Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Contextualizing community-based landslide risk reduction: an evolutionary perspective

  • Thematic Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following the current emphasis given to community-based action in landslide disaster risk reduction (DRR) and with reference to traditional community-based approaches, recent studies have increasingly addressed regionally diverse experiences with community engagement in DRR. In this paper, we question the mechanisms of the community-based landslide DRR throughout history. To do this, we use the original historical landslide database for NW Czechia spanning from 1531 to the present day, including 230 landslide events. Five historical periods with different political regimes and socio-economic conditions are illustrated with significant landslide phases (1770, 1895–1900, 1925–1928, 1955–1960) and individual socio-economically relevant landslides (1994). For each period, the institutional and social conditions are described, the landslide phase is characterized (number of events, triggers, impacts, and recovery) along with analyses of individual case study events, and finally the institutional analyses of stakeholders dealing with landslide recovery and future prevention are provided. We conclude that various conceptualizations of community may be assigned to individual historical periods and that the inherited and newly established practices have been combined, creating hybrid models of community-based landslide DRR and affecting both its efficiency and effectiveness. Based on our findings we argue that (i) further attention should be paid to understanding the institutional, social, and technological context that is permissive of certain approaches to community engagement; (ii) approaches to community engagement must be constantly re-evaluated, given the dynamic nature of communities’ structure and functioning; and (iii) eventual use of the traditional or historical community-based approaches and practices must be critically evaluated with respect to conditions, in which these approaches and practices were developed and transformed. Finally, we emphasize that these challenges should be explored by interdisciplinary studies employing documentary data and addressing long-term path-dependencies of DRR in specific environmental and institutional settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamson GCD, Hannaford MJ, Rohland EJ (2018) Re-thinking the present: the role of a historical focus in climate change adaptation research. Global Environ Chang 48:195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A, Gibson CC (1999) Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation. World Dev 27:629–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2

  • Ahmed B, Kelman I (2018) Measuring community vulnerability to environmental hazards: a method for combining quantitative and qualitative data. Nat Haz Rev 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000290

  • Alcantara-Ayala I (2002) Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries. Gemorphology 47:107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00083-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MG, Holcombe E (2013) Community-based landslide risk reduction: managing disasters in small steps. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MG, Holcombe EA, Holm-Nielsen N, Della Monica R (2013) What are the emerging challenges for community-based landslide risk reduction in developing countries? Nat Haz Rev 15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000125

  • Beierle TC, Cayford J (2002) Democracy in practice: public participation in environmental decisions. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10:1251–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bíl M, Krejčí O, Bílová M, Kubeček J, Sedoník J, Krejčí V (2014) A chronology of landsliding and its impacts on the village of Halenkovice, outer Western Carpathians. Geografie 119:342–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Brázdil R, Wheeler D, Pfister C (2010) European climate of the past 500 years based on documentary and instrumental data. Clim Chang 101:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9866-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cajz V (1999) The České středohoří Mts.: volcanostratigraphy and geochemistry. Geolines 9:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaye J (2004) Governance and community engagement: the Australian experience. In: Lovan WR, Murray M, Shaffer R (eds) Participatory governance. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 85–102

    Google Scholar 

  • CHMI (2018) Czech Hydrometeorologic Institute. <www.chmi.cz>

  • Cornwall M, Evans RJW (2007) Czechoslovakia in a nationalist and fascist Europe, 1918–1948. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney H, Kirkland J, Viguerie P (1997) Strategy under uncertainty. Harv Bus Rev 75:66–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18:598–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekens J (2007) Local knowledge for disaster preparedness: a literature review. International Commission for Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2004) Traditional knowledge in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(3):7 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard CM, Petley DN (2013) A risk society? Environmental hazards, risk and resilience in the latter Middle Ages in Europe. Nat Haz 69:1051–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0750-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glade T, Albini P, Frances F (2001) The use of historical data in natural hazard assessments. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1994) The AVI project: a bibliographical and archive inventory of landslides and floods in Italy. Environ Manag 18:623–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris J (2001) Tönnies: community and civil society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L (2014) The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11:167–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0436-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingrao CW (2000) The Habsburg monarchy, 1618–1815. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Janku A, Schenk GJ, Mauelshagen F (2012) Historical disasters in context: science, religion, and politics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannes RE (1989) Introduction. In: Johannes RE (ed) Traditional ecological knowledge: a collection of essays. IUCN, Gland (Switzerland) and Cambridge, pp 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones EC, Murphy AD, Faas AJ, Tobin GA, McCarty C, Whiteford LM (2015) Postdisaster reciprocity and the development of inequality in personal networks. Econ Anthr 2:385–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kárník Z (2000) Czech lands in the first republic 1918–1938 I. (in Czech). Libri, Praha

  • Kelman I (2017) Linking disaster risk reduction, climate change, and the sustainable development goals. Disaster Prev Manage: An International Journal 26(3):254–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-02-2017-0043

  • Kervyn M, Jacobs L, Maes J, Che VB, de Hontheim A, Dewitte O, Isabirye M, Sekajugo J, Kabaseke C, Poesen J, Vranken L, Mertens K (2015) Landslide resilience in equatorial Africa: moving beyond problem identification! BelGeo − Revue belge de géographie 2015(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.15944

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenk NL, Meehan K, Pinel SL, Mendez F, Lima PT, Kammen DM (2015) Stakeholders in climate science: beyond lip service? Science 350:743–744. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klíma A (1989) Domestic industry, manufactory and early industrialization in Bohemia. J Eur Econ History 18:509–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimeš J, Stemberk J, Blahůt J, Krejčí V, Krejčí O, Hartvich F, Kycl P (2017) Challenges for landslide hazard and risk management in ‘low-risk’ regions, Czech Republic − landslide occurrences and related costs (IPL project no. 197). Landslides 14:771–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0798-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klose M, Damm B, Highland L (2015) Databases in geohazard science: an introduction. Geomorphology 249:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klose M, Maurischat P, Damm B (2016) Landslide impacts in Germany: a historical and socioeconomic perspective. Landslides 13:183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0643-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krejčí J (1972) Social change and stratification in postwar Czechoslovakia. Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krejčí J, Machonin (1998) Czechoslovakia 1918–1992. Macmillan, Houndmills

    Google Scholar 

  • Krejčí O, Bíl M, Jurová Z, Rybář J (2002) Slope instability hazard evaluation in the Flysch Western Carpathians (Czech Republic). In: Instability, planning and management. Thomas Telford Publishing, London, pp 305–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger F, Bankoff G, Cannon T, Orlowski B, Schipper ELF (2015) Introduction. In: Krüger F, Bankoff G, Cannon T, Orlowski B, Schipper ELF (eds) Cultures and disasters: understanding cultural framings in disaster risk reduction. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 1–16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kurka J, Smolík R, Zavoral J (1995) Final report of engineering-geological survey and geotechnical control monitoring − landslide Vaňov (in Czech). Czech Geological Survey, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Kycl P, Rapprich V, Radoň M (2012) Geological setting of the Vaňov landslide area. Geosci Rep 45:82–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidskog R (2008) Scientised citizens and democratised science. Reassessing the expert-lay divide. J Risk Res 11:69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701521636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovan WR, Murray M, Shaffer R (2004) Participatory governance. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauch C, Pfister C (2009) Natural disasters, cultural responses. Case studies toward a global environmental history. Lexington Books, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen L, Garde-Hansen J, Holmes A, Jones O, Krause F (2017) Sustainable flood memories, lay knowledges and the development of community resilience to future flood risk. Trans Inst Br Geo 42:14–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer J, Kelman I, Taranis L, Suchet-Pearson S (2010) Framework for integrating indigenous and scientific knowledge for disaster risk reduction. Disasters 34(1):214–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01126.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munene MB, Swartling ÅG, Thomalla F (2018) Adaptive governance as a catalyst for transforming the relationship between development and disaster risk through the Sendai framework? Int J Dis Risk Red. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.021

