Abstract
Bark stripping is a key topic in forestry because of economic losses due to associated fungal infections of wood, finally resulting in growth decrease and the loss of ecosystem services. Numerous studies identified factors influencing the spatial distribution of bark stripping damage between stands or at the landscape scale. However, patterns within single stands are not yet reported. In this research, we performed a terrestrial laser scanning supported census of nine stands in Austria (9026 trees in total). A generalised additive model with a binomial distribution (link = logit) and soap film smoother was fitted to the data. The probability of bark stripping on the single tree level depended on the following covariates: Spruce was more vulnerable than larch, damage probability decreased with DBH and the local slope and increased with the Epanechnikov Kernel (bandwidth = 15 m) estimate of tree density. At the nearest neighbour distance of two metres, there was a damage maximum. The spatial distribution of bark stripping damage was clumped, and its intensity decreased with increasing distance to forest roads. In 67.7% of the cases, the model predicted the right outcome for the total population (overall model accuracy). This percentage varied between 55.3 and 79.1% between stands. In conclusion, the spatial distribution should be considered in inventory designs for bark stripping damages to mitigate bark stripping effects on the forests.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaksi F (eds) Second international symposium an information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281
Allen AM, Månsson J, Jarnemo A, Bunnefeld N (2014) The impacts of landscape structure on the winter movements and habitat selection of female red deer. Eur J Wildl Res 60:411–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0797-0
Ando M, Hiro-Omi Y, Ei’ichi S (2003) Bark stripping preference of sika deer, Cervus nippon, in terms of bark chemical contents. For Ecol Manag 177:323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00336-5
Apollonio M, Andersen R, Putman R (2010) European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Arhipova N, Jansons A, Zaļuma A, Gaitnieks T, Vasaitis R (2015) Bark stripping of Pinus contorta caused by moose and deer: wounding patterns, discoloration of wood and associated fungi. Can J for Res 45:1434–1438. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0119
Arnold AM, Gerhardt P, Steyaert SM, Hochbichler E, Hackländer K (2018) Diversionary feeding can reduce red deer habitat selection pressure on vulnerable forest stands, but is not a panacea for red deer damage. For Ecol Manag 407:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.050
Augustin NH, Sauleaub E-A, Wood SN (2012) On quantile-quantile plots for generalized linear models. Comput Stat Data Anal 56(8):2404–3409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2012.01.026
Baddeley A, Turner R (2020) SPATSTAT: spatial point pattern analysis, model-fitting, simulation, tests. Version 1.64–1. Website: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/spatstat/spatstat.pdf (01.08.2020)
BFW (2018) Österreichische waldinventur – auswahl: Bund_Stammschäden_Stammzahl Wuchklassen_Erhebung 2007–2009. Downloaded 14 July 2018 from http://bfw.ac.at/rz/wi.auswahl
Bivand R, Keitt T, Rowlingson B (2020) RGDAL: bindings for the ‘Geospatial” data abstraction library. Version 1.5–17. Website: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rgdal/rgdal.pdf (09.09.2020)
Bojarska K, Kurek K, Śnieżko S, Wierzbwska I, Król W, Zyśk-Gorczyńska E, Okarma H (2020) Winter severity and anthropogenic factors affect spatial behaviour of red deer in the Carpathians. Mamm Res 65:815–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-020-00520-z
Butin H (2011) Krankheiten der wald- und parkbäume: diagnose-biologie-bekämpfung, 4th edn. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart (Hohenheim)
Candaele R, Lejeune P, Licoppe A, Malengreaux C, Brostaux Y, Morelle K, Latte N (2021) Mitigation of bark stripping on spruce: the need for red deer population to control. Eur J for Res 140:227–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01326-z
Coppes J, Burghardt F, Hagen R, Suchant R, Braunisch V (2017) Human recreation affects spatio-temporal habitat use patterns in red deer (Cervus elaphus). PLoS ONE 12(5):e01175134. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175134
Danell K, Bergström R, Duncan P, Pastor J (2006) Large herbivore ecology, ecosystem dynamics and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (ISBN = 978-0-521-53687-5)
Debeljak M, Sašo D, Jerena K, Kobler A, Adamič M (2001) Habitat suitability modelling for red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in South-central Slovenia with classification trees. Ecol Model 138:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00411-7
Čermák P, Jankovský L, Glogar J (2004) Progress of spreading Stereum sanguinolentum (Alb. Et Schw.: Fr.) Fr. Wound rot and its impact on the stability of spruce stands. J for Sci 50(8):360–365
Cukor J, Vacek Z, Linda R, Sharma RP (2019) Afforested farmland vs. forestland: effects of bark stripping by Cervus elaphus and climate on production potential and structure of Picea abies forests. PLoS ONE 14(8):80221082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221082
Hahn C, Vospernik S (2022) Position, size, and spatial patterns of bark stripping wounds inflicted by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on Norway spruce using generalized additive models in Austria. Ann for Sci 79:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-022-01134-y
Gill RM (1992) A review of damage by mammals: 1. Deer for 65(2):145–169
Godvik I, Loe L, Vik J, Veiberg V, Langvatn R, Mysterud A (2009) Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection. Ecology 90:699–710. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0576.1
Gollob C, Ritter T, Wassermann C, Nothdurft A (2019) Influence of scanner position and plot size on the accuracy of tree detection and diameter estimation using terrestrial laser scanning on forest inventory plots. Remote Sens 11(13):1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131602
Gollob C, Ritter T, Nothdurft A (2020) Forest inventory with long range and high-speed personal laser scanning (PLS) and simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) technology. Remote Sens 12(9):1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091509
Greutter E (1985) Einfluss der lage von rotwildfütterungen auf schälschäden. Diploma thesis. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalised additive models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, New York, Washington, D.C.
Heiligenkreuz S (2018) Forstverwaltung wasserberg. Eigenverlag des Klosters, Gaal
Heinze G, Wallisch C, Dunkler D (2018) Variable selection – A review and recommendations for the practicing statistician. Biom J 60(3):431–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201700067
Hijmans RJ (2020) RASTER: geographik data analysis and modeling. Version 2.2–13. Website: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/raster/raster.pdf (09.09.2020)
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York/Chichester/Brisbane/Toronto/Singapore
Jerina K, Dajčman M, Adamič M (2008) Red deer (Cervus elaphus) bark stripping on spruce with regard to spatial distribution of supplemental feeding places. Zb Gozdarstva Lesar 86:33–43
Kamsker G (1975) Erfassung von schälschäden in einem forstbetrieb. Anlage einer kontrollstichprobe und auswertung der basiserhebung. Diploma thesis. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
Kiffner C, Rößiger E, Trisl O, Schulz R, Rühe F (2008) Probability of recent bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus) on Norway spruce (Picea abies) in a low mountain range in Germany – a preliminary analysis. Silva Fenn 42(1):125–134. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.269
Kilian W, Müller F, Starlinger F (1994) Die forstlichen wuchsgebiete österreichs: eine naturraumgliederung nach waldökologischen grundlagen. Forstliche Bundesversuchsanstalt, Wien
Licoppe A, Lievens J (2010) Utilisation de la plaine agricole par le Cerve élaphe et effets sur les résultats de comptages aux phares: cas des prairies de la Vesdre en Hertogenwald (B). Colloque national d’écologie scientifique, Montpellier
Meisingset EL, Loe LE, Brekkum Ø, Van Moorter B, Mysterud A (2013) Red deer habitat selection and movements in relation to roads. Wildl Manag 77(1):181–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.469
O’Sullivan D, Unwin DJ (2003) Geographic information analysis. Wiley, New York
Pollanschütz J (1985) Formzahlfunktionen der hauptbaumarten österreichs. Allg Forst Jagdzeitschrift 85:341–343
Putman RJ, Staines BW (2004) Supplementory winter feeding of wild red deer Cervus elaphus in Europe and North America: justifications, feeding practice and effectiveness. Mamm Rev 34:258–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2004.00044.x
Randveer T, Heikkilä R (1996) Damage caused by moose (Alces alces L.) by bark stripping of picea abies. Scand J for Res 11(1–4):153–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827589609382923
Reimoser F, Reimoser S (2019) Das rotwild (Cervus elaphus) in österreich. 25. Österreichische Jägertagung 5–12
Reimoser F, Gossow H (1996) Impact of ungulates on forest vegetation and its dependence on the silvicultural system. For Ecol Manag 88:107–119
Ritter T, Schwarz M, Tockner A, Leisch F, Nothdurft A (2017) Automatic mapping of forest stands based on three-dimensional point clouds derived from terrestrial laser-scanning. Forests 8(8):265. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8080265
Rönnberg J, Berglung M, Johansson U, Cleary M (2013) Incidence of Heterobasidion spp. following different thinning regimes in Norway spruce in southern Sweden. For Ecol Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.013
Spake R, Bellamy C, Gill R, Watts K, Wilson T, Ditchburn B, Eigenbrod F (2020) Forest damage by deer depends on cross-scale interactions between climate, deer density and landscape structure. J Appl Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13622
Sun Y, Yu Y, Guo J, Zhang M (2020) The winter habitat selection of red deer (Cervus elaphus) based on a multi-scale model. Animals. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122454
Vacek Z, Cukor J, Linda R, Vacek S, Šimůnek V, Brichta J, Prokůpková A (2020) Bark stripping, the crucial factor affecting stem rot development and timber production of Norway spruce forests in Central Europe. For Ecol Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118360
Valente AM, Acevedo P, Figueiredo AM, Fonseca C, Torres RT (2020) Overabundant wild ungulate populations in Europe: management with consideration of socio-ecological consequences. Mamm Rev 50:353–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12202
Vasaitis R, Lygis V, Vailiauskaite I, Valiliauskas A (2012) Wound occlusion and decay in Picea abies. Eur J for Res 131:1211–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0592-3
Vasiliauskas R, Stenlid J (1998) Discoloration following bark stripping wounds on Fraxinus excelsior. Eur J for Pathol 28:383–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0329.1998.tb01192.x
Verheyden H, Ballon P, Bernard V, Saint-Andrieux C (2006) Variations in bark-stripping by red deer Cervus elaphus across Europe. Mamm Rev 36:217–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2006.00085.x
Völk F (1997) Schälschäden und rotwildmanagement in abhängigkeit von jagdgesetz und waldbau in österreich. Dissertation. Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien
Vospernik S (2006) Probability of bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Austria. Silva Fenn 40(4):589–601. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.316
Wood SN (2017) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York
Wood SN, Bravington MV, Hedley SL (2008) Soap film smoothing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 70:931–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00665.x
ZAMG (2021) Climate station “Sekau”. Downloaded 20.12.2021 from https://www.zamg.ac.at/cms/de/klima/messnetze
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to the forest company Wasserberg/Stift Heiligenkreuz, and in particular to P. Cœlestin Klemens Nebel OCist. for the opportunity to make the measurements for our study on their sites and for their support. We thank Ralf Krassnitzer, Franz Gollob and Philipp Waltl for the careful fieldwork.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: CH, SV, CG, TR; Methodology: CH, SV; Formal analysis: CH, SV; Data curation: CH, CG; Writing—original draft: CH, SV Writing—review and editing: CH, SV, CG, TR.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors gave their informed consent to this publication and its content.
Ethical approval
The authors declare that they follow the rules of good scientific practice.
Additional information
Communicated by Lauri Mehtätalo.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hahn, C., Vospernik, S., Gollob, C. et al. Bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.): assessing the spatial distribution on the stand level using generalised additive models. Eur J Forest Res 142, 611–626 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01545-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01545-0