Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determination of Energy Use Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions of Persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.) Production in Turkey (A Case Study in Adıyaman Province)

Bestimmung der Energieeffizienz und der Treibhausgasemissionen (THG) der Kakiproduktion (Diospyros kaki L.) in der türkischen Provinz Adıyaman

  • Original Article / Originalbeitrag
  • Published:
Erwerbs-Obstbau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to perform the energy efficiency and GHG emissions of persimmon production. The data supplied from research were collected from 72 different farms by face to face surveys with simple random sampling method. According to the research findings, the energy inputs in persimmon production were computed respectively as 20,950.42 MJ ha−1 (44.04%) chemical fertilizers, 6370.74 MJ ha‑1 (13.39%) chemicals energy, 5200.08 MJ ha−1 (10.93%) human labour energy, 3479.76 MJ ha−1 (7.31%) machinery energy, 3376.80 MJ ha−1 (7.10%) electricity energy, 3029.48 MJ ha−1 (6.37%) diesel fuel energy, 2608.20 MJ ha−1 (5.48%) irrigation water energy and 2556.00 MJ ha−1 (5.37%) farmyard manure energy. Energy use efficiency, specific energy, energy productivity and net energy calculations were computed respectively as 1.57, 1.21 MJ kg−1, 0.82 kg MJ−1 and 26,908.52 ha−1. The consumed total energy input in persimmon production can be classified as 29.88% direct, 70.12% indirect, 21.79% renewable and 78.21% non-renewable. Total GHG emissions were calculated as 4440.00 kgCO2‑eqha−1. The results of the study showed that the share of human labor in total GHG emissions was the highest (1857.17 kgCO2‑eqha−1), chemical fertilizier (1698.85 kgCO2‑eqha−1) and herbicide (1177.35 kgCO2‑eqha−1) held the second and third.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (2016) The Adıyaman Governorship, Available: http://www.adiyaman.gov.tr/iklim. Accessed 15 May 2016

  • Anonymous (2020a) Native-persimmons. https://www.fatsecret.com/calories-nutrition/usda/native-persimmons. Accessed 2 Oct 2020

  • Anonymous (2020b) Maps of world. https://www.mapsofworld.com/world-top-ten/persimmon-producing-countries.html. Accessed 2 Jan 2020

  • Aydın B, Aktürk D, Ozkan E, Hurma H, Kiracı MA (2017) Armut üretiminde karşılaştırmalı enerji kullanım etkinliği ve ekonomik analiz: Trakya Bölgesi örneği. Turk Tarim Gida Bilim Teknol Derg 5(9):1072–1079 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydın B, Aktürk D, Özkan E, Hurma H, Kiracı MA (2019) Comparative energy use efficiency and economic analysis of apple production in Turkey: case of Thrace region. Erwerbs-Obstbau 61:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baran MF (2017) Energy and economic analysis of vetch production in Turkey: a case study from Thrace region. Fresenius Envıron Bull 26(3):1996–1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran MF, Gökdoğan O, Oğuz HI (2017) Determining the energy usage efficiency of walnut (Juglans regia L.) cultivation in Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau 59:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baran MF, Karaağaç HA, Bolat A, Çil A, Çil AN (2019) Determining energy usage efficiency in groundnut production (the case of Adana province). Eur J Sci Technol 15:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beigi M, Torki-Harchegani M, Ghanbarian D (2016) Energy use efficiency and economical analysis of almond production: a case study in Chaharmahal-Va-Bakhtiari province, Iran. Energy Effic 9:745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BioGrace-II (2015) Harmonised calculations of biofuel greenhouse gas emissions in europe. http://www.biograce.net. Accessed 2 June 2015

  • Çelen I (2016) An evaluation of energy use in agricultural applications. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges 2016:18–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelen S (2019) Effect of microwave drying on the drying characteristics, color, microstructure, and thermal properties of Trabzon persimmon. Foods 8:84. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8020084

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Çelen İ, Baran MF, Önler E, Bayhan Y (2017) Determination of energy balance of apple (Malus domestica) production in Turkey: a case study for Tekirdag province. Anadolu J Agric Sci 32:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çiçek A, Erkan O (1996) Agricultural economics research and sampling methods. Lesson Notes No: 6, vol 12. Gaziosmanpaşa University, Agriculture Faculty Publishing, Tokat

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark S, Khoshnevisan B, Sefeedpari P (2016) Energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions during the transition to organic and reduced-input practices: student farm case study. Ecol Eng 88:186–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eren Ö, Baran MF, Gökdoğan O (2019) Determination of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in the production of different fruits in Turkey. Fresenius Environ Bull 28(1):464–472

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gökdoğan O, Erdoğan O (2018) Evaluation of energy balance in organic olive (Olea Europaea L.) production in Turkey: a case study of Aydın-Karpuzlu region. Erwerbs-Obstbau 60(1):47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gökdoğan O, Oğuz HI, Baran MF (2017) Energy input-output analysis in organic mulberry (Morus spp.) production in Turkey: a case study Adıyaman-Tut region. Erwerbs-Obstbau 59(4):325–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gündoğmuş E (2006) Energy use on organic farming: a comparative analysis on organic versus conventional apricot production on small holdings in Turkey. Energy Convers Manag 47:3351–3359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houshyar E, Dalgaard T, Tarazgar MH, Jorgensen U (2015) Energy input for tomato production what the economy says, and what is good for the environment. J Clean Prod 89:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houshyar E, Mahmoodi-Eshkaftaki M, Azadi H (2017) Impacts of technological change on energy use efficiency and GHG mitigation of pomegranate: application of dynamic data envelopment analysis models. J Clean Prod 162:1180–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes DJ, West JS, Atkins SD, Gladders P, Jeger MJ, Fitt BD (2011) Effects of disease control by fungicides on greenhouse gas emissions by UK arable crop production. Pest Manag Sci 67:1082–1092

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Itamura H, Zheng Q, Akaura K (2005) Industry and research trend of Japanese persimmon. Acta Hortic 685:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltsas AM, Mamolos AP, Tsatsarelis CT, Nanos GD, Kalburtji KL (2007) Energy budget in organic and conventional olive groves. Agric Ecosyst Environ 122(2):243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaağaç HA, Baran MF, Mart D, Bolat A, Eren Ö (2019) Determination of energy usage efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in chickpea production (the case of Adana province). Eur J Sci Technol 16:41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaağaç MA, Aykanat S, Çakır B, Eren O, Turgut MM, Barut ZB, Oztürk HH (2011) Energy balance of wheat and maize crops production in Hacıali undertaking. 11th International Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 21–23 September, pp 388–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabat S, Aydın B (2018) İyi tarım uygulamalarının mandarin üretiminde enerji kullanım etkinliği ve ekonomik analiz üzerine etkisi: İzmir ili örneği. Toprak Su Dergisi 7(1):1–10 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakasova L, Babanovska-Milenkovska F, Lazov M, Karakasova B, Stojanova M (2013) Quality proparties of solar dried persimmon (Diospyros kaki). J Hyg Eng Des 4:54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawase M, Motohashi N, Satoh K et al (2003) Biological activity of persimmon (Diospyros kaki) peel extracts. Phytother Res 17(5):495–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshnevisan B, Rafiee S, Mousazadeh H (2013) Environmental impact assessment of the open field and greenhouse strawberry production. Eur J Agron 50:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshnevisan B, Shariati HM, Rafiee S, Mousazadeh H (2014) Comparison of energy consumption and GHG emissions of open field and greenhouse strawberry production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:316–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa H, Glucina PG (1984) Persimmon culture in New Zealand. DSIR Information Series, vol 159. New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington, p 74

    Google Scholar 

  • Koçtürk OM, Engindeniz S (2009) Energy and cost analysis of sultana grape growing: a case study of Manisa, West Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Resources 4(10):938–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo S, Yoshikawa H, Katayama R (2004) Antioxidant activity in astringent and non-astringent persimmons. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 79(3):390–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kızılaslan H (2009) Input-output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat province of Turkey. Appl Energy 86:1354–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Carbon emission from farm operations. Environ Int 30:981–990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal KG, Saha KP, Ghosh PK, Hati KM, Bandyopadhyay KK (2002) Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybean based crop production systems in central India. Biomass Bioenergy 23:337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani I, Kumar P, Panwar JS, Kant K (2007) Variation in energy consumption in production of wheat-maize with varying altitudes in hill regions of Himachal Prades, India. Energy 32:2336–2339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maraseni TN, Cockfield G, Maroulis J, Chen G (2010) An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the Australian vegetables industry. J Environ Sci Health B 45(6):578–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mardani A, Taghavifar H (2016) An overview on energy inputs and environmental emissions of grape production in West Azerbaijan of Iran. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:918–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi A, Rafiee S, Mohtasebi SS, Rafiee H (2010) Energy inputs-yield relationship and cost analysis of kiwifruit production in Iran. Renew Energy 35:1071–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi A, Tabatabaeefar A, Shahin S, Rafiee S, Keyhani A (2008) Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Convers Manag 49:3566–3570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi-Avval SH, Rafiee S, Mohammadi A (2011) Optimization of energy consumption and input costs for apple production in Iran using data envelopment analysis. Energy 36:909–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabavi-Pelesaraei A, Abdi R, Rafiee S (2016) Neural network modeling of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of watermelon production systems. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 15(1):38–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa T, Nakatsuka A, Yano K et al (2008) Expressed sequence tags from persimmon at different developmental stages. Plant Cell Rep 27(5):931–938

