Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for the histopathological diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

  • Special Feature: Review Article
  • Role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 21 January 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a disease concept that originated in Japan. It is characterized by diffuse pancreatic enlargement and irregular narrowing of the main pancreatic duct. Although the usefulness of the histological diagnosis of AIP using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) has been reported, enhanced diagnostic performance is expected with improvements in tissue collection methods and fine-needle techniques. Guidance for establishing the tissue diagnosis of AIP has been developed and is useful for histological evaluation. Histopathological diagnosis by EUS-FNA/FNB is expected to play a central role in AIP diagnosis in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Abbreviations

AIP:

Autoimmune pancreatitis

EUS-FNA:

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration

EUS-FNB:

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy

EVG:

Elastica van Gieson

G:

Gauge

ICDC:

International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria

IgG:

Immunoglobulin G

JPS:

Japan Pancreas Society

LPSP:

Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis

MOSE:

Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation

PDAC:

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

References

  1. Yoshida K, Toki F, Takeuchi T, et al. Chronic pancreatitis caused by an autoimmune abnormality. Proposal of the concept of autoimmune pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:1561–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamisawa T, Funata N, Hayashi Y, et al. A new clinicopathological entity of IgG4-related autoimmune disease. J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:982–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamisawa T, Okamoto A. Autoimmune pancreatitis: proposal of IgG4-related sclerosing disease. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:613–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamamoto M, Takahashi H, Ohara M, et al. A new conceptualization for Mikulicz’s disease as an IgG4-related plasmacytic disease. Mod Rheumatol. 2006;16:335–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Masaki Y, Dong L, Kurose N, et al. Proposal for a new clinical entity, IgG4-positive multiorgan lymphoproliferative syndrome: analysis of 64 cases of IgG4-related disorders. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1310–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Umehara H, Okazaki K, Masaki Y, et al. Comprehensive diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), 2011. Mod Rheumatol. 2012;22:21–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Members of the Criteria Committee for Autoimmune Pancreatitis of the Japan Pancreas Society. Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis by the Japan Pancreas Society (2002). Suizo. 2002;17:585–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Okazaki K, Kawa S, Kamisawa T, et al. Clinical diagnostic criteria of autoimmune pancreatitis: revised proposal. J Gastroenterol. 2006;41:626–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. The Japan Pancreas Society, the Ministry of Health and Welfare Investigation Research Team for Intractable Pancreatic Disease. Clinical diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (proposal). Suizou. 2011;2012(27):17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Japan Pancreas Society, the Ministry of Health and Welfare Investigation Research Team for Intractable Pancreatic Disease. Clinical diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (proposal). Suizou. 2018;2018(33):902–13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kawaguchi K, Tsuruta K, Okamoto A, et al. Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis with cholangitis: a variant of primary sclerosing cholangitis extensively involving pancreas. Hum Pathol. 1991;22:387–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Notohara K, Burgart LJ, Yadav D, et al. Idiopathic chronic pancreatitis with periductal lymphoplasmacytic infiltration: clinicopathologic features of 35 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:1119–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chari ST, Kloeppel G, Zhang L, et al. Histopathologic and clinical subtypes of autoimmune pancreatitis: the Honoluluconsensus document. Pancreas. 2010;39:549–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shimosegawa T, Chari ST, Frulloni L, et al. International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Autoimmune Pancreatitis: guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology. Pancreas. 2011;40:352–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi S, et al. Use of samples from endoscopic ultrasound-guided 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:316–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N, et al. Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2004;36:397–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishikawa T, Itoh A, Kawashima H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the differentiation of type 1 and type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:3883–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanno A, Ishida K, Hamada S, et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-FNA by using a 22-gauge needle based on the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:594–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morishima T, Kawashima H, Ohno E, et al. Prospective multicenter study on the usefulness of EUS-guided FNA biopsy for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:241–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanno A, Masamune A, Fujishima F, et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-guided FNA using a 22-gauge needle: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:797–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kandel P, Tranesh G, Nassar A, et al. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:1034–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Hasan MK, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy using a Franseen needle design: initial assessment. Dig Endosc. 2017;29:338–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ishikawa T, Kawashima H, Ohno E, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using a 22-gauge Franseen needle: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2020;52:978–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Facciorusso A, Barresi L, Cannizzaro R, et al. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in autoimmune pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2021;9:E66-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoon SB, Moon SH, Song TJ, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration versus biopsy for diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis: systematic review and comparative meta-analysis. Dig Endosc. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chhoda A, Rustagi T. EUS-guided needle biopsy for autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2020;13:669–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Notohara K, Kamisawa T, Fukushima N, et al. Guidance for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis with biopsy tissues. Pathol Int. 2020;70:699–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen J, Yang R, Lu Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesion: a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138:1433–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, et al. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:319–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Buxbaum JL, et al. How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass?: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas. 2013;42:20–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Madhoun MF, Wani SB, Rastogi A, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2013;45:86–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS, et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1739–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kurita A, Yasukawa S, Zen Y, et al. Comparison of a 22-gauge Franseen-tip needle with a 20-gauge forward-bevel needle for the diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study (COMPAS study). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:373-81.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Binmoeller KF, Jabusch HC, Seifert H, et al. Endosonography-guided fine-needle biopsy of indurated pancreatic lesions using an automated biopsy device. Endoscopy. 1997;29:384–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bang JY, Magee SH, Ramesh J, et al. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy. 2013;45:445–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nakai Y, Isayama H, Chang KJ, et al. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:1578–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Mukai T, et al. Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:177–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our deepest appreciation for the technicians in the Department of Pathology, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Dr. Konishi in the Department of Gastroenterology, Tochigi Cancer Center, and the technicians in the Department of Pathology, Tochigi Cancer Center.

Funding

This work was supported by MHLW Research Program on Rare and Intractable Diseases (grant number: JPMH20FC1040).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AK designed the study and wrote the manuscript; AK, KT, NF, AKL, and HY performed data analysis. All authors approved the final version of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Kanno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical statements

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised due to the Fig. 4d was missing from this article and the Fig. 4d has been included.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanno, A., Tamada, K., Fukushima, N. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for the histopathological diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. J Med Ultrasonics 48, 555–563 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01144-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01144-9

Keywords

Navigation