Abstract
Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) is a major production tree species for the European wood industry. However, it is highly sensitive to bark stripping (BS) by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.), which causes large timber losses. Because the red deer population has increased over the last decades, a better understanding of the underlying causes driving BS is urgently needed. BS outbreaks are multifactorial: winter food shortage, local and regional deer abundance and stand properties (thermal and visual cover, and scarcity of herbaceous layers) have been found to drive BS rates. Although the influence of each of these factors is well studied, there is still no consensus on their relative contributions to BS or what mitigation strategy is best. In this study, we made use of a long-term, large-scale BS inventory (13 years over 2570 km2) to fill these gaps. We modeled winter and summer BS rates in response to the most explanatory variables, selected from a large set of environmental variables. Our results highlight the prevalence of deer abundance combined with high sensitivity of coniferous thickets and pronounced habitat selection by deer for these stands. Our findings show that the control of red deer populations is a key measure for reducing BS in Norway spruce stands.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akashi N, Terazawa K (2005) Bark stripping damage to conifer plantations in relation to the abundance of sika deer in Hokkaido, Japan. For Ecol Manag 208:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.073
Alderweireld M, Burnay F, Pitchugin M, Lecomte H (2015) Inventaire forestier wallon : résultats 1994–2012. SPW DGO DNF Direction des Ressources forestières, Jambes
Allen AM, Månsson J, Jarnemo A, Bunnefeld N (2014) The impacts of landscape structure on the winter movements and habitat selection of female red deer. Eur J Wildl Res 60:411–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-014-0797-0
Ando M, Yokota H-O, Shibata E (2003) Bark stripping preference of sika deer, Cervus nippon, in terms of bark chemical contents. For Ecol Manag 177:323–331
Apollonio M, Andersen R, Rory P (2010) European Ungulates and their Management in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Arnold JM, Gerhardt P, Steyaert SMJG et al (2018) Diversionary feeding can reduce red deer habitat selection pressure on vulnerable forest stands, but is not a panacea for red deer damage. For Ecol Manag 407:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.050
Baders E, Donis J, Snepsts G et al (2017) Pruning effect on Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) growth and quality. For Stud 66:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/fsmu-2017-0005
Bertouille S, Duran V, Fichefet V et al (2015) Rapport Cerf 2014–2015. SPW/DGO/DEMNA et DNF, Gembloux
Bertouille SB, de Crombrugghe SA (2002) Fertiliy of red deer in relation to area, age, body mass, and mandible length. Z Für Jagdwiss 48:87–98
Bolyn C, Michez A, Gaucher P et al (2018) Forest mapping and species composition using supervised. Biotechnol Agron Soc Env 22(3):172–187
Borkowski J, Ukalski K (2012) Bark stripping by red deer in a post-disturbance area: The importance of security cover. For Ecol Manag 263:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.029
Burnevča N, Jansons Ā, Zaļuma A et al (2016) Fungi inhabiting bark stripping wounds made by large game on stems of <i>picea abies<i/> (L.) karst. in latvia. Balt For 22:2–7
Caudullo G, Tinner W, de Rigo D (2016) Picea abies in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (eds) European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, pp 114–116
Čermák P, Strejček M (2007) Stem decay by Stereum sanguinolentum after red deer damage in the Českomoravská vrchovina Highlands. J For Sci 53:567–572
Čermák P, Glogar J, Jankovskỳ L (2004) Damage by deer barking and browsing and subsequent rots in Norway spruce stands of Forest Range Mořkov, Forest District Frenštát p. R. (the Beskids Protected Landscape Area). J For Sci 50:24–30
Claessens H (2017) Les habitats forestiers. In: Blerot P, Heyninck C (eds) Le grand livre de la forêt. Forêt. Nature, Marche-en-Famenne, pp 131–137
Colson V, Garcia S, Rondeux J, Lejeune P (2010) Map and determinants of woodlands visiting in Wallonia. Urban For Urban Green 9:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.04.002
Conrad O, Bechtel B, Bock M, Dietrich H, Fischer E, Gerlitz L, Wehberg J, Wichmann V, Böhner J (2015) System for automated geoscientific analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4. Geosci. Model Dev. 8:1991–2007. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1991-2015
Cukor J, Vacek Z, Linda R et al (2019) Effects of bark stripping on timber production and structure of norway spruce forests in relation to climatic factors. Forests 10:320. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10040320
de Crombrugghe SA (1965) Beziehungen zwischen dem Umfang der Rotwildschäle in Buchenbeständen und den Niederschlägen. Z Für Jagdwiss 11:184–191
de Crombrugghe SA, Louis C (1981) Affouragement hivernal et écorcement chez le cerf (Cervus elaphus L.). Bull Société R For Belg 88:1–20
Delvaux J, Galoux A (1962) Les territoires écologiques du Sud-Est belge. Travaux hors-série. Bruxelles: ULB, Centre d’Écologie générale 2:311
Drimaj J, Kamler J, Mikulka O, Plhal R (2018) Bak stripping by red deer : the possible effect of recreational use of the landscape. Czech Republic, Krtiny, pp 69–72
EUFORGEN (2013) Distribution map of norway spruce (Picea abies)
FAO. (2020) Forestry Production and Trade. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Extracted from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/. Date of Access: 14–05–2020
Fehér Á, Szemethy L, Katona K (2016) Selective debarking by ungulates in temperate deciduous forests: preference towards tree species and stem girth. Eur J For Res 135:1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-016-1000-9
Garel M, Bonenfant C, Hamann J-L et al (2010) Are abundance indices derived from spotlight counts reliable to monitor red deer Cervus elaphus populations? Wildl Biol 16:77–84. https://doi.org/10.2981/09-022
Gheysen T, Brostaux Y, Hébert J et al (2011) A regional inventory and monitoring setup to evaluate bark peeling damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus) in coniferous plantations in Southern Belgium. Environ Monit Assess 181:335–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1832-6
Gill RMA (1992) A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1. Deer Forestry 65:145–169
Hall DK, Riggs GA (2015) MODIS/Terra snow cover monthly L3 global 0.05Deg CMG, version 6. Years 2003 to 2017. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA national snow and ice data center distributed active archive center. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD10CM.006. Accessed on 3 Oct 2018
Hall DK, Riggs GA (2016) MODIS/Aqua snow cover monthly L3 global 0.05Deg CMG, version 6. Years 2003 to 2017. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA national snow and ice data center distributed active archive center. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD10CM.006. Accessed on 3 Oct 2018
Hébert J, Herman M, Jourez B (2002) Sylviculture et qualité du bois de l’épicéa en région wallonne. Forêt Wallonne, Jacques Hébert Belgique
Heyninck C (2014) Pertes en volume et en valeur d’épicéas adultes touchés par des dégâts de cervidés. For Wallonne 132:24–30
Honda T, Ueda H, Takiguchi K (2008) Risk factors affecting the probability of damage by sika deer in plantation forests in Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan. Landsc Ecol Eng 4:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-008-0047-2
Jarnemo A, Minderman J, Bunnefeld N et al (2014) Managing landscapes for multiple objectives: alternative forage can reduce the conflict between deer and forestry. Ecosphere 5:97. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00106.1
Jerina K (2012) Roads and supplemental feeding affect home-range size of Slovenian red deer more than natural factors. J Mammal 93:1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1644/11-MAMM-A-136.1
Jerina K, Dajčman M, Adamič M (2008) Red deer (Cervus elaphus) bark stripping on spruce with regard to spatial distribution of supplemental feeding places. Zb Gozdarstva Lesar 86:33–43
Jönsson KI (1997) Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. Oikos 78:57–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545800
Kiffner C, Rossiger E, Trisl O et al (2008) Probability of recent bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus) on Norway spruce (Picea abies) in a low mountain range in Germany-a preliminary analysis. Silva Fenn 42:125
Legrain X, Demarcin P, Colinet G, Bock L (2011) Cartographie des sols en Belgique : aperçu historique et présentation des travaux actuels de valorisationet de révision de la Carte Numérique des Sols de Wallonie. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 15:647–656
Li S, Colson V, Lejeune P, Vanwambeke SO (2016) On the distance travelled for woodland leisure via different transport modes in Wallonia, south Belgium. Urban For Urban Green 15:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.007
Licoppe A, Lievens J (2010) Utilisation de la plaine agricole par le Cerf élaphe et effets sur les résultats de comptages aux phares: cas des prairies de la Vesdre en Hertogenwald (B). Colloque national d’écologie scientifique, Montpellier. -y-cologie-du-dy-placement.pdf
Licoppe AM (2006) The diurnal habitat used by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in the Haute Ardenne. Eur J Wildl Res 52:164–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-006-0027-5
Licoppe AM, De Crombrugghe SA (2003) Assessment of spring habitat selection of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) based on census data. Z Für Jagdwiss 49:1–13
Ligot G, Gheysen T, Lehaire F et al (2013) Modeling recent bark stripping by red deer (Cervus elaphus) in South Belgium coniferous stands. Ann For Sci 70:309–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-012-0253-9
Månsson J, Bunnefeld N, Andrén H, Ericsson G (2012) Spatial and temporal predictions of moose winter distribution. Oecologia 170:411–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2305-0
Månsson J, Jarnemo A (2013) Bark-stripping on Norway spruce by red deer in Sweden: level of damage and relation to tree characteristics. Scand J For Res 28:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2012.701323
Milner JM, Bonenfant C, Mysterud A et al (2006) Temporal and spatial development of red deer harvesting in Europe: biological and cultural factors: Red deer harvesting in Europe. J Appl Ecol 43:721–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01183.x
Nopp-Mayr U, Reimoser F, Völk F (2011) Predisposition assessment of mountainous forests to bark peeling by red deer (Cervus elaphus l.) as a strategy in preventive forest habitat management. Wildl Biol Pract 7:66–89
Pellerin M, Bonenfant C, Garel M et al (2014) Dynamique de la population de cerfs du domaine national de Chambord: analyse temporelle des indicateurs de changement écologique (ICE), Rapport d’expertise ONCFS. CNERAs cervidés-Sanglier faune montagne L’ONCFS LBBE-CNRS de l’université Lyon 1, Gières: 64
Perin J, Hébert J, Lejeune P, Claessens H (2016) De nouvelles normes sylvicoles pour les futaies pures équiennes d’épicéa et de douglas en appui à lagestion de la forêt publique en Wallonie. ForêtNature 139:58–67
Picard J, Oleffe P, Boisaubert B (1991) Inlfuence of oak mast on feeding behaviour of red deer (Cervus elaphus L). Ann For Sci 48:547–559
Rademacher P (2005) Contents of nutrient elements in tree components of economical important species in relation to their residual utilisation. Holz Als Roh- Werkst 63:285–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-004-0565-z
Rivrud IM (2013) Space use, climate and selective harvesting. PhD University of Oslo, Norway
Saïd S, Malengreaux C, Lievens J, Licoppe A (2015) Response of Vaccinium myrtillus height to ungulates populations
Saint-Andrieux C, Bonenfant C, Toïgo C et al (2009) Factors Affecting Beech Fagus sylvatica Bark Stripping by Red Deer Cervus elaphus in a Mixed Forest. Wildl Biol 15:187–196. https://doi.org/10.2981/07-100
Spiecker H, Lindner M, Schuler JK (2019) Douglas-fir: an option for Europe. European Forest Institute, Joensuu
Timbal J, Bonneau M, Landmann J et al (2005) European non-boreal conifer forests. Coniferous forests. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 131–162
Tricot Ch, Alexandred P, Berger A, et al (1994) Climat. In: Etat de l’Environnement Wallon 1994. Ministère de la Région Wallonne, Direction générale des Ressources naturelles et de l’Environnement, pp 125–247
Trisl O, Wode L, Aparslan A (1999) Sechs Jahre Schälschadeninventuren im Niedersächischen Forstamt Winnefeld. Forst Holz 54:425–428
Ueckermann E, Orthwein D, Ueckermann D (1988) Modification of mechanical-biological measures for the protection of the youngest spruce plantations | [Modifizierung der mechanisch-biologischen Maßnahmen zum Schälschutz der jüngsten Fichtenaltersstufe]. Z Für Jagdwiss 34:36–46
Ueda H, Takatsuki S, Takahashi Y (2002) Bark stripping of hinoki cypress by sika deer in relation to snow cover and food availability on Mt Takahara, central Japan. Ecol Res 17:545–551. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00513.x
Vasaitis R, Lygis V, Vasiliauskaite I, Vasiliauskas A (2012) Wound occlusion and decay in Picea abies stems. Eur J For Res 131:1211–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0592-3
Vasiliauskas R (2001) Damage to trees due to forestry operations and its pathological significance in temperate forests : a literature revieuw. Forestry 74:319–336
Vasiliauskas R, Stenlid J, Johansson M (1996) Fungi in bark peeling wounds of Picea abies in central Sweden. For Pathol 26:285–296
Verheyden H, Ballon P, Bernard V, Saint-Andrieux C (2006) Variations in bark-stripping by red deer Cervus elaphus across Europe. Mammal Rev 36:217–234
Völk FH (1999) Bark peeling frequency in the alpine provinces of Austria : Ther importance of forest strucrure and red deer management. Z Für Jagdwiss 45:1–16
Vospernik S (2006) Probability of bark stripping damage by red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Austria. Silva Fenn 40:589
Weiss AD (2000) Topographic position and landforms analysis. Poster. http://www.jennessent.com/downloads/tpi-poster-tnc_18x22.pdf
Wood SN (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc (B) 73(1):3–36. https://www.R-project.org/
Wood SN (2017) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R (2nd edn). Chapman and Hall/CRC
Zidar J (2011) Factors affecting bark-stripping by red deer (Cervus elaphus) the importance of landscape structure and forage availability. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, uppsala
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the officers of the Forest and Nature Department (DNF) for carrying out this considerable field survey and the contributors of the ACCRVF program. We particularly acknowledge Thibault Gheysen, Gauthier Ligot, Hugues Claessens (ULiege) and René Dahmen (DNF) for their valuable advice. We thank Fabian Petit (Hunting and Fishing Direction) for his support in the use of BS database. We are also grateful to Hugues Lecomte and Sébastien Bauwens (IPRFW), and Alain Servais (Comptoir Forestier) for access to valuable data. We also thank the E-OBS dataset from the EU-FP6 project ENSEMBLES (https://ensembles-eu.metoffice.com), the data providers in the ECA&D project (https://www.ecad.eu), and the contributors to MODIS (terra and aqua) and OpenStreetMap Foundation.
Funding
The study was financed by the public service of Wallonia (SPW) under the funding: “Accord-cadre de recherches et vulgarisation forestières” (ACCRVF 2014–2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Gediminas Brazaitis.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Candaele, R., Lejeune, P., Licoppe, A. et al. Mitigation of bark stripping on spruce: the need for red deer population control. Eur J Forest Res 140, 227–240 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01326-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01326-z