  • MunichRe (2017) TopicsGeo: natural catastrophes 2016 − analyses, assessments, positions. MunichRe, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotný J, Smejkalová T, Rybář J (2013) Activation of slope movement in the landslide area of the abandoned Ohře River meander in Žatec. Geoscience Rep 46:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Pánek T, Smolková V, Hradecký J, Baroň I, Šilhán K (2013) Holocene reactivations of catastrophic complex flow-like landslides in the Flysch Carpathians (Czech Republic/Slovakia). Quat Res 80:33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2013.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker DJ, Handmer JW (1998) The role of unofficial flood warning systems. J Cont Crisis Manag 6:45–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.00067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters-Guarin G, McCall MK, van Westen C (2012) Coping strategies and risk manageability: using participatory geographical information systems to represent local knowledge. Disasters 36:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01247.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petley D (2012) Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology 40:927–930. https://doi.org/10.1130/G33217.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister C, Brázdil R (2006) Social vulnerability to climate in the “Little Ice Age”: an example from Central Europe in the early 1770s. Clim Past 2:115–129. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2-115-2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raška P, Brázdil R (2015) Participatory responses to historical flash floods and their relevance for current risk reduction: a view from a post-communist country. Area 47:166–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raška P, Dostál P (2017) Evolution of disaster relief law under multiple transformations: progressive learning or walking in a circle? Environ Sci Pol 76:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raška P, Dubišar J (2017) Impacts of natural hazards on an early industrial community: a case study of North Bohemia and its implications for long-term vulnerability assessment. Moravian Geo Rep 25:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2017-0002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raška P, Zábranský V, Dubišar J, Kadlec A, Hrbáčová A, Strnad T (2014a) Documentary proxies and interdisciplinary research on historic geomorphologic hazards: a discussion of the current state from a central European perspective. Nat Haz 70:705–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0839-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raška P, Hartvich F, Cajz V, Adamovič J (2014b) Structural setting of the Čertovka landslide (Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic): morphostructural analysis and electrical resistivity tomography. Geol Q 58:85–98. https://doi.org/10.7306/gq.1134

    Google Scholar 

  • Raška P, Klimeš J, Dubišar J (2015) Using local archive sources to reconstruct historical landslide occurrence in selected urban regions of the Czech Republic: examples from regions with different historical development. Land Degrad Dev 26:142–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raška P, Zábranský V, Brázdil R, Lamková J (2016) The late Little Ice Age landslide calamity in North Bohemia: triggers, impacts and post-landslide development reconstructed from documentary data (case study of the Kozí vrch Hill landslide). Geomorphology 255:95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (2008) Risk governance. Earthscan, London-New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Renn O, Klinke A, van Asselt M (2011) Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: a synthesis. AMBIO: J Hum Environ 40:231–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0134-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rybář J (1991) Untersuchung der Hangbewegungen in der ČSFR. Felsbau 9:178–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangster H, Jones C, Macdonald N (2018) The co-evolution of historical source materials in the geophysical, hydrological and meteorological sciences: learning from the past and moving forward. Prog Phys Geo 42:61–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133317744738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk GJ (2015) Learning from history? Chances, problems and limits of learning from historical natural disasters. In: Krüger F, Bankoff G, Cannon T, Orlowski B, Schipper ELF (eds) Cultures and disasters. Understanding cultural framings in disaster risk reduction. Routledge, London, pp 72–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg L (1999) Risk perception by the public and by experts: a dilemma in risk management. Hum Ecol Rev 6:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavíková L, Syrbe R-U, Slavík J, Berens A (2017) Local environmental NGO roles in biodiversity governance: a Czech-German comparison. GeoScape 11:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1515/geosc-2017-0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Petley DN (2009) Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Špůrek M (1967) Historical analysis of influence of the climatic factor on landsliding in Bohemian Massif (in Czech). Dissertation thesis. Archive of the Czech Geological Survey – Geofond, Prague

  • Špůrek M (1969) Retrospective analyses of complex landslides: case study of the Hazmburk Hill near the Libochovice Town. Sborník geologických věd R.HIG 7:61–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg T (2000) Acts of god. The unnatural history of natural disaster in America. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudmeier-Rieux K, Jaquet S, Derron M-H, Jaboyedoff M, Devkota S (2012) A case study of coping strategies and landslides in two villages of Central-Eastern Nepal. Appl Geo 32:680–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropeano D, Turconi L (2004) Using historical documents for landslide, debris flow and stream flood prevention. Applications in Northern Italy. Nat Haz 31:663–679. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000024897.71471.f2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (1994) Yokohama strategy and plan of action for a safer world. United Nations, Yokohama

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (2007) Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. United Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. United Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban O (1982) Czech Society 1848–1918 (in Czech). Svoboda, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilímek V, Klimeš J, Torres MZ (2016) Reassessment of the development and hazard of the Rampac Grande landslide, Cordillera Negra, Peru. Geoenviron Disastres 3:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-016-0039-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9:5 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walshe R, Argumedo A (2016) Ayni, Ayllu, Yanantin and Chanincha: the cultural values enabling adaptation to climate change in communities of the Potato Park, in the Peruvian Andes. GAIA 25(3):166–173. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.3.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore S (2009) Mapping knowledge controversies: science democracy and the redistribution of expertise. Prog Hum Geogr 33:587–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509339841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis I, Fitton J (2016) A review of multivariate social vulnerability methodologies: a case study of the River Parrett catchment, UK. Nat Haz Earth Syst Sci 16:1387–1399. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1387-2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson G (2012) Community resilience and environmental transitions. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2014) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • www.geology.cz (2018) <http://www.geology.cz/extranet-eng/maps/online/map-applications>

List of historical sources (in original languages). Accessed 20 Oct 2018

  • S1 Untersuchung des bey Wessel, und Reindlitz Unweit Aussig zum Anfange Gegenwärtigen Jahrs 1770 Sich Ereigneten Heftigen Erdbebens Sammt der Entscheidung der Wahrscheinlichsten Ursache Desselben 1770 (F. Zeno), Prag

  • S2 Ohngefehrer Entwurf 1770 (J. I. Zechel). Fond Velkostatek Krásné Březno - Všebořice 1568–1945, inv. č. 1344, SoA Litoměřice, branch Děčín – Podmokly

  • S3 Plan der Gegend nahe Aussig, heute Ústí nad Labem, Federzeichnung, ca. 1 : 33 000 (G. A. Günther). Deutsche Fotothek, signature SLUB/KS A9960

  • S4 Aussiger Anzeiger newspapers (1856–1902). Sbírka novin, Archiv města Ústí nad Labem

  • S5 Postcard “Klapé od 8-10 dub 1898” and “Darujte 5kr. katastrofou postiženým v Klapém”, private collections

  • S6 Situationsplan zur Hebung der Strasse bei Waltirsche (1906). Fond Okresní úřad 1850–1938, inv. č. 261, Archiv města Ústí nad Labem

  • S7 Projekt für die Stabilisierung der Rutschung der Bezirksstrasse Waltirsche-Schwaden (1920). Fond Okresní úřad 1850–1938, inv. č. 261, Archiv města Ústí nad Labem

  • S8 Sanace sesuvu okresní silnice Valtířov-Svádov, Ředitelství státních drah Praha 1927. Fond Okresní úřad 1850–1938, inv. č. 261, Archiv města Ústí nad Labem. (note: the document is a reply from 1927 to earlier request by local authorities made in 1925)

  • S9 Waldschnitz, Ge. Waltirsche, Erdrutschung. Technisches Bureau des Landeskulturrates für Böhmen – Auẞenstelle Teplitz-Schönau. Fond Okresní úřad 1850–1938, inv. č. 261, Archiv města Ústí nad Labem

  • S10 Rutschung beim Wohnhaus C. No. 6 in Waltirsche, Bezirksverwaltungskommission Aussig 1928. Fond Okresní úřad 1850–1938, inv. č. 261, Archiv města Ústí nad Labem

  • S11 Zpráva o sesouvaném území v okolí kravína ČSSS Kadaň, farma Poláky 1958, Agroprojekt, n.p. Praha, závod Karlovy Vary, Archive of the Czech Geological survey (Geofond) P010463

  • S12 Dokumentace sesuvů v katastrálním území Poláky, Dotalík 2015, Czech Geological Survey, ČGS-441/15/0638*SOG-441/224/2015

  • S13 Rudé právo newspapers. Online archive of Czech periodicals, Institute for Czech literature, Czech Academy of Sciences, http://archiv.ucl.cas.cz [online]

  • S14 Assessment report on 2013 flood, Czech Hydrometeorological Institute, Prague 2013, http://voda.chmi.cz/pov13/SouhrnnaZprava.pdf [online]

  • S15 Ústecký deník newspapers 2014, https://ustecky.denik.cz [online]

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Czech Science Foundation [project no. GA16-02521S titled “Individual and organizational decision-making in environmental risk reduction: determinants, motivations and efficiency”].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science, Department of Geography, J. E. Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic

    Pavel Raška

Authors
  1. Pavel Raška
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Raška.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raška, P. Contextualizing community-based landslide risk reduction: an evolutionary perspective. Landslides 16, 1747–1762 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1099-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1099-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation