Abstract
Purpose
Hemodynamic change after total paracentesis was investigated because it might lead to various complications. Although cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) is safer and more effective than total paracentesis in theory, hemodynamic change after CART has been never reported. And previous studies did not mention hemodynamics of the venous system.
Methods
We investigated the hemodynamic change, including that of the venous system, before and after CART using color Doppler ultrasonography and fast Fourier transform analysis. Twenty-eight patients with tensive cirrhotic ascites underwent ultrasonography the day before and after total volume CART. The diameter and velocity of the main, right, and left portal vein; inferior vena cava (IVC); and right renal vein were measured using ultrasonography.
Results
A total of 11.8 ± 4.4 L of ascites (range 3.6–20.9 L) was filtered and concentrated to 0.85 ± 0.40 L (range 0.36–1.50 L). The diameter of the IVC increased from median 13.5 ± 5.4 mm (range 4–25 mm) to 18.5 ± 4.1 mm (range 7–29 mm) (p = 0.007). The diameter of the right segmental renal vein significantly increased after KM-CART [from 5.0 ± 1.0 (4–8) mm to 7.0 ± 2.0 (3–10) mm] (p = 0.011). Hemodynamic change of the portal venous system was not significant. The time to the next CART in patients with an IVC diameter ≥ 20 mm and < 20 mm was 86 days and 20.5 days (p = 0.035), respectively.
Conclusion
Tensive ascites results in venous congestion in patients with cirrhotic ascites. CART improved venous flow, but it did not change the hemodynamics of the portal venous system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Planas R, Montoliu S, Ballesté B, et al. Natural history of patients hospitalized for management of cirrhotic ascites. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1385–94.
Neijenhuis M, Gevers TJG, Atwell TD, et al. Development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measurement for symptom assessment in cirrhotic ascites. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:567–75.
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2010;53:397–417.
Okita K, Sakaida I, Okada M, et al. A multicenter, open-label, dose-ranging study to exploratively evaluate the efficacy, safety, and dose-response of tolvaptan in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:979–87.
Bureau C, Thabut D, Oberti F, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts with covered stents increase transplant-free survival of patients with cirrhosis and recurrent ascites. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:157–63.
Won JY, Choi SY, Ko HK, et al. Percutaneous peritoneovenous shunt for treatment of refractory ascites. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:1717–22.
Lind CD, Malisch TW, Chong WK, et al. Incidence of shunt occlusion or stenosis following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement. Gastroenterology. 1994;106:1277–83.
Bernardi M, Caraceni P, Navickis RJ, et al. Albumin infusion in patients undergoing large-volume paracentesis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Hepatology. 2012;55:1172–81.
Britton RC, Nakamoto S. Intravenous infusion of dialyzed, autogenous, ascitic fluid in the management of cirrhotic ascites: a preliminary report of favorable results in six patients. Cleve Clin Q. 1960;27:82–7.
Japanese CART Study Group, Matsusaki K, Ohta K, et al. Novel cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (KM-CART) for refractory ascites associated with cancerous peritonitis: its effect and future perspectives. Int J Clin Oncol. 2011;16:395–400.
Matsusaki K, Orihashi K. Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (KM-CART) for malignant ascites. Artif Organs. 2020;44:1090–7.
Inoue N, Yamazaki Z, Oda T, et al. Treatment of intractable ascites by continuous reinfusion of the sterilized, cell-free and concentrated ascetic fluid. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1977;23:699–702.
Vila MC, Solà R, Molina L, et al. Hemodynamic changes in patients developing effective hypovolemia after total paracentesis. J Hepatol. 1998;28:639–45.
Panos MZ, Moore K, Vlavianos P, et al. Single, total paracentesis for tense ascites: sequential hemodynamic changes and right atrial size. Hepatology. 1990;11:662–7.
Wang SS, Chen CC, Chao Y, et al. Sequential hemodynamic changes for large volume paracentesis in post-hepatitic cirrhotic patients with massive ascites. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B. 1996;20:117–22.
Kravetz D, Romero G, Argonz J, et al. Total volume paracentesis decreases variceal pressure, size, and variceal wall tension in cirrhotic patients. Hepatology. 1997;25:59–62.
Hung TH, Tseng CW, Tsai CC, et al. Mortality following catheter drainage versus thoracentesis in cirrhotic patients with pleural effusion. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:1080–5.
Colli A, Fraquelli M, Andreoletti M, et al. Severe liver fibrosis or cirrhosis: accuracy of US for detection—analysis of 300 cases. Radiology. 2003;227:89–94.
Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely-available easy-to-use software “EZR” (Easy R) for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.
Hanafusa N, Isoai A, Ishihara T, et al. Safety and efficacy of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) in refractory ascites: post-marketing surveillance results. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0177303.
Mullens W, Abrahams Z, Francis GS, et al. Importance of venous congestion for worsening of renal function in advanced decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:589–96.
Matsumoto N, Ogawa M, Kumagawa M, et al. Renal vein dilation predicts poor outcome in patients with refractory cirrhotic ascites. Hepatol Res. 2018;48:E117–25.
Brennan JM, Blair JE, Goonewardena S, et al. Reappraisal of the use of inferior vena cava for estimating right atrial pressure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:857–61.
Porter TR, Shillcutt SK, Adams MS, et al. Guidelines for the use of echocardiography as a monitor for therapeutic intervention in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:40–56.
Masugata H, Senda S, Okuyama H, et al. Age-related decrease in inferior vena cava diameter measured with echocardiography. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2010;222:141–7.
Stawicki SP, Braslow BM, Panebianco NL, et al. Intensivist use of hand-carried ultrasonography to measure IVC collapsibility in estimating intravascular volume status: correlations with CVP. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:55–61.
Kaneko M, Matsumoto N, Kumagawa M, et al. Measurement of the renal veins using ultrasonography in patients with cirrhotic ascites and congestive heart failure. J Med Ultrason. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01088-0.
Zhou PL, Yan L, Wu G, et al. Value of blood flow velocity on color Doppler ultrasonography for optimization of delay in scanning time on computed tomography venography in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome and inferior vena cava obstruction. Radiol Med. 2017;122:399–404.
Henriksen JH, Ring-Larsen H. Raised renal venous pressure: direct cause of renal sodium retention in cirrhosis? Lancet. 1988;2:112.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Masanori Abe (Professor, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine) for research support, and Editage (https://www.editage.jp/) for the English language review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Ethical statement
This study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Comprehensive informed consent regarding the use of data was obtained from each subject.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Matsumoto, N., Ogawa, M., Kanda, T. et al. Large-volume cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy improves venous flow in patients with liver cirrhosis. J Med Ultrasonics 48, 315–322 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01094-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-021-01094-2