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TLT, Hermansen JE (2012) System expansion for handling co-products in LCA of sugar cane bio-energy systems: GHG consequences of using molasses for ethanol production. Appl Energy 89:254–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nikkhah A, Royan M, Khojastehpour M, Bacenetti J (2017) Environmental impacts modeling of Iranian peach production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:677–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oğuz Hİ, Erdoğan O, Gökdoğan O (2019) Energy use efficiency and economic analysis of nectarine (Prunus persica var. nucipersica) production: a case study from Niğde province. Erwerbs-Obstbau 60(4):323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özalp A, Yılmaz S, Ertekin C, Yılmaz I (2018) Energy analysis and emissions of greenhouse gases of pomegranate production in Antalya province of Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-018-0380-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özkan B, Akçaöz H, Fert C (2004) Energy input-output analysis in Turkish agriculture. Renew Energy 29:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pishgar-Komleh SH, Ghahderijani M, Sefeedpari P (2012) Energy consumption and CO2 emissions analysis of potato production based on different farm size levels in Iran. J Clean Prod 33:183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qasami-Kordkheili P, Nabavi-Pelesaraei A (2014) Optimization of energy required and potential of greenhouse gas emissions reductions for nectarine production using data envelopment analysis approach. Int J Energy Environ 5(2):207–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Radha T, Mathew L (2007) Fruit crops. Horticulture science series. Jai Baharat Press,

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafiee S, Seyed H, Mousavi A, Ali M (2010) Modeling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy 35:3301–3306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaeifar MA, Akram A, Ghobadian B, Rafiee S, Heidari MD (2014) Energy-economic life cycle assessment (LCA) and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of olive oil production in Iran. Energy 66:139–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabah M (2010) Söke Ovasında İkinci Ürün Yağlık Ayçiçeği Üretiminde Enerji Kullanımı. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Tarım Makinaları Anabilim Dalı. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Adana (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shazia Y, Umar F, Afshan SI, Kashif A, Mian AM, Tusneem K, Farzana S (2016) Chemistry and Functionality of Bioactive Compounds Present in Persimmon. Journal of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3424025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh JM (2002) On garden energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India. International Institute of Management University of Flensburg, Sustainable Energy Systems and Management. Master of Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Singh S, Singh J (2004) Optimization of energy inputs for wheat crop in Punjab. Energy Convers Manag 45(3):453–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh H, Mishra D, Nahar NM, Ranjan M (2003) Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in Arid Zone India (Part II). Energy Convers Manag 44:1053–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spongberg SA (1977) Ebenaceae hardy in temperate North America. J Arnold Arboretum 58(2):146–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taghavifar H, Mardani A (2015) Prognostication of energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis of apple production in West Azarbayjan of Iran using Artificial Neural Network. J Clean Prod 87:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TUIK (2018) Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Tarımsal İstatistik Verileri, Ankara. http://www.tuik.gov.tr. Accessed 5 Mar 2018

  • USDA (1998) Agriculture Research Service vol 44. National Agricultural Library, Beltsville, pp 47–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaldız O, Öztürk HH, Zeren Y, Başçetinçelik A (1993) Energy usage in production of field crops in Turkey. 5th International Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture, Kuşadası, 11–14. October, pp 527–536 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz H, Aydin B (2020) Comparative Input-Output Energy Analysis of Citrus Production in Turkey: Case of Adana Province. Erwerbs-Obstbau 62:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-019-00447-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokozawa T, Kim YA, Kim HY, Lee YA, Nonaka G (2007) Protective effect of persimmon peels polyphenol against high glucose-induced oxidative stress in LLCPK1 cells. Food Chem Toxicol 45:1979–1987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Fırat Baran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M.F. Baran declares that he has no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baran, M.F. Determination of Energy Use Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions of Persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.) Production in Turkey (A Case Study in Adıyaman Province). Erwerbs-Obstbau 64, 499–505 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00639-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00639-0

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation