Lafeber. Clinical benefit of joint distraction in the treatment of severe osteoarthritis of the ankle: proof of concept in an open prospective study and in a randomized controlled study. Arthr. Rheum.: Off. J. Am. Coll. Rheumatol. 46:2893–2902, 2002.
Ploegmakers, J., P. Van Roermund, J. Van Melkebeek, J. Lammens, J. Bijlsma, F. Lafeber, and A. Marijnissen. Prolonged clinical benefit from joint distraction in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 13:582–588, 2005.
Wiegant, K., P. Van Roermund, F. Intema, S. Cotofana, F. Eckstein, S. Mastbergen, and F. Lafeber. Sustained clinical and structural benefit after joint distraction in the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 21:1660–1667, 2013.
Toft, R., and N. Berme. A biomechanical analysis of the joints of the thumb. J. Biomech. 13(4):353–360, 1980.
Thelen, D. G. Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. J. Biomech. Eng. 125(1):70–77, 2003.
Manal, K., and T. S. Buchanan. Subject-specific estimates of tendon slack length: a numerical method. J. Appl. Biomech. 20(2):195–203, 2004.
Riemann, B. L., R. G. DeMont, K. Ryu, and S. M. Lephart. The effects of sex, joint angle, and the gastrocnemius muscle on passive ankle joint complex stiffness. J. Athl. Train. 36(4):369, 2001.
D’Agostino, P., B. Dourthe, F. Kerkhof, G. H. Van Lenthe, F. Stockmans, and E. E. Vereecke. In vivo biomechanical behavior of the trapeziometacarpal joint in healthy and osteoarthritic subjects. Clin. Biomech. 49:119–127, 2017.
Knutson, J. S., K. L. Kilgore, J. M. Mansour, and P. E. Crago. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to the passive moment at the metacarpophalangeal joint. J. Biomech. 33(12):1675–1681, 2000.
Acknowledgment
Authors would like to thank the Khorasan Razavi Forensic Medicine Center for its assistance in conducting the cadaver experiments.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the Research Council of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences [research project number 981843], the National Institute for Medical Research and Development (NIMAD) [No: 4001155], and Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) [No: 4002792].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HH, SAY, AM, and AA contributed to the study conception, design, and methodology. Material preparation, data collection and analysis, and original draft preparation were performed by HH. SAY and AM supervised the research. AM and AA acquired the funding. SAY and NJ performed manuscript review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest concerning the contents of this article.
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran (approval No: IR.MUMS.REC.1399.633). This research was conducted in full compliance with the codes of ethical conduct from the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.
Additional information
Associate Editor Joel Stitzel oversaw the review of this article.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hafiz, H., Yousefsani, S.A., Moradi, A. et al. Contribution of Soft Tissue Passive Forces in Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Distraction. Ann Biomed Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-024-03492-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-024-03492-2