Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Load-attenuation mechanisms of flexible barrier subjected to bouldery debris flow impact

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impulse load of boulders at the front of debris flows is critical to the design of structural defense measures, which are commonly constructed on hillsides to mitigate landslide risk. Field evidences have demonstrated the capability of some steel flexible barriers in intercepting debris flows with bouldery inclusions. However, there is still a lack of fundamental understanding of the load-attenuation mechanisms of flexible barriers, especially under bouldery debris flow impact. In this study, systematic tests of mono-disperse and bi-disperse bouldery flows impacting an instrumented flexible barrier were conducted using a geotechnical centrifuge. The impact kinematics and barrier responses, such as mobilized structural forces and elongation of cables, were recorded synchronously. The results reveal that the load-attenuation mechanism of flexible barriers for the frontal impact originates from the barrier deflections and extended interaction duration. Only 30% of the frontal momentum is transferred to the flexible barrier. The performance of the flexible barrier is compared with that of a rigid barrier model under identical testing conditions. It is found that the boulder impulse loads on flexible barrier are significantly attenuated, resulting in a “plateau” pattern of the impact time history. The practical implication is that the design of flexible barriers may not demand separate considerations of the bulk debris and individual boulder impact loads. Detailed examination of the state of debris deposited behind the flexible barrier indicates that the static dry debris is close to the active failure state due to the large barrier deflection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashwood W, Hungr O (2016) Estimating the total resisting force in a flexible barrier impacted by a granular avalanche using physical and numerical modeling. Can Geotech J 53(10):1700–1717. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugnion L, Wendeler C (2010) Shallow landslide full-scale experiments in combination with testing of a flexible barrier. In: Monitoring, Simulation, Prevention and Remediation of Dense and Debris Flows III, pp 161–173

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bugnion L, McArdell BW, Bartelt P, Wendeler C (2012) Measurements of hillslope debris flow impact pressure on obstacles. Landslides 9(2):179–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0294-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanson H (2004) Hydraulics of open channel flow. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa JE (1984) Physical geomorphology of debris flows. In: Developments and Applications of Geomorphology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Craig RF (2004) Craig's soil mechanics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNatale JS, Iverson RM, Major JJ, LaHusen RG, Fiegel GL, Duffy JD (1999) Experimental testing of flexible barriers for containment of debris flows. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Reston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • EOTA (2016) Flexible kits for retaining debris flows and shallow landslides/open slope debris flows. EAD340020-00-0106. https://www.eota.eu/handlers/download.ashx?filename=ead-in-ojeu%2fead-340020-00-0106-ojeu2016.pdf

  • Gray JMNT, Tai YC, Noelle S (2003) Shock waves, dead zones and particle-free regions in rapid granular free-surface flows. J Fluid Mech 491:161–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hübl J, Suda J, Proske D, Kaitna R, Scheidl C (2009) Debris flow impact estimation. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering. Ohrid, Macedonia, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (2015) Scaling and design of landslide and debris-flow experiments. Geomorphology 244:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CG, Kokelaar BP, Iverson RM, Logan M, LaHusen RG, Gray JMNT (2012) Grain-size segregation and levee formation in geophysical mass flows. J Geophys Res: Earth Surf 117(F1)

  • Koo RCH, Kwan JSH, Ng CWW, Lam C, Song D, Pun WK (2016) Velocity attenuation of debris flows and a new momentum-based load model for rigid barriers. Landslides. 14(2):617–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0715-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan JSH (2012) Supplementary technical guidance on design of rigid debris-resisting barriers. GEO Report No. 270. Geotechnical Engineering Office, HKSAR Government

  • Kwan JSH, Cheung RWM (2012) Suggestion on design approaches for flexible debris-resisting barriers. Discussion note DN1/2012. Geotechnical Engineering Office, HKSAR Government

  • Kwan JSH, Sze EHY, Lam C (2018) Finite element analysis for rockfall and debris flow mitigation works. Can Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrouli O, Corominas J (2010) Vulnerability of simple reinforced concrete buildings to damage by rockfalls. Landslides 7(2):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArdell BW, Bartelt P, Kowalski J (2007) Field observations of basal forces and fluid pore pressure in a debris flow. Geophys Res Lett 34(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL029183

  • Ng CWW (2014) The state-of-the-art centrifuge modelling of geotechnical problems at HKUST. J Zhejiang Univ SCIENCE A 15(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Song D, Choi CE, Koo RCH, Kwan JSH (2016) A novel flexible barrier for landslide impact in centrifuge. Géotechnique Lett 6(3):221–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Su Y, Choi CE, Song D, Lam C, Kwan JSH, Chen R, Liu H (2018) Comparison of cushioning mechanisms between cellular glass and gabions subjected to successive boulder impacts. J Geotech Geoenviron 144(9):04018058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasiharan N, Muhunthan B, Badger TC, Shu S, Carradine DM (2006) Numerical analysis of the performance of wire mesh and cable net rockfall protection systems. Eng Geol 88(1):121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage SB (1984) The mechanics of rapid granular flows. Adv Appl Mech 24:289–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage SB, Hutter K (1989) The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline. J Fluid Mech 199:177–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield AN (1980) Cambridge geotechnical centrifuge operations. Geotechnique 30(3):227–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song D, Ng CWW, Choi CE, Zhou GGD, Kwan JSH, Koo RCH (2017) Influence of debris flow solid fraction on rigid barrier impact. Can Geotech J 54: 1421–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song D, Choi CE, Zhou GGD, Kwan JSH, Sze HY (2018a) Impulse load characteristics of bouldery debris flow impact. Géotechnique Lett 8(2):111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song D, Choi CE, Ng CWW, Zhou GGD (2018b) Geophysical flows impacting a flexible barrier: effects of solid-fluid interaction. Landslides 15(1):99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sze EHY, Koo RCH, Leung JMY, Ho KSS (2018) Design of flexible barriers against sizeable landslides in Hong Kong. HKIE Trans 25(2):115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T/CAGHP (2018) Specification of design for debris flow prevention. 021–2018. China University of Geosciences Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RN (1995) Geotechnical centrifuge technology. Blackie Academic Professional, Glasgow, U.K.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wendeler C, McArdell BW, Rickenmann D, Volkwein A, Roth A, Denk M (2006) Field testing and numerical modeling of flexible debris flow barriers. In: Proceedings of international conference on physical modelling in geotechnics, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendeler C, Volkwein A, McArdell BW, Bartelt P (2019) Load model for designing flexible steel barriers for debris flow mitigation. Can Geotech J 56(6):893-910.https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WSL (2009) Full-scale testing and dimensioning of flexible debris flow barriers. In: Technical report 1–22. WSL, Birmensdorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong ACY, Lam C, Lam NT, Perera JS, Kwan JSH (2019) Analytical solution for estimating sliding displacement of rigid barriers subjected to boulder impact. J Eng Mech 145(3):04019006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng C, Cui P, Su Z, Lei Y, Chen R (2015) Failure modes of reinforced concrete columns of buildings under debris flow impact. Landslides 12(3):561–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 51809261, 11672318, and 51709052), by a research grant (T22-603/15-N) provided by the Research Grants Council of the Government of Hong Kong SAR, China. This paper is published with the permission of the Head of the Geotechnical Engineering Office and the Director of Civil Engineering and Development, the Government of the Hong Kong SAR, China. The support by the Geotechnical Engineering Office is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process/Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China

    D. Song & Gordon G. D. Zhou

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    D. Song & Gordon G. D. Zhou

  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    D. Song, C. E. Choi & C. W. W. Ng

  4. The HKUST Jockey Club Institute for Advanced Study, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    C. E. Choi

  5. Geotechnical Engineering Office, Civil Engineering and Development Department, Government of the HKSAR, Hong Kong, China

    J. S. H. Kwan & H. Y. Sze

  6. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China

    Y. Zheng

Authors
  1. D. Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. E. Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. W. W. Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gordon G. D. Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. S. H. Kwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. H. Y. Sze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Y. Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon G. D. Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, D., Choi, C.E., Ng, C.W.W. et al. Load-attenuation mechanisms of flexible barrier subjected to bouldery debris flow impact. Landslides 16, 2321–2334 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01243-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01243-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation