Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design of active debris flow mitigation measures: a comprehensive analysis of existing impact models

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debris flows occur in mountainous areas characterized by steep slope and occasional severe rainstorms. The massive urbanization in these areas raised the importance of studying and mitigating these phenomena. Concerning the strategy of protection, it is fundamental to evaluate both the effect of the magnitude (that concerns the definition of the hazard), in terms of mobilized volume and travel distance, and the best technical protection structures (that concerns the mitigation measures) to reduce the existing risk to an acceptable residual one. In particular, the mitigation measure design requires the evaluation of the effects of debris flow impact forces against them. In other words, once it is established that mitigation structures are required, the impacting pressure shall be evaluated and it should be verified that it does not exceed barrier resistance. In this paper, the author wants to focus on the definition and the evaluation of the impacting load of debris flows on protection structures: a critical review of main existing models and equations treated in scientific literature is here presented. Although most of these equations are based on solid physical basis, they are always affected by an empirical nature due to the presence of coefficients for fitting the numerical results with laboratory and, less frequently, field data. The predicting capability of these equations, namely the capability of fitting experimental/field data, is analysed and evaluated using ten different datasets available in scientific literature. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the existing debris flow impact models, highlighting their strong points and limits. Moreover, this paper could have a practical aspect by helping engineers in the choice of the best technical solution and the safe design of debris flow protection structures. Existing design guidelines for debris flow protection barrier have been analysed. Finally, starting from the analysis of the hydro-static model response to fit field data and introducing some practical assumptions, an empirical formula is proposed for taking into account the dynamic effects of the phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albaba A, Lambert S, Nicot F, Chareyre B (2015) Relation between microstructure and loading applied by a granular flow to a rigid wall using DEM modeling. Granul Matter 17(5):603–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Albaba A, Lambert S, Faug T (2018) Dry granular avalanche impact force on a rigid wall: analytic shock solution versus discrete element simulations. Phys Rev E 97:052903-1-12

    Google Scholar 

  • Arattano M, Franzi L (2003) On the evaluation of debris flows dynamics by means of mathematical models. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:539–544. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-3-539-2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armanini A (1997) On the dynamic impact of debris flows. Recent developments on debris flows. In: Armanini A, Michiue M (eds) Lecture notes in earth sciences. Springer, Berlin, pp 208–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Armanini A, Scotton P (1992) Experimental analysis on the dynamic impact of a debris flow on structures. In Proceedings of the Internationl Symposium Interpraevent. Bern, Switzerland 107–116

  • Armanini A, Larcher M, Odorizzi M (2011) Dynamic impact of a debris flow front against a vertical wall. Ital J Eng Geol Environ:1041–1049

  • Ashwood W, Hungr O (2016) Estimating the total resisting force in a flexible barrier impacted by a granular avalanche using physical and numerical modeling. Can Geotech J 53(10):1700–1717

    Google Scholar 

  • Badoux A, Graf C, Rhyner J, Kuntner R, McArdell BW (2009) A debris-flow alarm system for the Alpine Illgraben catchment: design and performance. Nat Hazards 49:517–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) (2004) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighenti R, Segalini A, Ferrero AM (2013) Debris flow hazard mitigation: a simplified analytical model for the design of flexible barriers. Comput Geotech 54:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugnion L, McArdell BW, Bartelt P, Wendeler C (2011) Measurements of hillslope debris flow impact pressure on obstacles. Landslides 9:179–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Canelli L, Ferrero AM, Migliazza M, Segalini A (2012) Debris flow risk mitigation by the means of rigid and flexible barriers – experimental tests and impact analysis. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:1693–1699. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1693-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi CE, Au-Yeung SCH, Ng CWW (2015) Flume investigation of landslide granular debris and water run-up mechanisms. Géotech Lett 5(1):28–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou SH, Lu LS, Hsiau SS (2012) DEM simulation of oblique shocks in gravity-driven granular flows with wedge obstacles. Granul Matter 14(6):719–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross RH (1967) Tsunami surge forces. J Waterways Harbors Division ASCE 93(4):201–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui P, Zheng C, Lei Y (2015) Experimental analysis on the impact force of viscous debris flow. Earth Surf Process Landforms 40:1644–1655

    Google Scholar 

  • Daido A (1993) Impact force of mud debris flows on structures, Technical Session B. In Proceedings of the XXV IAHR Congress. Tokio, Japan 211–213

  • DeNatale JS, Iverson RM, Major JJ, LaHusen RG, Fiegel GL, Duffy JD (1999) Experimental testing of flexible barriers for containment of debris flows. USGS Open File Report 38:99–205

    Google Scholar 

  • EAD 340020-00-0106 (2016) Flexible kits for retaining debris flows and shallow landslides/open hill debris flows

