Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.): assessing the spatial distribution on the stand level using generalised additive models

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bark stripping is a key topic in forestry because of economic losses due to associated fungal infections of wood, finally resulting in growth decrease and the loss of ecosystem services. Numerous studies identified factors influencing the spatial distribution of bark stripping damage between stands or at the landscape scale. However, patterns within single stands are not yet reported. In this research, we performed a terrestrial laser scanning supported census of nine stands in Austria (9026 trees in total). A generalised additive model with a binomial distribution (link = logit) and soap film smoother was fitted to the data. The probability of bark stripping on the single tree level depended on the following covariates: Spruce was more vulnerable than larch, damage probability decreased with DBH and the local slope and increased with the Epanechnikov Kernel (bandwidth = 15 m) estimate of tree density. At the nearest neighbour distance of two metres, there was a damage maximum. The spatial distribution of bark stripping damage was clumped, and its intensity decreased with increasing distance to forest roads. In 67.7% of the cases, the model predicted the right outcome for the total population (overall model accuracy). This percentage varied between 55.3 and 79.1% between stands. In conclusion, the spatial distribution should be considered in inventory designs for bark stripping damages to mitigate bark stripping effects on the forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the forest company Wasserberg/Stift Heiligenkreuz, and in particular to P. Cœlestin Klemens Nebel OCist. for the opportunity to make the measurements for our study on their sites and for their support. We thank Ralf Krassnitzer, Franz Gollob and Philipp Waltl for the careful fieldwork.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: CH, SV, CG, TR; Methodology: CH, SV; Formal analysis: CH, SV; Data curation: CH, CG; Writing—original draft: CH, SV Writing—review and editing: CH, SV, CG, TR.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Christoph Hahn or Sonja Vospernik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors gave their informed consent to this publication and its content.

Ethical approval

The authors declare that they follow the rules of good scientific practice.

Additional information

Communicated by Lauri Mehtätalo.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1940 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hahn, C., Vospernik, S., Gollob, C. et al. Bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.): assessing the spatial distribution on the stand level using generalised additive models. Eur J Forest Res 142, 611–626 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01545-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01545-0

Keywords

Navigation