Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of index finger distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis on muscle forces and adjacent joint contact pressures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis is a frequent surgical operation performed to treat severe arthritis. Nevertheless, the angle selected when fusing the joint is arbitrarily chosen without any quantified data concerning its mechanical effects, thus preventing the optimal choice for the patient. In the current study, we realized an experiment and developed a numerical model to investigate the effect of fusion angle on the biomechanics of adjacent non-operated joints. Six participants performed a pinch grip task while arthrodesis was simulated with a metal splint. Kinematic and force data were recorded during this task and used in a biomechanical model to estimate contact pressures in adjacent joints. The biomechanical model involved combining a multibody system and a finite element method. Results showed that the angle of any distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis influences index finger kinematics and maximal grip force in several participants. For one participant, in the arthrodesis simulation, we observed an increase of 1.9 MPa in the proximal interphalangeal joint contact pressure. Our results provide quantified information about the biomechanical consequences of this surgical operation and its potential long-term effects.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ambike S, Paclet F, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2014) Factors affecting grip force : anatomy, mechanics, and referent configurations. Exp Brain Res 232(4):1219–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3838-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ameline T, Bégot V, Ardouin L, Hulet C, Hanouz N (2015) Arthrodesis of thumb interphalangeal and finger distal interphalangeal joints using the intramedullary X-Fuse® implant : retrospective analysis of 38 cases. Chir Main 34(2):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.main.2015.01.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. An KN, Chao EY, Cooney WP, Linscheid RL (1979) Normative model of human hand for biomechanical analysis. J Biomech 12(10):775–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(79)90163-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arauz P, DeChello K, Dagum A, Sisto SA, Kao I (2017) Biomechanics and pinch force of the index finger under simulated proximal interphalangeal arthrodesis. J Hand Surg 42(8):658.e1-658.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beldner S, Polatsch DB (2016) Arthrodesis of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the hand : current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24(5):290–297. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buckwalter JA, Anderson DD, Brown TD, Tochigi Y, Martin JA (2013) The roles of mechanical stresses in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis : implications for treatment of joint injuries. Cartilage 4(4):286–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603513495889

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chao, E. Y. (Éd.). (1989). Biomechanics of the hand : a basic research study. World Scientific.

  8. Cooney WP, Lucca MJ, Chao EY, Linscheid RL (1981) The kinesiology of the thumb trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone J Surg Am 63(9):1371–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cvijetić S, Kurtagić N, Ozegović DD (2004) Osteoarthritis of the hands in the rural population : a follow-up study. Eur J Epidemiol 19(7):687–691. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ejep.0000036794.40723.8e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Almeida YK, Athlani L, Dap F, Dautel G (2019) Distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis using the X-Fuse® implant : a retrospective study of 54 fingers with 24 months’ follow-up. Hand Surg Rehabil 38(3):186–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2019.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Domalain M, Evans PJ, Seitz WH, Li Z-M (2011) Influence of index finger proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis on precision pinch kinematics. J Hand Surg 36(12):1944–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Domalain M, Vigouroux L, Danion F, Sevrez V, Berton E (2008) Effect of object width on precision grip force and finger posture. Ergonomics 51(9):1441–1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802130225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Droz-Bartholet F, Verhoeven F, Prati C, Wendling D (2016) Prevention of hand osteoarthritis by hemiparesis. Arthritis & Rheumatol 68(3):647–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Faudot B, Milan J-L, Goislard de Monsabert B, Le Corroller T, Vigouroux L (2020) Estimation of joint contact pressure in the index finger using a hybrid finite element musculoskeletal approach. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 23(15):1225–1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1793965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fram BR, Seigerman DA, Cross DE, Rivlin M, Lutsky K, Bateman MG, Watkins C, Beredjiklian PK (2020) The Optimal position for arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the border digits. J Hand Surg 45(7):656.e1-656.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goislard De Monsabert B, Rossi J, Berton É, Vigouroux L (2012) Quantification of hand and forearm muscle forces during a maximal power grip task. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44(10):1906–1916. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825d9612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goislard de Monsabert B, Vigouroux L, Bendahan D, Berton E (2014) Quantification of finger joint loadings using musculoskeletal modelling clarifies mechanical risk factors of hand osteoarthritis. Med Eng Phys 36(2):177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guerra RS, Fonseca I, Pichel F, Restivo MT, Amaral TF (2014) Hand length as an alternative measurement of height. Eur J Clin Nutr 68(2):229–233. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kloppenburg M, Kroon FP, Blanco FJ, Doherty M, Dziedzic KS, Greibrokk E, Haugen IK, Herrero-Beaumont G, Jonsson H, Kjeken I, Maheu E, Ramonda R, Ritt MJ, Smeets W, Smolen JS, Stamm TA, Szekanecz Z, Wittoek R, Carmona L (2019) 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 78(1):16–24. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leibovic SJ (2007) Arthrodesis of the interphalangeal joints with headless compression screws. J Hand Surg 32(7):1113–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marshall M, Watt FE, Vincent TL, Dziedzic K (2018) Hand osteoarthritis : Clinical phenotypes, molecular mechanisms and disease management. Nat Rev Rheumatol 14(11):641–656. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-018-0095-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Melamed E, Polatsch DB, Beldner S, Melone CP (2014) Simulated distal interphalangeal joint fusion of the index and middle fingers in 0° and 20° of flexion : a comparison of grip strength and dexterity. J Hand Surg 39(10):1986–1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Metcalf CD, Notley SV, Chappell PH, Burridge JH, Yule VT (2008) Validation and application of a computational model for wrist and hand movements using surface markers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(3):1199–1210. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2007.908087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Miall RC, Rosenthal O, Ørstavik K, Cole JD, Sarlegna FR (2019) Loss of haptic feedback impairs control of hand posture : a study in chronically deafferented individuals when grasping and lifting objects. Exp Brain Res 237(9):2167–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05583-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sande LP, Cote Gil Coury HJ, Oishi J, Kumar S (2001) Effect of musculoskeletal disorders on prehension strength. Appl Ergon 32(6):609–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00035-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rockenfeller R, Günther M (2017) How to model a muscle’s active force–length relation : a comparatiVE study. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 313:321–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Seitz WH, Marbella ME (2013) Distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis using nitinol intramedullary fixation implants : X-fuse implants for DIP arthrodesis. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 17(3):169–172. https://doi.org/10.1097/BTH.0b013e31829ba688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vigouroux L, Domalain M, Berton E (2011) Effect of object width on muscle and joint forces during thumb–index finger grasping. J Appl Biomech 27(3):173–180. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.27.3.173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mathieu Caumes for his help with the experimental device.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Valerio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valerio, T., de Monsabert, B.G., Faudot, B. et al. The effect of index finger distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis on muscle forces and adjacent joint contact pressures. Med Biol Eng Comput 60, 2537–2547 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02624-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02624-x

Keywords

Navigation