  • Faug T (2015) Macroscopic force experienced by extended objects in granular flows over a very broad Froude-number range. Eur Phys J E 38(34):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero AM, Segalini A, Umili G (2015) Experimental tests for the application of an analytical model for flexible debris flow barrier design. Eng Geol 185:33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioraso G (2000) Indagini geologico-morfologiche su aste torrentizie della valtellina e della Valle di Susa ricorrentemente soggette a colate detritiche torrentizie (debris flow). Quaderni di studi e documantazione 23. Supplemento GEAM 1:3–59 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao L, Zhang LM, Chen HX (2017) Two-dimensional simulation of debris flow impact pressures on buildings. Eng Geol 226:236–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold JP (2004) Mobility statistics and hazard mapping for non-volcanic debris flows and rock avalanches. MS thesis, Portland State University

  • Hong Y, Wang JP, Li DQ, Cao ZJ, Ng CWW, Cui P (2015) Statistical and probabilistic analyses of impact pressure and discharge of debris flow from 139 events during 1961 and 2000 at Jiangjia Ravine, China. Eng Geol 187:122–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu K, Wei F, Li Y (2011) Real-time measurement and preliminary analysis of debris-flow impact force at Jiangjia Ravine, China. Earth Surf Process Landforms 36:1268–1278

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebl J (2001) Strategy of protection. In: Didier R, Zanolini F (eds) Risques torrentiels. Universitè Européenne d’Eté sur les Risques Natureles, Grenoble

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebl J, Holzinger G (2003) Kleinmassstaebliche Modellversuche zur Wirkung von Murbrechern. WLS Report 50, Institut fur Alpine Naturgefahren, Wien. 3 pp. (in German)

  • Huebl J, Steinwendtner H (2000) Debris flow hazard assessment and risk mitigation. Felsbau, Rock and Soil Engineering, Vol.1, 17-23, Verlag Glueckauf (in German)

  • Huebl J, Suda J, Proske D et al. (2009) Debris flow impact estimation. In Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering (WMHE2009) Vol. 1:137–148

  • Hungr O (2005) Classification and terminology. In: Debris flow hazards and related phenomena. Edited by M. Jakob and O. Hungr. Praxis Publishing Ltd., Chichester, UK 11–51

  • Hungr O, Morgan GC, Kellerhals R (1984) Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazard for design of remedial measures. Can Geotech J 21:663–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L (2014) The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11:167–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter K, Svendsen B, Rickenmann D (1994) Debris flow modeling: a review. Contin Mech Thermodyn 8(1):1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35:245–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (2015) Scaling and design of landslide and debris-flow experiments. Geomorphology 244:9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakob M, Hungr O (2005) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 445–487

  • Jakob M, Holm K, McDougall S (2016) Debris-flow risk assessment. Oxford Res Encycl Nat Hazard Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.37

  • Kienholz H (2003) Early warning systems related to mountain hazards. In: J. Zschau and A. Kueppers (eds), Early warning system for natural disaster reduction: 3rd International IDNDR Conference on Early Warning System for the Reduction of Natural Disasters. Postdam, 1998, 555–564, Springer-Verlag, Berlin

  • Kwan JSH (2012) Supplementary technical guidance on design of rigid debris-resisting barriers. GEO Report No. 270, Geotechnical Engineering Office, Hong Kong SAR Government

  • Lamberti A, Zanuttigh B (2004) Experimental analysis of the impact of dry granular debris flows against obstacles. XXIX Convegno di idraulica e costruzioni idrauliche, Trento 571–578

  • Leonardi A, Wittel FK, Mendoza M, Vetter R, Herrmann HJ (2016) Particle–fluid–structure interaction for debris flow impact on flexible barriers. Comput Aided Civ Inf Eng 31(5):323–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenhahn C (1973) Die Berechnung von Sperren in Beton und Eisen- beton, Kolloquium on Torrent Dams, Heft, Mitteilungender Forstlichen Bundensanstalt Wien 91–127. (in German)

  • McArdell BW (2016) Field Measurements of Forces in Debris Flows at the Illgraben: Implications for Channel-Bed Erosion. International Journal of Erosion Control Engineering 9(4):194–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizuyama T (2008) Structural countermeasures for debris flow disasters. Int J Erosion Control Eng 1(2):38–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Moase EE (2017) Guidance for debris-flow and debris-flood mitigation design. Simon Fraser University, Master Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Song D, Choi CE, Koo CH, Kwan JSH (2016) A novel flexible barrier for landslide impact in centrifuge. Géotechnique Lett 6(3):221–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Choi CE, Goodwin GR (2019) Froude characterization for single-surge unsteady dry granular flows: impact pressure and run up. Can Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0529

    Google Scholar 

  • Osanai N, Mizuno H, Mizuyama T (2010) Design standard of control structures against debris flow in Japan. J Disaster Res 3(5):307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal S, Choi CE, Song D et al. (2019) Review of mechanisms of debris-flow impact against barriers. In Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigations, Colorado, USA 1027-1034

  • Revellino P, Hungr O, Guadagno FM, Evans SG (2004) Velocity and runout simulation of destructive debris flows and debris avalanches in pyroclastic deposit, Campania region, Italy. Environ Geol 45:295–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Santi PM, Hewitt K, VanDine DF, Barillas Cruz E (2011) Debris-flow impact, vulnerability, and response. Nat Hazards 56(1):371–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9576-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidl C, Chiari M, Kaitna R, Mulleger M, Krawtschunk A, Zimmerman T, Proske D (2013) Analysing debris flow impact models, based on a small scale modelling approach. Surv Geophys 34:121–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotton P, Deganutti AM (1997) Phreatic line and dynamic impact in laboratory debris flow experiments. In Proceedings of the 1st ASCE International Conference on Debris-flow Hazard Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment. San Francisco, USA 777–786

  • Shen W, Zhao T, Zhao J, Dai F, Zhou G (2018) Quantifying the impact of dry debris flow against a rigid barrier by DEM analyses. Eng Geol 241:86–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Song D, Choi CE, Ng CWW, Zhou GGD (2017) Geophysical flows impacting a flexible barrier: effects of solid-fluid interaction. Landslides 15(1):99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovilla B, Faug T, Kohler A, Baroudi D, Fischer J, Thibert E (2016) Gravitational wet avalanche pressure on pylon-like structures. Cold Reg Sci Technol 126:66–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Suda J, Huebl J, Bergmeister K (2010) Design and construction of high stressed concrete structures as protection works for torrent control in the Austrian Alps. In Proceedings of 3rd FIB International Congress, Washington, USA, 1–12

  • Suwa H, Okuda S (1983) Deposition of debris flows on a fan surface, Mt. Yakedake, Japan. Zeitschrift Geomorph N F Suppl Bd 46:79–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (2007) Debris flow. Mechanics, prediction and countermeasures. Taylor and Francis Group

  • Turnbull B, Bowman ET, McElwaine JN (2015) Debris flow: experiments and modelling. C R Phys 16:86–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Vagnon F, Segalini A (2016) Debris flow impact estimation on a rigid barrier. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 16:1691–1697. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1691-2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vagnon F, Ferrero AM, Segalini A (2016) EC7 design approach for debris flow flexible barriers: applicability and limitations. In: Gercek H., Ulusay R., Hindistan M.A., Tuncay E., Aydan O. (eds), Mechanics and rock engineering: from the past to the future. International Symposium on International Society for Rock Mechanics, ISRM 2016. Cappadocia, Turkey, 29-31 August 2016, 1, 499-504, CRC Press/Balkema

  • Vagnon F, Ferrero AM, Umili G, Segalini A (2017a) A factor strength approach for the design of rock fall and debris flow barriers. Geotech Geol Eng 35(6):2663–2675

    Google Scholar 

  • Vagnon F, Ferrero AM, Latham JP, Xiang J (2017b) Benchmarking of debris flow experimental tests using combined finite-discrete element method, FEMDEM. In Proceedings of ISRM Afrirock – Rock Mechanics for Africa, 739-752

  • VanDine DF (1996) Debris flow control structures for forest engineering. Research Branch, BC Ministry of Forests, Victoria, BC. Working paper 08/1996. 75 pages

  • Watanabe M, Ikeya H (1981) Investigation and analysis of volcanic mud flows on Mount Sakurajima, Japan. Erosion sediment transport measurement. In: Int Assoc Hydrol Sei Publ, 133, Florence, 245–256

  • Wendeler C, Volkwein A (2015) Laboratory tests for the optimization of mesh size for flexible debris-flow barriers. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:2597–2604. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2597-2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendeler C, Volkwein A, Roth A, Denk M, Wartmann S (2007) Field measurements used for numerical modelling of flexible debris flow barriers. In C. I. Chen & J. J. Major (Eds.), Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation. Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, 681–687

  • Wendeler C, Volkwein A, McArdell BW, Bartelt P (2018) Load model for designing flexible steel barriers for debris flow mitigation. Can Geotech J 99:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanchetta G, Sulpizio R, Pareschi M, Leoni F, Santacroce R (2004) Characteristics of May 5-6, 1998 volcaniclastic debris flows in the Sarno area (Campania, southern Italy): relationships to structural damage and hazard zonation. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 133:377–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S (1993) A comprehensive approach to the observation and prevention of debris flows in China. Nat Hazards 7:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M, Haeberli W (1992) Climatic change and debris flow activity in high mountains areas. A case study in the Swiss Alps. Catena Suppl 22:59–72

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Science, University of Turin, Via Valperga Caluso 35, 10125, Turin, Italy

    Federico Vagnon

Authors
  1. Federico Vagnon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Vagnon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vagnon, F. Design of active debris flow mitigation measures: a comprehensive analysis of existing impact models. Landslides 17, 313–333 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01278-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01278-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation