Abstract
Interface tracking simulations of gas–liquid Taylor flow in horizontal square microchannels were carried out to understand the relation between the pressure drop in the bubble part and the curvatures at the nose and tail of a bubble. Numerical conditions ranged for 0.00159 ≤ CaT ≤ 0.0989, 0.0817 ≤ WeT ≤ 25.4, and 8.33 ≤ ReT ≤ 791, where CaT, WeT, and ReT are the capillary, Weber, and Reynolds numbers based on the total volumetric flux. The dimensionless pressure drop in the bubble part increased with increasing the capillary number and the Weber number. The curvature at the nose of a bubble increased and that at the tail of a bubble decreased as the capillary number increased. The variation of the curvature at the tail of a bubble was more remarkable than that at the nose of a bubble due to the increase in the Weber number, which was the main cause of large pressure drop in the bubble part at the same capillary number. The relation between the bubble velocity and the total volumetric flux was also discussed. The distribution parameter of the drift-flux model without inertial effects showed a simple relation with the capillary number. A correlation of the distribution parameter, which is expressed in terms of the capillary number and the Weber number, was developed and was confirmed to give good predictions of the bubble velocity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Taylor flow consisting of elongated bubbles separated by liquid slugs is one of the typical flow patterns in microchannels and is known to have good performances in heat and mass transfer. Understanding the flow characteristics of Taylor flow, e.g., the pressure drop and the bubble velocity, is indispensable for the design and development of efficient microdevices such as microreactors and micro heat exchangers.
The pressure drop in Taylor flow has often been modeled as the sum of the pressure drops in the bubble part ΔPB and the liquid slug part ΔPL (Chung and Kawaji 2004; Warnier, et al. 2010; Minagawa et al. 2013; Eain et al. 2015; Kurimoto et al. 2017, 2019, 2020; Kawahara et al. 2020), i.e.,
where dP/dz is the pressure gradient of one unit cell consisting of a Taylor bubble followed by a liquid slug, and L the length of the unit cell. Kurimoto et al. (2020) measured dP/dz in square microchannels. They calculated ΔPB as
where cs = 56.9 (Shah 1978), LL is the length of a liquid slug, ρL the liquid density, jT the total volumetric flux, Dh the hydraulic equivalent diameter of a channel, and ReT the Reynolds number defined by
where µL is the liquid viscosity. The dimensionless pressure drop, ΔPB* (= ΔPBDh/σ), in the bubble part increased with increasing the capillary number Ca defined by
where uB is the bubble velocity, and σ the surface tension. The dimensionless pressure drop also increased with increasing the bubble Weber number We or the bubble Reynolds number Re, i.e., inertial effects contribute to the increase in ΔPB*. The Weber and Reynolds numbers are defined by
Wong et al. (1995b) derived an analytical solution describing the relation between ΔPB* and the bubble shape in the limiting case of Ca → 0. The dependence of ΔPB* on Ca and We at a finite Ca would be also related with the deformation of the bubble shape. Three-dimensional interface tracking simulations have been carried out to obtain the shapes of Taylor bubbles, in particular the liquid film thickness, in square microchannels (Zhang et al. 2016; Ferrari et al. 2018; Magnini and Matar 2020; Magnini et al. 2022). However, the relation between ΔPB* and the bubble shape at a finite Ca has not been discussed yet.
Some numerical studies discussed the velocities of bubbles in square microchannels. Ferrari et al. (2018) showed that the bubble velocities increase with increasing Ca and are larger than those in a circular microchannel. Magnini and Matar (2020) pointed out that the bubble velocities with negligible inertial effects agree well with those of the propagation velocities of air fingers in a square channel (De Lózar et al. 2008). They also investigated inertial effects on the bubble velocities in a square channel. The bubble velocity of small Ca increased with increasing Re at high Re, whereas it was constant at low Re. At a large Ca, the bubble velocity decreased and then increased with increasing Re. No correlations of the bubble velocity have been developed in spite of its importance in modeling Taylor flow.
Numerical simulations of Taylor flows in square microchannels were therefore carried out to investigate the relation between the bubble shape and ΔPB* and to discuss the bubble velocity. An interface tracking method based on the volume of fluid method was used for the numerical simulations, which dealt with a single unit cell consisting of a bubble and a liquid slug (Langewisch and Buongiorno 2015; Kurimoto et al. 2018).
2 Numerical method and conditions
2.1 Interface tracking method
The continuity and momentum equations for two incompressible Newtonian fluids based on the one-fluid formulation are given by
where V is the velocity, t the time, ρ the density, P the pressure, µ the viscosity, κ the mean curvature of the interface, n the unit normal to the interface, δ the delta function which is non-zero only at the interface, and the superscript T denotes the transpose. The density is given by
where C is the cell-averaged volume fraction of the liquid phase, and the subscripts G and L denote the gas and liquid phases, respectively. Computational cells are filled with the liquid phase when C = 1, and with the gas phase when C = 0. A cell with 0 < C < 1 contains an interface. The viscosity is given by the harmonic mean (Tryggvason et al. 2011):
The height function technique (Francois et al. 2006) is adopted to evaluate κ. The advection and diffusion terms are discretized by using the CIP (cubic interpolated propagation) scheme (Takewaki and Yabe 1987) and the second-order centered-difference scheme, respectively. The surface tension force is accounted for in the discretized pressure gradient by adopting the ghost fluid method (Kang et al. 2000).
The following advection equation of C is solved to capture the interface motion by means of a combination of the NSS (non-uniform subcell scheme) (Hayashi and Tomiyama 2018) and the operator splitting method (Rider and Kothe 1998):
The divergence correction term C∇·V is introduced to conserve the fluid volume.
2.2 Computational domain and numerical condition
The computational domain is shown in Fig. 1, where x, y, and z are the Cartesian coordinates. The dimensions of the domain in the x, y, and z directions were 0.5Dh, 0.5Dh, and L, respectively. The boundaries at x = y = 0 were symmetric and those at x = y = 0.5Dh were no-slip walls. An instantaneous bubble velocity with the opposite sign (–uB(t)) was imposed on the walls and the instantaneous acceleration of the bubble with the opposite sign was added to Eq. (8) to fix the bubble position (Wang et al. 2008). The boundaries at z = 0 and L were periodic and a constant pressure gradient was imposed between z = 0 and L for driving a flow. The initial bubble shape consisted of a cylindrical section and two hemispheres at the front and rear of the cylindrical section with the radius of 0.45Dh. The initial bubble length was set based on L and the void fraction α of the unit cell. Thus, dp/dz, L, and α were input values for simulations. The computational domain was initially divided into uniform cells with the size h, which were the coarsest cells, i.e., the base cells. Finer cells were embedded into the base cells in the vicinity of the interface by a quadtree manner. The size of the computational cells, hl, at the lth refinement level was h/2l, where l = 0 for the base cell. The finest refinement level lmax was three. l = lmax when the magnitude of the local level set function at a vertex of the coarsest cell was smaller than h. l = 2 for base cells neighboring to the cells of l = 3. The minimum and maximum cell sizes were h3 = 0.5Dh/128 and h0 = 0.5Dh/16, respectively.
The numerical simulation in two cases (Dh = 298 µm, νL/νW = 1.0, α = 0.395, dp/dz = 0.360 MPa/m; Dh = 298 µm, νL/νW = 5.6, α = 0.404, dp/dz = 0.753 MPa/m, where νL and νW are the kinematic viscosities of liquid and water, respectively) were carried out with 1.5 times finer meshes to check the mesh size dependence. The changes in the bubble velocities due to the increase in the spatial resolution were less than 1.4%.
Water and glycerol-water solutions of five different concentrations (12, 21, 30, 41, and 52 wt%) were used as the liquid phase. Their liquid properties are shown in Table 1 (Ishikawa 1968). The gas density and gas viscosity were 1.19 kg/m3 and 1.8 × 10–2 mPa·s, respectively.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Pressure drop in bubble part
Figure 2 shows a comparison of ΔPB* between the experimental data (Kurimoto et al. 2020) and the numerical predictions. The numerical data agree well with the experimental data. The present numerical method can therefore reproduce well the characteristics of bubbles in Taylor flow through the square microchannels. At low Ca, the bubble interface forms very thin liquid films near the center planes of the channel, i.e., x–z plane at y = 0 mm or y–z plane at x = 0 mm, the thicknesses of which are less than the minimum cell size for Ca ≤ 0.00289. However, large liquid films, in which cells are adequately assigned, are formed at the corner of the channel in all cases. This result would indicate that adequate spatial resolution for the films at the corner is important to reproduce the flow characteristics of Taylor bubbles in a square microchannel. At Ca ≈ 0.02, We = 10.9 at νL/νW = 1.0 in Dh = 298 µm and We = 0.318 at νL/νW = 5.6 in Dh = 298 µm. The increase in ΔPB* is therefore due to the inertial effect. The numerical results are also tabulated in Table A1 in Appendix. It should be noted that the two data points for uB > 2 m/s at νL/νW = 1.0 in Dh = 298 µm are not used in Fig. 2 since the rear of the bubble was oscillating in time due to a large inertial effect, which made it difficult to clearly define the length of the bubble part. The solid and broken lines are drawn using the following correlation:
The coefficients, c1 and c2, are 7.106 and 2/3, respectively, in the analytical solution for the limiting case of Ca → 0 (Wong et al. 1995b), and 3.17 × 104 and 1.15 in an empirical correlation for an N2-water system in a 490 µm channel (Choi et al. 2010). The experimental and numerical data of νL/νW = 1.0 are close to the correlation of Choi et al. The increase in νL/νW decreases ΔPB*, and the data deviate from their correlation and lie within the range between the two correlations. The comparison suggests that the inertial effect should be introduced to improve Eq. (12).
Figure 3a shows the bubble shape and the profile of the pressure P* normalized by the maximum pressure on the z-axis at Ca = 2.09 × 10–2 and We = 0.318, where z* = z/L. The front shape of the bubble is slightly slender than the rear shape and the flat interface region parallel to the channel walls is formed in the middle of the bubble. The red solid line and the black dashed lines in the P*-z* graph represent the predicted pressure profile and the Darcy-Weisbach equation based on jT, respectively. The pressure in the liquid phase decreases with increasing z* and agrees well with the Darcy-Weisbach equation, while it in the bubble is almost constant. The pressure jump at the interface is caused by the surface tension and its magnitude corresponds to σκ.
The bubble shape and P* at Ca = 2.01 × 10–2 and We = 10.9 are shown in Fig. 3b. Compared with the bubble shape in Fig. 3a, the front shape of the bubble is more slender and the liquid film is thicker due to the increase in We. The pressure in the liquid phase deviates from the Darcy-Weisbach equation as reported in literature (He and Kasagi 2008). The pressure drop ΔPBJ between P* at the tail and the nose of the bubble is larger than that in Fig. 3a. The bubble shape and P* at Ca = 6.56 × 10–2 and We = 3.15 are shown in Fig. 3c. By comparing with the result in Fig. 3a, it can be understood that the increase in Ca makes the liquid film thicker and ΔPBJ larger.
It has thus been confirmed that bubble shape changes with the variation of Ca and We, which also affect ΔPBJ. The dependence of the curvatures at the nose and tail of a bubble on Ca and We is discussed below.
Figure 4 shows the relation between the curvatures of a bubble and Ca. Figures 4a–c show the curvatures, Kn and Kt, at the nose and tail of a bubble normalized by Dh and the difference between them, respectively. The black and red symbols represent the curvatures in the center and diagonal planes for the cross section of the channel, i.e., x–z plane at y = 0 mm and the plane tilted with the angle of 45° with respect to the x-coordinate, respectively, as shown in Fig. 4b. The curvatures were evaluated by the height function method based on the volume fraction (Cummins et al. 2005). The difference in the curvatures between the planes is negligibly small. The broken line in the figure is the theoretical value for Ca → 0 (Wong et al. 1995a), in this limiting case a bubble has the fore-aft symmetry so that Kn = Kt. The nose curvature is close to the theoretical value for Ca < 2.9 × 10–3 and becomes larger with increasing Ca. The curvature at νL/νW = 1.0 becomes slightly larger than that at νL/νW = 5.6 for Ca > 1.4 × 10–2, i.e., the increase in We makes the nose curvature slightly larger. The tail curvature is also close to the theoretical value for Ca < 2.9 × 10–3, while it decreases with increasing Ca. The curvature at νL/νW = 1.0 becomes lower than that at νL/νW = 5.6 for Ca > 8.3 × 10–3, i.e., the increase in We makes KtDh smaller. The difference in Kt between νL/νW = 1.0 and 5.6 is more remarkable than Kn, i.e., the deformation of the tail shape is strongly affected by the inertial effects. The tendencies of (Kn – Kt)Dh on Ca and We correspond to those of ΔPB* shown in Fig. 2. Therefore, the deviation of ΔPB* from that in the small Ca limit mainly relates with Kt.
3.2 Bubble velocity
The relation between uB and jT is shown in Fig. 5. The bubble velocity increases with increasing jT and is higher than those of the homogeneous model, i.e., uB = jT. The bubble velocity in a channel has often been correlated by the following drift-flux model (Zuber and Findlay 1965; Kawahara et al. 2009; Howard and Walsh 2013; Minagawa et al. 2013; Kurimoto et al. 2017):
where c0 is the distribution parameter, and vGj the drift velocity, which is known to be small in horizontal microchannels. The solid line in the figure means Eq. (13) with c0 = 1.37 and vGj = 0, where c0 was determined by the least-squared method. Although the drift-flux model with constant c0 represents the overall trend of the data, the data are scattered implying that c0 is not constant and depends on jT, Dh, and νL/νW.
The relation between c0 and CaT is shown in Fig. 6, where CaT is the capillary number based on jT:
Numerical predictions without and with inertial effects (Magnini and Matar 2020) are also plotted, where the ranges of ReT are ReT ≤ 10 and 1 ≤ ReT ≤ 2000, respectively. The distribution parameter obtained in the present numerical simulation increases with increasing CaT. The distribution parameters at νL/νW = 3.4 and 5.6 agree well with the data without inertial effects by Magnini and Matar and they can be expressed by the following fitting equation:
The power of 2/3 has been found to appear in an analytical solution of the liquid film thickness and the pressure drop for the limiting case of Ca → 0 (Bretherton 1961; Wong et al. 1995b). Even though the largest value of CaT is about 0.1, the power of 2/3 works well for correlating c0. The distribution parameter at νL/νW = 1.0 shows a steep increase for CaT > 0.012 and deviates from Eq. (15) with increasing CaT. The data for 1.3 ≤ νL/νW ≤ 2.2 lie between those at νL/νW = 1.0 and Eq. (15). Most of the numerical data with inertial effects by Magnini and Matar also show c0 larger than Eq. (15).
The numerical data are plotted on the ReT-CaT and WeT-CaT planes in Figs. 7a, b, respectively, to make clear the region in which the inertial effect is present, where the open symbols are for c0 agreeing with Eq. (15) within 1.5% deviation and the closed symbols are for the other c0 data. The Weber number, WeT, is defined by
The Reynolds number ReT at the boundary of the classification decreases with increasing CaT. On the other hand, the boundary of the classification is roughly WeT ≈ 10, although it tends to increase with increasing CaT.
Han and Shikazono (2009) proposed a correlation of liquid film thickness, the functional form of which was derived from a scaling analysis. Kurimoto et al. (2020) reported that the functional form can be used to calculate ΔPB*. Let us utilize the functional form for correlating c0, that is,
where a, b, c, d, e, and f are positive constants. This equation can be regarded as an extension of Eq. (15) by implementing the inertial effect in the denominator of the first term on the right-hand side. Employing a = 2.34 and f = 1.05 as in Eq. (15) yields
where \(F=b+c{Ca}_{T}^{2/3}-d{We}_{T}^{e}\) and solving the above equation for F gives
The values of F calculated using the data of CaT and c0 are plotted against WeT in Fig. 8, which shows that F tends to decrease with increasing WeT and decreasing CaT. Therefore, the form of F, Eq. (19), is reasonable. The constants were obtained as b = 0.85, c = 1.24, d = 0.0115, and e = 1.07. Thus,
Equation (20) is compared with the present data and the data with inertial effects by Magnini and Matar (2020) in Fig. 9. The correlation agrees well with 92% of the data with errors smaller than ± 5%, whereas it remarkably overestimates two data with inertial effects in the ranges of CaT ≥ 0.05 and WeT ≈ 50. It should however be noted that WeT = 50 corresponds to a very large jT, e.g., jT ~ 6 m/s for air–water Taylor flow in a 100 µm microchannel, and this is much larger than a typical volumetric flux used in microdevices.
The bubble velocity uB calculated from Eqs. (13) and (20) is compared with the present data in Fig. 10.The correlations agree well with 98% of the data to within ± 3% errors in the ranges of 0.00159 ≤ CaT ≤ 0.0989 and 0.0817 ≤ WeT ≤ 25.4.
4 Conclusion
Interface tracking simulations of single slug units in Taylor flow through a square microchannel was carried out to understand the relation between the pressure drop in the bubble part and the nose and tail shapes of a bubble. A correlation of the bubble velocity was also developed. The following conclusions were obtained:
-
(1)
The pressure drops in the bubble part of Taylor flows through square microchannels can be well predicted by using the interface tracking method.
-
(2)
With increasing in the capillary number Ca, the nose curvature increases while the tail curvature decreases, so that the pressure drop in the bubble part increases.
-
(3)
The decrease in the tail curvature due to the increase in the Weber number, in other words the inertial effect, is more remarkable than the increase in the nose curvature for Ca > 8.3 × 10–3, which causes the deviation of the pressure drop in the bubble part from that in the small Ca limit.
-
(4)
The distribution parameter c0 is increased by the inertial effects, and the criterion for whether the inertial effect is negligible or not can be roughly expressed by the Weber number.
-
(5)
The developed c0 correlation gives good predictions of the bubble velocity in the following applicable ranges: 0.00159 ≤ CaT ≤ 0.0989 and 0.0817 ≤ WeT ≤ 25.4.
Data availability
Data is provided within the manuscript.
References
Bretherton FP (1961) The motion of long bubbles in tubes. J Fluid Mech 10:166–188
Choi CW, Yu DI, Kim MH (2010) Adiabatic two-phase flow in rectangular microchannels with different aspect ratios: Part II – bubble behaviors and pressure drop in single bubble. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:5242–5249
Chung PM-Y, Kawaji M (2004) The effect of channel diameter on adiabatic two-phase flow characteristics in microchannels. Int J Multiph Flow 30:735–761
Cummins SJ, Francois MM, Kothe DB (2005) Estimating curvature from volume fractions. Comput Struct 83:425–434
De Lózar A, Juel A, Hazel AL (2008) The steady propagation of an air finger into a rectangular tube. J Fluid Mech 614:173–195
Eain MMG, Egan V, Howard J, Walsh P, Walsh E, Punch J (2015) Review and extension of pressure drop models applied to Taylor flow regime. Int J Multiph Flow 68:1–9
Ferrari A, Magnini M, Thome JR (2018) Numerical analysis of slug flow boiling in square microchannels. Int J Heat Mass Transf 123:928–944
Francois MM, Cummins SJ, Dendy ED, Kothe DB, Sicilian JM, Williams MW (2006) A balanced-force algorithm for continuous and sharp interfacial surface tension models within a volume tracking framework. J Comput Phys 216:141–173
Han Y, Shikazono N (2009) Measurement of liquid film thickness in micro square channel. Int J Multiph Flow 35:896–903
Howard JA, Walsh PA (2013) Review and extensions to film thickness and relative bubble drift velocity prediction methods in laminar Taylor or slug flows. Int J Multiph Flow 55:32–42
Ishikawa T (1968) Kongou Ekinendo No Riron. Maruzen (in Japanese)
Kang M, Fedkiw RP, Liu X-D (2000) A boundary condition capturing method for multiphase incompressible flow. J Sci Comput 15(3):323–360
Kawahara A, Sadatomi M, Nei K, Matsuo H (2009) Experimental study on bubble velocity, void fraction and pressure drop for gas-liquid two-phase flow in a circular microchannel. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 30:831–841
Kawahara A, Yonemoto Y, Arakaki Y (2020) Pressure drop for gas and polymer aqueous solution two-phase flows in horizontal circular microchannel. Flow Turbul Combust 105:1325–1344
Kurimoto R, Nakazawa K, Minagawa H, Yasuda T (2017) Prediction models of void fraction and pressure drop for gas-liquid slug flow in microchannels. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 88:124–133
Kurimoto R, Hayashi K, Minagawa H, Tomiyama A (2018) Numerical investigation of bubble shape and flow field of gas-liquid slug flow in circular microchannels. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 74:28–35
Kurimoto R, Minagawa H, Yasuda T (2019) Effects of surfactant on gas-liquid slug flow in circular microchannels. Multiph Sci Technol 31(3):273–286
Kurimoto R, Tsubouchi H, Minagawa H, Yasuda T (2020) Pressure drop of gas-liquid Taylor flow in square microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 24:5
Langewisch DR, Buongiorno J (2015) Prediction of film thickness, bubble velocity, and pressure drop for capillary slug flow using a CFD-generated database. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 54:250–257
Magnini M, Matar OK (2020) Morphology of long gas bubbles propagating in square capillaries. Int J Multiph Flow 129:103353
Magnini M, Municchi F, El Mellas I, Icardi M (2022) Liquid film distribution around long gas bubbles propagating in rectangular capillaries. Int J Multiph Flow 148:103939
Minagawa H, Asama H, Yasuda T (2013) Void fraction and frictional pressure drop of gas-liquid slug flow in a microtube. Trans Japan Soc Mech Eng Ser B 79(804):1500–1513 ((in Japanese))
Rider WJ, Kothe DB (1998) Reconstructing volume tracking. J Comput Phys 141:112–152
Shah RK (1978) Laminar flow forced convection in ducts. Academic Press, New York
Takewaki H, Yabe T (1987) The cubic-interpolated pseudo particle (CIP) method: application to nonlinear and multi-dimensional hyperbolic equations. J Comput Phys 70:355–372
Tryggvason G, Scardovelli R, Zaleski S (2011) Direct numerical simulations of gas-liquid multiphase flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wang J, Lu P, Wang Z, Yang C, Mao Z-S (2008) Numerical simulation of unsteady mass transfer by the level set method. Chem Eng Sci 63:3141–3151
Warnier MJF, de Croon MHJM, Rebrov EV, Schouten JC (2010) Pressure drop of gas-liquid Taylor flow in round micro-capillaries for low to intermediate Reynolds numbers. Microfluid Nanofluid 8:33–45
Wong H, Radke CJ, Morris S (1995a) The motion of long bubbles in polygonal capillaries. Part 1. Thin films. J Fluid Mech 292:71–94
Wong H, Radke CJ, Morris S (1995b) The motion of long bubbles in polygonal capillaries. Part 2 Drag, Fluid Pressure and Fluid Flow. J Fluid Mech 292:95–110
Zhang J, Fletcher D, Li W (2016) Heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of gas-liquid Taylor flow in mini duct of square and rectangular cross-sections. Int J Heat Mass Transf 103:45–56
Zuber N, Findlay JA (1965) Average volume concentration in two-phase flow systems. J Heat Transfer 87(4):453–468
Hayashi K, Tomiyama A (2018). Encyclopedia of Two-Phase Heat Transfer and Flow III: Macro and Micro Flow Boiling and Numerical Modeling Fundamentals (A 4-Volume Set), pp. 27–72, World Scientific, (Ed.) Thome, J. R
He Q, Kasagi N (2008). Numerical investigation on flow pattern and pressure drop characteristics of slug flow in a micro tube, Proceedings of the Sixth International ASME Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels and Minichannels, ICNMM2008–62225
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grants No. 23K03660).
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Kobe University. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 23K03660.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ryo Kurimoto: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft. Kosuke Hayashi: Investigation, Writing – original draft. Akio Tomiyama: Investigation, Writing – original draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A Numerical data
Table A1 shows the numerical data obtained in this study. The void fraction, the pressure gradient and the unit length at νL/νW = 1.0 and 5.6 are the same as in the experiment by Kurimoto et al. (2020)
Appendix B. Comparison between measured ΔP B * and predicted ΔP B J
Figure B1 shows a comparison between measured ΔPB* and predicted ΔPBJ. The predicted ΔPBJ becomes higher than the measured ΔPB* as Ca increases. The ΔPB* is calculated from Eq. (2) assuming that the Darcy-Weisbach equation is valid everywhere in the liquid slug. The difference between P* in the liquid phase and the Darcy-Weisbach equation, however, becomes larger with increasing Ca as shown in Fig. 3. Therefore, the assumption becomes inappropriate with increasing Ca and it should be noted that ΔPB obtained with Eq. (2) include some pressure drop in the liquid part
Appendix C. Relation between c 0 and K n D h
The relation between c0 and KnDh is shown in Fig. C1. The c0 increases with increasing KnDh and lies onto a single curve though a slight variation due to the liquid properties and the hydraulic diameter is present.
Appendix D. Bubble radii R c and R d at midpoint of bubble length
The liquid film thickness of a Taylor bubble is generally defined at a constant film thickness region. Some of Taylor bubbles in the present study do not have such a region since they do not have enough lengths, e.g., the bubble shown in Fig. 2(b). In this Appendix, the liquid film thickness at the midpoint LB/2 of the bubble length LB is considered. Figure D1 shows the dimensionless bubble radii, Rc and Rd, in the center and diagonal planes, respectively. The Rc and Rd are defined by
where δc and δd are the liquid film thicknesses at LB/2 in the center and diagonal planes, respectively. The Rc data for Ca ≤ 0.00289 are not included in the figure due to very thin film thicknesses. The Rc and Rd at low We are close to the numerical data without inertial effects by Magnini and Matar (2020) and the inertial effects make Rc and Rd small drastically, i.e., the liquid film becomes thicker.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kurimoto, R., Hayashi, K. & Tomiyama, A. Pressure drop and bubble velocity in Taylor flow through square microchannel. Microfluid Nanofluid 28, 58 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-024-02750-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-024-02750-y